Will Loudoun Cancel Frances Hazel Reid?

Frances Hazel Reid. Photo credit: Loudoun Times-Mirror

by James A. Bacon

Frances Hazel Reid began working for the Loudoun Times-Mirror in 1921, and remained an employee until shortly before her death in 1994 at the age of 94. Starting out as a secretary in an era when the majority of women did not work outside the home, she rose through the ranks as reporter, treasurer and associate publisher. She founded the Loudoun Business and Professional Women’s Club, and was appointed director of the Loudoun County Historical Society in 1970. She was held in such high regard in her community that an elementary school in Leesburg was named after her in 2003.

Now she may be canceled.

Frances Hazel Reid Elementary School is one of nine schools in Loudoun being considered for a name change as part of the school board’s effort, in the words of the Times-Mirror, “to reckon with systemic racism in a county that didn’t integrate its schools until 1968.”

Reid’s sin: she was one of 14 women who founded the Purcellville chapter of the United Daughters of the Confederacy (DOC) in 1924.

Nationally, the UDC pursued two main goals: erecting memorials in honor of fathers and grandfathers who fought in the Civil War and caring for aging Confederate veterans and their families. Many revile the UDC today because its members perpetuated the “Lost Cause” interpretation of the Civil War.

According to Karen Cox, an historian of confederate monuments, “the UDC committed itself to vindicating the Confederate generation, both the men who fought and the women who supported the cause, through a broad-ranging agenda that included education, preserving pro-Confederate histories, various forms of public commemoration, and lobbying for Confederate homes for soldiers, widows, and their descendants.”

Imagine that. The UDC erected memorials to their fathers, uncles, grandfathers, and neighbors who fought in the war, and went so far as to lobby on their behalf.

Remember, the U.S. government paid pensions to Union veterans and their families — the largest item of expenditure by the federal government — which was funded by means of tariffs levied on the entire country. Those tariffs protected Northern industrial interests and penalized the exports of cotton, the most lucrative Southern commodity. Impoverished Southern states were left to their own devices to care for their aging veterans. Elderly Southern veterans turned to their communities for support.

Reid’s grandfather was a Confederate veteran.

Her views on the “Lost Cause” narrative are not reported by the Times-Mirror, which suggests that they are not known.

As for matters of race, Times-Mirror editor and co-worker Tim Farmer said that despite Loudoun’s “stained” history of racism, he “never saw her treat any person of color any differently than anyone else. She was always gracious and dignified with everyone she encountered.”

However, Reid remained a member of the UDC until 1927 at least, when Virginia was in thrall to Jim Crow, the Ku Klux Klan operated in Purcellville, and the Times-Mirror ran racist ads, as the modern-day Times-Mirror reminds us in its article.

Reid school parent Jessica LeBlanc said there’s no evidence that Reid supported the Lost Cause, racism or segregation.  “If the Confederate cause or the Lost Cause was of any importance to her,” she said, “I think we would absolutely know about it because she was a journalist and had every platform that was available to her in the community to shout that from the mountaintops.”

The Loudoun school district and History Matters, a Richmond-based historical group hired to research the school names, will solicit public input about Reid and the propriety of naming a school after her.

The outcome of this process will be interesting. Will a woman of many accomplishments, who was on “the right side of history” in regard to women’s rights, be canceled because of guilt by association with the Daughters of the Confederacy, which in turn is deemed guilty of thought crimes?

We can reasonably infer that Reid was motivated to join the UDC at least in part by a desire to honor and care for aging veterans like her grandfather. We don’t know her early views on race; we don’t know if she voted for the segregationist Byrd machine. We don’t know her views about the Lost Cause, although we can say that she was never a vocal proponent of it. Conversely, we do have testimony that in later years she treated African Americans no differently from anyone else.

Unless research turns up evidence to the contrary, any case against Reid would be based on the conjecture that at one point in her life she might have held racist views and might have supported the Lost Cause narrative. It wouldn’t matter whether her views evolved. It wouldn’t matter what she contributed to the community or how she interacted with her fellow African American citizens. Canceling Reid on the basis of what we know now would be a travesty: a hateful act of retribution and cultural cleansing.

Hopefully, Loudoun County will not countenance such a thing.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

38 responses to “Will Loudoun Cancel Frances Hazel Reid?”

