by Chris Saxman

I wish the headline of today’s column was just click bait. It originates from a headline that was pushed across my phone that read “Will McDonald’s be leaving California?”

That immediately made me think that McDonald’s corporate offices might be considering moving their headquarters from California to another state. Given the exodus of companies that have left the Golden State it would be just another news story about another company leaving California.

Quickly remembering that McDonald’s was based in Chicago, not California, I clicked on the article. The president of McDonald’s USA, John Erlinger, had written an open letter dated January 25th in which he lamented the legislative and regulatory reality of California:

Last fall, the legislature passed a bill – AB257, or the FAST Act – almost entirely at the behest of organized labor’s firm grip on many of the state’s lawmakers. It makes it all but impossible to run small business restaurants, but the impacts are far beyond that. Under the FAST Act, an unelected council of political insiders, not local business owners and their teams, would make big decisions about crucial elements of running a business, fracturing the economy in the process. [Emphasis added.]

No, this is not a move of a company HQ, but rather the very real and public conversation about restaurants being unable to operate in California AT ALL.

A literal existential threat. Cue the “Golden” headlines — Golden Arches leave Golden State, etc… and of course references to actually being able to check out of the Hotel California.

Mr. Erlinger has to answer to McDonald’s shareholders, and if he doesn’t draw attention to these issues, he could be held responsible for not doing anything about them. That includes inviting very large lawsuits which could imperil the company’s performance and future investments.

So? That’s just wacky Cali. Great weather. Crappy business climate. Business leaves or closes. Right?

Nope.

Virginia, you got a mention in Erlinger’s letter!

The state is teaching us a powerful lesson about what our future could look like if this one-sided style of democracy is mimicked elsewhere, or goes unchecked in the Golden State. And this threat is real – just last week, a Virginia legislator imported from California introduced a near-identical piece of legislation that state leaders now have an opportunity to stop in its tracks. And no doubt, they’ll keep looking for backdoors in California. [Emphasis added.]

In fact, Virginia was the only other state noted in the letter. As I had not heard about this legislation, I clicked on the link Erlinger provided to see what bill he was talking about. House Bill 2478 was submitted for consideration by Delegate Irene Shin.

Thankfully, it was defeated 12-5 in the Rules Committee. Yes, HB2478 got five votes in support.

Whiskey Tango Foxtrot?

Yes, legislators (from both sides of the aisle) will put in legislation at the behest of their supporters. Redressing grievances and all…

But legislators and their elected leaders need to understand the ramifications of the simple act of dropping a bill in the hopper. Virginia has had its doozies over the years OR don’t you remember the Droopy Drawers Bill that made international headlines? Trans-vaginal ultrasound ring a bell?

Folks, policy matters. They set the rules of the game and that forces decisions by business leaders.

Timing matters, too. Since Virginia’s legislature is first out of the gate every year and we are in close proximity to the DC press/cable news corps, the spotlight can be intense.

This ain’t Wyoming.

Virginia has been the crucible for democracy. We have elections of consequence every year making us a daily bellwether. Virginia, as a direct result, is a cheap political lab rat for a whole host of grifting constituencies.

I’ll take a half-glass-full approach and fully embrace my word of the year – Positive.

Congratulations, Virginia! Our role as democracy’s crucible continues!

Now, go raise money!

From Chris Saxman’s The Intersection. Used with permission.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

40 responses to “Will McDonald’s Be Leaving Virginia? Not This year, But…”

  1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    If so, can In-n-Out move in…??!!

    “Whiskey Tango Foxtrot?”

    Rule #1, JAB…??🤷‍♂️

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      “Juliet Alpha Bravo?”

      Wasn’t that a reference to Hillary?

      Rule #1, E1/2T…??

    2. VaNavVet Avatar

      Agree, WTF is about all that I can say about the article as it is quite a bit of jumping to conclusions.

  2. LesGabriel Avatar
    LesGabriel

    For those interested, the 5 votes were Herring HD4, Watts HD14, Sickles HD17, Filler-Corn HD18, and Scott HD88. Perhaps not uncoincidentally, none of them have opponents as of now. But Irene Shin in HD8 does have Julie Perry as an opponent.

