When There Are No Consequences for Bad Behavior, the Consequence Is Bad Behavior

Brookland Middle School. Photo credit: Forrest Shelor / 8News

by James A. Bacon

At some public schools across the state last year, educators relaxed standards for everything from classroom attendance to cell phone usage out of a sense that children who had spent a year doing remote learning needed to ease back into learning at school. Adults effectively relinquished control, and anarchy followed. (See “No Grades, No Discipline, No Structure, No Learning.”) School officials say they learned their lesson, and they are trying to reestablish order in the new school year.

But educators are finding that it’s not easy putting the genie back in the bottle.

As WRIC reports, school divisions across Central Virginia are addressing internal security policies and procedures “amid a rash of in-school violence in local academic buildings.”

Brookland Middle School in Henrico County was put on “lock and teach” status — school and classroom doors are locked while teaching continues — after a 7th-grade student was hospitalized from a locker-room stabbing. Several students at Highland Springs High School, also in Henrico, had to be treated for pepper spray after a School Resource Officer used the chemical to break up a fight.

“There is an enormity of threat, both inside and outside the school building,” Richmond school board member Jonathan Young said Tuesday. “In a year, we average something like 20,000 incidents. To be clear, not all of them materialize in a melee or all-in assault on a student. But too frequently, they do.”

Approximately 3,500 alerts of violent messaging toward others via in-school devices were tracked since the start of the academic year, WRIC reports.

An emerging narrative in problem school divisions blames COVID, teenage angst, and social media for the disorder. 

“Kids are trying to impress each other, and there’s a lot of social anxiety, and the pandemic hasn’t helped with any of it,” said Gibson, vice chair of the Richmond School Board. “We’ve all seen these videos of kids — where these massive fights are breaking out at school. Do I think that kids are wanting to be in the videos because it gives some bit of notoriety? Unfortunately, I do.”

Richmond officials approved Monday a motion to restrict cell phone usage for secondary students in class.

“With all the personalities and the hormones, the normal choice of growing, learning how to deal with people, the angst of adolescence and all those things that build up, and, plus, an ever-increasing presence of social media putting out every school shooting, every incident, it creates a toxic soup environment,” said Mike Jones, whom WRIC described as a security consultant who works with several Virginia school divisions. “We’ve got students who are coming back for the first time with full school time, instead of a modified time due to COVID. So they’re having to re-learn the aspects of working with their peers, with their teachers, and just the way it is now.”

While there are elements of truth to this explanation — Bacon’s Rebellion has been highlighting the role of cell phones for many months — it overlooks the fact that many schools have abandoned traditional expectations for good behavior and punishments for bad behavior in favor of a social justice-inspired “restorative” approach to maintaining order.

But not everyone buys into that narrative.

Richmond’s Jonathan Young acknowledged that cell phones were a big part of the problem. But he also says that schools need to uphold strict consequences for poor behavior.

“Our first and foremost responsibility is always to prioritize the safety of our students, and too infrequently are we doing that,” he said. “All we need to do is look at our numbers. The metrics, unfortunately, bear out the consequences of a school district that is unwilling, it seems, to hold folks accountable.”

School officials have had an easier time in exurban counties such as Hanover and Goochland.

Hanover schools, which ban cellphone use during classroom instruction, have not seen many fights so far this school year.

“Over the summer and into the new school year, Goochland County Public Schools took a proactive approach to re-establishing a high level of expectations for student behavior,” a Goochland spokesman told the television station. “Policies were revised to discourage inappropriate behavior through the use of strong consequences, while also establishing structures and strategies that allow students to seek assistance prior to any confrontation taking place.”


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

20 responses to “When There Are No Consequences for Bad Behavior, the Consequence Is Bad Behavior”

  1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
    James Wyatt Whitehead

    The Richmond School Board needs to buckle up. 246 days until the last day of school. You can’t suspend these kids. No chance of going back down Pipeline to Prison Avenue.

  2. LarrytheG Avatar

    Maybe if we want to stoke the “doom *& gloom” stuff, we might also want to ask why so many school-age teens are turning into mass killers:
    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/16d70d4a9575693777d0dc360ce3a6bb580685473b17eb5b0e2617ed03e817ae.jpg

  3. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    These reports are examples of why I stopped watching local TV news a long time ago. They play up the violence, which is made for TV. But, then show a spokesman for Goochland spouting trite phrases: “high level of expectations”, “strong consequences”, “structures and strategies”. What does all that mean in concrete terms? What expectations have been established? What “strong consequences” have been instituted?

    Here is a simple solution. Ban all cell phone and other social media use on school property during school hours. If someone is caught using a cell phone, etc., don’t suspend or expel the student. Confiscate the cell phone or other social media device. Don’t give it back at the end of the school day. For the first offense, the device will remain confiscated for, say, a month. For any offense beyond the first, the device is confiscated for the remainder of the school year.

    If schools want to get really serious about this problem, there is technology available that can alert officials to when a cell phone is being used and the location. The Department of Corrections has used this technology to combat cell phone usage in prisons.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar

      I support your suggestion. But since you also know about DCOR and cell phones – can I ask why cell phones are not blocked especially at prisons?

      You don’t allow prisoners to have their own land lines – nor cell phones but if they have a cell phone it will “work”. Why? Why not block the signal inside the prison cells?

      Seems like they could do that at schools also, i.e. make classrooms unable to talk to cell towers.

