Who Will Report the News? 2012 Update

More bad news for news junkies: The press is the fastest shrinking industry in the United States. Advertising sales have halved since 2005. For every digital ad dollar earned, newspapers have lost $7 in print ads. Digital advertising is expected to surpass the combined advertising of newspapers and magazines combined. “There’s no doubt we’re going out of business now,” one executive was quoted as saying in this Financial Times article.

More newspapers are talking about charging subscriptions for access to their content., but so far the Wall Street Journal appears to be the only U.S. newspaper capable of generating meaningful revenue. In any case, charging for subscriptions would be a double-edged sword. Cutting off Web readers would reduce page impressions and Internet advertising revenue.

Here in Virginia, Landmark Communications has expressed an openness to selling its newspapers, which include the Virginian-Pilot and Roanoke Times (where I worked five years). Media General, which owns the Richmond Times-Dispatch as well as newspapers in Charlottesville, Lynchburg, Danville, Bristol and Manassas, is considering a divestiture of its newspaper properties. (See Peter G.’s article in Style Magazine.) Even the mighty Washington Post is suffering from eroding revenue and falling profit.

For the most part, newspapers are still profitable. But they are maintaining margins only by cutting expenses, including reporting staff. Even with a  resumption in economic growth, there is no sign that the slide in revenue has bottomed out. Meanwhile, digital alternatives continue to proliferate.

I would not lament the passing of newspapers if I thought digital media were creating new business models for reporting and sifting the news. There is no lack of opinion and commentary, which Americans appear to be willing to publish in great quantities for free. But few digital outlooks are doing much real reporting, as opposed to repackaging news created by others. Politico and Huffington Post are exceptions, but it’s not clear to me that they have financially sustainable business models.

Our media future will provide more opinion, more commentary, more content creation by interested parties, more aggregators uncritically packaging that content, and possibly more reporting by enthusiastic amateurs untrained in the basics of journalism…. but less news reporting. It is frightening to think that in a world awash in information there will be less reporting by credible and financially disinterested entities than before.

— JAB


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

  1. Darrell Avatar

    Maybe newspapers need less hardware and more Ad people? What is new media other than a fancy text version of radio/TV?

  2. I paid for the WSJ when it was $60 a year and would again but they bumped th price and I dropped out.

    I pay for the local paper and I still have to put up with their online ads the same as folks who don’t pay. they need to fix that.

    I think the problem is that the media refuses to admit that the business model is going to shrink and they need to streamline their operations to survive.

    At some point, enough people will realize that you really do get what you pay for – for SOME kinds of news but big bucks for puff pieces are going, going, gone.

    And it’s not that there are not some really good journalists “out there”, but it’s like a lot of other professions – not enough room for all that aspire.

    I’m constantly shocked by the insane popularity of Facebook which in my mind is one gigantic narcissistic gossip session but people actually get and promulgate “news” from Facebook.

    My local paper, the Free Lance Star actually REQUIRES a Facebook account to comment on their news stories!

    the stories that set Facebook folks on fire are the same exact ones – you’d hear a group of people gossiping about…

    so .. it’s a double whammy.. legitimate journalism is taking it on the nose and Facebook is becoming the cesspool de jure. UGH!

  3. Darrell Avatar

    What exactly is legitimate journalism these days? Is it the 200 seat cube at CNN where their press passively follows the other press companies to make sure they broadcast the same stories? Or Huffington Post that monitors RSS links to author their version of those same stories? Why have a legitimate journalism anyway? Couldn’t a free lancer do just as good a job by simply reading the blogs of other free lancers? Is ZeroHedge a legitimate journalist? After all, their articles are presented by the most insider of insiders and they are more accurate than the MSM.

    Maybe the whole problem with journalism is really disinterest in the story. Any story. If it bleeds it leads, with a new one tomorrow. Investigative reporting? No time, no dime, gotta go. What’s AP playing? How can there be freedom of the press if they are slaves to the game?

    Ben Franklin was considered a legitimate journalist and all he did was write an 18th century blog. With passion.

