Which Virginia Taxes Have Grown and How Much

Click for larger view.

By Steve Haner

What a difference just four years has made in Virginia’s financial condition, with the state’s General Fund tax revenue having increased 31% during the period and its Commonwealth Transportation Fund revenue increasing by almost 36%. This is comparing the annual results for the fiscal years ending June 30, 2023, just released, and the same summary for the year ending June 30, 2019.

Corporate income tax collections for FY 2023 were 117% higher than four years before, state motor fuel taxes rose 72% in the period, and sales and use taxes grew in excess of 30% during the period. Net (after refunds) personal income taxes rose more than 24%.

There were major headwinds pushing against such growth during the period, mainly the 2020 COVID-19 recession, an anemic stock market, and a round of income tax cuts in 2022. Pushing the other way, adding to revenue, were a series of tax increases approved when Democrats had full control of state government in 2020 and 2021, and the economic sugar high from federal deficit spending.

Put that all in the shaker and the result that pours out is Virginians seeing their overall taxes grow faster than the 19% official inflation for the period between July 2019 and July 2023. The resulting cash balances for the Commonwealth were previously discussed here.

Why start with 2019? That was the last full-scale Assembly election. In 2019 the General Assembly made various adjustments to state taxes in response to the federal Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, but most of them did not really kick in until the following tax year. Those changes basically left much higher effective corporate tax rates in full effect, which is the main explanation for those taxes more than doubling in four years.

Republican Governor Glenn Youngkin’s 2023 proposal to reduce the corporate tax rate slightly to compensate for the TCJA windfall has been denigrated by most Democrats and will likely be a club wielded against the GOP in the 2023 elections. Some people are ecstatic that corporations are paying more than double in just four years.

The 2020 General Assembly, under full Democratic control and working with a Democratic governor, expanded the scope of the sales tax to internet sales in line with the Wayfair federal court decision and raised transportation revenues, formally indexing the motor fuels tax rates to inflation. Those explain why the fuels taxes rose 72% over four years, and sales tax growth exceeded 30%. The sales tax growth has benefited both the General Fund and the Commonwealth Transportation Fund.

Last year Youngkin proposed to lower the impact of the higher motor fuel tax changes, also rejected by Democrats and defeated.

Inflation also played a major role in the growth of the general sales and use taxes, the sales and use tax on vehicles, and even the 24% growth in net personal income taxes. The adjustments made to the standard deduction in 2019 and 2022 did not fully counteract the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act’s “windfall” effects through lost deductions, or correct for all inflation.

Lottery sales more than doubled during the period, from just under $2.3 billion to just over $4.6 billion, but net profits the Commonwealth could spend grew only 38%, from $633 to $871 million. Many still consider that a tax on the mathematically challenged, but it is a voluntary drain on people’s pockets.

The Commonwealth Transportation Fund has undergone several changes in the short period. Gone is the Priority Transportation Fund as a separate category. It has been partially replaced by a new Highway User Fee that is aimed at electric and hybrid vehicles and the most efficient gasoline cars and trucks. The HUF collected only $58 million in 2023, but it will be a fast-growing revenue source.

Until then, higher motor fuel tax rates and the expansion of the sales tax to capture more transactions explain the growth in the Commonwealth Transportation Fund at almost twice the rate of inflation. Neither it nor the General Fund are likely to slip backwards now.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

39 responses to “Which Virginia Taxes Have Grown and How Much”

  1. Amazingly, tax cuts do not rate high among Virginians’ policy priorities. I guess that’s what happens when it seems like the world is going stark raving mad. People haven’t suddenly learned to like taxes — it’s just that other problems seem so much bigger!

    1. Lefty665 Avatar

      Or perhaps that taxes have not increased dis-proportionally to other inflation driven costs. They do not stick out from the spiraling costs of everything.

    2. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      People KNOW that it’s a longer run and right now we’ve got it good but dumb to forget downstream … common sense…conservative thinking… oops…

    3. vicnicholls Avatar
      vicnicholls

      No we just have a populace that will strike back physically. More and more I see a physical response to issues, its not a civil response.