  1. Thanks for calling this out, James. My kids were in elementary school when FH Reid Elementary opened and it was considered a wonderful thing to name the school after her, since she did a lot of reporting on education. BTW, no relation to me. I called this out some months ago in an article in Loudoun Now, and not just about Reid, but also an attempt to take Charles Fenton Mercer]’s name off Mercer Middle School. https://www.loudounnow.com/archives/letter-ken-reid-mclean/article_84d0e04e-5b76-5028-ac85-398311c60f4f.html Mercer was an abolitionist, but he supported (along with Monroe and few others at the time) repatriating black slaves to Africa. That’s how Liberia was created; capital “monrovia” named for James Monroe. If LCPS does rename the school, I will freak and hope it’s the opening salvo to get rid of this rogue board which supports indoctrination and sexualization of kids.;

    1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
      James Wyatt Whitehead

      Mercer’s story is remarkable. I used to make a big deal about Mercer and Monroe when teaching US History at Briar Woods. I wouldn’t dare touch any of those topics if I were still in the classroom. I once scored a field trip of students to Oak Hill. We were able to tour the home of President Monroe thanks to the gracious owners and see the very table where the Monroe Doctrine was written. Well, written by John Quincy Adams, signed by Monroe.

      Charles Fenton Mercer helped deliver a new nation! I have always believed that Mercer’s anti-slavery movement would have resulted in Virginia abandoning the institution. Mercer understood that for slavery to end, owners would have to be compensated. That was what the American Colonization Society was all about. It was unfortunate timing that Nat Turner’s revolt derailed the momentum of Mercer’s efforts in 1831.

  2. “[A] hateful act of retribution and cultural cleansing.” No, it’s not. It’s called competing values in society, and it’s how society works. Also, the UDC was not some quaint women’s society solely devoted to memorials. They actively promoted and taught lost cause ideology, which served as an underpinning for Jim Crow and segregation. Anyway, leaving aside the hyperbole, this woman shouldn’t be cancelled unless there’s demonstrable evidence that she played a role in segregation or supporting the Klan or some such.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar

      JAB apparently thinks the woman could have been a member of UDC but did not subscribe to the UDC mission.

      Also not mentioned was the role that UDC played in school textbooks which probably included Loudoun.

      What would be “good” would be the full and honest context with regard to this woman but that’s apparently a bridge too far for JAB and like minded.

      He would have us believe that membership in the UDC did not mean she knew of what they did nor approved of it and therefore “cancelling” her is misguided and wrong.

      We need the truth, not whitewashing.

      1. It’s a fair point. My take would be that mere membership in that organization wouldn’t be worthy of cancellation without something else. The UDC sucks, but they’re not and weren’t the Klan. But I think it’s reasonable to take the counter position, because that position has value too. It’s not “hateful retribution,” which is just silly.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar

          UDC was very much involved in Jim Crow, textbooks and some indications, the Klan.

          I’d want to know if the textbooks in Loudoun were influenced by UDC.

          I just find it odd that someone who was not actually associated with the county or the school system was named for a school.

          Imagine today, a reporter for any media left or right being named for a school.

          1. What, you don’t think that “Tucker Carlson Middle School for the Arts” has a ring to it? Yeah, if there’s evidence that the UDC was involved with segregation, Jim Crow or the Klan in Loudon, yes, time to rethink this woman’s legacy.

          2. f/k/a_tmtfairfax Avatar
            f/k/a_tmtfairfax

            I have an older video covering reunions of the Grand Army of the Republic and the United Confederate Veterans. One of the events covered was a UCV reunion where a black member explained why he was a member. It rather blew my mind but it is what it is. How do you explain that?

          3. LarrytheG Avatar

            Who knows? But pretty sure it does not represent the vast majority of black folks feelings.

            I see where West Point is removing Confederate Iconography with the words Ku Klux Klan itself… been there until now.

            https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/03c70997a468b705733bb2cca498217e11e17b36d2de7635b43b5bd8792c9cce.jpg

          4. f/k/a_tmtfairfax Avatar
            f/k/a_tmtfairfax

            My point is that human beings are complex and diverse. Hence, we were all taught to avoid generalizations. It’s often a challenge to do so for all of us. Living up to Martin Luther King’s wish is often hard to do.

            That’s probably one of reasons why classifications by race, color of skin, sex and others are suspect under the Constitution. We need to strive to treat people as individuals and to practice toleration and respect.

          5. James McCarthy Avatar
            James McCarthy

            Does that type of characterization include broad brushes characterizing the refugees at the southern border as present only for economic reasons?

          6. Well, there are generalizations and there are generalizations. Saying that the Confederacy fought for slavery and against the interests of the enslaved is not any less accurate because it doesn’t cover one gentleman who felt differently. And the classification of race, sex and religion as constitutionally suspect is really only a recent phenomenon, ~75 years and it was defied and fought for another 25.

