Youngkin Donated His Salary to Charity. Sore Losers Complain.

by Kerry Dougherty

We all understand that Virginia Democrats are smarting. They honestly believed that Virginia was a blue state and they could nominate a sleazy Clinton-crony retread and still win the governor’s race.

They lost and their criticism of Governor Glenn Youngkin borders on derangement.

Would it kill them to be gracious? To put aside their bitterness long enough to give Youngkin props when he does something undeniably good?

If not that, how about if they just shut up and drop the petty partisanship for a few days?

No sooner had Youngkin announced this week that he was donating his first quarter salary to the Virginia Law Enforcement Assistance Program, an organization “dedicated to helping law enforcement officers and first responders who have undergone traumatic critical incidents in the line of duty or inter personal lives” than the sniping began.

There was this, from the official Twitter feed of the Democratic Party of Virginia:

“The police will waste it all on Krispy Kreme,” snarked one member of the defund-the-police party.

Another called Youngkin’s donation “chump change.”

One Democrat had a single word for the governor: “Idiot!!”

A Richmond journalist took a slightly different tack:

Oh, please. This is Youngkin’s money. He earned it. He can do whatever he likes with it.

I checked and couldn’t find any record of Ralph Northam or Terry McAuliffe donating their salaries to charity. That’s all right, no one expected them to give their money away. When you work and get paid, what you do with fruits of your labor is your business.

Look, Youngkin promised during the campaign that if elected he would donate his salary to charity. Forbes estimates Youngkin’s net worth at about $400 million. He can afford to forego his $175,00 salary. This was a campaign promise made and a promise kept.

It’s not without precedent, either. Wealthy politicians have often declined their salaries or donated them.

George Washington attempted to refuse his salary, but Congress insisted he keep it. President Herbert Hoover donated his entire presidential salary to charities that were helping the poor during the Great Depression. John F. Kennedy donated his salary to charities such as the Boy Scouts and Girl Scouts. Barack Obama donated a large portion of his salary to charity and Donald Trump donated his to various federal agencies, such as the National Park Service.

Montana’s multimillionaire Governor Greg Gianforte is donating his salary to a drug treatment facility in his state.

These philanthropic gestures ought to be applauded. Unless you simply hate the rich, of course.

Fact is, the voters of Virginia elected Glenn Youngkin. Yet he didn’t get a five- minute honeymoon before the press was blasting him as they acted as the press agents for disgruntled Democrats.

Three months in, and lost in the wilderness, the opposition party is now slamming Youngkin for his charitable instincts.

This is not a winning political strategy. Mocking a man for his philanthropy is a big mistake. Unless your goal is to make yourself look small and bitter.

If that’s the case, job well done, Dems.

This column has been republished with permission from Kerry: Unemployed & Unedited.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

27 responses to “Youngkin Donated His Salary to Charity. Sore Losers Complain.”

  1. Kathleen Smith Avatar
    Kathleen Smith

    Well said, Kerry.

    1. VaNavVet Avatar
      VaNavVet

      Kerry, the queen of petty partisanship, could just not let one go by. Talk about looking small and bitter. You can bet that Gov Youngkin would indeed take the upper road. After all he did promise to be a unifying force for the Commonwealth. Now if he could just get Kerry to focus on his actual priorities.

      1. Matt Adams Avatar
        Matt Adams

        “The queen of petty partisanship”

        I can only presume you were looking in a mirror when making this comment.

  2. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    The comments are uncalled for and are stupid, from a political perspective. I would have preferred, however if Youngkin had just donated the money without having a press conference and press release to announce it.

    1. tmtfairfax Avatar
      tmtfairfax

      Elected officials aren’t generally known for doing things in private when they can get publicity.

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        when they WANT publicity . Politicians are famous for doing things in private. Most of the time, the only way we know of these things is by a gap in the records.

    2. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      Got him on Fox this morning, too, along with somebody from the recipient organization.

    3. vicnicholls Avatar
      vicnicholls

      He was trying to illustrate a political point and get others to follow suite.

