You Thought Payday Lenders Were Bad? Welcome to Internet Lending.

by James A. Bacon

A new law that went into effect this year is designed to protect Virginians against “predatory” short-term loans by limiting what lenders can charge. And in honor of National Consumer Protection Week, Attorney General Mark R. Herring is encouraging Virginians to familiarize themselves with the risks associated with smaller-dollar loans.

I’m all in favor of educating consumers, and I’m glad to see that the AG’s office is vigilant against fraudulent lending. But I can’t escape the worry that the political class’s do-gooder instinct to “help” poor people by regulating one of the few industry sectors willing to lend them money may do them more harm than good. Regulating payday lenders pushes poor people into the arms of online lenders.

In a press release today, the AG’s Office reported some interesting numbers regarding the scope of payday lending. Citing data from the 2019 Annual Report of the Bureau of Financial Institutions, the press release notes that 83,107 Virginians took out 268,097 payday loans totaling nearly $110 million with an average annual percentage rate of 253%.

That sounds terrible. Poor people trapped in a cycle of indebtedness and poverty, and all that. If there is fraudulent misrepresentation involved in the short-term loans, the AG’s Office needs to crack down. Nobody wants liars and cheats in the marketplace. But the more germane question is whether regulating the terms and conditions of the loans really helps poor people.

In 2019 the average loan amount made by Payday lenders was $413 with annualized interest rates ranging from e4% to 818%. Herring’s press release urges consumers to consider alternatives to “predatory” loans such as borrowing from banks and credit unions. Good luck with that! Banks aren’t interested in small-denomination loans, which are expensive to originate and process. Besides, how many poor people seeking payday loans even have banking relationships? Wells Fargo requires a minimum opening deposit of only $25 to open a checking account — but then charges a $10-a-month service fee!

Payday loans are predatory but checking accounts are not?

Consumers can avoid the monthly fees if they maintain a minimum $500 daily balance. Great. If poor people have $500 in their bank accounts, they wouldn’t need that $413 payday loan, would they?

The AG’s office also suggests taking out a credit card cash advance. Yeah, right, as if poor people are too stupid to figure that out themselves. I’ll guarantee you that the overwhelming percentage of payday borrowers either don’t have credit cards or have maxed them out.

Here’s the problem with lending money to poor people: they often default, and lenders don’t get their money back. When lenders advance loans to categories of people who don’t pay them back, they have to charger higher interest rates to offset the risk. Otherwise, if they lose enough money, they go out of business. This is a fundamental precept of finance — a reality that only politicians could be oblivious to.

The Bureau of Financial Institutions provides some useful data. While payday lenders in Virginia advanced $111 million in loans 2019, they also charged off $6.5 million as uncollectible. So, right off the bat, payday lenders had to charge about 6% more on an annualized basis just to offset the risk of nonpayment.

Then there’s the issue of administrative overhead. A $400 loan costs as much to process as a $4,000 loan. Offices must be maintained, rent paid, employees paid, and lawyers paid? Lawyers? Yes, payday lenders in Virginia sought to recover nearly $2 million worth of loans to 2,752 borrowers through lawsuits.

If payday lending were a lucrative business, one would expect to see more lenders entering the marketplace to get a piece of the action. But that’s not what happened in Virginia. According to the Bureau of Financial Institutions, between 2016 and 2019:

  • The number of payday lenders licensed to operate in Virginia fell from 18 to 15.
  • The number of locations operated declined from 171 to 152.
  • The total dollar amount of loans made tumbled from $326 million to $268 million.
  • The number of borrowers fell from 102,000 to 83,000.

The payday lending industry shrank. And it will continue to shrink. The new law caps interest and fees that can be charged under a short-term loan to an annual rate of 36% plus a maintenance fee, and sets the duration of loans to a minimum of four months. Fees and charges cannot exceed 50% of the original loan amount for loans less than $1,500.

Those caps will be severely constricting. According to the Bureau, the average payday term was 44 days. Interest rates ranged from 34% to 818%.

Where do poor people go when they are desperate for cash, they don’t have banking relationships, their credit cards are maxed out, and their friends and family don’t want to lend them the money because they don’t think they’ll get it back? They go online. There you see search results like these:

$400 – $5,000 Online Loans — No Credit History Needed

Fast Loans for Bad Credit — Got Bad Credit? No Problem.

Instant Approval / Bad Credit OK – No Credit Check Loans

Sound trustworthy to you? No, I didn’t think so.