          7. f/k/a_tmtfairfax Avatar
            f/k/a_tmtfairfax

            I’ve never argued in favor of the Confederacy. I grew up in Minnesota and had two 2nd great grandfathers fight for the Union. But everything doesn’t always fit into little boxes. The story of humanity is complicated. Individuals often defy expectations.

            We are all taught to avoid generalizations because they are almost always wrong.
            But we all do it. I do it, often about journalists. We need to try to avoid generalizations and we should also teach that there are exceptions to the expected.

          8. “Individuals often defy expectations.”Oh, I completely agree. But like I said, there are generalizations that are dumb and pernicious, like not accounting for the individual, and generalizations that are accurate and exceptions actually prove the rule. In the latter case, I have to say that given the complexity of human discourse and events, we must generalize to some extent. We collectively need to agree on some basic truths, such as slavery was bad. Does it means that all slaves agreed with the sentiment? Or that all masters were evil or had the same motives? No. But it does mean that the evidence tilts heavily in one direction, so we can make a sound general conclusion without fear that the exceptions disprove the rule.

          9. LarrytheG Avatar

            Totally agree. BUt that’s simple not the truth now or in the past and we must be honest about it instead of pretending something that simply is not true.

            We have a fundamental moral responsibility to be honest about history.

            We still have racists among us who care not what you think about MLK and his words and if we pretend not, we are complicit.

            THere is no free lunch on this

            Either we tell the truth and deal with it or we are avoiding reality and have no chance of changing what we won’t admit is still true and allow racism to continue under the guise of “we all have our views”.

          10. What was his reason? I don’t believe there’s any support that blacks voluntarily served the CSA at any scale. Nor was it legal for slaves to serve as troops until a month before the end of the war. By contrast 180K voluntarily served the Union Army. So, yeah, as it turns out the aim and practice of the CSA was racism.

          11. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
            James Wyatt Whitehead

            UDC HQ in Richmond Virginia has ample records of blacks who served and fought for the Confederacy? Ever been there? I have seen those records and they were shown to me by a black member of the UDC. But that doesn’t fit your narrow revisionist history does it Mr. Purdy?

          12. Generally speaking, blacks did not serve the CSA voluntarily. They accompanied their masters, were hired out as slaves by slave owners as cooks, laborers, etc. or pressed into service. They were not “soldiers” which wasn’t allowed until the war was all but lost, and no records exist showing the existence of black CSA soldiers. Lee’s Army took free blacks in PA and pressed them into service. Slaves came in droves through Union lines seeking refuge, then they did voluntarily serve with Union forces, presumably because being a slave is horrific. These are facts, and your comments display how truly successful the UDC was in its misinformation campaign. https://www.battlefields.org/learn/articles/black-confederates-truth-and-legend

          13. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
            James Wyatt Whitehead

            UDC has in it’s possession the muster rolls of black men who bore arms for the Confederacy. 67 black men were held as prisoners of war at Fort Delaware where Gettysburg POWs were held until transferred. They were captured from the Pickett’s Charge episode of the fight.
            You will refuse to believe this since Ken Burns did not mention it in his civil war documentary.

          14. I think the key is the term “bore arms.” They were not soldiers, and it was most likely not voluntary. The famous picture of the two confederate “soldiers,” one white, one black, posing side by side fails to mention that the black gentleman is the white gentleman’s slave. There was not a widespread phenomenon of black service (voluntary service, especially) for the CSA; whereas escaping to Union lines to become contraband, then serving by the tens of thousands in the Union army, was indeed prevalent.

        2. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
          James Wyatt Whitehead

          Dude. The UDC rules. They have unbelievable records on the War of Northern Aggression that your team would love to bury for all time. Why is it that people like you want to bury the truth?

          1. “Dude. The UDC rules.” I’m guessing this is the first time this phrase has ever been uttered;-)

          2. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
            James Wyatt Whitehead

            Enjoyed the exchange Mr. Purdy. Happy New Years to you!
            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vr5isFIY4Lc

          3. Likewise!

    1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
      James Wyatt Whitehead

      PG? Most definitely not interested.

      1. how_it_works Avatar
        how_it_works

        You haven’t been around here long enough if PG hasn’t threatened to sue you.

