Youngkin Delivers Early Christmas Gift

by Barbara Hollingsworth(This column was first published by the Thomas Jefferson Institute for Public Policy.)

Virginians received an early Christmas present this year. For four years, the Thomas Jefferson Institute for Public Policy has been strongly urging state officials in Virginia to lighten what has become a steadily increasing tax burden on residents and businesses in the commonwealth by enacting tax cuts and tax reform.

On December 15, during his appearance before the joint Senate and House of Delegates Finance and Appropriations Committees, Governor Glenn Youngkin took bold steps to do just that. The governor announced his plan to “accelerate” the state government’s transformation based on what he said was “driving better outcomes for less money.”

In his budget amendments to the 2022-2024 biennial state budget delivered to the General Assembly’s “money committees,” Youngkin proposed cutting taxes on Virginians by a billion dollars – in addition to the $4 billion tax relief bill he signed earlier this year.

Youngkin told legislators that the state, which is running a large surplus, can afford the tax cuts despite his acknowledgement that a national recession is looming. “Our carefully planned budget balances spending priorities and tax cuts, with roughly $1 billion … conditioned on meeting our 2023 revenue forecast,” Youngkin told state lawmakers.

The governor wants to “finish the job of doubling the standard deduction” for state income tax filers, a long-time policy objective of the TJIPP. He also wants to reduce the individual income tax rate for the highest income bracket to 5.5% and eliminate state income taxes on military retirement pay. Youngkin said that these individual income tax reductions will save Virginians $700 million per year.

Under the governor’s plan, the corporate income tax rate for businesses would also be reduced from 6% to 5%, “the first step toward the ultimate goal of 4 percent at the end of our administration.” For small businesses, Youngkin is proposing a 10% Qualified Business Income Deduction. These measures, if approved by the General Assembly, would total $450 million in business tax relief annually.

The Jefferson Institute argued back in 2018 that doubling the standard deduction for individuals “is the best of the various choices for individual taxpayers with the current projected revenue. It is the step taken by the Congress, which was seeking to move people away from itemized deductions. It also aligns Virginia with most surrounding states that use the income tax but do so with higher standard deductions for individuals and couples.”

We also argued that “reducing the corporate tax rate is the best step for business taxpayers and will help make Virginia more competitive.” Youngkin told legislators the same thing, pointing out that neighboring states such as Tennessee and North Carolina are more tax-friendly to business than the commonwealth.

And, while it is not part of the Youngkin package, we’ve firmly argued that Virginia tax brackets, standard deductions, and exemptions should be indexed for inflation, so taxpayers are no longer punished for rising consumer costs – and government coffers no longer profit from it.

With the state government running a record budget surplus of $3.6 billion, the state can afford to return some of that excess to taxpayers. Especially since the governor noted that his proposed budget amendments include contingencies that halt any tax cuts and $2.5 billion in new spending initiatives if revenue targets are not met. “In the event of a recession, Virginia will be able to avoid raising taxes or cutting needed public programs by maintaining revenue reserves greater than 15 percent of expected revenues,” the governor’s office explained in a briefing document.

Besides the clear benefits of tax cuts to the Virginia economy, tax relief is needed now more than ever as the worst inflation in 40 years continues to erode state residents’ standard of living. Tax cuts will at least help mitigate some of the brutal effects of inflation.

“For the first time in about a decade, you’ve got a budget that is on the side of working people,” said state Sen. Steve Newman, R- 23rd District, a member of the Senate Finance and Appropriations Committee, after hearing Youngkin’s presentation.

Of course, tax relief won’t become a reality unless the General Assembly actually approves the governor’s budget amendments. But legislators will have a hard time explaining to their constituents that they refused to lighten their tax burden while sitting on a record budget surplus.

Barbara Hollingsworth is a Visiting Fellow with the Thomas Jefferson Institute and a former editorial page editor with the Fredericksburg Free Lance-Star. She may be reached at BarbHoll3@gmail.com.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

19 responses to “Youngkin Delivers Early Christmas Gift”

  1. how_it_works Avatar
    how_it_works

    “Youngkin told legislators the same thing, pointing out that neighboring states such as Tennessee and North Carolina are more tax-friendly to business than the commonwealth.”

