Source: NOAA

by David Wojick

The massive offshore wind (OSW) project proposed by Dominion Energy may pose a serious threat to the endangered North Atlantic Right Whale population. A comprehensive environmental impact assessment is required to determine the extent of this threat and the mitigation it might require. The same is true for the other proposed Mid-Atlantic OSW projects.

The North Atlantic Right Whale is reported to be the world’s most endangered large whale, with an estimated population of just a few hundred critters. They winter off of Florida and Georgia, but summer off New England.  They migrate through the coastal waters off of Virginia twice a year, including that year’s baby whales. They can grow to over 50 feet in length and weigh more than 70 tons. Protecting them is a major challenge. 

Phase one of the proposed Dominion OSW project will occupy 176 square miles. Phase two might bump that up to 350 or more square miles and the proposed federal lease areas for additional OSW are even greater; much greater in fact.

The obvious monster question is how will all this development affect the severely endangered Right Whale population? Answering this question must be central to the project’s required Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) under NEPA, not yet complete and independent of the pending State Corporation Commission review. This is federal territory.

For example, will the whales enter and swim through the resulting maze of giant towers and whirling overhead blades? If not, then OSW might well prevent the migration. We first need to know just how these migrations work, in both directions. Is there a single path or many highly distributed paths? Are they taken by single whales or large groups? Do they quickly go straight through or is there a lot of wandering and feeding?

Then too, there is a great deal of northbound and southbound shipping in this area. The Northeast US and Canada supply, and are supplied by, many places and countries to the South. Being struck by ships is the leading cause of whale death. If the OSW arrays force the whales into the shipping lanes the impact could be devastating. Note that these huge OSW arrays are also an obstacle to commercial shipping, which might tend to concentrate the shipping, thereby increasing the threat of killing whales.

Then there is the noise issue. Whales communicate acoustically and there is an extensive literature on how human noise adversely impacts them. That wind arrays create a lot of noise is well established, with many states having noise limits for onshore wind.

So we need to know things like

  1. How noisy will this Dominion array be under water?
  2. What are the likely frequencies and how are they related to whale communication?
  3. Will the noise make it harder for whales to hear approaching ships?
  4. If a problem, how far will it extend?

It is conceivable that the noise might cause confusion, distress or even act like a great wall to the whales trying to migrate. Confusion alone could be dangerous to the baby whales. So the impact of noise should be a central part of the EIA.

There are other potential issues as well. For example, how might the huge OSW array affect the local food supply for the whales? What about the impact of construction, as compared to operation.

In addition to building and operating the huge OSW array itself, there may be issues with the power lines use to bring the juice ashore. These lines are collectively gigantic compared to even our biggest onshore power lines.

Phase one has a generating capacity of about 2,600 MW, with phase two boosting that to 5,200 MW. To my knowledge the biggest alternating current power line in America is just around 750 MW, and up to 1,000 MW for direct current. The OSW lines dwarf these land lines.

The whales are thought to actually dig into the ocean floor, which is an obvious problem with these monster power lines. But there is also the question of how the strong EMF of these lines might affect them.

In some cases, not building or operating during migration might be a viable mitigation action. Depending on how long a period that is, it might significantly change the economics of OSW.

In addition to NEPA, these whales are supposedly protected by the Endangered Species Act and the Marine Mammal Protection Act. I say supposedly because it appears that the proper analyses are not being done. There is already litigation along these lines for a smaller OSW array in New England.

The responsible agency is the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, and you can see from the name that they might not want to inhibit ocean energy development on environmental grounds. Their middle name is Ocean Energy.

The lawsuit says that BOEM’s EIS for this New England project is cursory at best. Apparently, the other agencies charged with enforcing these whale protection laws were also feeble. Given that the Biden Administration is hell bent on OSW development, this neglect may be predictable.

Likewise, I have heard nothing about whales from Dominion or Virginia state government. They both love OSW, just as BOEM does.

Litigation in Virginia may be the only real protection the whales have.

Note that in addition to this Virginia case, a whole series of huge OSW arrays and cable installations are proposed along the East Coast. North Carolina has one just south of Virginia’s, Maryland just a bit north, and so on. These successive arrays add up to a formidable gauntlet that the migrating whales will have to run twice a year. Surely this endangers the whales.