  3. walter smith Avatar
    walter smith

    Charity (like vaccination status! Ahem!) is best done and known privately. You know, the Left hand not knowing what the Right hand has done…
    However, as a campaign promise, it is a damned if you do and damned if you don’t, so I think notifying he did what he said was necessary. People can quibble over the method. But to quibble over the gift is truly petty. It was his money. Why didn’t Zuckerberg, instead of spending $400 million to buy the swing State machinery buy (let’s see 400 million divided by 46,500 = 8,602 times 11,500 homeless meals = nearly 100 million homeless meals! (Actually, I believe it would be more than that = from my time doing homeless events, I would imagine the meals were less than $4 each…unless you are doing full-costing of infrastructure, etc.)). Anyway, just petty. You can quibble over the announcement aspect, like DHS said, but even that…

    1. tmtfairfax Avatar
      tmtfairfax

      The federal tax code is the problem. Private foundations should not be allowed to try to influence public policy or opinion and be tax free. But people in D.C. move from government to the private sector, including nonprofits, and back again.

      1. walter smith Avatar
        walter smith

        It is a humongous problem. The private foundations, ostensibly for charitable or scientific purposes, then distribute money for clearly political purposes. Heck, they get government funding! So many of the “NGO”s are in Mexico, in conjunction with the Catholic and other churches, teaching illegals how to claim asylum. Technically a crime…and we fund it! Then you go to academia and the projects funded and then you get hired in an administration and then you come back to the academy, or make big grift on a public company, selling access, or go to some green energy deal boondoggle.

  4. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    The question is how it is donated… tax exempt?

    I’d rather no one refuse or donate their salary. Better they should get it lowered officially to an appropriate level. The president of the U of Alaska makes $108K more than the governor of California — the highest paid governor.

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      Can’t do that under the VA Constitution. The salary must be paid and cannot be changed during that term. Imagine the mischief if the Assembly could defund the Gov… 🙂

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Maybe the GA, et al.,ncould borrow the UVa Honor Code? According to James, it’s not being used.

  5. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Speaking of sneaky… did you catch the news that the government was tracking Russian bots being put on servers, both public and private, warning the private owners and when they did not rectify the situation, obtained FISA warrants, and removed them quietly.

    Oooooh betcha that’ll get you Conservatives and Libertarians worked up.

    1. oromae Avatar

      You wouldn’t know a Russian bot if you tripped over one.

    2. oromae Avatar

      You wouldn’t know a Russian bot if you tripped over one.

      1. DJRippert Avatar
        DJRippert

        I thought NN was a Russian bot until I realized that the bots were more logical, used better grammar and occasionally addressed the point at hand.

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          That’s because they’re capable of something you’re not — learning.

      2. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        You’re right. I doubt you would either. I don’t worry about worms, viruses, bot, etc., because they always error and crash on my Windows NT4.

        1. oromae Avatar

          NT4. How are things back in 1995?

          1. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            I lied. I did cry when I had to put ‘er down in 2012. But my XP is still working GREAT!

            BTW, I did have more than one virus crash on the NT4 machine trying to install.

  6. Penrosian Avatar
    Penrosian

    Love that Kerry apparently has no clue what the $46,000 tweet is about (hint: not the governor’s salary donation).

  7. Stephen Haner Avatar
    Stephen Haner

    Once upon a time the concept of the “dollar a year” public servant was praised. Sadly, I watched some of this idiocy unfold on Twitter. I really cannot summon the bile and hate these people exhibit on a regular basis, seeking to top each other with calumny and stupidity. Many like their cousins here hiding their names.

  8. WayneS Avatar

    Mr. Youngkin did not refuse his salary. He donated it to charity.

    A journalist should be familiar enough with the English language to know the definitions of the words “refuse” and “donate”. I must therefore assume that when you referred to Mr. Kutner as a “journalist” you were using the term in the loosest possible sense…

  9. When you’re pockets are filled with $300 million. $45,000 is chump change.
    Youngkin has so much to be proud of, why stop at $45,000? He could have doubled it, then he could brag about it.

Leave a Reply