What Is a Farming Landowner to Do?

by Jim Kindig

My 3rd great grandfather came to Augusta County in the 1820s, cleared land and established crops on land that is still in our family. Several of my neighbors could tell similar stories. We love farming, but it’s a hard life. Incredible increases in productivity have kept agricultural commodity prices depressed for 80 years. To keep up with the latest and greatest agricultural machinery and technology, farmers have borrowed heavily, using their ancestral lands as collateral. One or two bad years, and they go broke. Many see no way out of their cycle of indebtedness.

Today there is light at the end of the tunnel, so to speak, and that light comes from the sun. Large-scale solar farms offer landowners a low-risk means to keep their farm land. They can lease acreage to a solar developer for a guaranteed income over 25 years. At the end of the lease, they can easily convert the land back to agricultural production with no degradation of soil quality or health.

Solar development has become an issue in Virginia counties. Many local governments have acted to discourage it. Local planners and supervisors want to  be involved with any lease decisions the farmer is involved with, and they want to make approvals contingent upon land use restrictions and kickbacks to the localities. Local jurisdictions have created a maze of hurdles and gates that must be navigated before they would even consider permitting a solar facility. A facility that no one works in, lives in or visits gets more scrutiny than an apartment building, office building or Walmart.

It is helpful to consider why Virginia has Agricultural-zoned property. The zoning is meant to reflect what the land was used for more than a hundred years ago, prior to any zoning ordinances. Subdivisions and strip malls were gobbling up farm land, and zoning ordinances were invoked to protect farmers from rising prices and property taxes. Ironically, it is easier to get approval to rezone agricultural zoned property for residential or commercial use than to get for a low impact solar project.

A case in point was the proposed Strata Solar Project in Augusta County on land owned by Dennis Bradley and Alan Bocock. The project received so much local political resistance that the developer pulled out. What will happen to the Bocock and Bradley properties now? Once solar development is ruled out, the most economical choice is residential and commercial development. Once houses, strip malls and parking lots are built, the land will never be returned to productive agriculture. 

Agricultural products sustained the families of the early farmers and eventually the nation. Today we have another critical need that only large agricultural properties can satisfy. As our society and economy change, we need electricity generated from renewable sources. It is only reasonable to utilize agricultural property for solar projects that will generate efficient and clean electricity.

Some fear that devoting farmland to solar farms will harm the agricultural industry. Not so. Without the solar option, many farms, like the Bradley and Bocock properties, would be sold eventually for housing and commercial development. Localities should embrace large-scale solar development with the recognition that this alternative to conventional farming will help preserve and protect our county, state and country from urban sprawl and congestion.

James Lee Kindig owns Kinmont Farm in Waynesboro. As the 6th generation of the family to farm this property, he has traveled the United States in search of breeding stock. His search led to finding the first Charlois homozygous polled bull, which revolutionized the Charlois breed from a purely horned to purely polled breed. Kinmont Farm Charlois set records at Virginia BCIA feed tests and National Charlois sales. Expanding from a relatively small acreage property, Kinmont Farm, at one time leased more than 5,000 acres of pasture and hay land in four counties to accommodate the expanding herd of 1,000 head of  registered Charlais.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

64 responses to “What Is a Farming Landowner to Do?”

  1. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    Used to be that real Conservatives, real Libertarians supported farmers and especially small farms in things they could produce to pay for their needs and keep their land.

    Nothing wrong with solar, nor cell towers, nor even bio-solid application IMHO.

    Most farmland is not even suited for large scale solar because there needs to be a nearby major transmission line corridor.

    but if this company WSJ reports on is for real, it could be a game-changer for solar :

    “A four-year-old startup says it has built an inexpensive battery that can discharge power for days using one of the most common elements on Earth: iron.

    Form Energy Inc.’s batteries are far too heavy for electric cars. But it says they will be capable of solving one of the most elusive problems facing renewable energy: cheaply storing large amounts of electricity to power grids when the sun isn’t shining and wind isn’t blowing.

