Yes, Virginia, There Is Critical Race Theory In Our Schools

by Elizabeth Schultz

School districts across Virginia have been expending resources, directing staff time, and hiring consultants to address “equity” in curriculum delivery and for professional development of teachers and other employees. Fairfax and Loudoun County, the two largest counties in the Commonwealth, have set the lead in driving the changes in education and embracing critical race theory and “anti-bias” in their respective divisions.

Critical Race Theory (CRT) pushes the distorted concept that the most important thing about a person is his or her race. It divides people by those who are “minoritized” and those who are “privileged” and “oppressors,” advancing Marxist ideology that, by default, all interactions are derived from racism, our history and nation is built on racism, and all inequities are, yes, ascribed to racism. The color of one’s skin defines whether they are racist, not their beliefs or actions.

As a result, to undo the professed mantle of inherent racism in all aspects of society, CRT demands “diversity, equity, and inclusion”, addressing “justice”, and, according to activists like Ibrahm X. Kendi, the Center for Antiracist Research director at Boston University, requires people to become “anti-racist.”

Efforts to rewrite social studies curriculum with a goal of teaching from “diverse perspectives” began with Fairfax County teachers in 2018, joining with teachers from Albemarle, Charlottesville and the City of Virginia Beach. It later became a statewide endeavor to create an “anti-racist and culturally-responsive” curriculum, joined by teachers from Madison and Powhatan counties. The effort centered first on rewriting the fourth grade Virginia Studies curriculum.

At that time, Fairfax County Public Schools’ (FCPS) social studies coordinator, Colleen Eddy, identified that the work was intended to address the “overrepresentation of white and Eurocentric history” and the lack of “diverse perspectives in education.” The overhaul of the curriculum was done in collaboration with the framework created by Teaching Tolerance, an extension of the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), which has since been re-monikered to “Learning for Justice.” The objective was to “examine materials, events, and institutions critically attending to power, position, and bias,” with the intended use in 3rd, 4th, 6th, 7th, and 11th-grade classrooms.

A perusal of the Learning for Justice professional development and materials pre-populated for teachers to deliver in K-12 classrooms includes articles like one in which a teacher calls for “educators to commit to making schools — at all levels — critical active conscience spaces that center people long denied space, voice and freedom.”

Long before the Nikole Hannah-Jones and The New York Times Magazine’s divisive and erroneous “1619 Project”, which the NYT was later forced to quietly correct, the SPLC’s Teaching Tolerance list of “Essential Knowledge” included direction for teaching 3rd through 5th graders that “the United States was founded on protecting the interests of white, Christian men who owned property,” that the foundational growth of the U.S. economy was slavery, and that our founding documents were created to “protect the institution of slavery.”

In a July 2020 press release, FCPS included a comprehensive background on the work done by the division, its influence to collaborate across the state, and the work of Eddy to effect curriculum changes related to “bias, identity, and multiple perspectives” that had been done over the prior 18 months.

Simultaneous to the overhaul of curriculum materials by FCPS staff, Fairfax County residents experienced the unprecedented deployment of the policy known as “One Fairfax.” The Board of Supervisors and School Board swiftly adopted the declaration of a broad new effort to make all decisions in the county – on everything from education, housing, policing, and the budget – through the “lens of equity.” Outside consultants hired to advise staff in the county and school system successfully advanced the “lens of equity” progressive agenda, which has also been embedded in cities across the country and is backed by funding from George Soros.

In like-minded concert, the FCPS School Board secured a presentation by Kendi, expending $44,000 for a one-hour presentation — which they have refused to release publicly — and a supply of his books, inevitably bound for distribution to teachers and staff to further their “equity-driven” professional development.

In short order after the adoption of “One Fairfax,” policy decisions by FCPS on crucial issues such as school boundaries were made by setting the “socioeconomic and/or racial composition of students” as the primary criteria for establishing school boundaries.

The new demand of “One Fairfax” to embed “equity” in all decisions was then turned on the nation’s top ranked Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology (TJHSST). FCPS’ Superintendent Scott Brabrand, who had previously eliminated the executive role of a ‘Chief Academic Officer’ in exchange for a ‘Chief Equity Officer’, announced the revised TJHSST admissions plan to reduce the number of Asian students at the selective governor’s high school.

Brabrand laid out the plan for the School Board to eliminate the existing merit-based admissions test, designed to ensure selection of students with the greatest aptitude for math and science – regardless of race – and adopt in its place a “merit lottery.” The then-proposed and since-adopted admissions plan — now the subject of a lawsuit – opened TJHSST to all eighth-graders, merely establishing a minimum GPA of 3.5 to ostensibly increase “equity of opportunity.”