  4. I think Darrel indicates the skepticism of the public over the value and legitimacy of journalism.

    One could say that “one the scene” reporters would be needed in Syria or even things like the Va Tech shootings but I’m sure Darrell would say why do that when there are hundreds of cell phones “reporting” the news.

    of course the blogs he mentions are not only full of errors but often full of biased misinformation according to the beliefs of the blogger.

    Wikipedia and even PolitiFacts is now considered liberal front groups.

    people pretty much believe what they want to believe now days.. facts are treated as roaches…. by some…

    for instance…it matters one whit that Obama’s original full record of birth has been provided… there are still significant numbers of people who believe it is a forgery.

    people still believe that Sadaam had weapons of mass destruction…and that Muslims from countries other than Saudi Arabia flew planes into the twin towers.

    Remember under Clinton the “suspicious” suicide of Vince Foster?

    My point here is that distrust and suspicion of the media has been building for years… and now is at the point where virtually all reporters – print or broadcast are “classified” as to their political “leanings” which pretty much renders any reporting by them as suspect from one side or the other.

  5. From reader Randy Salzman:

    RE your piece on the press: The Pew Center on the Press studied all the articles over a week in Baltimore and discovered that only 17 percent of articles in ALL the media, including new media, had new info in 2010. As you note, we’re in trouble…

    “And of the stories that did contain new information nearly all, 95%, came from traditional media — most of them newspapers. These stories then tended to set the narrative agenda for most other media outlets.

    The local papers, however, are also offering less than they once did. For all of 2009, for instance, the Baltimore Sun produced 32% fewer stories on any subject than it did in 1999, and 73% fewer stories than in 1991, when the company still published an evening and morning paper with competing newsrooms.1 And a comparison of one major story during the week studied — about state budget cuts — found newspapers in the area produced only one-third as many stories in 2009 as they did the last time the state made a similar round of budget cuts in 1991, and the Baltimore Sun one-seventh as many. Yet the numbers suggest the addition of new media has not come close to making up the difference.”

  6. DJRippert Avatar
    DJRippert

    You have to make money with blogs.

    Huffington Post – $2,300,000 per month.
    The Mashable – $560,000 per month
    PerezHiltin – $450,000 per month
    TechCrunch – $400,000 per month
    Smashing Magazine – $190,000 per month

    Could Baconsrebellion make enough money to be self-sustaining? Maybe but probably not with a focus on transportation. It would have to be a Virginia Daily with separate sections for each of the 7 regions in the state. One full time reporter per region, one editor and three people working the material into compelling web material. Plus, several people selling ads.

    Call it $750,000 per year in expenses. Or, $62,500 per month.

    Could it take in $75,000 per month? Unlikely (based on the material covered) but possible. Other web sites do it in other areas.

    The key is being able to have your seven regional reporters able to videotape various local events, transmit them to BR HQ and have the video editors turn them into something compelling.

    Given the design skills at VCU, I’d expect that you could find the right kind of people in Richmond.

    I priced a simple, two week ad for my boat (with a photo I supplied) in the nvdaily for $120.00. Could Baconsrebellion pick up some ads like that? I don’t know – probably.

    The blog could add narrative from companies like The Kham Academy. These are relatively easy to make and use relatively little bandwidth to stream. For example …

    http://www.khanacademy.org/humanities—other/finance/current-economics/v/simple-analysis-of-cost-per-job-saved-from-stimulus

    Once somebody becomes proficient with the inexpensive tools required to create such an animation I would expect that it would take 20 – 30 minutes to make and publish such an animation.

    Now, don’t get me wrong – I am not suggesting that Jim should turn BR into a state-wide media Juggernaut. I am simply suggesting that it is possible to build a compelling web site in some areas, hire a staff and make money through advertising.

    There may be no future for paper based dailies reporting the news. However, there is a potential future for electronic newspapers with mobile extensions (“there’s an app for that”), annotated videos and blog based reporters.