    Yea, well, you get what you pay for.

    Those other states can’t possibly offer businesses all the things that Virginia can.

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      Perhaps they don’t want what Virginia offers them.

      1. how_it_works Avatar
        how_it_works

        Then we don’t need them. The superiority of Virginia is plainly obvious to anyone who cares to look.

        After all, there’s a reason Virginia was ranked the most narcissistic state in the entire country. It’s because Virginia is the best.

        We have the best schools, the best roads, the best government agencies, the best workers, the list goes on.

        Other states could only dream of being what Virginia *IS*.

      2. how_it_works Avatar
        how_it_works

        Then we don’t need them. The superiority of Virginia is plainly obvious to anyone who cares to look.

        After all, there’s a reason Virginia was ranked the most narcissistic state in the entire country. It’s because Virginia is the best.

        We have the best schools, the best roads, the best government agencies, the best workers, the list goes on.

        Other states could only dream of being what Virginia *IS*.

        After all:

        “To be a Virginian either by Birth, Marriage, Adoption, or even on one’s Mother’s side, is an Introduction to any State in the Union, a Passport to any Foreign Country, and a Benediction from Above.”

        Only the best state in the country could possibly have a quote about what a blessing it is to be born there!

  2. DJRippert Avatar

    Wait a minute! Didn’t I just read a BR column yesterday with the headline, “Youngkin’s Budget Amendments: No Radical Changes”?

    Yes, I understand that in the body of the column Dick waived any discussion of taxes, leaving that to Steve Haner.

    However, I find the headline misleading.

    Youngkin opponents have given up trying to make him into the PE – company boogieman. Now, they are trying to cast him as a political novice who isn’t getting much done.

    It seems to me that Youngkin is doing quite a bit regarding Virginia’s state finances.

    1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      It is true that Youngkin is continuing the unfortunate practice of governors of both parties of “legislating through the budget”, that is, tacking onto the end of the budget bill his proposed tax code changes. I am still a purist–when I refer to budget amendments, I am referring to spending amendments, not changes in the tax code.

  3. Okay. Merry Christmas.

    I think maybe I’ll spend the rest of the day thinking of all the things I’m going to do with the extra $115.71…

  4. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
    James Wyatt Whitehead

    Sounds good! I have plenty of old scissors for cutting things if Glenn Y. would like to borrow them.

  5. f/k/a_tmtfairfax Avatar
    f/k/a_tmtfairfax

    The current North Carolina corporate tax rate is 2.5% and will decline to zero in 2030 based on a bill signed by Governor Cooper (D.) in November 2021.

    According to the North Carolina Department of Commerce’s Economic Investment Committee, NC GDP ranks 10th in the nation and is more than all but 23 countries. https://myfox8.com/news/north-carolina/how-fast-is-north-carolinas-economy-growing-see-where-it-ranks-in-the-world/

    Where would Virginia be but for federal spending?

    1. DJRippert Avatar

      “Where would Virginia be but for federal spending?”

      Absolutely nowhere.

      1. how_it_works Avatar
        how_it_works

        Fairfax County would still look much like it did 70 years ago.

  6. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    The author does not mention that Youngkin’s proposal regarding the top tax rate would make Virginia’s income tax even more regressive. He is proposing to go in the exact opposite direction than JLARC proposed earlier this fall. If one of the goals is to help “working people”, there is another method that the governor’s proposals ignore–increasing the amount of the earned income credit that is refundable from 75% to 100%.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar

      or …. maintain a progressive tax structure… instead of lowering the top rate.

      The GOP used to be in love with the earned income credit but I think they’ve lost their ardor of late and prefer tax cuts for the rich.

