When You’ve Lost the WaPo Editorial Board…

Dogs and cats sleeping together…

by James A. Bacon

Rumor has it that the devil has canceled his natural gas account, shut down the fiery furnaces of Hades, and installed air conditioning. In other words, hell has frozen over. Amidst the proliferating signs and wonders signaling the possible end of times, none is more startling than The Washington Post editorial endorsement of the Republican Youngkin administration’s recent report on the perilous condition of Virginia’s public schools.

The report “documented a years-long trend of declining student performance and glaring racial, ethnic and income achievement gaps that have been hidden from public view,” states the Post piece. The editorial writer dismissed criticism coming from “Democrats and their allies in the teachers union,” and even blew off an analysis by the Post’s own “news” reporters that highlighted a narrow flaw in the report.

Democrats did not respond well to the implication that the quality of public schools in Virginia suffered immensely on their watch and that, for all their preoccupation with “equity,” the educational achievement gap between Asians and Whites on the one hand and Blacks and Hispanics on the other has gotten worse, not better, in recent years. Critics latched on to one particular point — the perils of comparing state Standards of Learning test results with the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) — by which they hoped to discredit the entire body of evidence in the report.

The report made much of what has been called the “honesty gap,” the gap in the percentage of students showing reading “proficiency” in state and national standardized tests. “Only 38% of Virginia fourth graders and 33% of eighth graders were proficient in reading on the 2019 NAEP, compared to 75% and 76%, respectively, on the 2019 state fourth- and eighth-grade SOL reading tests,” stated the report. As the Post reporters pointed out, that statement reflected confusion over differing definitions of “proficient.” Virginia’s definition of “proficient” is roughly equivalent to NAEP’s definition of “basic.” In truth, the Post news article contended, SOL and NAEP show very similar levels of academic achievement.

I have looked into this, and I find this narrow criticism to be valid. It is also tangential. The “honesty gap” may be central to the Youngkin administration’s rhetorical presentation of the findings, but it is not a substantive part of its factual indictment.

What remains undisputed is that the rigor of Virginia’s standardized tests, when mapped over to the NAEP and compared to those of all the other 50 states and Washington, D.C. is the lowest in the country. When standards lapsed, Team Youngkin argues, performance declined.


After Virginia began lowering standards in 2017, the percentage of Virginia students scoring proficient (using the NAEP’s definition of proficient) declined notably in 2019. In 2017, the percentage of Virginia students scoring proficient exceeded the national percentage by 8 percentage points. By 2019, they exceeded the national average by only 4 percentage points.

Many critics have misrepresented the Youngkin report as saying that Virginia’s public schools are terrible, and have countered with the fact that compared to students in other states, Virginia students still scored above the national average in the 2019 NAEP assessment.

To borrow a coinage from Virginia Department of Education spokesman Charles Pyle, this framing of the issue is “a straw man holding a red herring.”

The Youngkin report repeatedly acknowledges the superiority of Virginia’s public schools before 2017, which it credits to policies pursued by both Democrats and Republicans, but highlights worrisome signs that the school system has been heading in the wrong direction. The report points to declines in Virginia’s own SOL pass rates, to declines in NAEP pass rates, to early-grade literacy assessments, and to college readiness metrics such as SAT scores. Also, the report highlights the growing racial achievement gap. Critics have tried downplaying this finding as old news. What they ignore is that the gap has gotten worse.

“Progressive” Democrats are furious because the report discredits the philosophy that has dominated Virginia educational policy since 2017: that public schools are systemically racist — a system designed by Whites for the benefit of Whites — and that the solution is to pursue “equity” by engineering equal group outcomes. That philosophy, both before and during the COVID pandemic, has proven to be a spectacular failure. But adherents are dug in. They are more dedicated to their ideology than they are to the well being of the minorities they profess to care about.

 


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

26 responses to “When You’ve Lost the WaPo Editorial Board…”

  1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    The comparison is between 2017 and 2019. I seriously doubt if that would have provided sufficient time for the pursuit of equity by the Northam administration, even if would have had detrimental academic results, to have had a significant impact.

    The gaps are there and overall scores have decreased. But, you can’t blame a decreases over two years on a philsophy that was just beginning to get implemented. There is something else going on.

    The Northam administration acknowledged the gaps and recommended additional funding for districts in low-income areas. I agree with you that more money is probably not the answer. But, neither is blaming a philosophy that was just beginning to be implemented.

    1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      “A philosophy that was just starting to get implemented”? In 2017?

      “Systemic bias” as the cause of racial learning gaps and the implementation of race-based programs to repair it have been elements of both faith and work product in many non-sectarian education schools for at least two decades.