    1. dave schutz Avatar
      dave schutz

      Filler-Corn and Tran expected to contest new HD 18 in the coming primary, they were drawn into the same district.

  3. energyNOW_Fan Avatar
    energyNOW_Fan

    also recent demographic news is some post-COVID population shifts Novan’s moving to Richmond region…sort of like Californian’s moving to Arizona, and making it more Blue…

  4. LarrytheG Avatar

    For a given regulation, if it ran ALL of the fast food companies out of town/the state that WOULD be something
    worth lamenting!

    But what happens when it only drives out some? Does that mean the competition has outcompeted you ?

    All things equal (and they never are), govt regulation, as bad as it can be, is not as much a threat as the competition is (if the regs apply equally to all).

    It’s like arguing and increase in the minimum wage will drive out fast food restaurants. Nope. Some of them will do what businesses always do – adapt and compete.

    So when I hear all the other fast food stores are right behind McDonalds in leaving… I’ll reassess.

    I’m NOT advocating FOR the regulation, just pointing out the “squeal”.

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      So crushing government oversight is fine unless it kills them all. That’s the same argument with the whales and the wind turbines, right? The fittest WILL survive! Social(ism) Darwinism.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar

        No… you must have missed my words to the contrary. I’m just pointing out that regulation that applies to all is not the same as regulation that only applies to one and all things being equal if one company “exits” over regulation and others do not – then they clearly are better competitors!

        Regulation does not come about t penalize business. As you know from your career, there are usually two sides to regulation and a lot of it is to protect consumers and citizens from the actions of others including business who are out for their own interests also.

        And sometimes, regulation is one industry or company trying to undermine their competitors, which you know also and we seldom hear conservatives decrying that kind of “regulation”!

        So, we’d not have a cleaner Chesapeake Bay , and not clean enough yet, unless we had “crushing” regulation, right? We’d still have smog over our cities if we did not have that “crushing” regulation. On and on, and you know it but as a Conservative, you have to defend your philosophy.

        Regulation is necessary. We have too much of it, I agree but getting rid of it willy nilly, especially on pure political philosophy grounds is problematical.

      2. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Whyever would you believe that Darwin’s theory wouldn’t apply to the endeavors of man any less than to the man himself?

  5. Stephen Haner Avatar
    Stephen Haner

    The reality is that Virginia’s drift is clearly toward California and Massachusetts and New York. Not toward Florida, Texas or Tennessee. Even North Carolina is universally recognized as more pro-business than Virginia. Perhaps Youngkin can reverse the trend. Sorry, Brother Saxman, but our years of persuasive efforts may amount to howling into a hurricane. That bill would probably pass in the Virginia Senate.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      So jump for joy, Be gay and blithe,
      Or weep my friend with sorrow.
      What California is today,
      The rest will be tomorrow.

      1. Won’t that be great.

        “Drugstores Blame Shoplifting for Locked Up Shelves”

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L5C2qLPm5VI

  6. f/k/a_tmtfairfax Avatar
    f/k/a_tmtfairfax

    Bottom line – an employee must produce more economic value to the employer than she/he makes in compensation. At some point, mechanization makes economic sense.

    Look at retail. Many stores (grocery, pharmacy, Target, Walmart, Costco) have replaced multiple checkout stations with self-service. Instead of one employee per checkout stations, 8 or 10 self-service stations can be served by one (if busy, two) employees. Then there may be two or three regular checkout stations where there might have been six or seven.

    Most fast-food outlets in airports and malls have replaced the ordering and payment process with a kiosk.

    Places like Sam’s Club and Costco use robotic floor cleaning machines to clean the floors during shopping hours.

    We see rental real estate being run with an app. No local people to show the property, collect rents, or schedule repairs. Maintenance is being contracted out in many complexes.

    I think we are only seeing the tip of the de-employment movement, most especially for low-skill jobs. And yet, the Democrats in Congress want to bring in large numbers of unskilled people.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar

      It’s all about efficiency and competition! And there is an issue with self check-out – stealing and it’s going to add to the cost of products:

      https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/183adfcdbb523293770f5a1d2b24abdf3fd498fea9ccea8e8df83c2d29338a49.jpg

      Lots of stuff going on with AI right now.. gonna take a lot of jobs… make stuff cheaper but all those ex workers will have to get retrained to do something else.

