Why Virginia Democrats Should Support the New School Accountability System

President Obama signs the Every Student Succeeds Act in December 2015.

by Todd Truitt

In 2021, Republican Glenn Youngkin was able to flip the education issue on Democrats to pull off a victory. In 2025, Democrats need to reclaim the education issue to flip the Governor’s mansion back. One way of doing that is by supporting the new statewide public school accountability system, which furthers core Democratic values. If Democrats don’t get out ahead of this issue, Republicans will use it as a political issue.

The Current Broken Accountability System in Virginia

The 2015 Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) requires states to have accountability systems in order tomeasure and hold schools and districts responsible for raising student achievement for all students, and to prompt and support improvement where necessary.” However, referring to the current failure by many states to live up to their responsibility, a long-time New York Times editorial board member said recently:

The federal government made a disastrous choice a decade ago when it abandoned [a federal] accountability system (known as No Child Left Behind) that required schools to focus intently on helping the lowest-performing students catch up with their peers. Since [ESSA returned accountability systems to states], the already alarming achievement gaps that separate poor and wealthy children have only widened.

The COVID era demonstrated the failure of Virginia’s combined accountability and accreditation system. Virginia had some of the largest drops on the national NAEP exams, with the lowest performing students suffering the most. And yet, with accountability tied to accreditation, nearly the same number of Virginia schools were accredited last year as there were in 2019 (92% of VA schools in 2019-20 vs. 89% in 2022-23).

Barack Obama’s Secretary of Education, Arne Duncan, has spoken out about the need for Virginia families to get more honest information (Quote Tweeting Andrew Rotherham, a member of the VBOE who is a Democrat, former Mark Warner appointee and current Youngkin appointee):

Maryland’s accountability system also had similar problems with showing COVID era-related achievement changes, and the new State Superintendent of Schools appointed by Governor Wes Moore (D) recently started a process to revamp it. Maryland’s Superintendent stated:

I don’t honestly think our accountability system is holding anyone accountable… The only way we’re going to get better is to be honest about where we are and then we’re honest about the strategies we need to put in place.

Fixing the Failed System of Disclosure to Parents and Communities

Virginia is far along in the process of revamping its accountability system. The VBOE officially began the revision process in August 2023, and a new Virginia K-12 school Accountability framework is expected to be finalized and approved by the Virginia Board of Education (VBOE) this summer. This new Accountability framework will provide more transparent data to parents and communities about the academic performance of their public schools, including addressing three key shortfalls of the current failed system:

  1. Separate Accountability and Accreditation. The Accountability system will NOT be tied to Accreditation, similar to most states. The new Accountability framework will enable more transparent and granular academic performance data for parents and communities, while the Accreditation system will focus on compliance. The new Accountability framework will also allow for better targeting of support to schools most in need, which is a core purpose of such systems under ESSA.
  2. Provide a Simple to Understand Summative Score. The Accountability system will be based on Academic Mastery, Academic Growth (for ES and MS), Graduation (for HS), and Academic Readiness (e.g., chronic absenteeism, advanced coursework, performance tasks). The VBOE has made clear the summative score will not be an A-F system, but will be something like Maryland has that is easily understandable (e.g., 4 categories or a numerical system).
  3. Use a Mastery Index. The Accountability System will provide additional credit to schools for students who score higher on SOL exams than Pass/Proficient. Presently, schools only get credit for moving students to Passing an SOL exam. A Mastery Index will promote academic excellence for all Virginia public schools and incentivize individual schools to develop each student to their fullest potential.

Some opponents have claimed that more public disclosure will result in more segregation of public schools as families and teachers flee poorly performing schools. But that’s an insult to Virginia families, communities and teachers. Most families and communities would want to help their local public school (a bedrock of their communities) if negative reporting was given on school academic performance. And teachers are trained professionals who are already able to research such information. Many teachers choose to work in underprivileged schools to make more of a difference.