An estimated 16% of Americans — almost one in six — have poor credit scores (below 580). For all practical purposes, these people have no access to conventional sources of credit like banks and credit cards. As the payday sector withers away, their only recourse is the wild, wild west of online lending.

Not surprisingly, Herring and his team have been focusing in recent years on online lenders, which, according to the press release, account for a growing share of the small-loan market. If you thought traditional payday lenders were bad, it turns out that online lenders are really sketchy. The AG’s Predatory Lending Unit has recovered more than $45.9 million in restitution and forgiven debt from online lenders. I doubt that’s what the authors of the payday loan legislation had in mind, but I expect Virginia will see a lot more of it.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

29 responses to “You Thought Payday Lenders Were Bad? Welcome to Internet Lending.”

  1. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    “Them that got shall get. Them that not shall lose.”

  2. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    The lower level of these loans being made, may well be due to the economy and stimulus, unemployment and electric and rent moratorium… no?

  3. WayneS Avatar

    On-line Loan Sharks.

    Do they break your virtual legs if you don’t pay “the vig”?

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      They set up a webcam in your house and make your wife and daughter turn webtricks.

  4. DJRippert Avatar
    DJRippert

    Jim – Don’t you understand … the liberal elite are the sum total of all knowledge in the universe. If only the stupid poor people and equally stupid conservatives and libertarians would do what they are told by the liberal elite we would live in utopia. Heaven forbid that people who need payday loans be able to get those loans. That would probably be racist. Somehow. Meanwhile, Mark Herring couldn’t be more of a cartoon character if he dressed up like Harlan Sanders and waved around a fried chicken leg when he talked.

  5. WayneS Avatar

    ” Herring’s press release urges consumers to consider alternatives to “predatory” loans such as borrowing from banks and credit unions.”

    Gosh, why didn’t they think of that already?

    This guy is as out of touch with reality as a Kennedy or a Bush.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Wait! Have you seen the interest bank credit cards have? I’m seeing a difference without distinction.

      1. WayneS Avatar

        Herring did not mention credit cards.

        But my point was that it shouldn’t take a visit from Captain Obvious for Mr. Herring to realize that the reason people go to “predatory payday lenders” is because they don’t qualify for loans from banks and credit unions. He speaks/acts as if he thinks high interest loans are these people’s FIRST choice – as if he thinks they are stupid.

      2. John Harvie Avatar
        John Harvie

        Some predatory lenders’ interest rates are higher by a factor of 10.

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          It’s a bit like being dead, John. Shooting a corpse doesn’t make it any deader. The banks are usurious. The PayDay boys just take it to the next level.

  6. John Harvie Avatar
    John Harvie

    As a bank retiree who worked primarily in the unsecured lending area, aka credit cards I’m wondering if the commercial banking industry might take advantage of the business opportunity the poor credit worthy marketplace affords.

    Banking subsidiaries financially properly structured and in physically suitable locations to profitably serve such a market might prove fruitful to their overall bottom lines.

    As a start, many banks are shedding branches and going online so parts of the closed brick and mortar locations might be converted by their lessors into such bare bones locations. Banks would love to vacate some of their unneeded space since most branches are way too spacious anyway. Banks do not want to be in the real estate business (they hate foreclosures) so perhaps there is a business opportunity here.

    I’m over age in grade so will have to leave that to others.

    1. DJRippert Avatar
      DJRippert

      I worked in the banking industry for a number of years too. I was wondering the same thing. The problem with payday lenders, it seems to me, is that they are “one size fits all” operations. Some people who take out payday loans at what are exorbitant rates pay back those loans on time. The next time those folks need a loan shouldn’t they get a lower rate? I would think that a well run bank could charge a credit risk premium under the rates charged by payday lenders for a sizable percentage of those seeking the loans.

      I see a lot of ads for refinancing student loans these days. Why should an engineering graduate pay the same interest rate as an archeology major if the engineer is part of a degree class with a much lower propensity to default?

      1. WayneS Avatar

        ” I would think that a well run bank could charge a credit risk premium under the rates charged by payday lenders for a sizable percentage of those seeking the loans.”

        That solution is far too sensible to work in the real world…

      2. WayneS Avatar

        ” I would think that a well run bank could charge a credit risk premium under the rates charged by payday lenders for a sizable percentage of those seeking the loans.”

        That solution is far too sensible to work in the real world…

      3. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        The idea of seeing “po folks” as different from students with loans is interesting especially when justifying the interest rates.

        And we talk about “forgiving” the student loans but no such talk about payday loans.