  2. Lefty665 Avatar

    While several tax collections have increased as you describe, perhaps there is an additional conclusion to be drawn.

    We have changed how inflation is calculated, materially reducing it. Perhaps the 31% general fund increase more closely reflects the actual inflation rate than the reported 19%. Coincidence or causality, hard to know. But, 31% correlates reasonably well to inflation as previously calculated over the covered period.

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      That is probably true to some extent, with sales taxes at least. But doesn’t explain corporate and the fuel taxes, and incomes have lagged CPI! Those are real increases, as in after inflation.

      1. Lefty665 Avatar

        I was not contesting the increases you documented. The fuel tax put a fine point on the new tax my wife is now paying to renew tags on her hybrid.

        Yes, incomes have lagged even the current suppressed CPI, not to mention how much further they are behind previous calculations of inflation. We are all getting poorer in real terms, and the rate of decrease is increasing.

      2. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        not just fuel taxes… only about 20% of transportation fund is from fuels taxes.

        Another 20ish is from general sales taxes

        And another 20ish-ish is from new car sales…

        then some odds and ends… like HUF.

        https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/ce77e0eee9f158be9682bd71438a6711c6d798ecdbde971bdd3e70b65c4e170e.jpg

        https://www.dmv.virginia.gov/sites/default/files/documents/tracking_jun22_0.pdf

        While everyone was doing something else VDOT and the GA truly diversified their funding…so it is not at all reliant solely on fuel taxes!

        1. Stephen Haner Avatar
          Stephen Haner

          You make my point. That “one third” has grown faster than any other part of that list because the GA raised taxes!!

          1. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            But this is ALSO an example of a need for infrastructure ! It’s not like they’re collecting taxes and putting them in a storage vault or doubling salaries for VDOT. The whole point is that they actually do need the money for infrastructure!

            That’s what a lot of Virginians also worry about when this is advocacy for tax cuts… are we cutting off our own fiscal nose when we cut taxes while we have existing needs?

        2. DJRippert Avatar
          DJRippert

          In NoVa transportation improvements are reliant on sky-high tolls, despite the increases in taxes documented by Steve.

          There is no hope for NoVa.

          When people keep electing politicians who willingly allow their constituents to be pummeled by the “Rich men in and around Richmond” …. you know the end is near.

          Detroit was once a single-industry superstar too.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            Speaking of toll roads… I thought you lived out near this:

            https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/f75fd22f01d912fdb663fc38e87c7edd9d200b5a96a7ea9d639a68c6fc53b471.jpg

            Do you not remember it?

          2. how_it_works Avatar
            how_it_works

            There are already abandoned houses in Manassas Park that have been torn down.

            Just like Detroit.

            (These were neglected for years till the city finally had them torn down–it’s not like they were torn down for redevelopment–far as I know, there’s still a vacant lot where these houses used to be.)

  3. f/k/a_tmtfairfax Avatar
    f/k/a_tmtfairfax

    Maybe high taxes are needed to support all the illegals who will likely get to remain in the United States despite having no legitimate claim to asylum. Look at Mayor Adams’ plight.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      Congress sets the tax rate as well as the laws for asylum seekers…. Asylum seekers are entitled to a determination of their claim – they can’t be rejected without having their claim determined.

      That’s the current Federal Law. Until Congress changes that law… Biden can’t do much. He tried… but the courts just rules he can’t deny asylum seekers from getting their day in court.

    2. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      What is an “illegal” asylum seeker? If they come across the border, doesn’t the current law say they are entitled to a determination of their status?

      That’s the current law, right?

      What can Biden do about that? Didn’t Trump have the same issue?

      Won’t it take Congress to change the law?

      I thought Biden had a solution when they required illegals to “register” and said they’d be banned for 5 years if they did not but the courts have ruled that’s not legal.

      I think Biden is doing what he can according to the law and it will take Congress to change it.

      But at any rate, we need immigrant workers. The farmers are getting killed without adequate migrant labor.

