The
similarities between the 2005 session and the
potlatch, that
well-known custom of the Native Americans of the
Pacific
Northwest
,
are striking. The host of a potlatch would
assemble guests in order to shower them with
gifts. The guests, who couldn’t refuse the
invitation, were obligated to reciprocate with a
greater amount than they had received.
In this way, the gift-giving reinforced the
status and wealth of the giver.
The
only obvious difference between the General
Assembly and the Kwakiutl Indians is that Virginia
legislators don’t give away their own wealth –
they have yours and mine to distribute.
Most
observers opined in January that this year's
conclave of the political tribes promised to be
exciting. Greater-than-expected
revenues presented the chance to give away more
than had been anticipated.
At first, the Elephant clan and the Donkey
clan traded blame/credit for “surplus,” but
that quickly yielded to figuring out how to
dispense it.
Members of the Cement sub-clan had been
especially hopeful that they would receive it, as
they are the ones who dig the rocks out of their
hiding places in the earth, crush them, then mix
them in a liquid and pour the concoction in
ribbons across the Commonwealth.
Some say this pleases the Spirit of the
Rocks, which must be continually appeased.
The
skeptical reader may object to this analysis.
He/she may well assert that highway
construction is not some outlandish tribal
display. It
is a rational activity.
After all, roads are built by highway
engineers, highly trained people who drive large
trucks and didn’t flunk undergraduate math.
While
these are impressive credentials, I must insist
that that we remember that engineers do not
actually make the decisions about where to build
the roads. Those decisions are made by those who
have the money to pay for the highways. The talk
in around the General Assembly did not center on
technical aspects of highways such as, say,
whether the Commonwealth should be
building them to higher standards in order
to reduce maintenance costs.
The talk was about money.
Well,
the skeptic may counter, money is a rational
matter. Money
is
numbers, numbers have to compute, and that is the
essence of rationality.
Fair
enough, but let’s look at the numbers and also
think about what they mean.
This year’s “surplus” was pegged by
Gov. Mark R. Warner at $824 million.
Because of
Virginia
uses a two-year and not a one-year budget, the
entire budget wasn’t up for discussion.
That underlying getting and spending comes
to about $15 billion a year, so the predicted
fracas was over about one-seventeenth of what was
being spent. More
than small change, but not a major transformation,
either.
Oratory
about big bucks did precede the session.
For example, the Northern
Virginia Transportation Alliance (NVTA)
asserted that “unmet needs” in transportation
required the expenditure of an additional $1.7
billion every year for the foreseeable future for
the bi-state territory centered on
Washington,
of which the Commonwealth’s share comes to $750
million. Steve
Baril, a candidate for the Elephant nomination for
Attorney General, opined in January ("A
Marshall Plan for Transportation") that
the bill for “unmet needs” statewide amounted
to about $1 billion, which should be
unquestioningly raised from every source in sight
to build more highways. The same theme was echoed
by a number of business-oriented spokespeople and
groups. There
was almost complete uniformity in framing the
question as one of “unmet needs” and dollars.
The issue was seldom expressed as commuting
time in particular places, the kinds of trips that
make sense on super-highways, or the relation of
property values to highway construction.
So,
do numbers introduce rationality into public
discussion, or so they represent more bellowing to
attract attention in the verbal and visual storm
that we call modern communications?
A billion here, a billion there, lots of
zeroes, traffic that sucks, what’s the citizen
to make of it? For
those trained to the task, numbers introduce
precision and nail down identifiable realities.
But how about those who have a personal and
practical sense of numbers but are not used to
dealing with numbers bigger than those they
encounter and manage on a daily basis?
The
Virginia Lottery seems to think that $1 million is
a figure that dazzles people. “(Surrey Man Wins
$1 Million in Millionaire Party II Scratch
Game!”) For a lot of us, the price of just our
house is so large that we settle for thinking of
it as a monthly payment.
The monthly payment is manageable.
In contrast, the entire mortgage is so big
a number that it feels out of reach.