    The work of the Somerville, Mass., company has long been shrouded in secrecy and nondisclosure agreements. It recently shared its progress with The Wall Street Journal, saying it wants to make regulators and utilities aware that if all continues to go according to plan, its iron-air batteries will be capable of affordable, long-duration power storage by 2025.”

    https://www.wsj.com/articles/startup-claims-breakthrough-in-long-duration-batteries-11626946330?page=1

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Well, Virginia, if you read it in the Sun WSJ, it must be true.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        The thing is, if and when, cost-effective power storage becomes a reality, everything will change when it comes to wind/solar. Even the opponents will be hopping on board if it saves them electricity costs in their own homes and businesses!

        1. WayneS Avatar

          Thanks, Captain Obvious.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            Something not so “obvious” to more than a few including opponents of solar because it is “intermittent and unreliable”. So was a lot of technology in it’s early phases.

            Difference between optimists and Luddites?

          2. WayneS Avatar

            Solar electric power generation (on earth) will always be intermittent. There is no way around that limitation. The sun is not always shining even when it is up, and it is not always up.

            I have never doubted its reliability.

            I have doubted its economic viability from the standpoint of complete life-cycle costs, but those should be reduced as the associated technologies continue to develop and the systems become more efficient.

          3. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            Will the advent of direct or indirect battery storage change anything?

            Is there a lot of research and effort into developing battery storage?

            if/when that happens, does it change things in terms of “intermittent” being an issue? [excerpts – link has full text]

            ” In the energy sector, affordable batteries are making it possible for companies to store electricity and harvest renewable power.

            The gains are likely to continue.

            The battery boom could erode demand for crude oil and byproducts such as gasoline—as well as for natural gas, which is primarily used in power plants.

            The rise of rechargeable batteries is now a matter of national security and industrial policy. Control of the minerals and manufacturing processes needed to make lithium-ion batteries is the 21st-century version of oil security.

            Companies are working on new configurations—such as solid-state batteries, which don’t transfer ions through liquid—that could significantly enhance the power and further lower battery prices. The value of such a breakthrough could be measured in the billions of dollars, if not trillions.

            “There’s still a huge amount of innovation to come,” says Christina Lampe-Onnerud, chief executive at Connecticut-based battery startup Cadenza Innovation Inc. Her company envisions that buildings could someday have their own batteries, giving them reserves of electricity they could use during peak hours to reduce costs.

            The same batteries are being deployed on the power grid in growing numbers. Construction began in January on a battery in Florida that will use 2.5 million lithium-ion cells—similar in chemistry to Tesla cells, only larger. Florida Power & Light, part of NextEra Energy Inc., said the battery will be capable of powering Disney World for seven hours.

            Used automotive batteries, slightly degraded from years of filling up and discharging, are finding new life as storage projects. Amsterdam’s Johan Cruijff Arena has a three-megawatt “super battery” made from 148 Nissan Leaf battery packs, many of them recycled, storing electricity generated by rooftop solar panels and helping balance the stadium’s energy usage.

            https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-battery-is-ready-to-power-the-world-11612551578?st=e15povbpzm0cyod&reflink=desktopwebshare_permalink

          4. WayneS Avatar

            I’m pretty sure I said solar electric power generation will always be intermittent.

    2. Brian Leeper Avatar
      Brian Leeper

      Those smart people in Milwaukee figured out what do with their bio-solids.

      They package it up in sacks and sell it as fertilizer. “Milorganite”. Available at a home improvement center near you.

      1. Baconator with extra cheese Avatar
        Baconator with extra cheese

        That’s been done in Virginia for years. Nutri Green.

        1. Brian Leeper Avatar
          Brian Leeper

          Years ago Upper Occoquan Sewage Authority gave away “sludge” for use as fertilizer. Maybe they still do.

      2. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        they do but there must be way more of it than they can sell because it’s still applied on more than 40,000 acres in Virginia.

        1. Brian Leeper Avatar
          Brian Leeper

          Actually there is a shortage of Milorganite right now.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            not a shortage of sewage sludge, tho…. right?

          2. Brian Leeper Avatar
            Brian Leeper

            No, no shortage of that. Just a shortage of enterprising individuals to figure out how to package it up and sell it.