Relatedly, opponents have criticized the fact that Academic Mastery will be weighted greater than Growth for both Elementary and Middle School. But the weighting of Mastery in Virginia’s system will be less than in Massachusetts for Elementary School, and equal to Massachusetts for Middle School. And as described above, Maryland’s accountability system that weighs Growth almost at parity with Mastery failed. Most importantly, the goal for families, teachers and communities is for students to reach Proficiency/Mastery, not endlessly grow towards it.

The Accountability Framework Supports Democratic Party Values

The new Accountability framework will promote core beliefs of the Democratic Party: government transparency, equity and a commitment to excellent public education for all. As President Barack Obama stated when signing ESSA:

“…I want this not just because it’s good for the students themselves, not just because it’s good for the communities involved, not only because it’s good for our economy, but because it really goes to the essence of what we are about as Americans.  

There was a time I think when upward mobility was the hallmark of America.  We’ve slipped on that front compared to other countries. And some of it is because where we used to be so far ahead of other countries in investing in education for every child, now on some indicators, we’ve been lagging behind.  Hopefully, this is going to get us back out front.

There’s nothing more essential to living up to the ideals of this nation than making sure every child is able to achieve their God-given potential…”

Presumptive Democratic gubernatorial nominee Abigail Spanberger, a proud moderate, should publicly take the position to not support any legislation, or appoint any members to the VBOE who would support, lowering academic standards or decreasing public disclosure of academic data. Gray Davis in California made a similar pledge in 1998 for California Democrats to win back the governor’s office after similar battles over education, and helped enact a new accountability system shortly after taking office.

Any attempted rollback of the Accountability framework in whole or in part by Virginia Democrats would be politically unpopular and create an easy campaign issue for Republicans (with a likely veto while Governor Youngkin is in office). The Washington Post editorial board was very vocal against such actions during the McAuliffe and Northam administrations. Governor Youngkin (successfully) used them as a campaign issue in 2021, specifically pointing out how the McAuliffe administration’s changes to the Accreditation and Accountability system reduced disclosure of academic data to the public.

With the new Accountability framework, families, teachers and communities benefit from greater transparency and struggling schools benefit from better targeted support from their communities, all increasing support for the public school system in general. It is a win-win for Virginia Democrats, and for Virginia students, parents and communities.

Todd Truitt is a parent of two school-age children in Arlington County, Virginia. He is also the Chair of the Math Advisory Committee for Arlington Public Schools and active in the Arlington Democrats.  He is a business transactions attorney and a Certified Public Accountant.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

39 responses to “Why Virginia Democrats Should Support the New School Accountability System”

  1. Kathleen Smith Avatar
    Kathleen Smith

    Seems like there is one Democrat on the state board opposed to the new accountability system. She has made some good points; however, it makes for a fair system without a lot of touchy feely language that also allows for systems to scam the public. Accountability is just that-accountability as defined by the regulation. Nothing more, nothing less. Good job on the article.

  2. And yet those responsible for actually teaching are not held accountable for the results, yet want more money. Make teacher raises/salaries connected to the students' learning… that way, good teachers will make more money and poor teachers will get less pay.

    1. Teddy007 Avatar
      Teddy007

      And how does a school system account for the quality of the students? Would teachers be better off failing of of their students rather than have one advance and do badly on future tests?

  3. walter smith Avatar
    walter smith

    Abigail Spanberger…a proud MODERATE?
    What was her Pelosi voting percentage? Not selling that image with me…

    1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      She never supported Pelosi for Speaker and once even called for "new leadership" in the House. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/10/10/spanbergers-blast-pelosi-carries-more-benefits-than-liabilities/

      1. walter smith Avatar
        walter smith

        But how did she vote?
        You know politicians give hall passes on tough votes when they have what they need locked up. Same thing they used to do with filibuster votes in the Senate…oh, darn, we just couldn’t get it to the floor…

        Being the least crazy Dem doesn’t mean you are sane. And she isn’t the least crazy Dem. Plenty crazy all by herself.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          Well, did she represent the folks who voted for her? Would they vote for her again?

