Why They Fought — and Deserve to be Remembered

Units descended from both Confederate and Union forces are now part of the Kentucky Army National Guard’s 138th Field Artillery Brigade. These campaign streamers, from the brigade’s colors, commemorate that service. Streamers with a gray top commemorate Confederate service, blue tops honor Union service.

by Donald Smith 

Soldiers go to war for many reasons — home, country, duty, glory, personal adventure. But, in the midst of battle, soldiers fight for their comrades — “the man to the left of me, the man to the right of me,” as the saying goes. Good soldiers are driven by an intense desire to not let their comrades down. That drive is one of the main reasons why Americans have always honored combat soldiers. Now, the United States Congress has arguably left out one segment of America’s past fighting force — Confederate soldiers — and indicated that those men don’t deserve the same level of respect from today’s military.

The Congressional Naming Commission’s Final Report — which has mysteriously gone offline — says in its Preamble: “In passing the 2021 William M. “Mac” Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act, the United States Congress determined that Confederates and the Confederacy no longer warrant commemoration through Department of Defense assets.”

Most people think that translates to changing some Army base names. Apparently the CNC thought much, much more broadly. It construed its authority to mean that it should pass judgement on any and all symbols of the Confederacy, no matter how large or small, anywhere within the DoD. Specifically, it determined it had the prerogative to comb through battle streamers on Army unit flags and cast a thumbs-down judgment on some.

“Since 1925,” wrote the CNC, in Part III of its report, “the U.S. Army has recognized the Confederate service of certain Army National Guard units to establish a historical connection between pre-Civil War organized militia units and the 20th-century Army National Guard. Current U.S. Army policy authorizes units to display campaign streamers for Federal service in a named campaign. Since 1949, some units have been authorized to display unique campaign streamers to denote their service in the Confederacy during the Civil War. These Confederate campaign streamers are authorized for display as an exception to the Army policy of requiring Federal service …. There are 52 Army National Guard units that display the distinctive Confederate campaign streamers to denote Confederate service.”

Not anymore, said the CNC.  “The Commission recommends the Secretary of Defense direct the Secretary of the Army to REVOKE the 1949 exception to policy that facilitated the adoption of battle streamers NOT associated with U.S. Army service. As such, all battle streamers that commemorate the Confederacy should be removed.” Congress, so far, seems to agree with this. There’s no sign that Congress has done anything to stop or delay the implementation of the CNC’s recommendations — which it can do, if it has the will.

The CNC’s action directly challenges an important principle that most Americans have comprehended and respected for centuries: the actions of the soldiers are not the same thing as the actions of the politicians and generals who send soldiers into battle. Men joined the Confederate Army or Navy for many different reasons. Some, to be sure, wanted to protect the institution of slavery. (Even though 70% of Southern white families didn’t own slaves, according to the 1860 census.) Others joined because they wanted to serve their state, or sought adventure and glory, or feared being scorned by the folks back home if they didn’t enlist. In 1862 the Confederacy enacted a conscription law, so many Confederates HAD to join.

Once a soldier joins a unit, though, especially one that sees extended combat, he builds a bond with his fellow soldiers. That bond carries them through tough and deadly times; it spurs them to do heroic things and risk their lives. That courage, and shared suffering and sacrifice, is what’s symbolized and commemorated by the streamers attached to Army regimental flags.

The 116th Infantry Regiment, Virginia Army National Guard, is descended from the Stonewall Brigade. It has nineteen campaign streamers for battles fought while in Confederate service. Each of the streamers has the name of a campaign — Fredericksburg, Chancellorsville, Gettysburg, the Wilderness — where regimental soldiers fought, suffered, died and distinguished themselves. They are a rich part of the unit’s — and our — legacy. Politicians in Southern state capitals were the ones who decided to secede from the Union and endorse slavery. Privates, sergeants and junior officers in the 116th Infantry Regiment, and others like it across the South, defended roads and charged entrenchments because they had been ordered to. The campaign streamers commemorate them!

One of the most poignant moments of Band of Brothers was a speech a German general gave to his soldiers as they surrendered to Easy Company. “You’re a special group,” he told them. “You’ve found in one another a bond that exists only in combat, among brothers. You’ve shared foxholes, held each other in dire moments. You’ve seen death and suffered together. I’m proud to have served with each and every one of you. You all deserve long and happy lives in peace.”

The officers and soldiers of Easy didn’t interrupt the general’s speech to lecture him and his men that none of their courage and suffering mattered because they’d fought for Nazi Germany. The Americans listened respectfully, because they had the same special, unique bonds forged only in combat.  

