Will Dominion Now Have Three Offshore Windfarms?

By Steve Haner

The Kitty Hawk North windfarm off the coast of North Carolina, stalled because of its need to bring transmission cables ashore under Virginia’s Sandbridge Beach neighborhood, now has a new owner, a new name and a new lease on life. It is hard to imagine Dominion Energy Virginia would buy it without some plan to overcome the current local objections in Virginia Beach.

Also, Dominion Energy ratepayers will soon have another reason to sweat out future Atlantic hurricanes. We must all now forget the media frenzy of the last few weeks about how Hurricane Beryl was such a record breaker at Category 5 and thus a harbinger of future climate doom.

Within hours of the public announcement Monday that Dominion Energy Virginia would pay Avangrid $160 million to take over its lease and permits off the Outer Banks, Dominion officials hosted a meeting with some of the Sandbridge Beach residents who have been the roadblock. The quick engagement was greatly appreciated, said Joe Bourne, a leader of the Protect Sandbridge Beach Coalition, but the group’s basic objections to bringing the cables there have not changed. This is “early days,” he said.

Dominion has always been planning to build more offshore wind turbines after finishing the $10 billion Commonwealth of Virginia Offshore Wind project now under construction off Virginia Beach. Its most recent integrated resource plan included a second wave of wind development of roughly equal size to the first tranche, scheduled to begin operation in 2026.

But the utility was expected to expand CVOW into a new 176,000-acre lease area immediately adjacent to it but further out to sea. That new lease area will be among several auctioned by the federal government in August.

The Kitty Hawk North project planned by Avangrid, a European energy developer, is substantially smaller than the existing CVOW project and the possible second phase further out. It covers about 40,000 acres. It is likely to include less than a third as many turbines and produce on windy days less than a third as much electricity as CVOW. Much of its early regulatory spade work has been done. Avangrid will retain ownership of Kitty Hawk South.

Because Dominion plans to develop only a third of the full Kitty Hawk lease area, it will only need to bring two huge cables ashore under the Sandbridge Beach area, not the six that Avangrid was planning. Bourne indicated that Dominion stressed that in the meeting it held Monday, and again, it was viewed as positive, but added:  “We don’t have blinders on.”

Dominion could do both CVOW South and the westward expansion of the first turbine field. In making its announcement on Monday the company focused on expectations of massive growth in demand for its electricity. Exactly what Dominion is thinking hasn’t been made clear, but here are three things to keep in mind.

First, if Dominion does proceed on both the Kitty Hawk leasehold and what others expected to be the area for CVOW II, certain economies of scale may be available from the various manufacturers of the towers, turbines and blades and the installation contractors.

Second, Dominion has already successfully negotiated a deal to sell a 50% ownership share in CVOW phase one. The new partnership, still under regulatory review, is expected to fill the company’s coffers with fresh investment cash and reduce its own project risk. The exact same move of finding a non-controlling cash partner is probably under consideration in the planning for CVOW-South and CVOW II.

Third, a working group dominated by the wind and solar manufacturers and environmental advocates is already contemplating major changes in the existing Virginia Clean Economy Act. Now Dominion may have added motivation to support a change in the law that makes it easy to override the kind of local objections that have created the roadblock to the Kitty Hawk’s cables. The Sandbridge residents were aware of and opposed 2024 bills that sought to weaken local control, Bourne said.

Norfolk’s WTKR, in its coverage of the Dominion Kitty Hawk announcement, asked the company again about the need to bring any power generated ashore through the Sandbridge location. It seems nothing on that front has changed. In a statement to the television station, Dominion said what Avangrid was saying last year:

“We do not currently have the electric transmission infrastructure necessary along the northeast coast of North Carolina to land the cables in reasonable proximity to the CVOW-SOUTH lease area. Future cable landings in North Carolina would require network upgrades to prepare the grid there to receive offshore wind generation. Network upgrades are determined by our regional transmission organization PJM which coordinates the movement of wholesale electricity…”

When Virginia Beach City Council held a public hearing on the Avangrid plans in May 2023, Dominion Energy officials were visible in the crowd listening intently. Avangrid was also using the Virginia Clean Economy Act, which creates a presumption that offshore wind is in the public interest, as a justification for building out its project. Bourne said the announcement Monday was not a total surprise as Avangrid in company releases has been open about seeking a buyer.

It remains the case that only in Virginia, thanks to our pliant General Assembly, are captive utility ratepayers holding the financial risk if a project like this either fails to produce the expected level of electricity or fails to operate for the decades promised. In other states the plants are owned by independent companies that simply sell the power to a utility or to the grid under contract but take upon themselves much of the risk of failure.