        1. John Harvie Avatar
          John Harvie

          Rightly or wrongly I think there is a difference in that in the student loan case the loan’s maker usually (hopefully) was borrowing to enhance his/her future earning potential via education. The payday loan’s purpose in most cases I suspect not so much.

          And I am making no value judgment here, Larry.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            Yes , but. I will submit that way too many folks are way out over their skies and way too too much looking for forgiveness these days That’s not a conservative approach.

            Student debt is 1.7 trillion dollars and some is said to be uncollectible and will be paid for by taxpayers.

            Back in the day, there were things like “night school” and “working your way through school”, and the like – an aversion to debt unless no choice.

            And the willingness to go so deep in debt is enbolding higher ed charging more and more; they know the students will go into debt, they help them!

        2. WayneS Avatar

          No, Larry, YOU talk about forgiving student loans. I am, and always have been, adamantly opposed to forgiving student loans.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            Well, no. I think the loans are the worst thing since herpes…. and way too many folks are way more willing to go into deep debt on a gamble.. then even the fortunate ones end up years/decades in debt. Is that a careful and conservative way to begin a life? Back in the day, people did not see the wisdom in going into that much debt. Hells bells a car or a house was plenty!

          2. WayneS Avatar

            “Is that a careful and conservative way to begin a life? ”

            It’s how I began my life. My parents weren’t rich, Larry. They helped me as they were able to, and I worked throughout my college years, but I could not have paid for my tuition, books, fees, etc. if not for student loans.

            So, when I graduated I was in debt. I had student loans that needed to be paid back and I paid them back. I never considered it that big a deal – I just put off some other things I wanted to do for a few years.

          3. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            The fact that you and parents actually worked to minimize the debt necessary was “conservative” and prudent IMHO. You said tuition, books, fees, room & board?

  7. Baconator with extra cheese Avatar
    Baconator with extra cheese

    For Equity’s sake Dr Governor should get the state involved in lending. Maybe Virginia can start by making loans to Bristol casino patrons… sound like a wise investment.
    Or maybe for Equity’s sake we should ban credit scores and make every loan the same… I would guess out 45% would cover the defaults. But paying that mortgage would suck. I love my 840 credit score and my 2.8% mortgage it got me.

  8. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    So, what’s the difference between “predatory” payday loans and higher ed loans in terms of your “concern” AND what role you might have government play in each?

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Payday loans are taken for food and necessities. Education loans may result in upward mobility and may put a POC on par with a WASP.

    2. WayneS Avatar

      Interest rates; and visits from guys named “Rocko” or “Tiny”.

  9. Howard Bergman Avatar
    Howard Bergman

    I’ve wondered why there are no co-operative savings and loan organizations, funded with monthly contributions of the members, offering low interest payday loans to them. I suspect there are regulatory hurdles that are difficult to overcome. Could someone provide some background? Thanks.

    1. John Harvie Avatar
      John Harvie

      Just off hand I suspect there would be two problems unless this were chartered (and initially funded) by an organization or individuals with some banking knowledge.

      A business plan/application has to be filed with the state banking commissioner. The principals would be vetted by the FBI. Also NCUA would become involved if federally chartered.

      I fear the proposed “members” themselves would have little funds available to invest and would be unschooled if not out rightly suspicious of the the world of “investing”.

      The proposed organization would need to offer check cashing services to folks with limited IDs and no permanent employment.

      1. Howard Bergman Avatar
        Howard Bergman

        John, thanks for your comments. I’m sure you’re on the mark with both points: regs and funding.

        I wonder, though, if this type of co-operative could be regulated the same as a pay-day lender, whose only business to collect premiums from members and give payday loans to members, but as a non-profit.

        As for funding, they would probably need seed-money from other sources, for example, successful business people in the community or wealthy individuals who do not like payday lenders.

        Once it gets going, a small bi-weekly contribution from members should cover the payday loans needed in a month. Based on Jim’s data, individuals, on average, only need 3-4 loans per year for $400 per loan.

        In any case, I’ve wondered why lower cost payday services have not entered the market, if there is actually money to be made. (Which I understand to be Jim’s point).

        1. John Harvie Avatar
          John Harvie

          HB, your comments are spot on!

          Nonprofits would be great. Maybe some altruistic banks would originate a few as a trial… as long, of course as there was no negative impact on their bottom line. As an aside, your non profits would be grooming some of the deplorables to become future commercial bank clients!

          Do usually gooders only do their good up to a certain point, I fear.

Leave a Reply