Wojick On Whales IV: Deaths Spiked with Surveys

A Humpback carcass that washed up in New Jersey recently. Photo: Marine Mammal Stranding Center

By David Wojick

The recent deaths of seven whales off New Jersey, mostly humpbacks, drew national media attention. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Fisheries Directorate is responsible for whales. An outrageous statement by their spokesperson got me to do some research on humpback whale deaths.

The results are appalling. The evidence seems clear that offshore wind development is killing whales by the hundreds.

Here is the statement as reported in the press:

“NOAA said it has been studying what it calls ‘unusual mortality events’ involving 174 humpback whales along the East Coast since January 2016. Agency spokesperson Lauren Gaches said that period pre-dates offshore wind preparation activities in the region.” Gaches is NOAA Fisheries press chief.

The “unusual mortality” data are astounding. Basically, the humpback death rate roughly tripled starting in 2016 and continued high thereafter. You can see it here.  That data is just for humpback whales, with a dramatic acceleration in particular between 2016 and 2020.

The claim that this huge jump in mortality predates offshore wind preparation activities is wildly false. In fact, it coincides with the large-scale onset of these activities. This strong correlation is strong evidence of causation, especially since no other possible cause has appeared.

To begin with, offshore lease sales really geared up 2015-16, with nine big sales off New Jersey, New York, Delaware and Massachusetts. These sales must have generated a lot of activity, likely including potentially damaging sonar.

In fact, 2016 also saw the beginning of what are called geotechnical and site characterization surveys. These surveys are actually licensed by NOAA Fisheries, under what are called Incidental Harassment Authorizations or IHA’s.

There is some seriously misleading jargon here. IHA’s are “incidental” to some other activity, in this case offshore wind development. They are not incidental to the whales. The term “harassment” specifically includes injuring the whales. That is called “level A harassment.”

To date NOAA has issued an astounding 46 one-year IHA’s for offshore wind sites. Site characterization typically includes the protracted use of what I call “machine gun sonar.” This shipboard device emits an incredibly loud noise several times a second, often for hours at a time, as the ship slowly maps the sea floor.

Mapping often takes many days to complete. A blaster can log hundreds of miles surveying a 10-by-10-mile site. Each IHA is typically for an entire year.

Here is a list of the IHA’s issued to date and those applied for.

There are lots of ways this sonar blasting might cause whales to die. Simply fleeing the incredible noise could cause ship strikes or fish gear entanglements, the two leading causes of whale deaths. Or the whales could be deafened, increasing their chances of being struck by a ship later on. Direct bleeding injury, like getting their ears damaged, is another known risk, possibly leading to death from infection. There can be a big time lag between blasting and death.

Note also that these deaths need not be in the immediate vicinity of the sonar blasting, so spatial correlation is unlikely. Humpbacks in particular are prodigious travelers. One group was tracked traveling 3,000 miles in just 28 days, over 100 miles a day on average. Another group routinely migrates 5,000 miles. Both are winter-summer migrations which can happen twice a year.

Thus, a sonar blasting, site characterization in one place could easily lead to multiple whale deaths hundreds of miles away. If one of these blasters suddenly goes off near a group of whales they might go off in different directions, then slowly die.

The point is that the huge 2016 jump in annual humpback mortality coincides with the huge jump in NOAA Incidental Harassment Authorizations. It is that simple and surely NOAA Fisheries knows this.

Nor is this just about humpbacks. Some of the dead whales off New Jersey are endangered sperm whales. And, of course, there are the severely endangered North Atlantic Right Whales, on the verge of extinction.

Even worse, the IHA’s are about to make a much bigger jump. There are eleven pending IHA applications and eight of these are for actually constructing 8 different monster wind “farms”.

Driving the hundreds of enormous monopiles that hold up the turbine towers and blades will be far louder than the sonic blasters approved to date, especially with eight sites going at once. These construction sites range from Virginia to Massachusetts, with a concentration off New Jersey and New York.  For more on this likely noise storm see.

Clearly, we need a moratorium on new Incidental Harassment Authorizations until the safety of the whales and other marine species can be assured. Hundreds of whales may have already been killed by offshore wind activities. The evidence is right there.