The adverse impact of massive offshore wind development on the highly endangered North Atlantic Right Whale has yet to be properly assessed. It must be done.

David Wojick, Ph.D. is an independent analyst working at the intersection of science, technology and policy. He has been on the faculty of Carnegie Mellon University and the staffs of the U.S. Office of Naval Research and the Naval Research Lab.  This article was originally published at cfact.org. 


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

42 responses to “Wind Farm Threat to Whales is Next Big Argument”

  1. Stephen Haner Avatar
    Stephen Haner

    Who would be raising these issues if the proposal was for 176 offshore oil derricks? The environmental movement, certain groups in particular, is totally coopted by the Wind and Solar Industrial Complex. Wake up, Virginia.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Heard this AM that Lindsey Graham said he fears being “dragged in handcuffs” to Georgia in a PR stunt by Democrats.

      Funny, I should have thought it the other way around would be more likely.

    2. Baconator with extra cheese Avatar
      Baconator with extra cheese

      I guarantee the environmental groups won’t bring up the environmental justice argument when the windmill assembly facility is built in Portsmouth. Just like they won’t dare bring up the extra vehicle traffic going to the casino in Ptroit because Ms Lucas supports it.

      1. vicnicholls Avatar
        vicnicholls

        Nice to see someone else knows Ptroit.

  2. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    I suppose to the average Republican, dodging the parked cars in the parking lot is a challenge…

    “Speeding ships in the Chesapeake Bay endanger rare right whales, environmentalists report

    Aug 06, 2021 at 7:56 am

    A North Atlantic right whale carcass off the coast of Virginia Beach in 2018. The whale was later identified as a 10-year-old juvenile female. Speeding ships pose a threat to the endangered species. (Alex Costidis, Virginia Aquarium Stranding Response Program under NMFS permit 18786-02)
    Most ships moving through the Chesapeake Bay don’t slow down as required to protect the endangered North Atlantic right whale, environmentalists said in a new report.

    About 64% of vessels in the area don’t comply with speed rules designed to allow boat drivers to see and veer around the whales susceptible to strikes — sometimes going up to four times the required speed, according to the report released recently by conservation nonprofit Oceana. Cargo ships were the worst offenders.

    There are fewer than 400 North Atlantic right whales left, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, making them one of the most endangered marine mammals on the planet.”

    1. WayneS Avatar

      What are the potential legal repercussions for the owners of the speeding ships?

      Can fines be assessed? If so, are they ever assessed?

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Probaby yes. Probably no.

        The owners of QE II caught a bit fine for leaving NNSB&DD at 20+ knots one night. They threw a 4-foot wake on the navy base. Tossed some ships at the pier about.

    2. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
      James Wyatt Whitehead

      Dominion should be forced to watch Star Trek IV. Hire Scotty. He can beam the whales out of the danger zone.
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4CM8tTG9Yig

  3. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    This demonstrates how little Conservatives really understand the environment and NEPA in general which is the primary way projects are opposed by environmentalists.

    But just thinking about the basic issue of wind turbines and comparing to things like ship traffic.. is looney as heck.

    Whales typically do not run into stationary objects … usually it’s the other way around – ships run into them.

    Oil drilling is a wholly different critter. the problem is not the platform , it’s the oil and what happens to it when brought to surface and handled.

    What this post shows is just how little Conservative types really understand environmental law.

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      The Blind Apologist heard from. Wojick has done NEPA reports,….His point was the underwater cables and the noise alone might cause the whales to just stop and not migrate. I think it is a very valid question, especially if the massive OSW arrays are built out past the continental shelf. Nancy brought the ships into the discussion, but if the ships and whales are using the same narrow remaining pathways, it’s valid.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        tell me what NEPA reports Wojick has done.

        NEPA is a Federal Law primarily for Federal projects only and what NEPA requires is full documentation of impacts. NEPA alone does not turn down projects.

        Read about it.