      1. f/k/a_tmtfairfax Avatar
        f/k/a_tmtfairfax

        Most of the people crossing the border illegally are doing so for economic reasons. And wanting to jump ahead of the immigrants who follow the rules is both illegal and morally wrong. We do grant people asylum but most of the people seeking it are lying. They cannot prove they are qualified for asylum but want in simply to better their economic condition. If they want to do that, get in line.

        We don’t need to throw out everyone who came here illegally. Congress could change the law so that a non-immigrant visa could be given to those here before a specified date and who don’t have criminal records. We could grant similar visas to new people based on documented need (our need, not theirs). A fair guest worker program that included protections under American labor laws could work. Also, we need to make E-Verify mandatory with severe fines for not using it.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          RIght. but the current law says that if they set foot, they are entitled to a determination of whether they truly deserve asylum. How would you change that, have Congress change the law saying that anyone who crosses illegally is sent back immediately without a determination?

          totally agree with you on guest worker and E-Verify but again… Congress needs to act and to
          this point most Conservatives are opposed to immigration – period – no guest worker, no E-verify – no entry. strongly opposed to immigration and reflected in who they elect to Congress.

          More than half of “illegals” are not border crossers, they are folks who overstay their visas!

          https://www.npr.org/2019/01/16/686056668/for-seventh-consecutive-year-visa-overstays-exceeded-illegal-border-crossings

          1. f/k/a_tmtfairfax Avatar
            f/k/a_tmtfairfax

            Sure, everyone gets a hearing, but if you cannot prove you qualify for asylum, not only are you deported immediately, but you are forever disqualified from immigrating to the United States.

            Congress needs to act; Republicans need to compromise, but so do Democrats. Do you think they’d vote for a reform bill that didn’t provide total amnesty, citizensship and access to welfare?

          2. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            They get to stay until they get a hearing? The way it works now? I think you’re wrong about most Dems… they want a fair process but they do support immigration, unlike many Conservatives who oppose it totally. Right now, there is no real process… if you cross the border, you are entitled to a hearing… the hearings are not quick.. they are years… because Congress has not provided enough money for more judges and quicker hearings. Do you want those waiting for hearings to be able to work instead of relying on welfare?

            You know, if you look around the world, even in Europe… they have the same problems. It’s not about “liberals”, it’s about folks who don’t want immigrants at all… even though they are needed in the economy.

          3. f/k/a_tmtfairfax Avatar
            f/k/a_tmtfairfax

            Back up the truck. The new regulations require an asylum seeker to make a claim in the first safe country or by using the cellphone app. It’s not legal to cross the border and seek asylum. Why must we enforce tax laws and gun laws but not immigration laws?

  4. Moderate Avatar

    I don’t think most people know which taxes have increased or by how much. Most don’t understand how the Trump Tax Cuts – and others earlier – affected people. Thus, when they hear about corporate tax cuts, without an explanation of
    why they have become too high, they reject them as once again helping
    big business.

    Those who don’t itemize, for example, probably don’t realize how much loss of business expenses for university faculty and changes in deductions in general have affected us – for both state and federal taxes. No one has even considered doing anything to help even things out for loss of deductability of business expenses – significant for many of us. There’s some relief for those teaching at the secondary level, but not us.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      Many folks, don’t. Folks who make “good” money tend to pay closer attention and folks who make really good money pay someone to look after their financial interests including taxes.

      But a billion dollars for businesses to be able to claim more than the 10K max on itemized seemed to be a major help for small businesses and yet how many folks in general know or knew this?

      When the Trump tax cuts did the 10K limit on itemization.. it hurt a LOT of small business folks… apparently…

      1. how_it_works Avatar
        how_it_works

        Please elaborate. I am only aware of a 10K limit on “SALT” (State And Local Taxes) deductions.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          Many folks don’t even know things like their income bracket or if subtractions come above or below the line and the difference between refundable and non-refundable credits.

          1. how_it_works Avatar
            how_it_works

            That’s just how our overlords in DC like it.

          2. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            Federal taxes… the provisions of which are not hidden, easily knowable and most folks with significant assets, well aware of.