    2. f/k/a_tmtfairfax Avatar
      f/k/a_tmtfairfax

      Do you want economic growth and more jobs? The Democratic Governor and Republican Legislature in North Carolina agreed on a plan that eliminated many tax preferences and lowered the income tax rates and will continue to do so on a phase-in basis. And the Tar Heel state is kicking Virginia’s *** economically. And we don’t have the massive federal spending that keeps Virginia afloat.

      In terms of tax fairness, why don’t both Parties go after tax-exempt nonprofits that spend money lobbying or trying to influence public policy and opinion? Likewise, limit their ability to compensate people to the top SES wage or the nonprofit also loses its tax-exempt status. If a nonprofit is going to provide free dental care to poor people, leave it alone. But if they are trying to change health care policy and laws, make them do so after paying federal income taxes.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar

        why would you have the govt go after non-profits? Do you not think the for-profit companies don’t also lobby and “influence”?

        And do you REALLY want the govt to dictate compensation for ANY non-govt entity? Why?

        1. f/k/a_tmtfairfax Avatar
          f/k/a_tmtfairfax

          Larry, for-profit companies cannot deduct any costs for federal or state lobbying. This includes the portion of trade association dues spend on lobbying. It’s been this way since the Clinton Administration. Why treat nonprofits better?

          It’s my understanding that every nonprofit with gross revenues of $25 K or more must file IRS Form 990. The law and regs could be changed to require them to disclose any amounts spent in-house or on consultants or agents to lobby or influence public policy or opinion. Then audit them like businesses are audited.

          If members of a nonprofit write legislators but the nonprofit doesn’t fund it or support the effort financially, leave them alone.

          And “yes,” there should be regulation of nonprofit salaries because the paying entity rides free in society. Nonprofit executives often make huge salaries. Does it take a $500 K salaried executive to run a soup kitchen or give college scholarships to kids from low-income families?

      2. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
        Dick Hall-Sizemore

        Comparing tax rates at the state level is tricky because services are delivered differently in each state. For example, few states fund local law enforcement, whereas Virginia reimburses localities for the full approved cost of the number of approved sheriffs’ deputies. It also provides localities over $200 million annually for law enforcement, in addition to the amount for deputies. How states fund K-12 also differs considerably. Therefore, a better measure is the total tax burden on individuals. One such study indicates that the burden on individuals is virtually the same in Virginia and North Carolina. https://balancingeverything.com/tax-burden-by-state/

      3. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
        Dick Hall-Sizemore

        Comparing tax rates at the state level is tricky because services are delivered differently in each state. For example, few states fund local law enforcement, whereas Virginia reimburses localities for the full approved cost of the number of approved sheriffs’ deputies. It also provides localities over $200 million annually for law enforcement, in addition to the amount for deputies. How states fund K-12 also differs considerably. Therefore, a better measure is the total tax burden on individuals. One such study indicates that the burden on individuals is virtually the same in Virginia and North Carolina. https://balancingeverything.com/tax-burden-by-state/

        1. f/k/a_tmtfairfax Avatar
          f/k/a_tmtfairfax

          Dick, the North Carolina economy is hot. People of all ages are moving here, and many are landing very good jobs with a lower cost of living.

          Taxes are simply less burdensome. For example, NC has a county and a town/city car tax that must be paid annually. I recently bought a new car and my annual tax bill on a 2023 Honda CRV was less than the Fairfax County tax bill on my 2011 Honda CRV.

          In 2021, the following companies came to NC and added these many new jobs.

          Apple (3,000 jobs)
          Toyota (1,750 jobs)
          Fidelity (1,500 jobs)
          Google (1,000 jobs)
          Fujifilm Diosynth (725 jobs)
          Credit Karma (600 jobs)
          White River Marine Group (502 jobs)
          MasterBrand Cabinets (464 jobs)

          There is a big mentality difference between the two states. NC has a long tradition of supporting economic growth, whereas Virginia seems intent on becoming like New York or California.

          While I’m very glad to have lived in Northern Virginia and worked in D.C. for decades, If I were 40 years younger, I’d probably looked hard at North Carolina first.

Leave a Reply