        Wojicks “point” is coming from someone who knows nothing about that issue – NEPA is about information from folks who are experts in those fields not folks with opinions who have no background in that field.

        read about NEPA – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Environmental_Policy_Act

        it’s not what most think it is especially conservative folks blathering about it here.

        the only thing NEPA requires is documentation of impacts. It’s the failure to provide that documentation that gets projects into the courts – not the actual impacts NEPA allows even damaging impacts -as long as NEPA discloses them.

        1. By coincidence one of my projects was a first NEPA test case around 1970. NEPA is not just about federal projects. Mines on federal land are being hit, for example, which is why I specifically point out that this is Federal land. In fact BOEM has started the EIS for this project.

          I am standing in the road before them. The old man standing right in the road, as the song says.

          NEPA stops projects with hard questions. Oh wait. How about dem whales?

    1. Precisely. The EIS is in play. With the whales. You might try reading my article carefully. It is wind versus whales. I expect the SCOTUS will have to decide this one, in a decade or so, with nothing built until then.

      Migration is always dangerous, so making it more so for an extremely endangered critter is a very bad plan.

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      With Biden now pushing lease areas off the continental shelf, no question of interference with those migration routes.

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        But, but, that’s oil. That’s acceptable. The only issue with the mills would be LF sound, but nothing anywhere near the energy of a sonar. Kinda like sitting under a ceiling fan for you.

        1. WayneS Avatar

          A valid point, but ships/subs using sonar move around – they do not stay in one place. The LF emissions from a wind turbine are stationary, and more-or-less permanent.

          1. WayneS Avatar

            That sculpture didn’t look anything like Winston Churchill…

          2. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Sounds like ‘im… windy if you catch the drift.

  4. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    What’s happening with MOutain Valley Pipeline? The 15-day comment period is almost up.

    1. energyNOW_Fan Avatar
      energyNOW_Fan

      No idea status, but as a general rule, Biden Admin cancellation of Keystone Pipeline is considered by some to be effectively a virtual ban on many pipeline projects.

    2. energyNOW_Fan Avatar
      energyNOW_Fan

      No idea status, but as a general rule, Biden Admin cancellation of Keystone Pipeline is considered by some to be effectively a virtual ban on many pipeline projects.

    3. energyNOW_Fan Avatar
      energyNOW_Fan

      No idea status, but as a general rule, Biden Admin cancellation of Keystone Pipeline is considered by some to be effectively a virtual ban on many pipeline projects.

  5. I don’t know if the wind farms are a genuine threat to migrating whales or not. But I do approve of making wind and solar projects jump through the same environmental regulatory hoops as, say, gas pipelines. What’s sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander.

    1. energyNOW_Fan Avatar
      energyNOW_Fan

      I am afraid, for liberals, the extreme urgency to end all use of fossil fuels justifies much risk and cutting of red tape for green alternatives. Virginia has already legislated this development is in the public’s best interest and must be treated specially and approved immediately right? That was how New Jersey felt about coal plants, back in the day. The state is in charge, and they are of the mind to force this through ASAP. They will treat fossil projects with great hatred, why is any equality needed? It’s politics as usual.

      1. The state is not in charge of the federal EIS. It is ultimately up to the Federal Courts.

        But with NEPA you do not have to win, just take decades to get a decision. All the questions have to be adequately answered. My read of the Right Whale literature is that nobody has looked at migration. The studies are focused on the habitat areas.

    2. CJBova Avatar

      If Dominion is acknowledging the impacts in their COP, they’re a genuine threat or they wouldn’t be talking about permits for mitigation and having observers aboard their ships.

  6. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    https://asa.scitation.org/doi/10.1121/10.0002453#header

    n summary, the conclusion from Madsen et al. (2006) that the underwater noise radiated from individual wind turbines is low compared to the noise radiated from cargo ships does still apply despite turbines now being larger and more measurements being available. The combined source level of a large wind farm is smaller or comparable to that of a large cargo ship. However, the cumulative contribution to the soundscape from multiple turbines within a wind farm (in some cases, many hundreds) and the fact that wind farms occupy larger and larger fractions of coastal and shelf waters means that their combined contribution of noise cannot be ignored. The contribution from wind turbines can, in particular, be expected to be significant in areas with low natural ambient noise and low levels of ship traffic, possibly large enough to raise concern for negative effects on species of fish and marine mammals. Such large-scale cumulative effects should be addressed in both strategic impact assessments in connection to maritime spatial planning and in environmental impact assessments of individual projects.

