Youngkin Pumping The Presidential Brakes

by Kerry Dougherty

Looks like Gov. Glenn Youngkin may have some natural immunity to the presidential virus that seems to infect most Virginia governors.

At one time or another it seems almost every Virginia governor has his head turned by the seductive intoxication of presidential or vice presidential ambition.

Anyone else remember L. Douglas Wilder? He was elected governor in 1989 and his term ran from 1990 to 1994. By 1992, he was running for president as a Democrat, although Wilder dropped out before the primaries got underway.

In 2010, Gov. Bob McDonnell was selected to give the GOP rebuttal to President Barack Obama’s State of the Union Address, a sign that he was being groomed by the national party for higher office, perhaps vice president in 2012. In fact, when Sen. Mitt Romney came to Norfolk that year to announce his choice for veep, many assumed it was going to be the popular Virginia governor from Virginia Beach.

Instead, it was a head fake. Romney chose the USS Wisconsin as a backdrop to make his surprise announcement of Rep. Paul Ryan, from the Badger State’s 1st congressional district.

At various times during their 4-year terms former Governors George Allen, Jim Gilmore, Mark Warner and Tim Kaine also were mentioned as top contenders for their party’s presidential ticket. In fact, Kaine ran with Hillary Clinton in 2016. Mike Pence filleted him in the single vice presidential debate, however. Kaine was virtually invisible for the rest of the campaign.

There have been signs for weeks that, although he clearly flirted with the notion of running for president, Youngkin was pulling back. For instance, in the past couple of months several of his top political consultants, Jeff Roe and Kristin Davison, departed to join a DeSantis super-PAC.

Well, once The New York Times weighs in, it must be official. Youngkin is tapping the “brakes” as The Times wrote this weekend in a piece headlined “Youngkin Gives 2024 Presidential Run the Cold Shoulder.”

The newspaper claims the reason Youngkin is pulling back is his lack of legislative victories compared to Ron DeSantis.

No surprise there.

Virginia is far bluer than Florida, which became even redder during Covid as New Yorkers longing for freedom fled to the Sunshine State.

Covid turned Florida crimson.

Youngkin never said he was running. Now he is pointedly saying he is focusing on this fall’s General Assembly elections. Smart. GOP successes there will advance his agenda, losses will stymie him.

Asked about his presidential decision timeline this week, Youngkin said, “Listen, I didn’t write a book, and I’m not in Iowa or New Hampshire or South Carolina.” Instead, he said, he is putting his full focus on November’s statewide Virginia election, when all 140 seats in both chambers of the General Assembly are on the ballot. A decision to enter the 2024 campaign in November would be historically late, well past the first Republican debate in August.

“I am wholly focused on the Commonwealth of Virginia, and I’m looking forward to these elections,’’ Youngkin said during an appearance to promote Virginia’s agricultural exports. Standing outdoors at a terminal for barges near Richmond — dressed in a blue suit and tie rather than the red fleece vest he wore while seeking office, a symbol of his suburban dad-ness — the governor, 56, said that gaining majorities in the legislature “is what this year is all about.”

It could be a tough year for Virginia’s GOP, which is still giddy over its 2021 sweep of the top three offices.

Abortion enthusiasts in Richmond who favor unrestricted abortions up until the moment of birth will be trying to paint Youngkin’s support for a reasonable 15-week ban as extreme, when in reality it’s the Northam-make-them-comfortable-and-let-them-die Democrats who are on the ugly edge of what’s acceptable.

They hope that yodeling constantly about abortion will drown out Youngkin’s call for lower taxes and school choice.

With the help of far-left cheerleaders in the media, they may be successful.

Republished with permission from Kerry: Unemployed and Unedited.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

31 responses to “Youngkin Pumping The Presidential Brakes”

  1. StarboardLift Avatar
    StarboardLift

    “Abortion enthusiasts” really? There is no such thing.

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      Our previous governor talked openly about killing the child post partum. Sounds enthusiastic to me. Both parties are captured by their extremists on this, preventing honest debate and compromise.

