Youngkin’s Principles for Achieving Educational Excellence

by James A. Bacon

Educational outcomes in Virginia have been trending negative since 2017, says a report issued by the Youngkin administration today, “Our Commitment to Virginians: High Expectations and Excellence for All Students.”

So… how does Team Youngkin plan to get things moving in the right direction?

Broadly speaking, the answer is to raise expectations and raise standards.

In the Youngkin administration narrative, a succession of Republican and Democrat governors built one of the best public education systems in the country by setting ambitious goals and holding schools accountable. Beginning around 2017 concerns over racial disparities in academic performance prompted policies that, though well meaning, had the effect of watering down standards and hiding failure. Youngkin is determined to restore the commitment to excellence.

“The future prosperity of our Commonwealth depends on how well we prepare our students,” the Governor said in a prepared statement today. “Working alongside parents, teachers, and policymakers, we will restore excellence in education and ensure that all students have access to quality education opportunities that prepare them for success in our workplaces, our communities, and our democracy.”

The report details seven “guiding principles” for reforming Virginia’s education system. The challenge will be applying those principles to the lumbering bureaucratic process for revising policies and practices, even as considerable authority is vested in the State Board of Education, which is stocked with Northam-era appointees, and autonomous school boards which engineered the very policies that Youngkin seeks to reverse. Superintendent of Instruction Jillian Balow, who hails from Wyoming and has had little time to build political alliances, partnerships and friendships, will have her hands full.

The guiding principles are (quoting verbatim):

High expectations. All students deserve to be held to high expectations aligned to the needs of the knowledge economy. We will prioritize resources for those students and communities furthest behind and teach comprehensive history.

Empower parents and teachers. Parents are their child’s first and most important teacher. They must be an integral player in our education systems. Next to parents, having a quality teacher is the greatest determinant of a child’s success. Great teachers must be celebrated and rewarded.

Freedom of speech and inquiry. Our institutions of learning will embody a commitment to free speech and the exploration of diverse ideas. Our democracy rests on the foundation that education must teach every generation how to think, not what to think.

Zero tolerance for discrimination. We will not allow the ascribing of traits or behavior based on race, gender, political beliefs, or religion. We will reinforce that every person has a right to reach his or her full potential. Education should provide them with the tools and knowledge to do so.

Post-secondary readiness. Learners must be empowered with multiple pathways to post-secondary success, including apprenticeships, internships, workforce training, dual enrollment, and other opportunities.

Transparency & accountability. Our education systems will be held accountable for preparing all learners for success in life. This requires an emphasis on evidence and transparency.

Innovation. There is excellence in education in Virginia, but there are many children who have not had access to that excellence. We will create a culture of innovation that breaks the “one size fits all” education model by increasing school choice. (e.g. lab schools)

So, what does this mean in practice? The fact is, enormous inertia is built into the educational system, and power is distributed widely. The Youngkin administration does not have the authority to change key educational standards willy-nilly.

Consider, for example, the controversial issue of SOL “cut scores,” the number of questions a student must answer correctly on a Standards of Learning test to be considered proficient in a subject. Working groups, traditionally dominated by teachers, review the matter to be mastered and the tests created by an outside vendor. The vendor makes recommendations for what cut scores it takes to maintain continuity with previous years’ tests. The evaluators can submit their own recommendations, as can the Superintendent of Instruction. At the end of the process, the decision rests with the State Board of Education (SBOE), whose board members rotate on and off every four years. Youngkin has not yet announced his selections for the SBOE for the first cohort to join the board July 1.

Most controversial in the current political environment will be history and civics, the content of which unavoidably reflects, to some degree, the political and ideological views of those who are shaping the standards. The Youngkin administration has said it will seek input from a broader group of stakeholders than in the past, not just educators, but academics, business and civic leaders, museum administrators, and parents, while also consulting best-in-class standards from across the country. In an interview with Bacon’s Rebellion, Balow cited an Arizona State University framework for discussing history and civics as an example that might be emulated

“The result will be better history standards than we’ve ever had,” Balow says. While the review process will be informed by the guiding principles, she declines to predict the outcome of the process regarding particularly volatile topics such as slavery, segregation and racism. Providing no evidence, critics have accused Youngkin of wanting to ban the teaching of unsavory aspects of Virginia’s past altogether. Balow responds that the Governor is committed to teaching history “comprehensively” — even the “tough subjects.”

