Whites Under-Represented in UVa’s Entering Classes

by James A. Bacon

As the debate unfolds about how to apply the U.S. Supreme Court ruling restricting the use of race as a factor in college admissions, it would be helpful for the discussion to be rooted in reality. At the University of Virginia, any dialogue should be based upon the recognition that admissions policies have transformed the racial/ethnic profile of the undergraduate student body over the past 10 years.

According to enrollment data published by the State Council for Higher Education in Virginia (SCHEV), the racial/ethnic make-up of students entering UVa for the first time (as first-year students or community college transfers) has changed significantly between the fall of 2013-14 and the fall of 2022-23:

Remarkably, the percentage of undergraduate White students has declined from 59.3% of the entering class at UVa to 46.9% over a single decade. Non-Hispanic Whites are now a minority.

For purposes of comparison, non-Hispanic Whites account for 57% of Virginia’s population and 48% of all public high school students. If we adjust the comparison to include private school students, who are disproportionately White and account for 11% of Virginia school enrollment, it would appear that non-Hispanic Whites are now under-represented among entering undergraduate students at UVa.

A logical question arises: how does the transformation of the UVa student body compare to admissions trends in Virginia’s higher-education system as a whole? Do the enrollment numbers reflect statewide trends affecting all institutions, or are they the result of policies specific to UVa?

To some degree, UVa’s enrollment reflects the changing demographics of Virginia’s college-bound youth. More Asians, Blacks and Hispanics are enrolling in the state’s four-year colleges, while the White college population has declined over the past decade. Here are the numbers for all first-time enrollees at Virginia four-year institutions (both public and private):

However, broader enrollment trends do not fully account for the change in UVa enrollment numbers. UVa enrollments depart significantly from the statewide trend. While the number of entering Asians surged 68.2% statewide, they shot up 89.2% at UVa. Similarly, while Black enrollment leaped ahead 33.8% statewide, it increased 54.7% at UVa. (The increase in the percentage of Hispanics at UVa rose, but the rise lagged statewide figures.)

Here is the most notable departure from the statewide pattern: while White enrollment in Virginia four-year institutions declined 15.5% statewide, it collapsed by 30.4% at UVa. 

Despite evidence that Asians are discriminated against in admissions — their percentages of UVa enrollment would be even higher if based purely upon measures of academic achievement such as standardized test scores and high school grade-point averages — their numbers have surged. The numbers of Blacks and Hispanics also have seen robust increases at UVa.

Non-Hispanic Whites have been the big losers from changes in UVa admissions policies over the past decade. Given the fact that Whites were under-represented in the latest entering class, can it also be said that UVa admissions discriminate against Whites?

That’s a trickier question that hinges in part upon how one defines “discriminate.” If admissions criteria are based entirely upon standardized test scores and grade-point averages, then, yes, UVa discriminates against Whites and Asians in favor of Blacks and Hispanics. If admissions criteria incorporate traits such as personality, character, and a demonstrated ability to overcome adversity, then not necessarily. The question then becomes how objective those criteria are and how subject they are to bias in favor of the so-called marginalized groups.

As the Ryan administration sorts out the implications of the Supreme Court ruling, it will be impossible for the UVa community to engage in an informed dialogue without a clear statement of the admissions criteria, the weights those criteria are given, and the process by which admissions decisions are made. Without greater openness, any discussion will be fraught with unknowns, ambiguity and conflicting narratives disconnected from reality.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

25 responses to “Whites Under-Represented in UVa’s Entering Classes”

  1. Hamilton Lombard Avatar
    Hamilton Lombard

    Some of this may be a result of UVa historically struggling to recruit students from southern and western Virginia which are disproportionately white. The faster growing parts of the state tend to have proportionally smaller white populations.

    The population turning 18 in Virginia that identified as white alone not Hispanic fell from around 60 percent in the early 2010s to below 50 percent since 2020, as a result of intermarriage and steady immigration.

    College applicants have a strong incentive to report any non-white or non-Asian ancestry, which could also be helping to lower UVa’s reporting. Close to 70 percent of Virginians turning 18 identify as white but a large share also identify as an other race or as Hispanic.

    1. “College applicants have a strong incentive to report any non-white or non-Asian ancestry…”

      What a boon for Ancestry.com!

      1. VaNavVet Avatar
        VaNavVet

        Admissions should rely on more than just scores and GPA which are not always reliable predictors. Perhaps now at UVA it is biased in favor of marginalized Asian-Americans.

  2. Hi Ewald Avatar
    Hi Ewald

    Back in the 80’s, with advent of Ben & Jerry’s, Pillsbury (owner of Hagen Daz) apparently engaged in some sketchy market warfare, quietly squeezing retailers to avoid giving B&J shelf space. Ben & Jerry launched a successful guerilla marketing campaign, with a tag line: “What’s the Dough Boy afraid of?” How about: “What’s UVA Admission Office afraid of?” Sunshine and transparency is the minimum I’d expect from UVA – which makes the status quo especially hard to accept.

    1. Teddy007 Avatar
      Teddy007

      It the university releases enough data, people can begin to figure out who got admitted and how.

      1. Hi Ewald Avatar
        Hi Ewald

        Ah! THAT explains it.

        1. Teddy007 Avatar
          Teddy007

          After the Grutter V Bollinger decision universities learned that they could have affirmative action if they just hide how they did it. This was different than Gratz V Bollinger where the University of Michigan was ruled to have violated the civil rights of white students by giving black and Hispanic students 20 points on a 150 point scale for admission.

