New Youngkin Tax Cuts Total $7 Billion By 2028

Governor Youngkin’s major tax proposals and how much they save taxpayers. Source: Secretary of Finance. Click for larger view.

by Steve Haner

The set of Virginia tax changes Governor Glenn Youngkin (R) has baked into his proposed 2023 budget amendments is far more extensive and involves substantially more tax relief than the descriptions he offered in his December 15 presentation.

“Baked into” is the correct phrase because his actual proposals can only be found in the budget document itself. None of them are introduced as bills yet, but the text can be found in a series of Code of Virginia amendments starting on page 713 of the printed budget bill under “Additional Enactments.” You will not find them in the on-line version most people see, or even the heading Additional Enactments. You have to call up the full PDF document.

The 50 pages of dense text also include apparent changes to Virginia’s marijuana laws and the rules dealing with skill games. It is 50 pages of “legislating in the budget” on steroids, continuing and building on a trend many legislative process purists decry. In fairness, Youngkin didn’t start this. Nor is he fixing it.

In his presentation, Youngkin focused on two major tax proposals. He wants to cut the corporation income tax by 16%, from a headline tax rate of 6% to 5%. He wants to cut the top income tax rate for individuals from 5.75% to 5.5%. Since that top rate kicks in at $17,000 of taxable income, quite a few middle income households will benefit from that. How much they benefit I discuss below. (Hint: not much.)

Youngkin pegged it at $1 billion in tax relief, but that is just for the remainder of this two year budget cycle, ending in July of 2024. The foregone revenue rises to $2.9 billion in the next biennium cycle, and $3.1 billion in the following, Fiscal Year 2027 and 2028 cycle. Those numbers were included in Secretary of Finance Stephen Cummings’ presentation from the same day. It totals $7 billion over six years, back-loaded. If combined with last year’s changes, Virginia businesses and individuals will enjoy significant tax cuts.

What is included in the new batch other than the two income tax rate changes?

For individuals, Youngkin wants to increase the standard deduction another $1,000 per individual or $2,000 on a joint return. That achieves the 2021 campaign promise of doubling the standard deduction Virginia has offered for the past several years, only partially met last year. For a married couple that saves another $115 in tax (but only $110 if the top rate drops).

For individuals collecting military retirement pay, the administration wants to expand the subtraction to cover all retirees of any age, not just those 55 and older, effective with tax year 2023. The subtraction amount is $20,000 next year, $30,000 in 2024 and $40,000 starting in 2025. This, of course, would be in addition to the $9,000 (or $18,000 for a couple) standard deduction.

Cummings’s proffered explanatory table “scores” this at $37 million of revenue lost (or taxes reduced). That is ignoring the out years when the full $40,000 subtraction kicks in immediately upon retirement from the military at any age. The foregone state revenue on $40,000 at the top tax rate is $2,300 ($2,200 at 5.5%). A full fiscal impact analysis should be produced at some point in the coming session.

Measured by revenue impact on the state treasury, reducing the top individual tax rate to 5.5% is the largest proposal, putting about a third of a billion dollars back in individual pockets each year. But that is divided among millions of taxpayers. For someone with $50,000 of taxable income, it saves $125. On income of $1 million it saves $2,500. That will be a hard sell.

And while comments were made last week about tax relief being tied to future revenue growth targets, which if missed leave the tax rules unchanged, it appears that only applies to the individual tax rate cut. Most of the other proposals have no contingencies attached in the budget language. Another Cummings slide confirms that.

On business taxes, Youngkin’s two major proposals balance nicely. There is his cut in the corporate tax rate to 5% for businesses organized as C corporations. But for sole proprietors and partnerships, business income ultimately taxed under individual tax rules and rates, he proposes to piggyback on a popular federal small business tax provision allowing them to subtract 20% of their business net income.

That qualified business income or QBI deduction was created in the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. On federal returns it is applied after the calculation of adjusted gross income (AGI). Since federal AGI is the starting point for state taxes, there is no similar QBI deduction recognized in Virginia.