      They not only have not worked, but have exacerbated the problem of learning gaps by contending that learning just wasn’t being measured properly.

      I offer two observations:
      – educational gaps are linked ineffective schools in urban areas.
      – progressives decry standardized testing precisely because it exposes the failures of their dogmatic solutions.

      Progressive “scholars” on the other hand contend that tests used as measurements of learning are biased. So is instruction that focused on western values, canons and concepts of learning. The emphasis on reading is said to fail to acknowledge the value of oral traditions in other cultures. All of those ideas have been percolating and being tried in schools across the country for decades.

      We, however, can observe that Success Academy, KIPP and others have exposed as false and utterly misguided the basic educational philosophies and programs of the progressive educational establishment.

      Bad schools are not a race or poverty problem. They are just bad schools.

      1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
        Dick Hall-Sizemore

        But as the chart you presented shows, the Virginia Fourth Grade Proficienty rates were going up annually until 2019. Are you saying that two decades of “progressive” attitudes finally caught up to us in 2019?

      2. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        re: ” Bad schools are not a race or poverty problem. They are just bad schools.”

        then why does Success Academies target low-income and race?

    2. Turbocohen Avatar
      Turbocohen

      There is something else going on and it ends with xist. Dems are gaslighting Virginians over divisive CRT doctrine in public school curricula and they’re hell bent to paint anyone who might be concerned over their extreme left (Marxist) CRT agenda and now parents in the center increasingly see diversity training as something other than what racist conspiracy theorists intended. Parents have had enough of finding out their taxes pay for “educators” to teach their kids who are being told they are oppressive racists because of their lack of pigment.

      https://twitter.com/MattWolking/status/1405174723747667972?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1405174723747667972%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftownhall.com%2Fcolumnists%2Flarryoconnor%2F2021%2F06%2F16%2Fdems-attempt-to-gaslight-on-critical-race-theory-going-down-in-flames-n2591086

      1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
        Dick Hall-Sizemore

        All the concern about CRT came along after 2019. How did CRT affect the 2019 SOL scores?

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          They just did. Trust ’em.

        2. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          Ya know, Dick, maybe we can use this. If SOL scores drop in 2023, we can say that “removing CRT and books” was the cause. Silver linings, Dick, silver linings.

      2. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
        Dick Hall-Sizemore

        All the concern about CRT came along after 2019. How did CRT affect the 2019 SOL scores?

  2. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    The trend of the chart you reference is clearly upwards and NAEP numbers trend very closely to VA numbers. The year by year differential is as follows 7,6,6,7,9,8,8,4. Really very, very stable differential over time. If the 4 at the end is what bothers you, I would wait for a few more repeats of that number (or less) before pulling the alarm… not how BR rolls though, I know. The bigger issue is that the next couple years will have too much Covid noise to really draw the comparison accurately… again, won’t stop BR “journalists”, we know…

  3. James C. Sherlock Avatar
    James C. Sherlock

    I note that the comments so far on the Balow report address the test scores of Virginia’s schools as a whole and blame/credit for those scores. I consider state average scores at best misleading. The subtitle of the report was “High Expectations and Excellence for all Students”. All students, not the average school.

    I suggest readers turn their gazes to the outcomes in our urban schools and don’t look away. That is what the Superintendent did in her report to her great credit. The opening line of her letter forwarding the report to the governor “I am issuing this update on the status of our efforts to restore excellence and close K-12 achievement gaps. Gaps, not averages. https://www.doe.virginia.gov/statistics_reports/our-commitment-to-virginians.pdf

    That is also what the Charlottesville Daily Progress, not noted as a conservative bastion, wrote in its editorial “Admitting Failure is the First Step to Improvement”.
    https://dailyprogress.com/opinion/opinion-editorial-admitting-failure-is-first-step-to-improvement/article_6f213e5c-d791-11ec-ba8d-bbe8d6b0475b.html

    “The data clearly show that downward adjustments to state proficiency standards and any other form of lowered expectations did not serve Virginia students and, in fact, hurt Black and Hispanic kids more than they hurt Whites.”

    If any readers’ feelings are hurt by the report because it was issued by Republican appointees, get over it.

    For readers who have expressed concern in previous discussions that the Superintendent comes to us from another state, consider that maybe it took a wider perspective to see what has been right in front of us.

    1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      Superintendent James Lane emphasized the same point in 2020, when he called a statewide summit on the decline in reading scores. https://www.doe.virginia.gov/news/news_releases/2020/2-20-20-reading-summit.docx

    2. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      What specific academic things for reading and math has Youngkin said he will do about the “bad” urban school problem?