  3. Teddy007 Avatar
    Teddy007

    Remember, for the Asians at TJ, UVA is their safety school. And 48% of public school students are non-Hispanic white in Virginia but what percentage of the entering class of foreign students, out of state students, or attended a private school in Virginia. Those would affect the numbers.

    Universities should not lump in international students into their ethnic/racial reporting. Lumping in out of state students is questionable.

  4. Lefty665 Avatar
    Lefty665

    Why is UVa’s admission policy so opaque? We certainly should not have access to individual applications, but the admission goals, objectives, policies and procedures are public information.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Eye of toad and ear of newt…. Some things are best kept from view.

    2. Teddy007 Avatar
      Teddy007

      To try to limit the system from being gamed as much as it is now. The counsellors are the top private and public schools have enough data since they know who applied to UVA, who did not get accepted, who got accepted, and who actually enrolled. That is a huge benefit for the parents paying with either tuition or higher real estate prices.

    3. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Eye of toad and ear of newt…. Some things are best kept from view.

  5. Stephen Haner Avatar
    Stephen Haner

    Jim, my first reaction was so what. My second was: See? That is what Jim cares about, protecting the presumed turf privileges of White People. The statistical story there is that Hispanic and black are still underrepresented in that cohort (about 10% or less each of the 2,248 admitted) and now the Asian category (31% of admittees) is also squeezing out the white students. The success of Asian families in prepping their youngsters for academic success is the story here. And the trend is only going to continue.

    So 232 black kids represents a 50% increase over a decade ago? Then what was going on a decade ago was absolutely shameful. So I will go with my first reaction of “so what” to the numbers you find “remarkable.”

    1. Your first reaction was so what? So what that Whites are now a slightly under-represented minority at UVa (and I’ll bet at W&M, too)? That doesn’t go against the White Supremacy narrative? That doesn’t undercut a lot of the leftist rhetoric about systemic racism?

      So, you’re OK with the applying the merit principle to Asian students, whose families prep them for academic success. But the merit principle doesn’t apply to Whites whose families prep them for academic success?

      I agree that the low percentage of Black and Hispanic kids is a scandal — but it’s a scandal that begins long before they get into college and is not rectified by anti-racism policies in college.

      1. Stephen Haner Avatar
        Stephen Haner

        This is only of interest if 1) one presumes more qualified white kids are being excluded to admit those others or 2) it is the job of admissions to make the school track the makeup of Virginia as a whole. I reject both. Which of those is your “so what?” 1 or 2?

        1. Yes, it is of interest if white kids are being discriminated against on the basis of race. As Walter Smith has demonstrated through his investigation into admissions rates and SAT scores, there is significant evidence to suggest that such is the case. But that’s not something UVa wants to discuss. As you may or may not have noticed, the column is a cry for more transparency so we stop making assumptions and base our discussions on facts.

          As for tracking the makeup of Virginia as a whole, I’m only holding the administration to its own standard. I’m perfectly comfortable with Asian kids being admitted into UVa in disproportionate numbers as long as they are admitted on merit, and I’ll fight to lift Harvard-style restrictions on their admissions.

          1. M. Purdy Avatar
            M. Purdy

            Do you think it’s time to end legacy admissions?

          2. Stephen Haner Avatar
            Stephen Haner

            Thank you. My number 1. You presume/suspect “more qualified” white kids are being bumped in favor of “less qualified” applicants who check a diversity box. Be it affirmative action or anti-racism or whatever you want to call it.

      2. M. Purdy Avatar
        M. Purdy

        Can you expand on what you mean by the white supremacy narrative?

      3. Eric the half a troll Avatar
        Eric the half a troll

        “But the merit principle doesn’t apply to Whites whose families prep them for academic success?”

        Apparently not as well as some of the minority students, eh?

        1. Stephen Haner Avatar
          Stephen Haner

          Generalizations are just as wrong as models, but in general, the Asian kids are kicking the butts of everybody, including the white families Jim presumes (quite wrongly) are putting the same emphasis on academic prep. Their little darlin’s don’t work very hard anymore. Interferes with the social lives. My wife taught in the highest of the high end private schools. Get some wine in her and ask about how they compared to her best public school kids….There were your legacy families, though.

          She’s also the one, though, who saw some talented minorities pressured to be “less white” by their peers, which was tragic.

      4. M. Purdy Avatar
        M. Purdy

        Can you expand on what you mean by the white supremacy narrative?

        1. Stephen Haner Avatar
          Stephen Haner

          I assume he means UVA is not the deeply racist institution its critics claim, and if he adds “any more” it is a fair point. But now he is upset by how it got there.

          1. M. Purdy Avatar
            M. Purdy

            Yeah, it’s hard to tell. If the argument is that society has systemic problems that go back to the founding, that’s an argument I can get with. UVa is certainly part of that lineage, but isn’t terribly unique in that regard. I do get concerned when posters exploit numbers and policies they disagree with for their own ends. I would argue that UVa has done a remarkable job coming to terms with its checkered history and legacy of racism through things like the equity task force, the study on slavery, and yes, affirmative action. The relative diversity of the student body reflects that. Mind you, none of these initiatives is anything that I’ve heard the conservatives here voice any support for, but they’re more than happy to use the outcomes to argue things are just fine. Reminds me of electeds who vote against certain programs, only to take credit for them when $$ ends up flowing back to their districts.

Leave a Reply