Who Needs the General Assembly? Let the Budget Conferees Do It.

Sen. Janet Howell (D-Fairfax), chair of Senate Finance and Del. Barry Knight (R-Virginia Beach), chair of House Appropriations. Photo credit: Richmond Times Dispatch

by Dick Hall-Sizemore

Although legislating through the budget, a practice that used to be frowned upon, is not new, this year’s budget conferees are taking the practice to a new dimension.

The amendments released by the budget conferees include the following new provisions in the “General Provisions” section. In most cases, the Code of Virginia is amended. The remaining cases involve just language in the Appropriation Act.

  1. Changes to the tax code. These have become a standard practice.  This year there are provisions to increase the standard deduction, eliminate the state portion of the sales tax on groceries, increase income tax credits for military benefits, and make significant changes to the statutory  language regarding housing opportunity credits.
  2. University housing. To the extent that institutions of higher education operate student housing during breaks, requires them to allow eligible foster students to stay in them free of charge.
  3. Casino referendum. Prevents the city of Richmond from having a second referendum on casinos until November 2023.
  4. Private school. Exempts a private school from licensing requirements.  (The school was previously exempted until repeal of the applicable statutory provision in 2020.)
  5. Games of skill. Changes the definition of games of skill.
  6. Marijuana and hemp. Establishes a criminal penalty for possession of four ounces to one pound of marijuana. Changes requirements for labeling of products including industrial hemp. This is the first time that I remember the budget bill being used to amend the criminal code and impose a new criminal penalty.

There are several significant advantages to proposing major policy changes in this manner. First, they do not have to go through those pesky subject area committees where they are subject to public comment, debate among the members, amendment, and failure. Second, the budget conference report is developed largely behind closed doors, away from public scrutiny, as well as scrutiny by other members of the legislature. Finally, the conference report on any bill, including the budget bill, is not amendable on the floor; there is only an up or down vote on the report as a whole. However, it may be possible to challenge some provisions under the “germaneness” rule. For example, how is the timing of a casino referendum in Richmond germane to a bill appropriating funds to operate the government? Or how is a criminal offense for possessing four ounces of marijuana germane?

At this rate, most of the legislators can just sit back and allow the budget conferees take care of most of the legislative business before the General Assembly.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

15 responses to “Who Needs the General Assembly? Let the Budget Conferees Do It.”

  1. Enacting non-budgetary legislation through the budget process is indeed is a matter of concern. As Dick observes, it bypasses the normal committee/subcommittee process, it makes a farce of transparency, and it concentrates power into the hands of a few legislators.

    Doesn’t Virginia have a rule against combining unlike pieces of legislation into a single bill? Isn’t that exactly what these budgetary practices do?

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      The rules mean what the House Speaker and 21 votes in the Senate say they mean. The single object rule was shattered long ago.

      1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
        Dick Hall-Sizemore

        There is a single object provision in the state constitution, but as Steve points out, it is open to interpretation.

      2. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
        Dick Hall-Sizemore

        There is a single object provision in the state constitution, but as Steve points out, it is open to interpretation.

  2. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    Silly (and ignorant) me. I always thought the process of making law was separate from the process of funding the government.

    But I was also aware that one could “follow” a bill or bills through the session only to find out that somehow some other provisions or even laws suddenly seemed to pop-up right at the end of the session without warning or ability to comment.

    Clearly, folks like Dick and Haner know this but I’d bet most average Virginians have no clue of how the GA and lawmaking really work.

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      Hence how I made my living. Jungle guide.

  3. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    A few years back Nancy Pelosi and others were roundly mocked for saying: ” you have to pass the bill to see what is in it”’.

    Turns out she was right, eh?

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      Sadly, the game of suddenly producing substitutes in committee or on the floor means exactly that. They usually are not red-line versions and finding what changed can be impossible until a careful read later.

  4. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    And thank you Dick, once again, for laying out an issue more or less objectively then giving your view and not using culture war rhetoric and hyperbole.

    Haner and Sherlock do well also avoiding the worst of the culture wars IMHO but typically start off with their subjective viewpoint then work to support it, sometimes leaving out relevant parts and/or cherry-picking.

    The time and effort spent by you guys on the issues is much appreciated.

  5. Kathleen Smith Avatar
    Kathleen Smith

    I have always said it is not over until the fat lady sings!

  6. Stephen Haner Avatar
    Stephen Haner

    Like you I have watched this trend growing over several recent years, and railed about it, but there it is. They see no reason not to do it this way. As Senate Finance has expanded its power by calling all substantive bills to it for a final “fiscal” review, the House has responded by letting Appropriations do the same. The supposed House tax writing committee, House Finance, is a shell now. Most members are not on their respective money committees, and a majority of members can put a stop to this. The votes are there. Yet they don’t rebel as long as enough of their amendments make the cut.

    I bet you just scratched the surface for buried legislative decisions inside the budget. The conference committee often adds things that didn’t even come up during session. Will be reading along with you. 🙂

    1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      Of course, Senate Finance has always had tax bills under its purview. I haven’t noticed that it has expanded its power that much over substantive bills, but I have noticed more bills going to House Appropriations than before, including tax legislation.

      I agree that I have probably just scratched the surface regarding policy decisions in the budget. The General Provisions section is the easiest place to find them, if you know where to look.

      I have to admit that I did my share of drafting policy language for the budget. There is one little provision still nestled in there that I recommended that was once cited in a court decision. But, those provisions all had some relation to spending and were fairly narrow in scope.

      1. Stephen Haner Avatar
        Stephen Haner

        Lobbyists using budget provisions to get their client’s wishes accomplished? Perish the thought. I never did that. 😉

        1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
          Dick Hall-Sizemore

          Mine were not the results of lobbyist requests, but rather clarifying the language to reflect reality or putting in language to give DOC more flexibility in operating its prisons.

  7. VaPragamtist Avatar
    VaPragamtist

    I’m having a hard time locating the new proposed budget. I can’t find it on DPB’s budget site or through LIS. Am I overlooking something?

Leave a Reply