      1. f/k/a_tmtfairfax Avatar
        f/k/a_tmtfairfax

        Clearly, there is an increased risk of theft with self-checkout. Sam’s Club and Costco, of course, check receipts against what’s in your cart. Wegman’s, where we shop in Wake Forest, normally has two people stationed near their self-checkout stations. I suspect the chain’s management has figured out where risks and cost-savings balance.

        1. how_it_works Avatar
          how_it_works

          The fact is that a criminal, err, “undocumented inventory reduction specialist” can walk into any store, take whatever they want off the shelf, walk out with it and NOBODY will stop them.

          Saw it happen at the Manassas Lowe’s on Thursday night. Saw the guy with 4 boxes of DeWalt power tools casually strolling through the parking lot, secure in the knowledge that nobody is going to go after him.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar

            and we pay increased prices for it, right?

          2. how_it_works Avatar
            how_it_works

            That would be my guess…

            I’m not saying it’s related or that the area where the Lowe’s is has a crime problem like that…

            …but the Best Buy about a mile or two up the street became a Best Buy outlet.

            They have nothing that you can shoplift. They mostly sell large appliances and computers/laptops, and the laptops are locked up.

          3. They have nothing that you can shoplift. They mostly sell large appliances…

            I would bet that, were we so inclined, which we are not, you and I working together could shoplift a refrigerator – without being caught.

          4. how_it_works Avatar
            how_it_works

            That’s a whole lotta work for the same amount of money a couple of ipads would bring.

          5. f/k/a_tmtfairfax Avatar
            f/k/a_tmtfairfax

            I’m not suggesting shoplifting is not a big problem. It is. But I’m not sure how having extra cashiers fixes the problem of grab and go. Perhaps, a solution is to use some of the savings from self checkout stations to hire more security employees, cameras and other devices.

          6. LarrytheG Avatar

            I think that IS what they are doing. At some point, we may start seeing armed security guards at the entrance/exits…

            We just had a Walmart shut down entirely when someone came in carrying a shotgun!!!

          7. how_it_works Avatar
            how_it_works

            Home Depot has started stocking power tools that won’t work without activation at the register, or so I’ve heard.

          8. LarrytheG Avatar

            People that steal are scum. And there are lots of ways to steal besides just stuff at Home Depot.

          9. how_it_works Avatar
            how_it_works

            Years ago the Home Depot in Manassas had the circuit breakers locked up. You had to ask a clerk to unlock them to get one.

            At the same time that was happening in the Manassas Home Depot, the Fredericksburg Home Depot had a sign up saying that they won’t accept circuit breaker returns without a receipt.

            Things that make you go hmmm…

          10. LarrytheG Avatar

            is that an expensive item?

          11. how_it_works Avatar
            how_it_works

            $15 or so but they are small. You could probably fit 5 of them in a cargo pocket. More specialized breakers like GFCI ones could be as much as $50.

          12. LarrytheG Avatar

            gonna start selling them on plastic cards…like tools

          13. f/k/a_tmtfairfax Avatar
            f/k/a_tmtfairfax

            I’ve seen that too. And at Lowe’s as well.

  7. LarrytheG Avatar

    re: ” crushing regulations” – yeah take a look at some of the proposed laws and regulations coming from Youngkin and the GOP over culture war stuff… like mandating awards, transgender, CRT, book banning, etc.

    1. “yeah take a look at some of the proposed laws and regulations coming from Youngkin and the GOP over culture war stuff… like mandating awards, transgender, CRT, book banning, etc.”

      Boy that’s oppressive.

      So if a high school student wins a national award, they need to get it. You have a problem with that?

      And schools can’t expose the youngest children to explicit sex. How will they survive?

      Schools and teachers can’t hide potentially life altering decisions of minors from their parents. Wasn’t it you who posted existing law which clearly establishes parents legal authority over their children?