  7. Peter Galuszka Avatar
    Peter Galuszka

    As a journalist, I know that our industry has been totally screwed by the rise of the digital media. This is because from its inception Web site owners have considered their content “free” thus content providers should not be paid.
    For example, at the alt weekly where I work part-time in Richmond, I am only paid if a piece goes into the print magazine. If I contribute to their web page or provide info that is used in radio or TV discussions, it is free. This is the model that they don’t want to shake despite my suggestions otherwise. I once was paid a retainer for two business-related blogs I did at bnet.com, but getting money out of them after CBS took over was so time-consuming, I quit.
    After more than a decade of this,digital owners are still scared to death of putting up paywalls. They are worried that the public, spoiled by free content, will just go elsewhere.
    This is why original content has become rare. Since you are not making any money but want to keep your name out there, the easy solution is simply to slice and dice other people’s stuff.
    I was lucky in a sense. I hit the very last wave of well-paid j0urnalism circa 1990s. Back then, they paid a New York salary and flew you at least business class overseas. But the reaper has come and some of my former colleagues up there have gone instead into landscape architecture.

  8. Andrea Epps Avatar
    Andrea Epps

    Jim:
    I like DJ’s ideas. And I need a job, so ????
    I am capable of writing biased-free stories but if you prefer…I’m also opinionated as hell. 😉

  9. Peter Galuszka Avatar
    Peter Galuszka

    Jim,.
    You say “there’s even speculation” that Media General “is considering a divestiture.” This is factually incorrect. MEG has said publicly and flatly in a press release that it is. No speculation about it.

    1. Thanks, I’ll make the correction.

  10. Actually the two professions that are related here in an odd way (I assert) is media/journalism and teaching.

    In both cases, in the internet age – what is the legitimate purpose of each?

    I’m not saying they are not valuable but their value as gate-keepers of content is seriously eroded.

    Can someone learn -at home – without a professional teacher?

    Can someone keep up with local, national and world news AND PERSPECTIVE without a professional journalist?

  11. Richard Avatar

    I think the new model will be a social media model – Wikipedia/Bacon’s Rebellion or Twitter/Facebook. Because much or most of what is posted on the web by nontraditional news sources is a lie, tainted by self-interest, and often both, that information is inherently untrustworthy. The alternatives are sites like Wikipedia and Bacon’s Rebellion which are policed by its volunteers, and your friends. Your friends are trustworthy, you know their expertise and level of judgment, and you know their interests and prejudices, so when you receive information from them, you can interpret it and receive value from it. The greater your social connections the more likely you will be able to get valuable information. In Egypt and Libya last year, which do not have reliable news sources, Twittering was apparently successful in disseminating reliable information, enough to fuel a revolution.

    1. Interesting observations. If info is disseminated through social networks of people who trust one another, that solves the credibility issue. But the delivery of news will be very piecemeal and fractured.

  12. well.. folks who “trust” sources like FAUX News and the Heritage and Cato are sucking up propaganda that misinforms…and actually at times promotes disinformation yet the folks who lean the way these groups do – “trust” them.

    My approach is to NOT trust A source not even several sources if those sources all tend to lean the same way.

    What they do not teach in school these days – and it’s painfully apparent – is HOW to VET information.

    more than that – How to WANT to VET INFO – to actually seek the truth not reassurance of your biases and prejudices.

    but I digress…. eh?

    seriously – when the VAST MAJORITY of people do not understand simple facts that there are two (actually 4) Medicares and one if funded from FICA and the other from premiums … how in the hell can we start to agree on what to do about deficits?

    When we have a 1.5 Trillion deficit and 210 billion of it is Medicare Part B, and we have people believing that we can balance the budget by cutting ONLY entitlements… .for a “free” society with the internet providing a fire-house of information – we are – ignorant.. because we “trust” certain sources that are lying out their butts because they have political agendas.

  13. […] has been right around the corner for about the last, oh, decade or so. But the crack-up may finally be underway. Jim Bacon, a former newspaper man himself, and publisher of Bacon’s Rebellion, talks with […]

  14. […] has been right around the corner for about the last, oh, decade or so. But the crack-up may finally be underway. Jim Bacon, a former newspaper man himself, and publisher of Bacon’s Rebellion, talks with Scott […]

Leave a Reply