As the effort to revamp curriculum expanded beyond Fairfax County with the statewide work undertaken in 2018 and 2019, FCPS’ Eddy then became appointed to the “Culturally Relevant and Inclusive Education Practices Advisory Committee” to the Virginia Department of Education (VDOE), established by direction of the 2020 Legislative Session of the Virginia General Assembly.

The legislation passed by the General Assembly calls for submission of recommendations on history and social science Standards of Learning by the Committee to the VDOE for a 2021-2022 review, which the Board of Education “shall consider” with required input on matters such as “historical dehumanizing injustice and discrimination” and “acknowledgment of inequity on the individual level, such as biased speech and harassment, and injustice at the institutional or systemic level, such as discrimination, and the harmful impact of inequity and injustice on the community, historically and today.”

The division and statewide-level work that has been cloaked under the guise of being “inclusive,” “cultural responsive,” ensuring “equity,” and embracing “anti-racism” is well documented. The underlying themes are driving people to be consumed about race over individual conduct, promoting race-shaming students, welcoming dangerous Marxist ideology, and working to divide an educational system by teaching young children to see and judge people by race, rather than by class or character.

Parents in Loudoun, including those who survived the Maoist purge, have been particularly vocal about pushing back on their school board, with minority parents decrying the actual racism that is behind and promoted by critical race theory. Instead of authentic conversations about what unites us as Virginians and Americans, parents are calling for school boards to end to this hate-promoting, divisive indoctrination in our classrooms.

So, yes Virginia; despite protestations of school boards in Fairfax and Loudoun that they are not “teaching” it, there has been a comprehensive, deliberative, and manipulative effort of school staff and the school boards, underway for years. The tactics have been advised and funded by outside progressive consultants, groups, and money — then intentionally expanded statewide — to embrace and deeply-embed critical race theory in our schools.

Elizabeth L. Schultz, a Senior Fellow for Parents Defending Education, is the mother of four sons, three former FCPS students and one current student. This column, republished with permission, was published originally in The Fairfax County Times.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

36 responses to “Yes, Virginia, There Is Critical Race Theory In Our Schools”

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      It is a BR reprint because of the liberal (Har, humor) use of the term Marx, -ism, -ist.

      If only one of the Fox hosts would slip up and associate fossil fuels with Karl Marx then the climate change debate would be over.

  1. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    1 pick an amorphous term.
    2 rail against it.

    Instead of debating the evils of CRT as you have defined it, try applying your arguments, not to the strawman definition of CRT, but to this one: https://www.americanbar.org/groups/crsj/publications/human_rights_magazine_home/civil-rights-reimagining-policing/a-lesson-on-critical-race-theory/

  2. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    I hate black jelly beans. Let me tell you why. First they are yellow and taste like lemons.

    “Critical Race Theory (CRT) pushes the distorted concept that the most important thing about a person is his or her race. It divides people by those who are “minoritized” and those who are “privileged” and “oppressors,” advancing Marxist ideology that, by default, all interactions are derived from racism, our history and nation is built on racism, and all inequities are, yes, ascribed to racism. The color of one’s skin defines whether they are racist, not their beliefs or actions.”

    Completely distorts CRT. I guess the Captain was right. Our K-12 system has failed us an this article proves it. This story is an example of the image that accompanies it.

    “Principles of the CRT Practice

    While recognizing the evolving and malleable nature of CRT, scholar Khiara Bridges outlines a few key tenets of CRT, including:

    Recognition that race is not biologically real but is socially constructed and socially significant. It recognizes that science (as demonstrated in the Human Genome Project) refutes the idea of biological racial differences. According to scholars Richard Delgado and Jean Stefancic, race is the product of social thought and is not connected to biological reality.
    Acknowledgement that racism is a normal feature of society and is embedded within systems and institutions, like the legal system, that replicate racial inequality. This dismisses the idea that racist incidents are aberrations but instead are manifestations of structural and systemic racism.
    Rejection of popular understandings about racism, such as arguments that confine racism to a few “bad apples.” CRT recognizes that racism is codified in law, embedded in structures, and woven into public policy. CRT rejects claims of meritocracy or “colorblindness.” CRT recognizes that it is the systemic nature of racism that bears primary responsibility for reproducing racial inequality.
    Recognition of the relevance of people’s everyday lives to scholarship. This includes embracing the lived experiences of people of color, including those preserved through storytelling, and rejecting deficit-informed research that excludes the epistemologies of people of color.
    CRT does not define racism in the traditional manner as solely the consequence of discrete irrational bad acts perpetrated by individuals but is usually the unintended (but often foreseeable) consequence of choices. It exposes the ways that racism is often cloaked in terminology regarding “mainstream,” “normal,” or “traditional” values or “neutral” policies, principles, or practices. And, as scholar Tara Yosso asserts, CRT can be an approach used to theorize, examine, and challenge the ways which race and racism implicitly and explicitly impact social structures, practices, and discourses. CRT observes that scholarship that ignores race is not demonstrating “neutrality” but adherence to the existing racial hierarchy. For the civil rights lawyer, this can be a particularly powerful approach for examining race in society. Particularly because CRT has recently come under fire, understanding CRT and some of its primary tenets is vital for the civil rights lawyer who seeks to eradicate racial inequality in this country.”