The Union Army recognized that, too. At Appomattox, when the Confederate infantry marched in to formally surrender, the commander of the Union contingent called his troops to attention and salute arms. (General John B. Gordon, commanding the Confederates, saluted back). The Armies of the Potomac and James had no problem saluting the Army of Northern Virginia.  They felt and understood something that, apparently, the CNC didn’t. (Or wouldn’t).

The CNC is now disbanded, and its PR representative’s email no longer accepts messages. The one commissioner who is a member of Congress, Austin Scott of Georgia’s 8th district, refuses to discuss its judgments or why it reached them. His press aide said he “is unable to comment per commission request.” Therefore, the responsibility now falls on Congress. Congress created the CNC.  Does it agree with all of its recommendations? If it doesn’t, then it has all sorts of ways to avoid the implementation of those it doesn’t support.

Donald Smith was raised in Richmond. His mother was born in a house not far from VMI, and family members still live there.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

46 responses to “Why They Fought — and Deserve to be Remembered”

  1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    You contend that this is the principle that should be recognized: “an important principle that most Americans have comprehended and respected for centuries: the actions of the soldiers are not the same thing as the actions of the politicians and generals who send soldiers into battle.” Does that mean that you would support the burying of German soldiers on the fields of Normandy and other World War II graveyards, erecting statutes to them, and including the battle streamers of those units in current German army regalia?

  2. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    You contend that this is the principle that should be recognized: “an important principle that most Americans have comprehended and respected for centuries: the actions of the soldiers are not the same thing as the actions of the politicians and generals who send soldiers into battle.” Does that mean that you would support the burying of German soldiers on the fields of Normandy and other World War II graveyards, erecting statutes to them, and including the battle streamers of those units in current German army regalia?

    1. Matt Adams Avatar
      Matt Adams

      “Does that mean that you would support the burying of German soldiers on the fields of Normandy and other World War II graveyards, erecting statutes to them, and including the battle streamers of those units in current German army regalia?”

      La Cambe contains 21,200 German military personnel.

      Not all German soldiers were Nazi’s and not all of them committed atrocities.

      There is also a monument to those Soldiers in that Cemetery. These are things you’d know if you’d bothered to research before opining about things to which you should not comment.

      1. Charles D'Aulnais Avatar
        Charles D’Aulnais

        They were in France. Atrocity #1. And Germany pays for their cemeteries in France.

        1. Stephen Haner Avatar
          Stephen Haner

          Fascinating fact. Between the wars Eisenhower worked with the Army team on the WWI cemeteries and the time he spent on that task, and the understanding it gave him of the geography of those battlefields, proved rather useful later. 🙂

          1. Charles D'Aulnais Avatar
            Charles D’Aulnais

            Getting the lay of the land. And not just Summersby.

            Another factoid. Lee, when venturing into PA, was reported to have used large scale maps that masked features even though he had better maps available. Don’t recall the reason.

        2. Matt Adams Avatar
          Matt Adams

          “Charles D’Aulnais Matt Adams
          4 minutes ago
          They were in France. Atrocity #1. And Germany pays for their cemeteries in France.”

          Well here’s the thing NN (yes, I know it’s you, at least you aren’t hiding behind a women’s name now, so progress).

          That has nothing to do with anything and actually they are done through donations. There are a plethora of monuments to the German soldiers littered across Europe. They have the uncanny ability to separate the solider who served from the war criminals.

          1. Charles D'Aulnais Avatar
            Charles D’Aulnais

            A soldier’s reason is family history. The army’s reason was a rebellion. The author wants to honor the army.

            Wow, a regular Sherlock Holmes.

          2. Charles D'Aulnais Avatar
            Charles D’Aulnais

            A soldier’s reason is family history. The army’s reason was a rebellion. The author wants to honor the army.

            Wow, a regular Sherlock Holmes.

            Donations? From whom?

          3. Matt Adams Avatar
            Matt Adams

            “A soldier’s reason is family history. The army’s reason was a rebellion. The author wants to honor the army.”

            That’s not true at all, those steamers don’t “honor” the army. They honor the soldiers of the unit, which is why they are specific to each unit.

            Which is again, not the topic of DHS’s comment. Germany was in Poland first and there are German Cemeteries there as well, also with monuments.

            “Wow, a regular Sherlock Holmes.”

            Not really, you’re pretty predictable. This new handle hasn’t improved your logic or ability to have a salient comment.

            Gee how hard is to do research, clearly for you two, very difficult.

            https://www.volksbund.de/en/a-brief-introduction#:~:text=With%20their%20contributions%20and%20donations,the%20federal%20and%20state%20governments.