    For perspective…
    Low Frequency Active Sonar (LFAS) is a military sonar technology designed to detect and track quiet submarines. The U.S. Navy is planning to deploy LFAS in 80% of the world’s oceans at an effective source level of 240 dB. Using the Nav’s number of 61.5 dB (to express the conversion between air and water) 240 dB is equivalent in air to being 20 feet away from a Saturn V rocket at takeoff. NATO and other navies also have LFAS and other high intensity sonars.

    NN says, when this thing pings, it boils the water.

    1. Great source, so many thanks. But Dominion scale OSW wind arrays also have hundreds of towers to contend with, unlike large ships. The effect is truly problematic.

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        I used to know that suff, but the noisy ones at 130 dB (in air) is like being at a rock concert. Seventy and 80 dB is normal conversation. So, after 40 meters, the clanging is tolerable.

        The real problem is water, sound travels faster and further, and the complexity of shallow water, multipath, and the additive nature of sound will mean convergence zones, nulling, and random beam forming.

        Of course, just about the loudest thing in the ocean is a shrimp. That’s the constant popping and crackling sound you hear when you put your head underwater.

        If I had to swag, the area within the array will be avoided by some sea life and will attract others. The towers will provide shelter. When the Challenger wound up on the bottom, 1200 feet down, within weeks the larger pieces were covered with fish and other sea life. Shelter from the storm, ya know.

  7. energyNOW_Fan Avatar
    energyNOW_Fan

    Whales are worthy of consideration, but I am not aware of an issue. Keep in mind, Dominion’s defunct ACP gas pipeline was huge pipe diameter, almost unheard of. My understanding, the same goes for the proposed wind turbines, these will be among the largest ever made. This is just the way utilities think: everything has to be the worlds largest for economies of (huge) scale. It is easy to see that there could be many unforeseen problems, whales just being one of many many potential issues. Scale-up in size is an extremely tricky business, in so many words, that was basically my R&D career, scaling up experimental to large plants. Trial and error to a large degree unfort. If you do tons of development work, and you get lucky, then the plant might work “as advertised”.

    These days, development work is for the weak minded. No longer any patience or money or staff for that. The main thing is to give stockholders superb profit results.

    As an aside, the plight of the southern Right Whales were covered in CNN’s new series on Patagonia. Killer whales track down the newborn, in that case.

    1. If you are not aware of an issue you might read my article again. It is OSW versus a Save the Whales. About as stark as issues get.

  8. William Chambliss Avatar
    William Chambliss

    The link to the purported New England litigation is either down or non-existent. Wonder why “Texas Policy” was cited as the source? I didn’t find anything on their website about New England.

    1. WayneS Avatar

      Try this: https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/solar-co-sues-feds-over-offshore-vineyard-wind-farm-approval-2021-07-19/

      I think there are several lawsuits in the works regarding that project, but this is the first one I found.

  9. WayneS Avatar

    OTOH, maybe we can communicate with the whales:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6UDVbl_ranI

      1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
        James Wyatt Whitehead

        Spock can talk to whales. Maybe he can spread the word about the wind mill detour.
        https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/47172d5c7610d1d27a184a77bd4b2257efa62b772f3cf6000661a0fc3ae7a678.jpg

  10. WayneS Avatar

    I’m not so sure the physical obstacles posed by the platforms are particularly dangerous to the whales. They are not stupid, and I suspect they can find a way to navigate through an offshore wind farm.

    Sound is what I am concerned about. As the article states, whales are very sensitive to sound. The vibrations associated with a rotating windmill are significant (including some at frequencies humans cannot hear) and they are transmitted through the supporting structures and into the ocean. We have no idea what effect these sound waves may have on the nervous systems of whales, or other marine life for that matter. I think this issue is deserving of serious study.

    ————————————————————————–

    Also, none of us can speak “whale” so for all we know the sound waves emitted into the water by an offshore wind farm might be telling the right whales to swim in front of ships or beach themselves and commit suicide. 😉

Leave a Reply