            Actually, there’s nothing to figure out. It’s all been done. I’m sure the Milwaukee Sewage District isn’t operating with any trade secrets.

        2. WayneS Avatar

          Yes. Reuse is a great thing.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            well… plants to food to poop to plants but not for direct human consumption – not sure about animals… cattle, etc…

      3. WayneS Avatar

        Milorganite… Miller Lite…

        Coincidence? I don’t think so. And it explains the taste of Miller Lite.

        🙂

    3. WayneS Avatar

      “Used to be that real Conservatives, real Libertarians supported farmers and especially small farms in things they could produce to pay for their needs and keep their land.”

      You can [unjustly] single out conservatives as opponents of this all you want , but the fact is NIMBYs come from all points along the political spectrum. In my 30+ years experience dealing with them, lib-left-democrat-leaning NIMBYs outnumber conservative-leaning NIMBYs by a small but significant margin. I’d say 55% to 45% plus or minus 2%.

      NIMBY-ism is one of those issues that often brings the two sides together.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        I totally acknowledge NIMBY but there is a second thing going on separate from NIMBY when Conservatives argue against solar – no matter where it is located. No?

  2. James Kiser Avatar
    James Kiser

    What you are experiencing is the NIMBY effect and the greasing of palms that all businesses go through. I live in Augusta just outside Waynesboro and I no beef with your solar farm. But a word of warning they will eventually decide you are making too much money and will work to get that out of you. The mary jane people in Co were so furious after it was legalized and after a couple years here came the tax increases. Good luck.

  3. James C. Sherlock Avatar
    James C. Sherlock

    A great contribution to our understanding of that side of the issue. Thank you. I support you.

    The left will first roll over to the solar NIMBYs, who, like the Kennedys and Kerrys on Cape Cod and other limousine liberals, are for alternative energy philosophically, but just not in the sight of “people like us – you know – the right people”.

    Then, if you manage to get a license and profit from it, they will figure out a way to tax the profits away from you unless you donate generously to their political campaigns.

    That is now the “Virginia Way” cycle of life.

    The rich left uses spare cash to buy exemptions from the laws that affect the “little people”. Ask Charlottesville “philanthropists” Sonjia Smith and her husband Michael Bills.

    1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      What members of the “left” have opposed the development of solar farms near them?

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Chesapeake? Oh wait, no.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          NIMBY knows no limits politically! However, Conservatives in general who doubt global warming are often also opposed to wind and solar renewables.

          But neither left nor right want a Nuke or even a large gas or coal plant within site of their home, usually.

          1. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            The spousal unit and I were looking for a recreational property in Pa near the daughter. There are no lakes in eastern Pa. Well, damned few, so when I found a riverfront house on the Susquehanna, I got excited. Newly renovated 3br, 3ba, reasonable price, 40 online photos. Looking through the photos there was a boathouse, small dock, … and then I saw them. Cooling towers on the other side of the river… Three Mile Island and within spitting distance… green sunrises? Nope.

          2. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            I know…. However, it is no problem what-so-ever for some folks – Lake Anna is crawling with 2nd homes…and permanent homes for retirees…. even on the “hot” side.

          3. Matt Adams Avatar
            Matt Adams

            1) TMI isn’t “eastern” PA, it’s Central.
            2) If your afraid of a TMI “meltdown” you’re anti-science

          4. WayneS Avatar

            How much were they asking for it?

            I like nuclear power plants.

          5. Brian Leeper Avatar
            Brian Leeper

            But they’re perfectly happy to buy property next to a lake which was created solely for cooling the nuclear plant, like Lake Anna….

      2. WayneS Avatar

        Here’s one example:

        https://www.jacksonsun.com/story/news/local/2021/02/24/madison-county-moves-ahead-silicon-ranch-solar-farm-project/4555662001/

        from the article: “

        The Madison County Commission recommended Tuesday that the board of zoning appeals rezone 942.5 acres in the Denmark area from agriculture to industrial for the project.

        The commission’s recommendation split down party lines, with all 15 Republicans present at the meeting voting in favor of the proposal and the eight Democrats against it.