          4. Charles D'Aulnais Avatar
            Charles D’Aulnais

            One monument does not a plethora make. And there is one monument in Europe (outside of Germany) to a German soldier from WWII. See if you can find it.

          5. Matt Adams Avatar
            Matt Adams

            There are monuments located in every German Cemetery (in and out of German), you should really spend more time researching and less time speaking.

          6. Charles D'Aulnais Avatar
            Charles D’Aulnais

            Show me a picture.
            You miss the point entirely. The allied cemeteries are paid for and maintained by the host countries.
            The German cemeteries by Germany/donation.
            The monuments of which you speak are in the cemeteries.
            The CSA monuments are in the town squares.
            No one has ever suggested that CSA monuments were not appropriate for cemeteries.

            Steve hit the nail. And you missed that too.

          7. Matt Adams Avatar
            Matt Adams

            “Show me a picture”

            Open up a new web browser and type German Cemeteries around Europe and stop being lazy.

            “The allied cemeteries are paid for and maintained by the host countries.”

            That is not the point at all, that wasn’t DHS’s point at all and you’re wrong. The ABMC (US Federal Government) pays for the maintenance, the host nation just defers taxes.

            There exists throughout Germany in towns all over, monuments to their soldiers, you again don’t even bother to research anything you write.

            “No one has ever suggested that CSA monuments were not appropriate for cemeteries.”

            Arlington Cemetery called it would like to remind you of articles on this blog, which you commented on, which says the exact opposite what you’re espousing now.

            “Steve hit the nail. And you missed that too.”

            False, Steve’s comment isn’t at odds with my mine.

          8. No one has ever suggested that CSA monuments were not appropriate for cemeteries.

            Sure they have.

            https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/sep/13/arlington-national-cemetery-confederate-memorial

    2. M. Purdy Avatar

      To build on Dick’s point, outside of understated military cemeteries, and some small exceptions for those who rose up against Hitler, Germany does not publicly honor units or individuals who served in WW2. Also, VMI has its own battle streamers from the CW, which I’ve been told were issued by the US Army. Something you may want to look into.

      1. Stephen Haner Avatar
        Stephen Haner

        There is a German cemetery at Normandy. But what this fellow wants for the Confederates is not “remembrance” but “celebration.”

        1. Matt Adams Avatar
          Matt Adams

          Campaign steamers are just that, they are tied to regimental flags. They get flown at HQ or come out when there is a CoC. It really is rather petty to remove them, but that’s the current climate.

        2. Donald Smith Avatar
          Donald Smith

          This person (singular of “those people”) is close. They deserve to be commemorated and honored…but I wouldn’t object to celebrating them.

  3. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    “…one segment of America’s past fighting force — Confederate soldiers…”

    Confederate soldiers were never any part of the US past fighting force…. hence the need for the exception you cited…

    1. Charles D'Aulnais Avatar
      Charles D’Aulnais

      CSAUSA

    2. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
      James Wyatt Whitehead

      And it begins…

      1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
        Eric the half a troll

        …reality, that is… it never ended…

  4. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
    James Wyatt Whitehead

    Thank you Mr. Smith. Enjoyed the article immensely and relevant to my latest Confederate ancestors research. The 116th Regiment draws much of it’s heritage from the 5th Virginia Infantry of the famed “Stonewall Brigade”. My 4th great grandfather was KIA at First Bull Run during Stonewall Jackson’s assault on Rickett’s Battery on the Henry Hill. I assumed he was buried on the battlefield but my good nose for history led me to his grave at St. Pauls Old School Baptist Church in Happy Creek, VA. A special nod to my friends at the Warren County Historical Society. I plan to mark his grave with a proper military tombstone. Private Robert Alexander was just 21. He was a simple farm laborer. Owned no land and held no slaves. He left behind a wife and 4 children.

  5. The Left does not forget. The Left does not forgive. The Left has no interest in national reconciliation. The sins of a century-and-a-half ago burn as intensely as those of a year ago.

    The attitude reminds me of something I once read about Osama Bin Ladin. In his imagination, it was as if the Crusades — the Muslim wars against the Christian Crusaders over control of the Holy Land — weren’t ancient history. He drew a straight line between the Crusades and the events of his day. It was as if the Crusades were only 1,000 days past, not 1,000 years.

    The mentality of conflating long-ago events with current events (not the terrorism) is the same. That’s how the Left (in its own mind) draws moral legitimacy. The Left sees itself as heir to the righteous struggles of the past. Thus, it must keep those memories alive.