      1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
        James C. Sherlock

        The administration is doing first things first. This report was designed to identify the problems as a basis for developing solutions.

  4. DJRippert Avatar
    DJRippert

    One thing Youngkin may want to reconsider is his pledge to refund the state’s surplus funds to Virginia taxpayers.

    The empty-suited economic buffoonery coming out of the White House, aided and abetted by the radical left in Congress, seems poised to push the US economy into recession this year or next. But for the clear-headed courage of Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema we might already be in a full blown period of recessionary stagflation.

    Recession affects the Local Composite Index (LCI) transfer of money from more affluent areas (especially NoVa) to less affluent areas. Adjusting the LCI calculations is part and parcel of the process. However, during the last recession (2008 – 2010) the call went out to freeze the LCI changes as I recall. Otherwise (heaven forbid), RoVa would have to make due with less of NoVa’s money.

    As I recall, Bob McDonnell “solved” this problem by underfunding the state retirement system.

    Youngkin might want to keep his fiscal powder dry until he sees the depth and breadth of the coming Biden Recession.

    1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      Exactly. Virginia has a rainy day fund. It’s about to start raining like crazy. Inflated costs for what the state pays for, reduced income to pay those bills.

  5. Lefty665 Avatar
    Lefty665

    Declining standards hurt the least prepared students, mostly poor kids, the worst. Our imperative is to teach ALL kids to read.

    To accomplish that we need to start early, K and pre K to overcome the deficits in often chaotic poor homes that are often headed by single poorly educated young women. We are producing generations of people who are not prepared to thrive.

    Declining averages are bad for individual students and the state, and accelerating failure to teach the least prepared to read blights their lives and everyones even more.

    Lets try creating real equity in actual reading skills instead of the depressed standards, rhetorical gimmicks and time wasted pointing fingers that have not fixed anything.

    If we teach all kids to read, and to read well, we will have created the equity we have failed to achieve by decree.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Ya know, most of my age, including them what rails here, didn’t learn to read until picking up “Fun with Dick and Jane” in kindergarten. I’ll venture a bet that for many of my age group that came in 1st grade instead.

      Apparently, they think they turned out above average.

  6. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    Along the lines of what Dick said:

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/3a0aa893304fedb6c4831d4897101b36e220b27b03c520dbacd08a10d5ae1460.jpg

    notice that Virginia has some company on the decrease of scores.

    All the stuff about CRT and DEI in Virginia is largely false especially in Virginia rural districts.

    But the biggest and most substantial flaw in Youngkins “report” is that he did not lay out a plan to fix the problem other than improve the way that history is taught.

    As far as I can tell, not a word about how Virginia would improve reading scores especially for the lower-income demographic where there are indeed serious shortfalls – once again, not in Virginia alone by a long shot.

    Based on Youngkin’s current trajectory on Education, does anyone here think he will be called Virginia’s “Education” Governor? I’d say at this point, it’s pretty much mostly culture war politics with almost zero real efforts to improve education.

  7. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Ya know, when I was in K-12, we took standardized tests. I remember some from HS and JrHS, and I’m pretty sure, I took one or two in K-6.

    Has anyone ever considered digging up those 1960 standardized tests and giving them to kids today?

    It’s one thing to measure an evolving system. It’s quite another to use evolving tools.

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        The links on the page are dead to me. Do you have the original link? I’d like to read the method, and the extrapolation on the ABOUT page.

    1. WayneS Avatar

      Or why not a 1912 non-standardized test? 😉

      https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/467d65b0bc5c2336018a04252e6169ad5bf3501ec4f39d42c004dc2b5d97ff92.jpg

      WARNING: Some of the history questions are very euro-centric and systemically racist…

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Yeah. Why not? The problem might be we’re approaching a genetic asymptote. I saw “Limitless”, and the one with Scarlet Johannson.

  8. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    At this point, all this really is , is more a largely partisan blame game without any real proposals to address the issue.

    Blaming lower test scores on CRT and DEI or even reduced cut scores is bogus and dishonest IMH and without any specific proposals to address the issue – it’s really just a nothing-burger.

    And no, you won’t fix this with a Virginia version of Success Academies although I’d support a specific version which would only enroll kids of low-income demographic who attend poor performing schools AND full transparency of academic results for the kid AND the school.

    And finally, they need to address the fact that Success Academies seems to have the option of “washing out” kids, i.e. send them back to the public schools.

    Is that what we want in Virginia?

  9. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    One out of every 250 children in Uvalde, Texas will not take the SOLs next time. Wonder if it will change their proficiency outcomes? Hey, could work.

Leave a Reply