    See ABA link in previous.

    1. As Henry Rogers stated when asked to define racism:

      ” [Racism is] A collection of racist policies that lead to racial inequity that is substantiated by racist ideas.”

      I learned in high school that you cannot define a term with that term……but I guess that is a white supremacist Euro-centric oppressor idea.

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        If you say so.

        Rwanda? Genocide. Hutu and Tutsi. Your Euro-centric oppressor would be confused. In fact it would be in wonder at Myanmar too. CRT, as summarized by the ABA, is as applicable in those countries as ours.

        Why do I care about Rogers(Kendi)? Why do you? His definitions are no more valid than those of our Ms. Shultz, who seems more engaged with Kendi than CRT.

        I can assure you that if you search, you will find people who claim to have a “mathematically proven” system for winning in roulette too.

        Christ once rode an ass. Now the asses ride him.

        Q-uacks Abound.

        Sorry for the continuous editing. This crappy ol’ iPad sucks… badly. Disqus locks it up something fierce.

  3. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
    James Wyatt Whitehead

    Where have you been Elizabeth Shultz? This has been going on for the past 5 years in Loudoun and Fairfax. Where were you when we needed you? You are blowing the whistle 5 years too late. Damage has been done. This is embedded now. It will take a crow bar to pry out CRT. Just like Pearl Harbor: At Dawn You Slept!

  4. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    It seems that every we have a post in which someone warns of the use of CRT in Virginia schools and the dire consequences, there is a different definition of CRT. Today it is “the distorted concept that the most important thing about a person is his or her race.”

    ” Earlier, Jim Sherlock defined it as: ”

    “It postulates that racism is the driving force in society, that in order to understand power relations, in order to understand institutions such as the law, education, the Constitution, social relations, you have to understand that through the lens of race.”

    Those definitions are quite different.

    This post is full of lots of words, but, when I finished reading it, I still was not sure what she is warning us against. What are these people afraid of? What changes to the history and social studies curriculum are being made that has them so upset? All we get is hysterical rhetoric and no specifics.

    If CRT really posits that the most important thing about a person is his race, then Virginia society and its leaders have been practitioners of CRT for generations. As I discussed in some detail earlier, Virginians have been obsessed with race.

    https://www.baconsrebellion.com/crt-and-virginia-history/

    People could not go to certain schools solely due to their race. People could not drink out of designated water fountains solely due to their race. Prince Edward closed its public schools for five years solely because of the race of certain students who wanted to attend. People could not swim in certain public swimming pools solely due to their race. People could not marry certain people solely due to the race of one of the partners. A policeman knelt on a Black man and slowly killed him in public because of his race. And I could go on and on.

    Now, some people say, “Yes, all that was awful and evil. But, we now have equality in our laws and we need to put the past behind us. We should not focus on race anymore.” That is pure chutzpah, telling Black folks, whose fathers and grandfathers were denied a decent education, ability to buy homes, forced to live in certain areas of town, denied entry to well-paying jobs, all because of their race, that now race is not a factor. Fairness (equity) demands, not equal outcomes, but that everyone starts out even and there is a level playing ground. That is not the case now.

    The people who are raising the alarm about CRT can’t seem to agree exactly what it is they are so excited about. The more I read and hear these dire warnings against CRT, I tend to think that many are using CRT as an excuse to deny that American society has been racist in the past and those racist attitudes shaped many of our institutions and laws, which, in turn shaped the society we live in today. Furthermore, they seem to be afraid that their kids may learn about this aspect of American history and society.

    1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
      James Wyatt Whitehead

      Mr. Dick. With respect, how would you respond to Ty Smith’s statement on the Critical Race Theory?
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=55L2CNaBfHo&t=6s

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        What if it were called “Critical Lunch Card Theory”?

        In a nutshell, this is not a mathematical theory. A single counter example doesn’t disprove it. But you know that.