    1. M. Purdy Avatar

      “The Left has no interest in national reconciliation.” I saw lots of right wingers carrying Confederate flags bent on “reconciliation” in Charlottesville in 2017 and in DC in 2021. Being a Lost Cause apologist doesn’t help your case or that of the Jeff Council. So please continue…:-)

      1. Stephen Haner Avatar
        Stephen Haner

        I’ve given up trying to educate them on that point….They were doomed to lose in 1861 and haven’t learned a damn thing since.

        1. Donald Smith Avatar
          Donald Smith

          Thank you for your concern. But, we realize there’s more to life than our electric bill.

      2. Donald Smith Avatar
        Donald Smith

        Hey, can I play too? I saw lots of BLM members burning businesses and stealing flat-screen TVs during the George Floyd riots.

        Now, to be fair, the vast majority of people at those BLM protests weren’t rioters or criminals. But, if you’re going to paint with a broad brush, then I can, too—right?

        1. M. Purdy Avatar

          Right, you’re rhetorically making the same point Bacon made, i.e. it’s the left who are the bad guys here. I made the counterpoint. I didn’t see all right wingers.

    2. Charles D'Aulnais Avatar
      Charles D’Aulnais

      “ The Left does not forget.”

      Uh, who keeps bringing this up? Who won’t let go?

      “ The mentality of conflating long-ago events with current events (not the terrorism) is the same.” You mean like conflating the Confederate flag with white supremacy?

      https://www.gannett-cdn.com/-mm-/e1d78d18d18c0e71d5c7c4a0350b598687f50fe1/c=0-50-534-352/local/-/media/2017/07/08/USATODAY/USATODAY/636351300380906564-KKKK32.jpg?width=534&height=302&fit=crop&format=pjpg&auto=webp

      Wonder why?

      1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
        James Wyatt Whitehead

        Hmmm. The Klan August 8th, 1925 Washington DC. 60,000 strong. Likely Democrats. What shall we do about this flag? What shall we do about Democrats?
        https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/a71898ed85d3e21524a48e3452b236d6ea200f18f2cf493ac835e822d51e527e.jpg

        1. James McCarthy Avatar
          James McCarthy

          Hmmnn!! Nearly 100 years ago, KKK parade with US flags carried by likely Democrats. Nice equation.

          1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
            James Wyatt Whitehead

            You know better. The Democrats of the 1920s had a broad coalition of segregationists and nativists.

    3. Charles D'Aulnais Avatar
      Charles D’Aulnais

      For 10 additional bonus points Jim, answer the following:
      Which US President continually referred to the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq as “a crusade”?
      To which political party did that President belong?

    4. James McCarthy Avatar
      James McCarthy

      “Muslim wars against Christian Crusaders”?? Is that phrase reversible?

      1. Actually, Muslim wars against Christians is probably more accurate. After all, they started making war on Christians and Jews pretty much from the day Islam was founded.

  6. Wahoo'74 Avatar
    Wahoo’74

    Another superb example of the woke 21st century inability to view history and judge people in the context of their times. Mr. Smith nails it. There were hundreds of thousands of men possessing honor, courage, and integrity on both sides of the Civil War. His example of Gen. Chamberlain saluting Gen. Gordon’s defeated Confederate troops at Appomattox is a perfect example of this,

    My great-grandfather was there as a member of the 2nd Maryland CSA. He returned to Southern Maryland, signed the loyalty oath, tended to his farm and became Superintendent of the Charles County schools. He lived a life of service giving back to his county, state, and nation.

    Many of his descendants have served their country in the military. Should we not honor his service as well? The CNC may not but I do.

    Shame on them.

    1. General Joshua Chamberlain was one of the most courageous, capable, and honorable leaders on either side of that war.

      In my opinion, of course.

  7. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
    James Wyatt Whitehead

    The 116th Regiment played a promient role during D Day. It is important to note that many soldiers in 116th were direct descendants of the 5th Virginia from the Civil War. General George C. Marshall insisted on using the regiment in the first wave at D Day. The men from the Shenandoah Valley were to be heard from. The 116th Regiment’s motto “Ever More” must go too. Words of Stonewall Jackson in praise of this unit’s valor at Bull Run. The coat of arms are a no go too. It draws from the Seal of Virginia and has ties to secession. Great article about the 116th at D Day below. If you were in this unit during the Civil War, WWI, or WW2 you were going to get shot. They were always the tip of the spear.
    https://emergingcivilwar.com/2019/06/06/ever-forward-the-116th-virginia-infantry-dday/

Leave a Reply