          1. walter smith Avatar
            walter smith

            OK, Larry – I am just going to have to go Proverbs 27:22 and save myself the aggravation.
            Your inane, as usual, comment means why even have a representative if all the representative is supposed to do is “vote” as “the people” say? There is no need for a Rep. That’s “pure” Democracy and is not what we have because of its inherent flaws. We have a representative Republic, actively under attack by Leftist zealots.
            A Representative is supposed to be selected for leadership, not automaton votes. Maybe that’s the problem with our country as we are trillions in debt for a society breaking down, not because of Trump, who signifies Normie disgust with our so-called elites, but because our so-called elites (of both Parties) will do anything to retain their undeserved power.

          2. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            elections Walter? That’s how we govern, right?

      2. Matt Adams Avatar
        Matt Adams

        "She never supported Pelosi for Speaker and once even called for "new leadership" in the House."

        Your citation doesn't prove your comment and in fact she Rep. Spanberger only made that request in 2022 as a result of the gamesmanship by Rep. Hoyer and the Speaker at that time Rep. Pelosi.

  4. Lefty665 Avatar
    Lefty665

    <i>"In 2025, Democrats need to reclaim the education issue to flip the Governor’s mansion back."</i>

    Viewing our children's education as a partisan campaign tool is disgusting.

    The issue with McAuliffe was his position that parents should have no voice in their children's education, not education itself. That is what cost him the election.

    To encourage Spanberger to use our children's education as another steppingstone to further her career ambitions, as she used the CIA and House of Representatives, is also disgusting. That you link to her web site and misrepresent her as a "proud moderate" is a partisan abuse of BR. I encourage our actual moderator to consider that.

    Have you no shame?

  5. Bob X from Texas Avatar
    Bob X from Texas

    Teachers hate having their work product evaluated. However, evaluating them is easy.
    Test students at the beginning of the year and at the end of the year. Reward the best teachers, retrain the mediocre teachers, and transfer the worst teachers to the great American labor pool.

    1. Teddy007 Avatar
      Teddy007

      The students have to have some skin in the game for any testing to work. And if students are held back for low scores then all of the issues involving race/class/economics come into play.

    2. Matt Hurt Avatar
      Matt Hurt

      The pre-test post-test methodology of measuring growth has not proven reliable. Lots of gamesmanship at play.
      https://www.baconsrebellion.com/virginias-student-growth-model-stunts-achievement/

      Besides that, teachers do play a huge role in the performance of a classroom, but school and district leadership play a huge role in school outcomes. Better leadership typically produces better outcomes when controlling for external factors that cannot be controlled by educators.

  6. CJBova Avatar

    it is not the BR moderator’s place to review posted articles. That is the role of the editors. Since readers have expressed similar and opposite opinions, they’ve covered the issue.

    1. Lefty665 Avatar
      Lefty665

      Tks for looking, appreciate your understanding of scope.

    2. Lefty665 Avatar
      Lefty665

      Tks for looking, appreciate your understanding of scope.

  7. Teddy007 Avatar
    Teddy007

    A system that even gets close to implying that all students can learn calculus is bound to fail. The iron rule of educaiton is either one can have high standards or high completion rates. One cannot have both.

  8. Lefty665 Avatar
    Lefty665

    <i>"In 2021, Republican Glenn Youngkin was able to flip the education issue on Democrats to pull off a victory. In 2025, Democrats need to reclaim the education issue to flip the Governor’s mansion back."</i>

    Viewing our children's education as a Dem partisan campaign tool is disgusting.

    The issue with McAuliffe was his position that parents should have no voice in their children's education, not education itself. That is what cost him and the Dems the election.You fundamentally misrepresent the issue.

    To encourage Spanberger to use our children's education as another steppingstone to further her career ambitions, as she used the CIA and House of Representatives, is also disgusting. That you link to her web site and misrepresent her as a <i>"proud moderate"</i> is a partisan abuse of BR. I encourage our actual moderator to consider that.