        He is the product of 3 things, two of which were in his control; hard work, determination, and being born in 1982 and not 1942.

        Had he gone to school in the 1950s, he wouldn’t have had the lunch card on which to build his discrimination myth, but then he wouldn’t have had the nutrition that gave him the opportunity to develop the brain that allowed hard work and determination to be effective.

        Don’t know what universities and medical schools he attended, but dollar to a dime says there would have been a big difference in outcome had he applied to them in 1960 and 1964, respectively.

        As an historian, you may have encountered another theory, which I’m going to see if I can find later, in which the author postulates that it takes 90 years to establish “lasting peace”. Basically, 3 generations must pass before the memories and the injuries that caused the war will be forgotten, if not forgiven.

        Well, maybe by 2054…

        1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
          James Wyatt Whitehead

          CRT’s axiom cannot be proven like this one.
          https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/65/Pythag_anim.gif

          1. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            C+. Not all the elements are graphically displayed.

            That is not the usual graphical proof of the Pythagorean Theorem. While you know it to be true, are you convinced, at sight, that the 3 black areas are equated by those particular folds?

            The usual approach would involve the total FOV square (a+b)^2, and the folding of all 4 triangles into the rhombus (c^2) in the middle.

          2. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
            James Wyatt Whitehead

            I had to go to summer school for Geometry. 32 boys and 1 girl. One heck of a good teacher. I passed the class and the one girl became my first girl friend who went on to be Miss Prince William County at the fair that summer. So I think I should get an honorable mention A+.

          3. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Okay! You get an attaboy… for beating out 31 rivals. You haven’t shot an arrow through any ax heads lately, have you?

          4. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
            James Wyatt Whitehead

            Didn’t last long. Miss Prince William County’s German Shepherd bit me. I dumped her.

          5. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Two types of people to stay away from — girls with big dogs and people who play knock-knock at funerals.

        2. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
          James Wyatt Whitehead

          I think Ty Smith’s lunch card story is a good one. It shows how our perceptions of ourselves, others, and the relationships can easily get distorted and even set up to divide. I see something good in our youth today. So many born after the 1960s have built positive relationships where race is not a factor for that relationship. So many have moved beyond that construct. Why revert to a world of division by rearranging the deck chairs?

          One example might not prove much. So how can the success of these Americans be explained?
          https://d3t1qz3s2moybi.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/1_Ns1cTIIsAVVLkg3soieUYw.jpg

          1. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive
          2. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            There are many ways to make money… marriage is perhaps the worst.

      2. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
        Dick Hall-Sizemore

        In response to you, James, in the first place, my Southside Virginia-developed brain cannot follow very well anybody that talks that fast!

        But, I did understand the gist of his argument, which is that he did not let discrimination deter him. I think his example of the lunch card illustrates very well what critical race theory is about. There was a system in which children were singled out and race, perhaps unconsciously, was an element of that system. He got angry at being singled out, but other kids in that situation may have become convinced that, somehow, they were less worthy than others.

        When she was little, our daughter overheard my wife comment to a visitor that she had a friend at school that was Black. She looked up and asked, “Who?” My wife replied, saying the boy’s name, and my daughter said, “Oh”, and went back to playing. I wish that race could be just that for all of us, an incidental characteristic, rather than a defining one.

        I became friends with a Black man in my office and that friendship has helped me get closer to that point.

        I have been concerned for many years, before I even heard of CRT, about the emphasis on race and that emphasis may continue to divide society. I feel that some proponents of CRT put too much emphasis on race and that some critics over dramatize the possible effects of that emphasis.

        I would like us to move to a post-racial society, such as the one shown in Star Trek and other science fiction. But, we are not there yet. The effects of centuries of discrimination are still embedded in our institutions and consciousness. To take one example, for many years, the policies of the U.S. Dept. of Agriculture resulted in Black farmers being denied loans and grants. It was not explicit, or overt,discrimination, but, because USDA loans were based on the credit histories of the applicants, they worked against Black farmers, who had systematically been denied credit by banks, especially in the South. The federal government has paid out a lot of money in settlement of suits brought on this issue. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pigford_v._Glickman However, a lot of harm was done and that harm, in the form of lost value in inheritances, for example, cannot be undone.

        USDA policies have been changed, but, that does not render the situation equitable. Generations of farmers and their heirs lost value.

        It is this aspect of CRT that I find valuable–an acknowledgement that race was a major factor in the development of systems that exist today and a recognition that the effects of those race-influenced policies and practices are still present. Some people, whose positions and advantages are derived, at least in some part, from those race-influenced policies and practices in the past seem pretty anxious to deny that.

