Six RGGI auctions have reaped Virginia $378 million.

by Steve Haner

Last week Virginia collected another $76 million in carbon tax dollars through the ongoing Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative allowance auction. That was the sixth such sale since Virginia joined RGGI, and the state’s total tax take is now $378 million in 18 months.

Do not for one minute allow yourself to be fooled into thinking this money is not coming out of the pockets of Virginia’s citizens or businesses. Do not fall for the ploy Dominion Energy Virginia is attempting by claiming it will charge it off to “base rates.” The pea is still under your walnut shell. 

In a few weeks several new members will arrive on the Air Pollution Control Board, perhaps changing the balance on this issue. It was the Air Board that issued the regulations imposing the RGGI carbon tax on Virginia’s largest fossil fuel power production plants, most of them part of Dominion. It is the Air Board that can amend or remove the regulation. This is the path Governor Glenn Youngkin (R) has chosen to keep his promise to get Virginia out of RGGI.

The proposed regulatory language is not public yet, but the assumption is that it will suspend Virginia’s membership in RGGI upon publication. Then the lawsuits will begin, probably. RGGI’s supporters claim participation is mandated by state law, while others (me included) believe the statute is merely permissive. Some kind of carbon dioxide reduction scheme may be mandatory, but not the RGGI tax.

Anticipating the regulatory move, Dominion filed a petition with the State Corporation Commission asking to also eliminate its monthly bill adder which passes the RGGI tax on to consumers. It asked for the change to happen as of July 1. Everybody’s bills will soon reflect the recently exploding cost of fossil fuels and getting rid of the RGGI charge will lower the net impact (a bit).

But the RGGI collection started late and was set low, meaning the money collected on bills through July 1 will fall short of the amount Dominion has paid. When the petition was filed, the figure of $178 million still outstanding was mentioned. That apparently included a projection for this most recent sale.

Yes, it is a given that Dominion’s base rates remain excessive and are piling up cash on the books. It has the money. But if customers don’t pay it through a continued rate adjustment clause on the bills, that means $178 million less in excess profits Dominion might have to refund in a future rate case. It also reduces the risk that the SCC might order base rates to go lower due to overcollection. The math on what’s best for consumers gets complicated.

The clever folks in the environmental community filed a response to Dominion’s petition that called its bluff. It proposed that any future carbon allowance costs also be charged to base rates, treated as an expense already built into those rates. Dominion’s petition only deals with the RGGI tax through this month. That idea is vigorously opposed by Dominion in its response to the responses, asserting it has every right to collect it in any manner it chooses.

The Appalachian Voices petition is a quite cheeky, worth a read:

Dominion’s request proves that it could comply (and always could have complied) with the emissions reduction program without raising customer costs at all. In fact, this petition shows that Dominion had every opportunity to put these costs into base rates from the beginning but instead, at its own election, decided to raise customer bills through a rate adjustment clause….

With this petition, however, the game is up. The Governor’s basis to repeal Virginia’s emissions reduction program is a proclaimed “emergency” arising out of the costs imposed by Dominion on its customers. Dominion, however, has now admitted that such an “emergency” only exists because of the cost recovery mechanism Dominion voluntarily chose to impose on its customers. In reality, the current petition makes clear that Dominion can comply with Virginia’s emissions reduction program without increasing bills at all.

Appalachian Voices has a fair point that the $1 billion in unplanned fuel costs about to hit Dominion customers is far more of an emergency than the current RGGI tax. However, the group ignores the environmental movement’s role in constricting natural gas supply to raise those prices.

Meanwhile, on another front, the recent budget conference report approved by the General Assembly shows it has taken only one budget cycle for the RGGI tax dollars to inspire legislative greed. As the Virginia Mercury first reported, mission creep is evident and the original plans for the money are being ignored.  The legislators diverted $25 million to a new Resilient Virginia Revolving Loan Fund, and $11 million for flood relief in the Southwest Virginia town of Hurley. There is no sea rise in Hurley.

Is anybody surprised? The people who believe RGGI will save the planet from Catastrophic Climate Change need allies in their holy mission, and cash works just fine in recruiting them. Playing politics with the money is just more proof we need to get out of this cap-and-tax scheme at the earliest possible moment. But the environmental community is building up for a major campaign to defeat Youngkin and protect the honey pot.

This recently from Walton Shepherd at the National Resources Defense Council:

Because RGGI was passed by the Virginia General Assembly with broad, bipartisan support, Youngkin has so far failed in his attacks. We need to keep it that way.

In only the first year of RGGI’s operation in our Commonwealth, it has already:

Decreased carbon pollution so significantly that it will deliver Virginians $34 million in health benefits annually, through avoided hospital visits and more.

Provided more than $110 million in funding to improve energy efficiency initiatives in low-income communities.

Allocated more than $100 million in climate resiliency funding for our coastal communities coping with sea level rise.

In fact, Republican legislators had RGGI totally bottled up when they controlled both chambers, and the House this year voted to repeal it. RGGI has never had much bipartisan support (well, they like it in Hurley now). As to the claimed health benefits, nothing could be more bogus. But passions are running high.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

24 responses to “You Just Paid More RGGI Tax, Virginians”

  1. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Cuts into Koch Industry profits, no doubt.

    1. Koch actually went green about 5 years ago.

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        WV v. EPA is going green?

  2. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Cuts into Koch Industry profits, no doubt.

  3. Kathleen Smith Avatar
    Kathleen Smith

    From the start, the concept never made sense: My humble take – if it smells fishy, it is fishy.