    Have you no shame?

  9. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    I concur that the accreditation/accountability system before was nothing to write home about.

    It seemed to be all about giving credit to low performing schools that improved but they were still far from basic performance.

    Many low performing schools are basically neighborhood schools with low income demographics in districts with many schools more urban than rural where income stratification is less an issue.

    It occurs in place like Richmond, Henrico and Chesterfield,

    A VDOE build-a-table query will pull up dozens of really good school and dozens of really bad schools – in the same district – and pretty much aligned along income demographics in the neighborhoods the schools serve.

    I don't agree that this new system will "encourage" teachers and communities to improve the schools. Teachers who will be held "accountable" for not successfully teaching low-income, at-risk kids will protect their own careers by transferring to schools with easier-to-teach schools,

    The low performing schools will become even harder to staff and lead to even more hiring of newbie teachers who will also flee as soon as they are able once they see that they will be held "accountable" for low-performing low-income kids.

    The question is what the Governor and DOE will do about these schools because the problems have been there all along and the prior accountability system tended to "hide" them so that sanctions against principals and teachers were less likely – as long as they could show "improvement".

    The problem remains of neighborhood schools primarily reflecting the education level and income level of the folks who live in those neighborhoods.

    All the accountability system will do is show the problem. How to fix it is not yet being seriously addressed.

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/7bbedadf1e919d40a9e73c79a10837750d4a406a8aff7de2d89540972c1e8a69.png https://richmond.com/many-v

  10. Charles Pyle Avatar
    Charles Pyle

    I would also suggest that back in the day under Kathleen Smith as director of school improvement with VDOE — directly holding divisions with MOUs accountable — we would not be seeing this clown show in Petersburg. https://www.wtvr.com/news/local-news/petersburg-superintendent-travel-expenses-may-21-2024

  11. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    I concur that the accreditation/accountability system before was nothing to write home about.

    It seemed to be all about giving credit to low performing schools that improved but they were still far from basic performance.

    Many low performing schools are basically neighborhood schools with low income demographics in districts with many schools more urban than rural where income stratification is less an issue.

    It occurs in place like Richmond, Henrico and Chesterfield,

    A VDOE build-a-table query will pull up dozens of really good school and dozens of really bad schools – in the same district – and pretty much aligned along income demographics in the neighborhoods the schools serve.

    I don't agree that this new system will "encourage" teachers and communities to improve the schools. Teachers who will be held "accountable" for not successfully teaching low-income, at-risk kids will protect their own careers by transferring to schools with easier-to-teach schools,

    The low performing schools will become even harder to staff and lead to even more hiring of newbie teachers who will also flee as soon as they are able once they see that they will be held "accountable" for low-performing low-income kids.

    The question is what the Governor and DOE will do about these schools because the problems have been there all along and the prior accountability system tended to "hide" them so that sanctions against principals and teachers were less likely – as long as they could show "improvement".

    The problem remains of neighborhood schools primarily reflecting the education level and income level of the folks who live in those neighborhoods.

    All the accountability system will do is show the problem. How to fix it is not yet being seriously addressed.

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/7bbedadf1e919d40a9e73c79a10837750d4a406a8aff7de2d89540972c1e8a69.png https://richmond.com/many-v

    1. You raise some good points that I wanted to pre-but in my article, but I didn't want a 2,000+ article.

      First, teachers are trained professionals. They know how their schools are performing. They talk. I encourage you to go volunteer at a Title 1 school and talk to teachers about why they're there.

      Plus, people don't get into teaching for the money, they do it to make a difference. Where can you make the biggest difference as a teacher?

      In addition, the majority of states have separate accountability systems. Massachusetts overall weighs mastery more than Virginia will. Are they seeing such doom and gloom consequences?