    2. Unfortunately, there is such a thing. They may not be out there in large number but they are out there.

      I was once in a discussion with a left-leaning individual about limitations on abortion. He opposed any limits whatsoever on abortions up to, and even beyond, the moment of birth. At one point during our “debate” he referred to having “joyfully and gleefully” driven his wife to have an abortion when she became pregnant again after their last child was born.

      Joyfully and gleefully. Those are the exact words he used.

      What other name is there for someone who uses adjectives like those when discussing abortion?

    3. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      Our previous governor talked openly about killing the child post partum. Sounds enthusiastic to me. Both parties are captured by their extremists on this, preventing honest debate and compromise.

      1. M. Purdy Avatar

        That’s been debunked.

        1. Can’t debunk that he said: “there may be a fetus that’s non-viable…” May be. What discussion would be needed if it weren’t viable? Read the whole quote in the piece where Reuters tried to play the debunking game. https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-virginia-gov-abortion/fact-check-virginia-governors-2019-comments-about-abortion-bill-are-missing-context-idUSKBN27D2HL“There are, you know, when we talk about third-trimester abortions, these
          are done with the consent of, obviously, the mother, with the consent of the physicians, more than one physician by the way. And it’s done in cases where there may be severe deformities, there may be a fetus that’s
          non-viable. So in this particular example, if a mother is in labor, I
          can tell you exactly what would happen. The infant would be delivered, the infant would be kept comfortable, the infant would be resuscitated
          if that’s what the mother and the family desired, and then a discussion
          would ensue between the physicians and the mother.”

          1. M. Purdy Avatar

            https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-virginia-gov-abortion/fact-check-virginia-governors-2019-comments-about-abortion-bill-are-missing-context-idUSKBN27D2HL He’s talking about nonviable pregnancies, not arguing for aborting healthy fetuses, in the third trimester.

          2. If it’s third trimester and as he says, “the infant” is born alive, it is viable at that time.

          3. M. Purdy Avatar

            That’s your gloss, your semantics, not what he’s talking about.

          4. StarboardLift Avatar
            StarboardLift

            If you’ve spent time on a farm you’ve seen humane medical treatment, live birth followed by euthanasia. Born alive is not necessarily viable. It should not be called abortion, but the same mercy should be shown toward humans. This is what matters to me, not parsing through the intention of words tossed out by Northam nor any single individual elected or otherwise.

      2. StarboardLift Avatar
        StarboardLift

        “A woman wants an abortion the way an animal caught in a trap wants to chew off its own leg.” Amputees don’t have enthusiasm for procedures that are deemed in their best interest. Family health matters are private, weighty, and mine will not be forced on you.

        Mischaracterizing Northam’s comment is not honest and doesn’t promote debate. You can disagree with his position but adding melodrama isn’t helpful.

        1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
          James Wyatt Whitehead

          Yes let’s not mischaracterize his Excellency, the former Governor Virginia, Ralph Northam.
          https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/c3640c715ad2e0b4ce6830000a9c806b3228d88144735b7dfe05d7fa556225f9.jpg

    4. Unfortunately, there is such a thing. They may not be out there in large number but they are out there.

      I was once in a discussion with a left-leaning individual about limitations on abortion. He opposed any limits whatsoever on abortions up to, and even beyond, the moment of birth. At one point during our “debate” he referred to having “joyfully and gleefully” driven his wife to have an abortion when she became pregnant again after their last child was born.

      Joyfully and gleefully. Those are the exact words he used.

      What other name is there for someone who uses adjectives like those when discussing abortion?

  2. M. Purdy Avatar

    Another way to frame this: Gov. Youngkin’s “parental rights” crusade failed to move the needle in any meaningful way in VA or the US during the midterms, largely because it was a parochial and fabricated issue. An issue that VA and national voters care about a great deal, however, is access to abortion. So they will punish any party seeking to restrict that right. With roughly ~2% in primary polls, he thought it best not to waste his time. And he knows that if things go badly in VA in 2023, his chances of ever gaining higher office are over.