      Tell me, why do you find normalcy so alarming? It’s unfortunate that it takes action from the government to restrain radical extremism, but that’s where we find ourselves these days.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar

        Yep. I do. It puts more and more rules and paperwork on the schools, costs money and lots of loopholes, – the same argument that business uses… 😉

        No it was not me who proposed “legal authority over kids”. It’s a shared responsibility especially
        when the kids are in the custodial care of the school and are supposed to follow school rules.

        Not “normal” to have laws dictating top-down on things like recognizing awards. Pretty dang foolish if you ask me. Such proposals die left and right in the GA and should.

        1. f/k/a_tmtfairfax Avatar
          f/k/a_tmtfairfax

          Public schools already have bloated staff who could certainly make sure notice of awards is made.

          Interestingly, FCPS recently made a Facebook post of students who won regional art awards. Why would the Schools be able to spend time and money on a Facebook post when they cannot do the same to notify academic award winners?

          Further, how is recognizing superior art talent consistent with staff efforts to adopt programs that result in equal academic performance? These would be interesting questions for a student’s attorney to ask FCPS leadership in a jury trial.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar

            I don’t think it’s wrong to recognize achievement, especially in public schools, which they have usually and often done in the past and if some “thinking” has changed to where schools , in the name of “equity” have decided NOT to recognize then I’d agree to kick their ever-loving butts for doing so.

            But, first, I’d like to know for sure that’s what actually happened given the prior trumped up claims of CRT, grooming , etc et all.

            We have people who are doing everything they can to undermine public schools these days.

            They are a long way from perfect. They make mistakes and screw up but the basic concept of public education is very legitimate, every single developed country in the world does it and in those countries, literacy is high 90+ % and productivity, GDP – high. And yet in this country we want to tear it down
            and use tax dollars for de-facto private schools.

          2. f/k/a_tmtfairfax Avatar
            f/k/a_tmtfairfax

            Come on, Larry. It’s quite possible that one school in a system could drop the ball. But when multiple schools do it both in a single district (Fairfax County) and in a general area (Northern Virginia), it’s not likely a coincidence. Then, toss in the rhetoric, programs and speakers urging equal results in the name of equity, and the likelihood of innocence drops rapidly. Who knows what’s in emails and text messages.

            Decades ago, I spent a good part of a summer reviewing the work of paralegals producing documents for an antitrust case. There was very little damning information in the documents themselves, but the story was different in the marginal notes written by executives. Now, it’s in the emails and text messages.

            And how do you explain that competition and winners and losers are OK in public school art, drama, music and sports, but wrong in other academic subjects? Public schools have brought on their own troubles, when they moved from equal opportunity to equal results.

          3. LarrytheG Avatar

            re: ” And how do you explain that competition and winners and losers are OK in public school art, drama, music and sports, but wrong in other academic subjects?”

            We are talking about 6 and 7 yr olds in 1st, 2nd and 3rd grade, right? Is it a “competition” where
            some are just better than others like they might be taller or clumsy? Is that the idea? That if they can’t learn in 2nd grade, it’s because there are “winners” and “losers”?

          4. f/k/a_tmtfairfax Avatar
            f/k/a_tmtfairfax

            The art competition is not at the lower grades.

            There is a lot less need for competition in the lower grades, be it one on one, one against a standard or team competition. Soccer for very young kids usually doesn’t keep score. But T-ball does. My kids’ primary grade classes had different reading groups based on where children were in reading progress. My son started TKD in 2nd grade. He had to take a test to get his white belt, etc.

            Except in the land of the woke educators, people face tests and competition their entire life, be it a school test, a music audition, a limited number of positions on a school team, obtaining and keeping a job. Competition should be fair but equal results is inconsistent with human behavior and history.

          5. LarrytheG Avatar

            but you support “competition” in K 1-3 grades? If not, why not?

          6. LarrytheG Avatar

            Nothing to do with equity. Was going on long before the equity issue. It’s present in many large school districts that have stratified income/education demographics, as neighborhood schools are often reflective of the income/education demographics.

            This goes back many years, way before the current “equity” stuff.

            You’ll have to explain this: ” And how do you explain that competition and winners and losers are OK in public school art, drama, music and sports, but wrong in other academic subjects? Public schools have brought on their own troubles, when they moved from equal opportunity to equal results.”

            what are you talking about here?

Leave a Reply