        1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
          James Wyatt Whitehead

          I think Ty Smith was on one of those school board meeting timers so he was trying to get a lengthy statement read before the buzzer blew. I do love to hear the deliberate and measured speech of a Halifax Virginia man. A unique accent as well that can only be found in the southside. Thanks for sharing.

        2. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          and I’m pretty much where Dick is.

          I think he’s dead-on correct and much more articulate about it than I.

    2. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      The sad thing about CRT is that the developers used the R-word. Had they but developed the definitions and principles based on which end of the egg one opens first, or simply used the word “feature”, or “discriminator” then the theory itself would be less of a target, forcing critics to the specifics of the application.

      But then, in a country with a 300-year history of “discrimination based on race”, we’d devolve to the same positions. Just can’t get past it.

  5. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    “It divides people by those who are “minoritized” and those who are “privileged” and “oppressors…”

    Actually it just points out that society itself “divides people by those who are “minoritized” and those who are “privileged” and “oppressors””. Many of those who have and do benefit from that division don’t like that very much.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      As if Jim Crow, segregation, massive resistance did not “divide” people, but telling the true history about it actually does.

      Talk about revising history!

      Understanding history changes people’s attitudes. Not that long ago, we’d hear Conservatives blather endlessly: ” “Those Who Do Not Learn History Are Doomed To Repeat it”.

      No more. We can’t teach kids true history because it will “divide us”.

      Oh, and pointing this reality out in BR – well heckfire that’s “trolling”.

      yepper… this is where Conservatism is headed… these days.

    2. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Not to worry, Mate. The States like Tennessee have passed laws against CRT that are so incredibly vague and are so certainly unconstitutional that it’s bound to result in a teacher being prosecuted.

      Hmmm, Tennessee? Wonder what Dayton, Tennessee is like midsummer?

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Affe_mit_Sch%C3%A4del.jpg

  6. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    CRT has been twisted into something it’s not by folks who seem to like to promulgate misinformation as a partisan tactic.

    CRT is a legal concept. The issue about the schools themselves is more like this:

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/70def6e0ae4e0c430ccc98559af0d2098b7de816de65114d7f87b1000770f95d.jpg

    after schools had taught this for decades:

    https://penntoday.upenn.edu/sites/default/files/2018-06/cake.jpg

    Yes, it’s “Marxism” to teach the truth about history but it was fine to teach white kids lies while we forced blacks kids to attend different schools.

    We just can’t have the truth taught because it would make white kids feel guilty and piss off their parents and grand parents who want Jim Crow monuments left alone.

    1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
      James Wyatt Whitehead

      I never been a fan of Zinn or his book. Zinn’s intersection of culture, politics, economics, and race is narrow with no turning lanes.

      1. Matt Adams Avatar
        Matt Adams

        Zinn like the 1619 project just ignored the fact checkers and overstated their points (without factual evidence of course).

    2. Matt Adams Avatar
      Matt Adams

      If you believe that Howard Zinn’s work was factual history than you have zero understanding of history. He fabricated and or overstated many of his citations.

  7. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    We, more than any country in the world, have studied education. There are on the order of 1000 schools of education in the good old US of A. That many minds working on the problem is bound to find a solution.

    Note: A not THE.

  8. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    “That it shall be unlawful for any teacher in any of the Universities, Normals and all other public schools of the State which are supported in whole or in part by the public school funds of the State, to teach any theory that denies the Story of the Divine Creation of man as taught in the Bible, and to teach instead that man has descended from a lower order of animals… or anything to do with race.”

  9. Fred Costello Avatar
    Fred Costello

    Some questions that might be asked of the School Boards:
    1. Are the schools teaching that the foundation of the U.S. was set in 1619 or 1776?
    2. Are the schools teaching that the U.S. is the “melting pot” in which people of all nations unite, without reference to nationality or race?
    3. How many different races are identified in the K-12 program? At what age are the distinctions first made? Why are the distinctions made?
    4. Are the students taught how the laws and legal institutions in the United States create and maintain social, economic, and political inequalities between whites and nonwhites, especially African Americans?
    5. Where can we see the work product of The Virginia Department of Education’s Culturally Relevant and Inclusive Education Practices Advisory Committee?

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      I agree with your questions but you did leave out one.

      Are Virginia schools teaching the TRUTH about our history?

      sometimes, it seems like the answer is along the lines of ” all of that stuff is over with, we’re past it, no need to rehash it”.

  10. […] too, such as the 2021 Virginia governor’s race, which was largely shaped by conflicts over how issues of race and racism are taught in the K-12 curriculum, and transgender student […]

Leave a Reply