So, hope all the scaremongers are wrong about the horrible ocean storms in our future due the so-called existential threat of catastrophic climate change.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

11 responses to “Will Dominion Now Have Three Offshore Windfarms?”

  1. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    more Luddism.

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      Luddites would have loved windmills. Old tech even in their day.

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        And so, what now then, Quixote? A sabot wouldn’t stand a chance in these gearboxes.

  2. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    I saw this and my immediate thought was that this sounds like something
    that Dominion CHOSE to do without incentives or subsidies. Perhaps I'm wrong but if Dominion DID willingly choose to do this – it sounds like they
    see opportunity – financial and otherwise?

    Also what about the whales? I thought that was still an ongoing challenge?

    Wrong?

    Also, anyone know what the storm rating is for the turbines? Is it equal to other infrastructure in the bay like the Bay-Bridge tunnel?

    I just don't see the hurricanes as the same bugaboo as others even with climate change.

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      Any wind project will be awash with subsidies from the federal government, either payments based on output or major tax breaks on the infrastructure investment. Certainly Dominion sees a financial opportunity, especially since it has now broken the code on the partnership flip to monetize the long term debt with a third party investor.

      The damage that land tornados can do to onshore wind facilities is well documented. As to the damage from a hurricane (or Pacific cyclone) to offshore facilities, time will tell. The winds are just as bad or worse than a tornado, more sustained, and cover far larger areas. All the way back to the case around the two test turbines, Dominion has treated much of that information as highly proprietary and has kept it secret.

      It is a stupid move that they would not do if the risk was on their stockholders and not their customers.

    2. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      Any wind project will be awash with subsidies from the federal government, either payments based on output or major tax breaks on the infrastructure investment. Certainly Dominion sees a financial opportunity, especially since it has now broken the code on the partnership flip to monetize the long term debt with a third party investor.

      The damage that land tornados can do to onshore wind facilities is well documented. As to the damage from a hurricane (or Pacific cyclone) to offshore facilities, time will tell. The winds are just as bad or worse than a tornado, more sustained, and cover far larger areas. All the way back to the case around the two test turbines, Dominion has treated much of that information as highly proprietary and has kept it secret.

      It is a stupid move that they would not do if the risk was on their stockholders and not their customers.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        Okay. Any more or less than the subsidies the govt does for nuclear including SMR and the Bill Gates project?

        on the “monitize” – interesting in that the third party investor sees financial opporunity?

        on storm damage, yes, we will see but it’s not like hurricanes have not already happened and took
        down oil rigs, powerlines, roads, bridges, etc… even the bay-bridge has a Cat rating which implies
        a higher cat could do damage. Why is this any more of an issue with turbines that other infrastructure
        that gets destroyed?

        1. Stephen Haner Avatar
          Stephen Haner

          Biden just signed a bill on nuclear that I think makes major improvements in the possible subsidies for that industry. I admit I have not dived into the details.

          As to why the damages to turbines matter more, the answer is because the utility still gets paid in full! The electricity stops flowing but the utility will still get its investment back with profit. Needed replacement power will also be at ratepayer expense. That profit and perhaps various tax preferences are the benefits the outside investor is after, as I wrote in the article linked.

        2. Stephen Haner Avatar
          Stephen Haner

          Biden just signed a bill on nuclear that I think makes major improvements in the possible subsidies for that industry. I admit I have not dived into the details.

          As to why the damages to turbines matter more, the answer is because the utility still gets paid in full! The electricity stops flowing but the utility will still get its investment back with profit. Needed replacement power will also be at ratepayer expense. That profit and perhaps various tax preferences are the benefits the outside investor is after, as I wrote in the article linked.

        3. Stephen Haner Avatar
          Stephen Haner

          Biden just signed a bill on nuclear that I think makes major improvements in the possible subsidies for that industry. I admit I have not dived into the details.

          As to why the damages to turbines matter more, the answer is because the utility still gets paid in full! The electricity stops flowing but the utility will still get its investment back with profit. Needed replacement power will also be at ratepayer expense. That profit and perhaps various tax preferences are the benefits the outside investor is after, as I wrote in the article linked.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            I guess I would have thought the turbines would be like any other structures that Dom owns that would get damaged/destroyed in a disaster. I assume they set aside some amt of money and/or have insurance to deal with the impacts from storms.

Leave a Reply