One thing the administration has accomplished is purge the Virginia Department of Education website of “inherently divisive” concepts tied to race, including ideas derived from Critical Race Theory. But to Balow, that’s ancient history. The administration is forward looking. The focus, she says, is achieving excellence in education and addressing the racial achievement gaps.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

34 responses to “Youngkin’s Principles for Achieving Educational Excellence”

  1. Speaking as a cognitive scientist, my question is this. How is what the teachers do in the classroom supposed to change, such that the outcome is significantly different?

    1. I am reminded of when I taught regulation writing. My message was “Words on paper are not your product. Your product is behavior, so write to that.”

    2. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      That is the crux of the issue and has not been addressed by the administration. Of course, to be fair, it has been in office only four months.

  2. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    RE: ” So, what does this mean in practice?”

    Well, Carol said to give it a chance.

    I remain skeptical and unless Youngkin is S L O W L Y leading up to THE actual things… this is mostly rope-a-dope stuff with a hefty dose of ideological juice.

    Disappointed but not shocked.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      As granny used to say, “Wish in one hand and spit in the other and see which one fills first.”

  3. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
    James Wyatt Whitehead

    I noticed something in the report. From 2002 to 2019 every time SOLs were administered with new standards or new cut score the number of schools that failed to meet accreditation standards increased. Whatever changes come next will that pattern hold?
    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/13eb74b1c96f7fed7b56d2d96afadd23b11a5cf5fd393028da2b6c2c08db3c20.jpg

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      It makes sense if you increase the cut scores but make no changes in how or what you teach – what would be expected?

      And as far as I can tell, despite Youngkins characterization of Virginia schools falling down on PALS and NAEP – reading and math, not a single change in how or what we teach in reading and math, only history?

      WTF?

      Unless more is forthcoming , this is more culture war PR rather than an “honest” effort to increase K-12 academics.

      To be fair, early in the administration and new blood in the education leadership and possible something more substantive might be forthcoming though no real roadmap about future direction was provided.

      At this point, just bogus culture war PR stuff masquerading as ‘reform’.

      1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
        James Wyatt Whitehead

        “It makes sense if you increase the cut scores but make no changes in how or what you teach – what would be expected?”

        Do you know what the school teachers have to say about that? A setup for failure. And who gets framed for the failure? The school teacher. Not good Mr. Larry. This has been played out so many times in the past. Attention Governor! This would be a good chance to break that cycle

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          not clear on your point.

          what exactly should Youngkin do to break the cycle?

          what I say is that if you increase cut scores and do nothing to change how it’s taught, why would you expect anyting other than higher failure rates?

          Do we agree?

          1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
            James Wyatt Whitehead

            Yes I agree and school teachers get blamed for the higher failure rates. Politicians such as Wilder and Allen made significant education changes without allowing for teachers to learn the ropes of the reforms before accountability begins. Age old set up. Youngkin’s people need to have a real path for teachers to follow that lead to the desired outcomes without the gotcha game.

  4. Carmen Villani Jr Avatar
    Carmen Villani Jr

    Noteworthy that Superintendent of Instruction Jillian Balow has removed “inherently divisive concepts” from the website but before the administration starts “looking forward,” it needs to be removed from college campuses as well!

  5. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    I have no argument with the principles or aspirations. I hope the administration can figure out how to implement them in this complex system in an equitable manner. Regardless of what they say at the top, the concept of equity is now prevalent in the system.

    1. Donald Smith Avatar
      Donald Smith

      “Regardless of what they say at the top, the concept of equity is now prevalent in the system.”

      Well, if the system now favors equity over excellence, then the system needs fixin’!

      1. f/k/a_tmtfairfax Avatar
        f/k/a_tmtfairfax

        How many times will this be reported? How many follow-up stories? Will the media jump on this issue until it causes pain in the ranks of the teachers’ unions?

        Given the diversity of Maryland, the District and NoVA, there would be a great opportunity to find out what happened in the many school systems around the Metro Area. How about outstate Maryland and Virginia?

        Will the media examine the impact of collective bargaining on schools and education?

        1. DJRippert Avatar
          DJRippert

          Exactly right – it was the big, very diverse school systems with liberal school boards and very loud teachers’ associations which stayed closed the longest. Private schools, Catholic schools and rural schools opened earlier and provided hybrid opportunities more frequently.

          I seems that the more liberal the school board the fewer days of in-person teaching occurred. And the more liberal boards are in the more urban, more diverse areas.

          Given what we know about the effects of distance learning, especially on poor children (who are disproportionately “people of color”), why aren’t the liberal school boards being accused of systematic racism?

          1. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            How do you know what the performance of the private schools was?

