Wojick on Whales II: Missing BOEM Report?

by David Wojick

In my previous article I raised this question: what is the potential adverse impact of Virginia’s massive offshore wind project on the severely endangered North Atlantic Right Whales? Answering this basic question should be a central feature of the upcoming Environmental Impact Analysis (EIA) required for the wind project by the National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA).

The 70-ton North Atlantic Right Whales migrate through Virginia’s offshore waters twice a year, making the impact of these proposed huge offshore wind projects a serious question. I have been doing some digging, and the results are puzzling. We may have some secret science going on.

To begin with, while there has been a lot of research on these whales, it has almost all been done in their northern and southern habitat zones. There is almost nothing on migration, even though migration is especially dangerous for any critters that do it, whales included.

So, it is not clear that we even have a clear picture of how they migrate through the waters where these massive wind projects are proposed. A lot of the risk depends on how they migrate, and we seem not to know much about that.

I say we “seem not to know” because someone in the federal government may actually know more than they are prepared to divulge. This is where it gets puzzling, as follows.

The EIA for the risk to North Atlantic Right Whales, of which there are only a few hundred alive, is up to the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management or BOEM. They are the folks who need to understand where the whales are and what danger they are in from the proposed huge Mid-Atlantic wind facilities, such as Virginia’s.

BOEM has done a major study of Right Whales off of Virginia. They describe this study here. The title seems plain enough: “Understanding Whale Presence in the Virginia Offshore Wind Energy Area Using Passive Acoustic Monitoring.” Simply put, these endangered whales are tracked by listening to them. They do lot of vocalizing.

Here is the project description:

BOEM Information Need(s) to be Addressed: The Federal waters off the coast of Virginia are of tremendous interest for offshore wind development and potential oil and gas exploration. However, there are few datasets in this area that provide for a long-term, complete seasonal understanding of the occurrence of marine protected species in these planning areas. Currently there is no sound source verification data for High Resolution Geophysical (HRG) equipment use in the Virginia Offshore Wind Energy Area (WEA). The existing data gaps present regulators and industry with risk due to potential conflicts with the Endangered Species Act, Marine Mammal Protection Act, and the National Environmental Policy Act. This study will assist in BOEM’s fulfillment of its requirements to address these statutes.

According to the link, this $1.5 million whale tracking project was to be completed in 2018. It says the draft report has been reviewed and the final Report was due in September 2018. But there is no final report.

Perhaps BOEM did not like the result because they found too many whales. After all, it’s possible, even likely, that the entire endangered population of North Atlantic Right Whales passes through offshore Virginia twice a year, babies included.

Even more puzzling, the Cornell University group that did this extremely important study seems never to have published their results in the scholarly literature. They publish a great deal, over a dozen articles a year, but I see nothing on this major study of Virginia’s offshore whales.

They did publish a prior study (here) in 2017, titled “Long-term passive acoustic recordings track the changing distribution of North Atlantic right whales (Eubalaena glacialis) from 2004 to 2014″

One thing they found was that the presence of endangered right whales in the Mid-Atlantic was increasing. Maybe this is what the BOEM study also found, that the federal sponsor did not care to publicize.

In any case, the BOEM EIS for phase 1 of the massive Virginia offshore wind complex is underway. It will be very interesting to see if they try to use secret science to say that there is no danger to the severely endangered North Atlantic Right Whales.

Save the whales!

David Wojick, Ph.D. is an independent analyst working at the intersection of science, technology and policy. He has been on the faculty of Carnegie Mellon University and the staffs of the U.S. Office of Naval Research and the Naval Research Lab.  This article was originally published at cfact.org. 


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

27 responses to “Wojick on Whales II: Missing BOEM Report?”

  1. Whalegate exposed.

    If NOT building the wind turbines saves just one whale, it will be worth it. Chine Joe stated just such a sentiment in 2013 saying, “As the President said, if your
    actions result in only saving one life, they’re worth taking.””

    1. “Whalegate” is great! Had not thought of it. Will try to get it used. Many thanks.

  2. The environmentalists opposing the Atlantic Coast Pipeline made a great to-do about the fact that the pipeline route passed through habitat of some endangered salamanders. They have been silent about the potential impact of the offshore wind project on right whales — they certainly haven’t been filing lawsuits to block the project. Curious. One might be tempted to suspect that maybe the concern about the salamanders was not entirely sincere.

    1. Whales are people too!
      Actually better than many people.

    2. Whales are people too!
      Actually better than many people.

    3. Good example of my thesis that Environmentalism, drunk with power, has lost its way. Saving whales replaced by building monster industrial facilities!
      See my https://www.heartland.org/news-opinion/news/environmentalism-has-lost-its-way

  3. James McCarthy Avatar
    James McCarthy

    Naturally, the cover-up concerns “right” whales. Were these creatures woke, normally such a story would be ignored. Disclosure here in BR of this conspiracy of silence is testimony to its even-handedness.

    1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
      James Wyatt Whitehead

      Now hold up a minute. These whales are right whales. They can never be wrong. I do think it was worth taking a look into. Only 400 left.