  4. vicnicholls Avatar
    vicnicholls

    Thank you for being a farmer!

  5. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    This is a good presentation of the other side of the issue.

    The opposition to using farmland for solar facilities is another example of the long-running battle between farmers and newbie non-farmers. The newbies move out into the country in order to get some more space for their homes, enjoy the beauty, etc. Pretty soon, however, they start complaining about the farmer next door spreading smelly fertilizer on his fields or the other smells that come from farms. The farmer moving his equipment between fields and slowing down traffic annoys them. Also annoying is the farmer plowing his fields at night or early in the morning.

  6. Richard Smith Avatar
    Richard Smith

    What Farmer wouldn’t LOVE to rent out a thousand acres for 25 years and then kick back and take it easy for,,,,, 25 years.
    Farming takes real work… Leasing out land takes,,, not much of anything.
    If you’re leasing out land are you a farmer, or just a property manager or absentee landlord???
    The hardest part is deciding which bank to have that automatic deposit made in every month…

  7. LesGabriel Avatar
    LesGabriel

    As someone who grew up on a farm and who has many relatives, friends, and classmates still farming, I am sympathetic to these views. That said, not all lands and not all solar companies are the same. There are valid arguments on both sides in each situation, and it is incumbent on Planning Commissions and Boards of Supervisors to hear all sides and make judgements after an open and transparent process. Rather than debating solar energy in the abstract, we should be concerned about how to ensure our local elected officials conduct fair and unbiased processes. It could be argued that in the case of the large solar facility in Western Spotsylvania County, some voices got a more sympathetic hearing than did others.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      What I saw in Spotsylvania was NIMBY on steroids to be honest. Now that the project is approved and well underway, a drive out that way and it’s almost impossible to see the panels at all – all the way around the entire project. It’s back off all public roads with trees and berms in between. The land they’re building on was clear cut years prior and was basically fields of stumps and no plans to farm it.

      I felt like the BOS and Planning Commission actually went the extra mile in getting input and feedback and some of the opponents talked and acted like idiots.

      1. Brian Leeper Avatar
        Brian Leeper

        I am convinced that, per capita, the Northern Virginia region has more NIMBYs than anywhere else in the country.

        Must be the large number of white-collar Federal office workers who have no clue how anything industrial actually works(and no desire to get one).

  8. energyNOW_Fan Avatar
    energyNOW_Fan

    Let’s hear a little about the numbers. How much payout is being offered to the land owners? How can solar be so cheap if are paying so much rent for the land (besides the obvious answer of subsidies)?

    1. Baconator with extra cheese Avatar
      Baconator with extra cheese

      Bingo. I do some work related to the utility scale solar facilities. They often speed through the beginning phases in order to start producing electricity in order to maximize subsidies/ incentives.
      Too many times that initial work is done without respect to stormwater regulations/ permits and they end up having compliance issues. The panels are impervious plus they compact the ground incidentally during construction leaving the rest of the field functionally impervious.
      Also at issue is the fact that insects and birds may see the panels as water. This can very disruptive to natural cycles.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        We’re having a 5000 acre solar farm built in our county and all the rules are being followed. Panels are installed on posts much like you see on a fence line or even a guardrail along the highway. The ground below the panels is open and porous.

        Birds and other critters are no more affected than say a house with windows or cars on the road.

        Panels are really not much different than most other built infrastructure.

        here’s the biggest “killer” of birds:

        https://www.sibleyguides.com/wp-content/uploads/Bird_mortality_chart.jpg

        1. WayneS Avatar

          You said: Birds and other critters are no more affected than say a house with windows or cars on the road.

          You also posted a link to a list of the biggest killers of birds…

          According to the chart at the link you posted, the biggest killer of birds is windows. So, if as you claim, solar panels affect birds in a manner similar to the way windows affect them, then as solar panels proliferate they will become a significant killer of birds.

          1. Matt Adams Avatar
            Matt Adams

            He also posted above about the Government invoking imminent domain to acquire the land for solar panels.

          2. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            nope. you need to look a little further.