David Wojick, Ph.D. is an independent analyst working at the intersection of science, technology and policy. He has been on the faculty of Carnegie Mellon University and the staffs of the U.S. Office of Naval Research and the Naval Research Lab.  This article was originally published at cfact.org. 


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

42 responses to “Wojick On Whales IV: Deaths Spiked with Surveys”

  1. Stephen Haner Avatar
    Stephen Haner

    So, now somebody needs to dig just a bit deeper, get the records and find out exactly when the surveys started banging away, when perhaps the tempo rose or fell, and then cross reference the known whale deaths. Perhaps that will happen.

      1. Stephen Haner Avatar
        Stephen Haner

        That has no more data depth than the post, and regulators would be inclined to defend their permit, dontchathink? It calls out for more.

    1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
      James Wyatt Whitehead

      Agreed. Backup plan. Send Kirk and Spock on a time warp, save the whales, and time warp ahead to a future that is a little saner. Better hurry. William Shatner is 90.

  2. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    Drill, Baby, Drill!! Eh, Wojick!!

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      The oil survey use massive explosions to find deep pockets.

      Windmill construction uses side-scan high-frequency, low power sonar.

      1. Pile driving dosen’t use sonar: Old knowledge…
        “Especially the noise created during pile-driving operations involves sound pressure levels that are high enough to impair the hearing system of marine mammals near the source and disrupt their behaviour at considerable distance from the construction site.” Jul 6, 2006
        https://tethys.pnnl.gov/sites/default/files/publications/Effects_of_offshore_wind_farm_noise_on_marine-mammals_and_fish-1-.pdf

  3. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    “ The humpback whale population has grown off the East Coast, and their favored food like menhaden are swimming closer to shore in recent seasons. That can be exposing them to more risk of collision with coastwise vessel traffic, from seasonal recreational boats and year-round commercial ship, tug and barge traffic.”

    Maybe, just maybe, we needn’t look any further than Reedville on the Great Wicomoco.

    1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
      Eric the half a troll

      Omega Protein Corporation

  4. Bubba1855 Avatar

    has anyone read this…https://arstechnica.com/science/2023/01/wanted-by-scientists-dead-birds-and-bats-felled-by-renewables/
    ?
    between the whales and the birds this project is going to get really complicated.

  5. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    From the article you cited:

    “Of the whales examined, about 40 percent had evidence of human interaction, either ship strike or entanglement.”

  6. Mitigating without facts isn’t mitigation.
    Oct. 2021 cvow-construction-and-operations-plan
    p4-567 Dominion Energy would avoid and minimize disturbance of wildlife, particularly endangered sea turtles and marine mammals. Avoidance, minimization, and mitigation measures include soft-start pile driving, dedicated marine mammal and sea turtle observers on vessels, and other activities.
    p. 4-84 “Noise mitigation requirements and methods have not been finalized at this stage of permitting; therefore, these two levels of reduction were applied to potentially mimic the use of noise mitigation options such as bubble curtains.
    p. 4-103 “The Project would obtain necessary permits to address potential impacts to marine mammals, sea turtles and fisheries resources from underwater noise and would establish appropriate and practicable mitigation and monitoring measures through discussions with regulatory agencies.”
    https://www.boem.gov/renewable-energy/state-activities/cvow-construction-and-operations-plan

    1. Who is looking at the combined impacts?
      https://www.boem.gov/renewable-energy/state-activities
      Mass and Rhode Island
      8 leases, 7 projects
      New York 1 and 1
      New Jersey 2 and 2
      Maryland 1 and 1
      Virginia 1 and 1
      NC 1 and 1

      1. Block Island (RI) is in service. It seems like a good place to start a long-term study on whether operation of offshore wind turbines has any detrimental effects on marine life

        1. energyNOW_Fan Avatar
          energyNOW_Fan

          I suspect Block Island is not very representative in terms of size number and location

          1. True, it is small. It only has five or six turbines, if I recall correctly, but it’s the only one we have on-line so far in the migration paths of these whales.