      1. James McCarthy Avatar
        James McCarthy

        Right!! The left 400 have not yet been determined to be woke or blue or red. All of these imponderables ought not impede conservative attention.

    2. WayneS Avatar

      The difference is in their relative rarity. North Atlantic Right Whales are endangered. Northeastern Left Whales are almost as numerous as Pacific Coast Left Whales, which are as ubiquitous as sand crabs.

      1. And just as thoughtful.

      2. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        I think it’s all good snark. “Right” whales and “Woke” whales, and “Left” whales… what can we do with Minke whales?

        Nevertheless, studies should be done, and we can thusly use them against the military and limit where, in peacetime, they can use their Low Frequency Active Sonar systems, which we already know travels hundreds of miles and kills and deafens sea life.

        1. WayneS Avatar

          I agree about the studies. There should be serious concern about the health of these amazing animals. I also think the military should reduce its use of low frequency sonar to the absolute minimum necessary to maintain national security.

          By the way, I’m thinking about changing my last name to Snark. I wouldn’t even have to update my screen name.

      3. James McCarthy Avatar
        James McCarthy

        Marine biologists are concerned about the sperm viability of Chesapeake Blue crabs in sustaining the food pyramid upon which Left whales depend. Right whales are thought to favor Chick-fil-A and expected to experience a revival under the leadership of Ahab theorists. Look for a UVA symposium in the near future devoted to uncancelling the Moby Dick suppression.

  4. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Vetocracy in action.

    I doubt sound will be much of an issue, transmission loss, will take care of most of it withtin a mile.

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      Stand by for Wojick III on that point. 🙂

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        The problem he has is that compared to most all other man made noise, it’s going to be pretty minor, even in the frequencies that count. Far too many sources to single them out, e.g., ships, oil rigs, even the Boston storm drains and sewage outlets.

        BTW, he’s got to be careful to thread the needle. Wouldn’t do for him to show that noise from windmills is damaging, and 5 years later go seeking offshore drilling permits in the same area. Could come back to bite!

        1. WayneS Avatar

          I am hesitant to ask what sort of noises emanate from sewage outfalls in Boston…

          1. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            It goes kinda like BBBBBAAAAAZZZZZTTTT!

  5. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Wow, that’s a whale of a tale…

  6. Stephen Haner Avatar
    Stephen Haner

    There is litigation underway in other states and that may crop up in Virginia, too. The prospect of the Kitty Hawk project also bringing major transmission lines ashore in Virginia Beach is finally getting folks there stirred up. If such a report is hiding in a desk drawer at BOEM, discovery should bring it to light.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Yeah, see? Sometimes those environmentalists’ lawsuits can be useful.

      God, we hamstring ourselves.

      1. Stephen Haner Avatar
        Stephen Haner

        No the enviro groups take the money from the Wind and Solar Industrial Complex and never sue on these issues. They line up to applaud.

  7. And what exactly is the perceived danger to whales from a fixed turbine farm?

  8. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    have trouble making sense of much of this article and the comments. First of all, let’s consider this supposed conspiracy to squelch the report on right whales. It was due in 2018. Do we remember who was President in 2018? If it were squelched, then there is the place to start, not with some progressives supposedly trying to protect offshore wind farms.

    The comparison with the Atlantic Coast Pipeline is not a legitimate analogy. The pipeline would have significantly disrupted, if not destroyed, the habitat of the salamanders. The habitat of the right whales is the western part of the Atlantic Ocean. The wind turbine farm does not pose a danger to the undersea ocean habitat of the whales.

    As ARL asks, what is the perceived danger to the whales? With their sense of echolocation, the whales are not in danger of bumping into the infrastructure of the turbines that are under water. Unlike large ships that have huge propellors, the turbines do not have moving parts under water that might pose a danger. The continued use of fossil fuel, with its oil spills from ships (see Exxon Valdez) and from oil platform accidents (see Deepwater Horizon) pose more of danger to whales and other ocean wildlife than offshore wind turbines.

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      Maybe the missing report would change your mind. It ought to be out there. Remember, on my list of five reasons to say hell no, secrecy was number one.

    2. WayneS Avatar

      Spinning wind turbines create vibrations. Quite a few vibrations, actually, and at many different frequencies. These vibrations travel throughout the structure of the facility, including under water where they are transmitted into the ocean. Whales are very sensitive to vibrations, and depending upon the frequencies involved, can suffer negative effects from exposure to them. Low frequency vibrations can travel quite a long way under water.

      Unlike the vibrations from a moving vessel, the vibrations created by a wind farm will be from a stationary source. In this case, it will be a stationary source that is very close to, or possibly within, the migration path of the North Atlantic Right Whale.

      I am not claiming the noise/vibrations transmitted underwater from the proposed offshore wind farm will be harmful to these whales. However, it is possible certain frequencies of vibration will be detrimental to them. I think the issue deserves study and/or the release of any studies which already exist.

Leave a Reply