Why San Franciscans Are Thinner than Other Americans

SONY DSC

No, it’s not the bean sprouts and tofu. It’s not even the great year-round climate that encourages people to do stuff outdoors. It’s the hills. The Bacon family has hiked and biked a lot of hills over the past three days and we’ve eaten a lot of food, but the hills won. I swear I have cinched in my belt buckle by a notch.

As I recall, one of the largest concentrations of superannuated (really old) people is in the Caucasus Mountains. The Georgians, Armenians and Azerbaijanis get lots of exercise walking up and down mountains. Living around hills is healthy! I don’t recall seeing a single fat person in San Francisco. (OK, maybe a couple of hefty people but no obese people). I’ve seen more little old Chinese ladies on walkers chugging up the hills in Chinatown than I’ve seen fat people.

Oh, maybe I should add that it’s not just the hills. It’s the hills in combination with the sidewalks. San Francisco is a walking town. The city has great streetscapes and no matter where you are there is an abundance of destinations within walking distance. People walk places, and when they walk, they walk on hills. It’s that simple.

— JAB


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

3 responses to “Why San Franciscans Are Thinner than Other Americans”

  1. Peter Galuszka Avatar
    Peter Galuszka

    They eat lots of yoghurt, fruit and nuts.

  2. they have twice the density of Arlington.. they must be walking/running in single file or something, eh?

  3. Breckinridge Avatar
    Breckinridge

    They spend so much on rent and taxes, they can only afford to eat every other day….(We did do a lot of walking during our visit there a while back.)

    I’d heard that the Midwest had the largest people (obesity wise) and on a couple of visits to St. Louis and Iowa in the last decade, I’ve come to agree with that assessment. Flat land, right Jim? And of course all that corn….

Leave a Reply