Youngkin proposes to allow it in Virginia, but at 10% rather than 20%. According to a legislator who has looked, no other state with an income tax has conformed with the federal QBI. Virginia could be the first and it could be very attractive for small businesses and attract start-ups. And remember, if the top rate is cut to 5.5% for individuals, that also lowers taxes on Schedule C and other forms of business income reported on personal returns.

Attracting more business investment is also the justification for reducing the corporate income tax to 5%, which Youngkin ultimately wants to make 4%. North Carolina has slashed its rates and shows stronger economic growth than Virginia.

In the wake of passage of the 2017 federal tax bill, some legislators proposed similar corporate tax rate cuts. That is what the feds had done, cut the corporate tax rate The state bills hit a wall in 2019, however, with the senior legislators reporting that the business community itself was apathetic. Nobody was saluting that flag but the patrons and we at the Thomas Jefferson Institute for Public Policy. Our proposals on the standard deduction got more traction (and still do).

The bills also got no support from then-Governor Ralph Northam (D). Youngkin presumably will push the idea and line up major business endorsements and some economic analysis to bolster his argument. He also built his budget on the assumption this and all his other ideas pass, removing the usual whining about having to “cut” the budget to “pay” for lower taxes.

Virginia is enjoying a bonanza of revenue growth. The $3.6 billion in unallocated revenue legislators have to work with is based on very conservative estimates that assume a period of recession, which might not materialize. Even with the tax cuts Virginia will be sitting on huge and growing cash reserves.

Yet the battle on all these proposals (except maybe on the third rail of military retirement pay) will be fierce. Government always wants more.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

49 responses to “New Youngkin Tax Cuts Total $7 Billion By 2028”

  1. Deckplates Avatar

    This excellent overview of the proposed tax cuts helps to understand the impact of state revenue & proposed cuts. Of course, we can “only” project how lowering taxes has a future effect in increasing revenue, but it does work in other states. I did not see anything about indexing brackets or standard deduction to inflation (CPI).

    Another item I have not seen anywhere is considering the requirements for the size of government, which is the big consumer of taxes. Should not that be addressed too?

    As for revenue, tax cuts for business and personal income are appropriate. It is easy to understand the concepts of the Laffer Curve, which shows the relationship between taxes and revenue. It is not too difficult to measure the increased revenue, and positive effects of those cuts – economic & social effects. The article sites South Carolina. However, many other states are doing the same, and with positive results.

    Why the opposition to cutting taxes, which has an actual future increase in revenue, a positive effect of growth, and more disposable income for people? “Government always wants more.”

    1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      In what states has cutting taxes increased revenue? It didn’t work out too well in Kansas. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/unpacked/2017/07/11/the-kansas-tax-cut-experiment/

  2. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    “He wants to cut the corporation income tax by 16%, from a headline tax rate of 6% to 5%. He wants to cut the top income tax rate for individuals from 5.75% to 5.5%.”

    16.7% vs 4.3%. Seems fair… /s

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      Remember, corporate income is taxed twice. First on the corporate return, and then when distributed as salaries or dividends, on individual returns. D’s have a hard time grasping that (or pretend to.) But if you want to move both to 5%….

      Yes, Deckplates, no indexing. The bill will be introduced.

      1. how_it_works Avatar
        how_it_works

        Corporations aren’t able to deduct salaries and dividends as business expenses?

      2. Eric the half a troll Avatar
        Eric the half a troll

        S Corporations have no federal tax liability you know…

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          Damn, shoulda looked down first.

          BTW, SAIC is an S corporation so contrary to popular belief, they’re not all small companies.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar

            and don’t forget Net Operating Loss (NOL) Carryforward….

        2. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          Damn, shoulda looked down first.

          BTW, SAIC is an S corporation so contrary to popular belief, they’re not all small companies.

      3. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        C corporations, not S corporations. Most are S.

      4. James McCarthy Avatar
        James McCarthy

        According to Mitt Romney, corporations are people with far greater flexibility in offsetting income with business expenses versus the downstream recipients of corporate activity, employees and shareholders. Of course, employees could forgo salary and wages in favor of benefitting the company. Or benefit from a Haner theory that such income ought not be taxed at all. Dems have no difficulty discerning the differences. Corporate income is not taxed twice.