      Lastly, Progressive leader (and future Supreme Court Justice) Louis Brandeis said in 1913 "sunlight is said to be the best of disinfectants." One of Barack Obama's first acts in office was a government transparency executive order. Neither have caveats at the end "…but if we're afraid of how people will react, then let's not disclose the information to the public as they're the unsophisticated masses." Such attitudes towards government transparency are elitist, anti-public schools, anti-equity, anti-Democratic and anti-good government.

  12. Charles Pyle Avatar
    Charles Pyle

    I really don't understand the accountability vs. accreditation theme. Governor Allen used the Board of Education's broad authority under its regulations for accrediting schools to implement the standards-based SOL accountability program — bypassing potential opposition in the General Assembly (although important to remember that back in the early 1990s, there were a few Democrats who understood the urgency of raising standards). Given the Board of Education's broad authority over accreditation/accountability standards — including "cut scores" on SOL tests — it is mystifying that on the eve of the release of 2023-2024 SOL scores, we are still operating under the McAuliffe/Northam/Lane accountability and assessment standards.

  13. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    LarryG and Charles Pyle have highlighted two key issues. It is well and good to have more transparenty and accountability. Then what? What is going to be done to help those schools that score low? There are numerous reasons that schools could score low on this accountability measure and they differ from school to school. It could be the demographics of the studenty body. The school system can't do anything about the demographics; it would have to devise ways to teach that would overcome the demographic obstacles. That's a tall order. It could the presence of weak teachers at key points. There will need to be a way to identify those teachers and help them. It could be poor leadership in the principal's office. Again, the division will need to identify those principals, help them or move them out. Accountability is good, but if nothing is done to rectify the problems found by the accountability system, it will become just a way of labelling the "bad" achools.

    Regarding Charles Pyle's comment about the cut scores on the SOL tests, Governor Youngkin declared two years ago that Virginia would raise its passing scores to the highest in the nation. Nothing has happened.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      I predict that once the new system is in place, almost no schools in higher income demographics will be shown to be "bad", no bad teachers, no bad principals, no bad schools on a year-after-year systemic basis. Virtually all will be low-income schools.

  14. Matt Hurt Avatar
    Matt Hurt

    I've been trying to track this process very closely since the BOE first began these discussions, and so far, I really don't have any major complaints. However, the Board has only discussed some high level decision points, and the devil could be in the details.

    A lot of folks are going to be in for a rude awakening with the new growth statistic (VVAAS). The old growth was viewed in a very positive light by educators because it only was applied when a student failed a test, and served as a bonus if the student scored well enough. VVAAS will look at the growth of all students, including those among the highest scoring. This paints an entirely different picture.

    I think the argument that this will not be an A-F system is moot. It appears to me that the new system will likely be set up to group schools into quartiles based on the indices that will be used. Though the schools in the bottom quartile won't be designated as an F school, it won't take everyone long to realize that there's not much difference in an F rating and the bottom quartile rating.

    Dick brings up a very good point- what are we going to do with those schools that demonstrate need of improvement? It seems that we don't have a very good track record in helping those schools as some have been perpetually engaged with the Office of School Quality for roughly 20 years. I have known of local school board practices that are antithetical to school improvement. Also, many of the biggest factors that determine student outcomes among high risk populations are very intangible (school/division culture, climate, expectations, etc.) and are very difficult to measure, much less positively impact. How can these issues be addressed by Richmond? I suspect there is a way to do this, but I don't know if I have ever seen evidence of it. It appears to me that the Constitution of Virginia does not provide sufficient means for the VDOE to make the kinds of changes needed to realize necessary improvements.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      If you think I'm wrong/misguided/whatever, on what I have been saying, I don't mind hearing that opinion from people who are actually in the education community, like Matt, Charlie, et al, because I feel confident it will be done without engaging in a personal attack or name calling.

      So have at it. Please. It really is part of "learning" – for all of us. Those who are actually engaged in the field have insights that those who are not, usually do not have.