  3. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Jeez, it’s not like she said Emmett Till whistled at her…

  4. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
    James Wyatt Whitehead

    Frances Hazel Reid. Legendary figure in 20th century Loudoun. I never met her, but I feel like I did. I came across countless historical items and articles conserved by her tireless efforts to preserve Loudoun County history. The Balch Library would be rather empty without local historians such as Reid, Mary Fishback, and Eugene Scheel. I fully expect the race hustlers to double down and cancel Reid.

  5. If we used the same standard applied to UDC, shouldn’t we go after anyone and everyone associated with the Democrat Party?

    Since its founding in 1829, the Democratic Party has fought against every major civil rights initiative, and has a long history of discrimination. The Democratic Party defended slavery, started the Civil War, opposed Reconstruction, founded the Ku Klux Klan, imposed segregation, perpetrated lynchings, and fought against the civil rights acts of the 1950s and 1960s.

    https://assets.ctfassets.net/qnesrjodfi80/6bQdKPLDjyo2s0I8c60gA2/aec7a4feb53cdd469d9c59bc3dd5cc64/swain-the_inconvenient_truth_about_the_democratic_party-transcript.pdf

    1. I don’t think that the UDC ever disavowed its love of the Lost Cause, or admitted that the institution of slavery was the cause of the War. Contrast the Democratic party, which has certainly shed its love for Jim Crow and the Klan.

      1. M. Purdy:
        “I don’t think that the UDC ever disavowed its love of the Lost Cause, or admitted that the institution of slavery was the cause of the War.”

        I don’t get your point. If UDC had kept pace with the Democrat Party, would that retroactively improve how we view Frances Hazel Reid who’s last known association with UDC was in 1927?

        “Contrast the Democratic party, which has certainly shed its love for Jim Crow and the Klan.”

        So when did the Democrat Party “shed its love for Jim Crow and the Klan”?

        “In the name of the greatest people that have ever trod this earth, I draw the line in the dust and toss the gauntlet before the feet of tyranny, and I say segregation now, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever.”

        George Wallace (Democrat) 1963
        (written by Wallace’s new speechwriter, Ku Klux Klan leader Asa Earl Carter.)

        Shouldn’t everyone associated with the Democrat Party when it had not yet “shed it’s love of Jim Crow and the Clan” be treated like Miss Reid? That’s my point.

        Frances Hazel Reid’s last known association with the UDC was in 1927. Why tar and feather her with guilt by association, but give those who were Democrats during its racist past a pass?

        1. Not Today Avatar

          Wallace is DEAD and the modern Democratic Party has long since disavowed those views. Does no one here wish to recognize the CRA or Southern Strategy for realigning the ‘teams’? Did the subject person ever realign or disavow the happy slave narrative that was, until at least 2015, STILL posted on the DoC website?

          1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
            James Wyatt Whitehead

            Wallace is indeed dead and LBJ was a member of the KKK. The Democratic Plantation lives on.
            https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/a3460c18393499b0536ba70e4f0e654f9b000b196b2f2bacae9f1479b30fa743.jpg

          2. Not Today Avatar

            Nah, plantations are dead too, ‘cept in the minds of those who think enlightened self-interest and microeconomic choices are only right when they’re white. 😂. See what I did there? I live in the 2000s. Join me. The water’s fine.

          3. LBJ despised African Americans and is also said to have used the N word. JFK put him on the ticket because he needed the Southern votes he would bring with him.

            The Democrats have a legacy with respect to African Americans. It’s one of using them for power and personal gain.

          4. A life of service is not enough, for her we must prove a negative, and she’s guilty until proven innocent.

            Frances Hazel Reid is also dead and cannot defend herself.

            There are many still alive with much more damning associations.

            Clinton awarded the Medal of Freedom to William Fulbright in 1993 and dedicated a life-size statue of his mentor and friend.

            Do you know Fulbright’s history? For starters, he was a signatory to the Southern Manifesto. Are you familiar with that?

            More about William Fulbright from the Washington Post:

            “His record in the Senate on civil rights was something else again: it was dismal. He not only voted against all the laws which in the fifties and sixties transformed this nation, he filibustered against them in company with some of the worst racists ever to serve in the Senate.”

            https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/opinions/1995/02/10/j-william-fulbright/4a7578c7-c6c4-440f-be81-b780ace31e0b/

          5. Not Today Avatar

            Is that like Trump giving that same honor to Rush Limbaugh? What’s your point? The UDC had, at the time of her death, during her tenure, a known policy of advancing inaccurate historical/racist narratives.

            Two wrongs don’t make a right. Kindergarten rules, where nearly all of life’s great lessons are learned. 😆 We know better now. We should do better now.

Leave a Reply