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      Agreed, his fortunes are tied to the outcome in November, and a Republican victory vaults him forward. But I suspect there are conversations at the top levels nationally among those who want Somebody Else to head the ticket about how to stop You Know Who and winnowing the field down early is part of that. DeSantis is emerging as the most likely Somebody Else.

      The Democrats’ deep pride in how many abortions they facilitate is a pathetic path to victory, but it may work. They will indeed do all in their power to keep that the top issue come October/November. DeSantis signing a six-week bill also keeps the issue front and center. It will clearly help him with the nomination, complicate the general.

      1. M. Purdy Avatar

        I don’t think I would frame the abortion issue like that, but I generally agree. Also this judge out of TX and a few wackamole state legislatures have assured that moderation will not be in the political cards in 2024. Youngkin is trying to thread a needle, but there are no conditions for compromise right now. It’s too bad.

      2. Matt Adams Avatar
        Matt Adams

        The “case” will suck up all the air in the room (that is and was it’s purpose, not about the law or Justice), they want “You Know Who” because frankly, he’s the only one that they can beat at this point.

        If anyone else gets pushed to the top of the pile, POTUS Biden will get the F in front of his name, and VP Harris will be thrown to the scrap heap never to be heard from again.

        1. Stephen Haner Avatar
          Stephen Haner

          I think that is why he lingers over his announcement. Come Labor Day, if the Republicans are trending toward Somebody Else, Biden may defer to their own Somebody Else. Many, many of us would like a different choice this time on both sides! But it is less clear who that other Democrat might be.

          1. Matt Adams Avatar
            Matt Adams

            You’re probably correct in that statement, they are just planning on the NY thing to embolden a specific person and galvanize his base.

            They were lucky to weather the storm of a back economy in the midterms, I wonder if they’ll be able to for a second cycle.

            Their bench does seem shallow, I can see Newsom running, but honestly outside of that, it’s Sec. Clinton again.

          2. Lefty665 Avatar

            Yes, but but but…

            Us boomers are too old, time for all of us to get off the stage. Doesn’t mean we will, hell even the pre boomers are not exiting willingly.

            With any luck the country is not ready to Californicate itself, and the noises from the Hillary crypt have lessened considerably.

            Will the Repubs figure out how to ditch himself and retain populism? We shall see.

            Some of us have been bitching since the ’90s that the Dems were doing nothing to build a bench. They have succeeded.

            How did we get into this mess?

          3. Matt Adams Avatar
            Matt Adams

            Because it’s been the lesser of two evils for far, far to long.

            Don’t worry, not all of us find “boomers” at fault for things.

          4. Lefty665 Avatar

            But we have stayed too long at the fair.

          5. Matt Adams Avatar
            Matt Adams

            Maybe the politicians, but than again we aren’t sending our best to state capitals or Washington.

    2. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
      James Wyatt Whitehead

      Don’t forget Uncle Joe Biden. The man is intent on destroying this country. A certain lifeline to Republicans in Virginia for the November elections.

      1. M. Purdy Avatar

        I don’t think he’s intent on destroying this country, but he is certainly a drag on the ticket. But he also a drag on the ticket last Nov., and Dems still made out quite well. So not sure it’ll matter that much.

        1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
          James Wyatt Whitehead

          Biden’s disastrous tenure sure has rehabilitated the legacies of Jimmy Carter and James Buchanan.

          1. M. Purdy Avatar

            But when your predecessor literally tries to overturn a free and fair election, the bar is real real low.

          2. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
            James Wyatt Whitehead

            Could be the last so called free and fair election thanks to the current occupant of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.
            https://i.makeagif.com/media/1-28-2017/QPysVM.gif

          3. M. Purdy Avatar

            That makes no sense. Biden will and has abided by the outcomes of every election he’s run in, which is now ten times. Compare, contrast…and watch the Fox News trial that starts tomorrow.

Leave a Reply