      Seems like for awhile, VDOE had an approach for troubled schools – i.e. "turn-over specialists". Have not heard about it lately and I don't see any VDOE or Governor initiative to appoint someone who is the Guru in what comes next with regard to holding under-performing schools accountable.

    2. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      Richmond's problem is different than other systems IMO.

      It's obviously different from SW Va CIP schools.

      And it's different from Henrico, Chesterfield, Fairfax, etc.

      Many, most? Richmond schools serve lower income populations while Henrico/Chesterfield have stratified schools largely segregated by income and class. The lower income schools typically are not high scoring and the higher income typically are.

      The basic theme for many (not all) is if the school is largely attended by kids who are at-risk, low-income (usually low education attainment) households – they will have academic performance challenges.

      Is it chicken/egg as to whether most all these low-performing schools just happen to have teachers and principals that are not "good" and that's the reason … and it can be "fixed" merely by holding them accountable and replacing them if they fail to bring their schools up to "good" performance levels? Color me skeptical.
      Have the administrators actually replaced the personnel at low performing schools with new personnel who will perform better and "fix" the problem?

      If that is TRUE – then what ROLE and responsibility does the school administration hold for schools that, year after year, continue to not perform acceptably? Is it the teachers and principal or the administrators that should be held accountable?

      1. Matt Hurt Avatar
        Matt Hurt

        The performance of schools and divisions are a multivariate problem, to be sure. Certainly, demographics and other factors outside of the control of educators factor into the outcomes. However, according to our investigations, factors that educators can control factor into the outcomes more than factors that that cannot control. Just because the results haven't been good doesn't mean that there is no hope. We have plenty of examples of schools and divisions that have employed problem solving strategies to identify the problems, develop mitigation strategies, measure the implementation of the mitigation strategies, adjust as necessary, until the problem has been overcome.

        The problem of accountability is variable as well. Eventually, it all rests at the top, whether that be the school board or the electorate who puts those folks in place.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          I’m with you Matt. There are actually SOME, a few, multi school districts in Va that have stratified neighborhood demographics or most all district low income like Richmond, that do reasonably well.

          What really pains me is to see kids that are lost after 3rd grade because they did not acquire the tools they must have to learn material at the higher grades. They give up, often become disruptive or truants and grow up lacking the basic education they need to fairly participate in the economy, to earn a decent living, to have healthcare, to build and IRA and wealth, to take care of their families and not need entitlements.

          And they often repeat the cycle when they have kids.

          If “we” don’t catch these kids in grades 1-4 , and help them get the tools they must have, we are ending up with enormous problems and costs both financial and societal.

          It undercuts the entire concept of WHY we tax people to provide a public education.

          And what “we” do depending on who the “we” are, is cast blame, condemn govt and public education as a concept, and make excuses.

          It is unconscionable for a wealthy district like Henrico to go year after year after year with thousands of kids who routinely fail to get enough education to fairly participate in the economy and instead pick up the tab for those failures… IF we cannot or will not take care of our kids to become self-supporting adults, what the heck are we doing? end of rant!

    3. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      If you think I'm wrong/misguided/whatever, on what I have been saying, I don't mind hearing that opinion from people who are actually in the education community, like Matt, Charlie, et al, because I feel confident it will be done without engaging in a personal attack or name calling.

      So have at it. Please. It really is part of "learning" – for all of us. Those who are actually engaged in the field have insights that those who are not, usually do not have.

      Seems like for awhile, VDOE had an approach for troubled schools – i.e. "turn-over specialists". Have not heard about it lately and I don't see any VDOE or Governor initiative to appoint someone who is the Guru in what comes next with regard to holding under-performing schools accountable.

  15. CJBova Avatar

    Larry, if you see any name calling, flag it. Otherwise, it’s off topic to bring up something that isn’t there or related to the main post.

  16. CJBova Avatar

    Larry, if you see any name calling, flag it. Otherwise, it’s off topic to bring up something that isn’t there or related to the main post.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      I will, thanks. Did not know flagging it would make much difference.

Leave a Reply