            Many folks down the totem pole, but even folks with middle incomes, know far less..even though they could and should.

            The IRS will definitely come after you if you don’t pay tax on income they know about but they don’t care if you pay more taxes than you should, they just keep it!

            People do silly stuff, like cash their 401(k)s when they switch jobs and have no idea that they not only will owe taxes on it but penalties also.

            People will negotiate with credit card companies to forgive their debt , not realizing that forgiven debt is counted as income by the IRS

            Folks don’t realize their social security benefits can be taxed if they have other income….

            etc, etc…

            Not only Fed taxes but state taxes also…. Virginia has a number of ways to reduce income subject to tax that most don’t know about unless a good tax counselor helps them.

            The tax software companies often don’t know themselves but they’ll charge 200-300 dollars for really simple returns…

          3. how_it_works Avatar
            how_it_works

            The IRS also only gives you 3 years to submit an amended return in case you mess up and paid them too much.

            But, if you messed up and didn’t pay them enough? Well, they have 7 years to come after you!

  5. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    It’s kinda hard listening to the GOP yammer about how terrible the “Biden” economy is and then all that increased spending that bumps up sales and other taxes…

    So all the folks are hurting economically, especially those suffering from the men north of Richmond but Virginia is going great guns on tax collections from increase spending from consumers?

    Very confusing.

    We are 30-some trillion in debt from Federal tax-cuts funded from selling treasury notes and it has indeed “trickled”down to Virginia. Not exactly “conservative” policy and cutting “out of control” Federal spending. Nope, the opposite. Trump started it and Biden is fine with it… used to be the GOP was never fine with it but now…. who knows …. 30-some trillion is apparently the Dems fault!

    Hard to understand all of this but I’m still suspicious that Virginia is gonna see increased tax revenues as far as one can see from now on… Anyone who believes that has a super short memory of bad times in the Va budget.

    at some point, the Fed tax-cut party is going to be over…and I’d rather see less tax rebates..in Va, . than a budget crisis where tax revenues fall below our required budget spending and we need draconian cuts in the Va Budget… including k-12 schools.

    Weird thinking from Conservatives these days. They used to be the careful ones… don’t count your eggs, etc…save for rainy days, etc… now… they sounds like Dems! There are no more fiscal conservatives!

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      The “Biden Economy” is still owing quite a bit to the “Trump Tax Cuts.” But my point is Virginia’s taxes are burgeoning because of policy decisions, not economic strength.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        Okay. What policy decisions have increased tax revenues for Virginia ?

      2. Stanwood Avatar

        As best I can tell, the Virginia corporate income tax rate has been 6% since 1972. That puts us squarely in the middle of state tax rates. If tax receipts have doubled since 2019 it’s because corporate profits have doubled. I suppose you can argue that is a result of a policy decision. If we have a recession and corporate receipts go down are you going to argue we should raise the rate?

        Even now, corporate tax receipts are just 7% of General Fund receipts. If we have a budget surplus and you want to reduce the tax burden the personal income tax would be a better place to look. I don’t recommend cutting taxes when the economy is going gang busters and inflation is a concern. Better to hold the cash and spend it during the next recession.

  6. Stephen Haner Avatar
    Stephen Haner

    I can’t believe Hall-Sizemore is giving me free rein to spin this. I hope he’s having a fun vacation. 🙂 News is we have a budget agreement so soon I can do the same four year comparison, at least on the budgeted amounts (which as we’ve seen again is not the same as what gets spent.)

  7. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zC3-gzYTU88

    Just make a few obvious substitutions, e.g., Virginia for Australia, carbon for mining, etc.

    1. I didn’t say it was right, I was telling you what the prize was.

      I like it.

    2. I didn’t say it was right, I was telling you what the prize was.

      I like it.

    3. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
      James Wyatt Whitehead

      Did you know Clarke is dead? I am so slow. Just realized this was satire.

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Yes. 2011? They were a regular on the Aussies’ nightly news. I imagine they freaked out an entire nation the first couple of times.

Leave a Reply