  4. Let’s call it petition tag. DOM’s reply that we can do what we want, when we want, is interesting in its own.

    Have the APCB newbies been named yet?

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      Yes. Don’t have time to hunt them up…

      It’s just a tax, Kathleen. A tax on air. A tax on a vital gas without which life on Earth would not exist. Of course Democrats will tax that.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        RGGI is about as deep into the weeds as it can get. I doubt seriously than 1 Virginian in 1000 could explain it.

        I know I can’t even after reading Haner’s ‘explanation’ in part because he focuses so much on the ‘tax’ aspect and not the intent and effect of it.

        It SOUNDS similar to what was done about acid rain.

        1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
          Dick Hall-Sizemore

          It is the same concept.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            except maybe acid rain was “real” and not a “lie” concocted by a global conspiracy of science and govt?

            and yes, no such “outrage” for the “tax” to clean up coal ash waste.

            And sorry you are getting personal attacks on the gun issue from the usual suspects.

            I see they worked over Sherlock the other day also.

    2. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      Yes. Don’t have time to hunt them up…

      It’s just a tax, Kathleen. A tax on air. A tax on a vital gas without which life on Earth would not exist. Of course Democrats will tax that.

  5. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    My current Dominion bill includes $1.95 for RGGI. That amount that is meant to help move Virginia away from carbon pollution is less that the $2.40 I have to pay toward the clean up created by the use of coal (coal ash).

    Oh, the burden of the PIPP rider meant to help low-income residents? $0.02. Two cents. Hard to get worked up over that one.

    1. energyNOW_Fan Avatar
      energyNOW_Fan

      What is actually happening with the coal ash? Is it actually moving from BackYard#1 to BackYard#2? Where is BackYard#2 and is it a lined landfill? I assume BackYard#2 is southern Virginia near Mount Trashmore and region, so I do not see much activity here in NoVA. Your trash is our cash, as they say in the places that like to in-haul wastes.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        The basic problem with coal ash is that if rainwater is allowed to go through it , it leeches stuff into the surrounding soil and groundwater and into rivers.

        so, it’s handled like proper landfills are – with a liner and a cap – essentially entombing it. Part of the problem with some sites is that they are too close to existing waterway ways and they need to be moved also to sites where they are away from water tables.

        Thankfully, those who say that science lies about greenhouse gases don’t believe the scientists are lying about coal ash. 😉

  6. Stephen Haner Avatar
    Stephen Haner

    Back to doing my big morning workouts (yeah) and missing the morning debates…

    Larry, the acid rain programs were cap and trade, but not cap, tax and trade. It would also be possible to do pure cap and trade on CO2. The politicians wanted the honeypot and the enviros love the $$$.

    Dick, sure, small amounts now. PIPP hasn’t even started. Just some admin money. And remember, Dominion had filed to basically double the RGGI tax late last year, then withdrew the application when Youngkin won. Assume it is costing you double what you see on your bill now, at least, and if it doesn’t go away it will also start to grow.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      Ah, the tax! Okay, so you’d be okay with RGGI if it was just a cap and trade and worked like the acid rain program?

      Good to hear you’re back to your exercise! I’m off to do mine – 3 mile walk.

      1. Stephen Haner Avatar
        Stephen Haner

        CO2 emissions are going down in the US of A. Were long before RGGI came to VA, and will continue to if RGGI goes away. You don’t seem to be among the idiots on this and you are not insisting we go 100% fossil free. But true idiots are out to do it all with the sun and the wind (some even no nukes!), and that nonsense must be suppressed.

        The rest of the world is just pretending and hence globally, the CO2 levels ain’t going down in our lifetimes.

      2. Stephen Haner Avatar
        Stephen Haner

        CO2 emissions are going down in the US of A. Were long before RGGI came to VA, and will continue to if RGGI goes away. VCEA sets reducing targets without any tax (just the capital costs.)

        You don’t seem to be among the idiots on this and you are not insisting we go 100% fossil free. But true idiots are out to do it all with the sun and the wind (some even say no nukes!), and that nonsense must be suppressed.

        The rest of the world is just pretending and hence globally, the CO2 levels ain’t going down in our lifetimes.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          Oh I DO think there is a mortal climate threat and we need to make changes but it’s going to take time – between the not-ripe technologies and the skeptics, we’re not going to make massive short time changes.

          It will take decades and even then we’re probably going to see bad stuff start to occur that we can’t stop.

          I would just say that MOST people do not think we can go fossil free right now, however they do believe there is an issue with climate unlike the skeptics and deniers.

          Yes there are wackos – left and right but we’re never going to make progress as long as each sides points to the extreme wackos on the others side.

          For instance, Bill Gates gets demonized by the right all the time.

          But he’s saying we must have nukes and even then we have things that will take decades to change.

    2. energyNOW_Fan Avatar
      energyNOW_Fan

      In other words, as Eliza Doolittle once said: Just you Wait (Enry Iggins)….to see the full impact of the policies being adopted.

  7. f/k/a_tmtfairfax Avatar
    f/k/a_tmtfairfax

    I just paid my electric bill to Wake Electric Membership Company. We used 378 KWH. $40.45 for the commodity. $15 for the facility charge and $3.88 in taxes.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      was that for a month?

  8. energyNOW_Fan Avatar
    energyNOW_Fan

    Recent article:
    UTILITIES: Most utility bills don’t disclose what chunk of ratepayers’ money is going toward pro-utility lobbying, leading federal regulators to consider making it harder for utilities to recoup these costs. (Grist)

    …but please tell me something I do not already know

  9. Merchantseamen Avatar
    Merchantseamen

    Follow the money.

Leave a Reply