This
perceptual shift is the More Than I Can Imagine
Having at One Time Effect, (MTICI, for short, and
pronounced em-tiki).
Because of the limits of practical
experience, for a lot of us, zeroes cease to have
meaning above a particular level.
They turn into an undifferentiated blur,
and thus, the difference between $1 billion
($1,000,000,000) and $10 billion ($10,000,000,000)
has no meaning because both figures are too large
to pin to anything tangible.
Therefore, the budget numbers become
something like “
Virginia
regularly spends MTICI and this year there was an
extra MTICI; the highway guys wanted MTICI and
more on top of that ….”
How is a body to tell a met need from an
unmet one? Who
keeps the list? Who
figures this stuff out?
So,
was the public included when the Assembly and the
Governor agreed to say the surplus was $848
million (most of it went to transportation, one
way or another), with over $410 million of that
added to what was already there for highways ($3.1
billion combining the HMO and TT Funds, with $986
billion for acquiring right-of-way and building
new roads)? Or
does this kind of inundation just leave people
stupefied? As
we have seen, due to the MTICI effect, it may boil
down to “Virginia
spends more than I can imagine. This year the pols
had an additional amount bigger than I can
imagine. It
doesn’t matter in any practical sense because
it’s all more than I can imagine.” Very large
numbers are not public discourse.
The
General Assembly huffed and puffed, finally
(mostly) agreed with the Governor, and announced
it had done great things.
But the session didn’t generate much
excitement, after all.
It ended with a whimper.
No sound of popping champagne corks around
Capitol
Square
.
The never-at-a-loss-for-words Steve Haner,
speaking for the state Chamber of Commerce,
dismissed the results of the trials and
tribulations of session by noting that the
“additional funding amounts to one canteen of
water on a hot day in the desert – it won’t
get us far and we need to find the well.”
Lessee,
assuming he’s talking about new construction
only, that’s $141 million added to the $900
million that was already there, so if roughly $150
million is one canteen, (maybe a new budgetary
measure! Not
so many zeroes!!) that would be an already
existing count of six canteens, plus one more for
a total of seven. So
the caravan has folded its tents and is moving on,
with about seven canteens of water and in search
of the well. The
fall election campaign has begun in March in
Virginia,
the state of the Perpetual Campaign.
We
will be treated to more bluster, more political
muscle-flexing, and more efforts to astound and
amaze us bumpkins. Potlatches,
too, were accompanied by fervid oratory.
Potlatch was deeply ingrained in the life
of the Native Americans of the Northwest.
This combination of yard sale and Monopoly
game somehow provided a sense of community as well
as chances to travel around the region.
When the cycle got to the point where the
big man had more stuff than he could store, he
would use the occasion to both overshadow any
rivals and break the chain of obligation by
holding a celebration to destroy the otter skins,
copper plates, and Hudson Bay Co. blankets that
had accumulated. Then
the cycle could begin again.
Nature’s
bounty was so plentiful and so readily available,
and the population was so small, that the society
could bear it. However,
both Canadian and US authorities were apprehensive
about what happened, at this point, to the slaves
that got traded. Rumors
of sacrifice and cannibalism were never confirmed,
but they weren’t quieted, either.
So the authorities did everything they
could to stamp out the practice.
They also wanted to get the people to hang
onto their own property and use it for a better
life.
--
March 28, 2005
Note:
If
you are interested in developing better
information about how infrastructure policies and
practices affect property values, send a note to josephfreeman@msn.com
attention of Property Dynamics, a project that
will be getting underway this summer.
For more on the potlatch,
see Helen Cordere, Fighting with Property (Seattle: University of Washington Press,
1950) and Abraham Rosman and Paula G. Rubel, Feasting with Mine Enemy (Prospect Heights, Ill.:Waveland Press,
1971) these are industrial strength anthropology.
For a nicely illustrated account, see Alson
Jonaitis (ed.) Chiefly
Feasts (Seattle: University of Washington
Press, 1991).
--
March 18, 2005