      1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
        Dick Hall-Sizemore

        I am not sure why DOC does not choose to block cell phone signals unless it is because staff use cell phones a lot and such technology could not distinguish between staff and prisoner signals.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar

          There must be some law or regulation that does not allow it , not only for prisons but school also.

          I know I’ve been to places like doctors offices where the cell coverage goes away once you in some interior rooms but don’t know if this is because of the steel/block construction or something else.

          I also know that law enforcement can use a device called a stingray to intercept calls.

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stingray_phone_tracker

    2. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
      James Wyatt Whitehead

      You can’t do any of that Mr. Dick. Schools will not permit it. I used to confiscate phones. That was not supported. I bought a cell phone signal scrambler on ebay. Waited 3 months for it. Came from Hong Kong. The deputy at school had a long talk with me about that. Then one day I just gave up.

      1. This is from a 2020 FCC ‘Alert’ sent to state and local law enforcement agencies:

        Updated April 2020

        ***ALERT***

        Federal law prohibits the operation, marketing, or sale of any type of jamming equipment that interferes with authorized radio communications, including cellular and Personal Communication Services (PCS), police radar, and Global Positioning Systems (GPS).

        Jamming Prohibited

        Signal jamming devices can prevent you and others from making 9-1-1 and other emergency calls and pose serious risks to public safety communications, as well as interfere with other forms of day-to-day communications.

        The use of a phone jammer, GPS blocker, or other signal jamming device designed to intentionally block, jam, or interfere with authorized radio communications is a violation of federal law. There are no exemptions for use within a business, classroom, residence, or vehicle. Local law enforcement agencies do not have independent authority to use jamming equipment; in certain limited exceptions use by Federal law enforcement agencies is authorized in accordance with applicable statutes.

        1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
          James Wyatt Whitehead

          I had no idea. But the deputy sure did explain it to me. Apparently the jammer in my room was so strong that half the building had no cell phone signals.

        2. Lefty665 Avatar

          Wonder if school policies prohibiting cell phone use could be construed as
          “jamming equipment”? They certainly “interferes” with radio communications.

          “Federal law prohibits the operation, marketing, or sale of any type of jamming equipment that interferes with authorized radio communications, including cellular and Personal Communication Services(PCS),”

      2. This is from a 2020 FCC ‘Alert’ sent to state and local law enforcement agencies:

        Updated April 2020

        ***ALERT***

        Federal law prohibits the operation, marketing, or sale of any type of jamming equipment that interferes with authorized radio communications, including cellular and Personal Communication Services (PCS), police radar, and Global Positioning Systems (GPS).

        Jamming Prohibited

        Signal jamming devices can prevent you and others from making 9-1-1 and other emergency calls and pose serious risks to public safety communications, as well as interfere with other forms of day-to-day communications.

        The use of a phone jammer, GPS blocker, or other signal jamming device designed to intentionally block, jam, or interfere with authorized radio communications is a violation of federal law. There are no exemptions for use within a business, classroom, residence, or vehicle. Local law enforcement agencies do not have independent authority to use jamming equipment; in certain limited exceptions use by Federal law enforcement agencies is authorized in accordance with applicable statutes.

      3. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
        Dick Hall-Sizemore

        Unfortunately, you were ahead of your time. Schools are beginning to face up to the problem. Even the Halifax County School Board has banned the use of cell phones during “instructional time.” The school administration wanted to ban use during the entire day, but the Board would not go that far. Unfortunately, the Board opted for suspension, rather than confiscation, as a penalty. If one wants real consequences for breaking the rules, suspension won’t cut it. Certain confiscation would serve as a far better deterrent for students. http://www.yourgv.com/news/education/halifax-county-school-board-tightens-cellphone-stance/article_f18b7d70-2319-11ed-a97c-9f91c6af79b7.html#:~:text=As%20those%20students%20return%20to%20the%20classroom%2C%20the,board%20during%20a%20special%20called%20Monday%20evening%20meeting.

        1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
          James Wyatt Whitehead

          25 years ago at Potomac Falls HS in Sterling, Mr. Carpenter in I used to run the before and after school detention. 1 hour of supervised detention. It was used as punishment for late to school and other small change infractions. We had a list of kids in advance in order to track down school work from their teachers. We ran the place like a monastery. It corrected a great many behaviors. The school always had a great climate for learning.

      4. LarrytheG Avatar

        you really did this? what a hoot!

    3. For the first offense, the device will remain confiscated for, say, a month. For any offense beyond the first, the device is confiscated for the remainder of the school year.

      Some parents, probably a higher percentage than you might think, would be positively apoplectic if a teacher or principal did this to their child.

      1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
        Dick Hall-Sizemore

        Tough. Most of those parents got through school without cell phones.

        1. Oh, I know. I was not disagreeing with your suggestion. I was simply opining on the likely outcome of enacting it.

  4. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Didn’t the British fill prisons and parts of two continents with children?

    1. Lefty665 Avatar

      Yeah, and Australia got the criminals too while we got the religious kooks. Australia had first choice.

  5. “In a year, we average something like 20,000 incidents.

    Wow. Twenty thousand ‘incidents’ per year. There are only about 22,000 students in the entire City of Richmond public school system.

    Does the Fairfax County public school system have 170,000 ‘incidents’ per year in their schools?

Leave a Reply