          2. Block Island is 5 turbines 593 ft tall 3.8 miles offshore vs CVOW 176 turbines 800 ft tall 27 miles offshore. CVOW will need to make a lot more noise to install them. How many whales will be injured or die from the impacts before any study is concluded?

  7. It gets worse. The dramatic decline in North Atlantic Right Whale numbers also started in 2016, when the Humpback death rate tripled.

  8. James McCarthy Avatar
    James McCarthy

    I, like many I’m sure, admire and am fond of whales of all types. As one commenter noted, humpbacks are experiencing a population growth. NOAA offers no data on the humpback population; so, it’s difficult to assess the effect of 174 of their deaths over a 6 yesr period. More critically, the lack of forensic info with respect to cause(s) offers little credible evidence to connect off shore construction with the deaths.

  9. If only ‘environmentalists’ would fight as hard to protect whales as they did the snail darter…

    1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
      Eric the half a troll

      If only Conservatives would fight to save whales as hard as they fight to promote fossil fuels…

        1. I guess I’d better not show you my elephant skin boots, eh?

          1. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            With ivory eyelets for the rhino horn laces, no doubt.

          2. Nope. Just plain old brown cowboy boots.

            They’re 35 years old. The hide was taken and imported in accordance with the laws in effect at that time.

            Elephant is the toughest leather I’ve ever encountered, but not much stiffer than regular old bull hide. It makes for a comfortable and long-lasting pair of boots.

          3. Nope. Just plain old brown cowboy boots.

            They’re 35 years old. The hide was taken and imported in accordance with the laws in effect at that time.

            Elephant is the toughest leather I’ve ever encountered, but not much stiffer than regular old bull hide. It makes for a comfortable and long-lasting pair of boots.

          4. Nope. Just plain old brown cowboy boots.

            They’re 35 years old. The hide was taken and imported in accordance with the laws in effect at that time.

            Elephant is the toughest leather I’ve ever encountered, but not much stiffer than regular old bull hide. It makes for a comfortable and long-lasting pair of boots.

      1. I don’t promote either of those things.

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          You are just one Conservative.

          1. Good point – and I have long suspected that I not a ‘typical’ conservative…

            But regardless of what ‘conservatives’ do or fail to do, the hypocrisy of some who call themselves environmentalists is disappointing to me.

          2. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Well, Euell Gibbons we ain’t. Besides for my tastes, pine nuts are edible, but the bark is not.

        2. Eric the half a troll Avatar
          Eric the half a troll

          I did not fight for the snail darter…

          1. I did.

            Or, at any rate, I supported delaying completion of the dam until the potential effects on the fish were properly studied and mitigation efforts were made.

            Which is exactly the same thing I support re: wind farms & whales.

  10. so it’s not lobster pots? who would have guessed!

  11. Here’s an interesting website:

    https://dosits.org/

    No, seriously, you should check it out. The initials stand for “Discovery of Sound in the Seas”. The site is dedicated to the study of sound/noise in the earth’s oceans.

    They appear to make an effort at being straight-down-the-middle – providing factual information with little commentary.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Worthy of six thumbs! Nice site. How’d you ever stumble on it?

      1. Just a random search for “ocean noise whale turbine” or something like that.

        It really is a gem.

  12. walter smith Avatar
    walter smith

    So you hope the whales died from not being vaxxed?
    And you pretend to be a good human.

  13. Interesting how the Marine Mammal Foundation is focused on funding climate change studies. The 2023 proposals are for Marine Mammal Health in a Changing Climate. In 2022,
    7 of 8 grants were CC related. In 2021, they did support the
    Effects of Sound in the Ocean on Marine Mammals conference, but there are no new publications listed on their site

    https://www.mmc.gov/grants-and-research-survey/grant-awards/2022-grant-awards/

  14. beachguy Avatar

    A common environmentalist rationalization when the oil industry is potentially endangering wildlife is, “If it only kills one bird (seal, Snail Darter, etc.) that’s one too many.”

    Since we don’t know the actual extent of damage to whales from offshore wind production, perhaps we should play it safe and use as this as the accepted standard.
    (My feeble attempt at sarcasm)

Leave a Reply