      5. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        C corporations, not S corporations. Most are S.

        1. But most of the money is in Cs.

          1. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Like GE… but no taxes paid.

  3. If taxes are cut, then what spending cuts are going to be made to offset the lower revenues?

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      None. Revenue really is growing so fast that spending will also grow along with the tax cuts. The stars really are aligned (inflation, the COVID money sugar high, the Northam-era tax hikes, etc.)

      1. This is the same that GW Bush believes in 2001. How did that work out?

        1. Stephen Haner Avatar
          Stephen Haner

          FAAANtastic. Trump 2017 even better. Best since the JFK tax cuts. 🙂

          1. Needs a snark warning. How many trillions of dollars did the Trump Administration add to the national debt?

          2. Stephen Haner Avatar
            Stephen Haner

            Only Congress can spend.

          3. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Well, they can print too.

          4. “Best since the JFK tax cuts.”

            Remember, Kennedy cut marginal tax rates from around 90% to around 60%. Would you prefer “cuts” that took us back to that level?

            Clinton’s surpluses had us on a path to pay off the national debt by 2018. Duhbya thought that tax cuts were the answer to every question, and here we are 20 years later with the national debt approaching 100% of GDP for the first time since WWII. Oops.

          5. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            “Tax and spend” Democrats!

            “Taxes, we don’t need no stinkin’ taxes; we’ll just borrow it” Republicans.

          6. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            You could make the top bracket 99.44% and not increase revenues a dime. There is no such thing as a “loophole” for an AGI < $250,000. Tell your boss to pay you in carried interest, eh?

          7. Clinton’s ‘surpluses’ were not applied to the national debt. The debt rose every year he was in office. He increased the debt by 32%.

          8. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            “inflation, the COVID money sugar high, …”

    2. VT will not build it’s proposed indoor rock climbing wall, water slide, and chocolate fountain.

      1. No chocolate fountain?!

        Oh, dear.

        This will be bad for the mental health of the students. I mean, in all seriousness, is life still worth living if your college fails to provide you with a chocolate fountain?

        1. how_it_works Avatar
          how_it_works

          You can find a chocolate fountain at your nearest Golden Corral, why does the college need to provide it?

        2. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          JMU has the eternal soft serve ice cream machine. I confess the spousal unit publicly shamed me on my third trip on parent’s weekend by loudly counting the trips…

  4. f/k/a_tmtfairfax Avatar
    f/k/a_tmtfairfax

    North Carolina’s state income tax rates going forward.
    For Taxable Years beginning in 2023, the North Carolina individual income tax rate is 4.75%.
    For Taxable Years beginning in 2024, the North Carolina individual income tax rate is 4.6%.
    For Taxable Years beginning in 2025, the North Carolina individual income tax rate is 4.5%.
    For Taxable Years beginning in 2026, the North Carolina individual income tax rate is 4.25%.
    For Taxable Years beginning after 2026, the North Carolina individual income tax rate is 3.99%.

    The standard deduction levels are as follows:

    Single $10,750
    Married Filing Jointly/Qualifying Widow(er)/Surviving Spouse $21,500
    Married Filing Separately
    Spouse does not claim itemized deductions
    $10,750
    Spouse claims itemized deductions
    $0
    Head of Household $16,125

    1. how_it_works Avatar
      how_it_works

      Yea, well, how many Presidents were born in North Carolina, huh?

      1. f/k/a_tmtfairfax Avatar
        f/k/a_tmtfairfax

        I love it.

        1. how_it_works Avatar
          how_it_works

          Manassas City’s slogan used to be “Rich in Historic Interest”.

          I thought, “That’s nice. Has anything happened here in recent times that would make someone want to visit, let alone move here?”

  5. f/k/a_tmtfairfax Avatar
    f/k/a_tmtfairfax

    Technology is disrupting many businesses and markets. For example, some companies have automated residential property. A prospective tenant can use an app to unlock the door of a house or apartment. She can use the same app to agree to rent the property and e-sign a lease. He can pay rent online or through an app. Repair requests can be made electronically. Quite often, the tenant never crosses paths with a local property manager — who doesn’t exist.