            Also, not all schools in Va closed as you point out. Where are the results of the public schools in Va that did not go virtual?

        2. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          It’s reported in the MSM , consistently as opposed to not.

          why are you demanding that the MSM produce all of this stuff when the information itself is available for you to get?

          If the MSM is so bad then what about conservative media?

  6. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Somebody remind me what years the GOP controlled the GA…

    “Even with recent progress, state support will be down 9.1 percent per student for the 2018-2019 school year in real dollars compared to 2008-2009 – the last year before the Great Recession started to impact K-12 funding. The lower levels of funding have forced many schools to cut back on instructors and school staff and we’re still down from where we used to be. Since 2009, staffing in Virginia schools has declined by 1,242 positions while enrollment has grown by more than 50,000 students. This means larger class sizes and fewer supports for students. At the same time, the needs of students have also been changing. The number of economically disadvantaged students has increased by almost 90,000 students since 2009 and English learners in Virginia schools have increased by over 54,000.”

    http://www.thecommonwealthinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/State-K12-Direct-Aid-01-300×224.jpg

    1. DJRippert Avatar
      DJRippert

      As far as I can see, there is no relationship between dollars spent per student and educational achievement. The District of Columbia spends like a drunken sailor on a per-student basis and has terrible results.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        As you have opined before, cost of living plays into these numbers, right?

        1. DJRippert Avatar
          DJRippert

          Yep. But DC spends $22,406 per year per public school student and Fairfax County spends $16,505. Which place’s public schools would you want your kid to attend?

          The better argument is that DC’s public schools are so bad that nobody with two nickels to run together sends their kids to public schools in DC. Certainly the Obamas never considered public schools for their daughters.

          Fairfax County is quite different. A lot of middle class and affluent people send their kids to public schools.

          DC schools deal with children that have all the problems that accompany poverty – single parent families, that single parent working two jobs, etc.

          While DC is far from a poor city, on average, I’d wager that the median income of the parents of public school students in DC is quite low.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            yes, but are you teachers more to teach there or more teachers because of so many poor students, etc?

            Similar to Richmond and other urban?

      2. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
        James Wyatt Whitehead

        I would like to see the dollars follow the student/parent.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          Would we have schools that don’t provide transportation, meals, sports, etc, just academics and the parent gets the kid there and back home?

    2. f/k/a_tmtfairfax Avatar
      f/k/a_tmtfairfax

      Cut non-instructional positions back to where they were in 2008-09. Fairfax County just got $100 M more despite having more than 10,000 fewer students. Freeze all administrators’ pay for positions paying $125 K or more. There is very little turnover in these positions. Treat students and their parents as one would treat customers and see support for public education grow.

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        State funding Boss, not the local make-up. One more time, ya get what you pay for… education on the chintz.

      2. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        how does any of that improve reading and math proficiency TMT?

  7. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=MBbT40H74sc

    Dreams are nothing more than wishes…

    If your horse can’t jump 4′, raising the bar to 6′ won’t have the desired effect.

  8. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    The NAEP definitions for basic, proficient and advanced are different from the VDOE definitions – they don’t match one for one and those who have looked at them say that the NAEP definitions for Basic are more in line with SOL definitions for proficient.

    You can see this for yourself:

    https://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/reading/achieve.aspx

    https://www.doe.virginia.gov/testing/scoring/performance_level_descriptors/index.shtml

    to assert they are equivalent is not exactly honest and has been pointed out.

    It’s basically not an honest report and worse than that – even if it WERE TRUE – Youngkin and company don’t lay out any substantive changes they would actually make to improve the academics for math and reading and especially so tor the lower performing demographic groups they cite.

    This is just more of the same culture war idiocy and political theatre by ideologues who really do not have the best interests of the kids in their minds to start with.

    This is what NAEP reading looks like for Virginia compared to other states: We’re basically 10th not last and take a look at the scores for basic and proficiency as compared to the other states above us. None of the states are above 50% for NAEP “proficient”.

    So NONE of this was provided by Youngkin to provide context and understanding.

    You don’t have a serious governance if you can’t tell the basic truth about things and Youngkin has chosen to portray something that is simply not the truth.

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/5cf394d7f03332a9573e4377ed18a1c7d60d1fc6a3a6aac09d13645c21380d36.jpg

    1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
      James Wyatt Whitehead

      Do you think this equates with Jim Crow the way Senator Lucas has stated?

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        what did she say?

  9. Donald Smith Avatar
    Donald Smith

    2017, eh? Gosh, what happened in 2017, and got worse in 2019…

Leave a Reply