    But very few government operations, beyond filing papers with courts or agencies on an electronic basis, have taken effect. Why? Because a major function of government is to provide jobs to people with advance degrees. From the federal government to small townships, there is ample opportunity to provide the same or better-quality service and operations while driving out employment costs.

    Taxpayers need disruption of government operations.

  6. Deckplates Avatar

    The wisdom and developed strategy behind the taxation, are most often tied to an agenda. That being, “what can I do, and how can I get it done” (Sorta, kinda obvious.) Now, what effect will the cuts have on the people, aka taxpayers, and of course government recurring costs, plus programs, plus projects and other expenses, will be the big issue in the debates.

    Budgets, developed at home on the kitchen table, are real and pragmatic. There, the (take home or net) earned & investment income is (usually) planned to be spent with the most prudence. Say, “what do we prioritize, after paying the bills?”

    Budgets developed by the government are from money taken from taxes, bonds, fees & other stuff, and then spent. Yes, spent, by the will of the people, and also spent by the will of the legislators. Who are not always prudent with Other People’s Money, eh? Cynical, is maybe one take, but realism is certainly another take.

    The focus should always be on the constituents, vs. a wonderful new program to meet a nebulous goal. One example of going askew, would be the electron moving, windmills – so many direct and indirect ways to take money from people and transfer it to other places. And to no sum benefit.

  7. Stephen Haner Avatar
    Stephen Haner

    I’m trying to cut down on this issue but Hall-Sizemore insisted I weigh in. 🙂

    1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      Anyone reading this article understands my insistence.

  8. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    If all goes as planned… and the unicorns cooperate.

    I like the tax cut, but would rather it be more progressive (yeah, I would) by keeping the 5.75 for those over some limit, e.g., VAGI > $130K and put in a couple of brackets between $17K and $130K.

    1. I might be able to be convinced that is a not bad idea… 😉

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        When it comes to taxes, the commies got it half right, “From each according to their ability…”. Or, if you prefer, JFK got it right, “From those to whom much is given, much is expected.”

        No CEO is worth 5000x their average employee, so call it a windfall tax if you’d like.

  9. LarrytheG Avatar

    Haners did a pretty good job with this and thanks to Dick for egging him on!

    I’m not a laffer curve guy. Basically, the premise is that only spending on the private side can really generate real growth.

    If anyone really thinks that, propose taking away an Army base or cutting the gas tax and still expect roads.

    And the govt IS being “disrupted” by technology. DMV has done good at “online”. We collect gas taxes “at the rack” instead of “at the pump” – way more efficient. You like your phone for navigating? Thanks the “investment” the govt has made in GPS satellites and while you’re at it, give NOAA credit for all those weather satellites that have “replaced” the Farmer’s Almanac!, and tell us with more and more accuracy about hurricanes, floods and ” bomb cyclones”.

    Want more early childhood education? Want more/better mental health facilities? Want more/better teachers? Want less fentanyl and more cops?

    Dems call this money “investments”. The GOP calls it money better spent as tax cuts.

    Still trying to figure out how Northam shut down the economy in Virginia but now we have surpluses out the wazoo.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      “You didn’t build that.”

  10. LarrytheG Avatar

    One change in the tax law will very much affect people and businesses, gig economy that use payment services like Venmo or Paypal.

    The threshold used to be 20,000 and 200 transactions.

    Now it is 600 and any number of transactions.

    That means filing a Schedule C and paying FICA taxes.

    It’s the little guy getting it in the neck….. again…

      1. LarrytheG Avatar

        they called it off… this year

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Including Zelle?

  11. Mr. Haner, One technical note regarding the LIS budget page: you can see the enactment clauses if you click on the “4-14.00 Effective Date” link. I’ve never understood why there isn’t an additional section for the enactments, but they do show up there. https://budget.lis.virginia.gov/item/2023/1/SB800/Introduced/4/4-14.00/

Leave a Reply