            Most windows are oriented 90 degres to what most solar panels are. Birds move across the terrain usually .. most don’t dive bomb into solar panels…

          3. WayneS Avatar

            Don’t give me your arrogant, condescending “nope”.

            You made the statement I quoted. You posted the chart which I referred to.

          4. WayneS Avatar

            Don’t give me your arrogant, condescending “nope”.

            You made the statement I quoted. You posted the chart which I referred to.

          5. WayneS Avatar

            PS-

            You wrote: “Most windows are oriented 90 degres (sic) to what most solar panels are. ”

            This is incorrect. The optimum angle for PV solar panels at our latitude is 38 to 39 degrees from horizontal.

    2. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      What if solar worked like pipelines, power lines and other energy infrastructure and the builders could use eminent domain to obtain the land and overrule local authority?

      1. Matt Adams Avatar
        Matt Adams

        “LarrytheG energyNOW_Fan • 2 hours ago
        What if solar worked like pipelines, power lines and other energy infrastructure and the builders could use eminent domain to obtain the land and overrule local authority?”

        So use the power of Government to compel people to move by offering (nice way of saying force) them bare minimum for their property.

        Sounds very authoritarian of you.

  9. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    “With more than 21,000 megawatts of installed solar capacity, California easily leads all fifty U.S. states in solar electricity production – enough to power 5.4 million homes!”

    So jump for joy, be gay and blithe,
    Or weep, my friend in sorrow.
    What California is today,
    The rest will be tomorrow.

    1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      Of course, California has a distinct advantage in this area. It has the Mojave desert in which to place most of its solar panels.

      https://ww2.energy.ca.gov/almanac/renewables_data/solar/index_cms.php

      1. Matt Adams Avatar
        Matt Adams

        So much for land conservation.

        That’s just ruining a habitat that residence don’t find usable, not to mention the destruction of cultural sites.

      2. Stephen Haner Avatar
        Stephen Haner

        We don’t want California’s energy problems. Truly they have screwed it up big time.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          Apparently can’t be too bad, they’re still the 5th or 6th largest economy in the world.

          and compared to pure capitalism Texas? ha ha ha !

          1. Brian Leeper Avatar
            Brian Leeper

            Yes, and Ronald Reagan was once Governor of California, at a time when nobody in Virginia would have voted for a Republican like that.

      3. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        they do but even in places less advantaged, solar is still apparently cost-effective for direct from panel to grid. When/if batteries ever become cost-effective, the game totally changes and solar anywhere, no matter if it is on the low end compared to places like California, it will become more and more adopted. Even a low-performing solar – if the power can be captured and stored will change the game.

      4. Matt Adams Avatar
        Matt Adams

        So much for land conservation.

        That’s just ruining a habitat that residence don’t find usable, not to mention the destruction of cultural sites.

  10. WayneS Avatar

    The key is to get the General Assembly to classify electricity as a cash crop. Solar farms will then be “by right” as an agricultural use…

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      It does matter what uses and activities are on the land, though. Even for something like a cattle farm – too much of it done the wrong way can cause real damage to other properties.

      1. WayneS Avatar

        It was a joke.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          I caught that but the reality is that zoning DOES talk about what kinds of uses and their IMPACTS to other property owners.

  11. Down here in Mathews County, we have some mighty fine waterfront, with homes dotting the shoreline, And there are a few farms still functioning, back from that, along the roads that serve all those waterfront homes. But — go into the center of the County and you find: (1) dead-flat barren land used for sand and gravel excavation, (2) the occasional stand of cut-over ‘scrub’ timber, and (3) swampy muck. No farms, no homes, no businesses, only a handful of roads, all but one unpaved. There’s only one sign of modern life out there: a big transmission line, which runs west to east to supply the Courthouse area.

    But the hot topic on upcoming Planning Commission and Supervisors’ meetings is whether to prohibit solar ‘farms’ in this wasteland.

    I agree completely with Larry: the modern farmer has as much right to raise kilowatts as corn, or cannabis for that matter. Solar farms do not pollute the land, the collectors are easily removable, the aesthetic impact (if any) can easily be hidden by landscaping, the noise from an inverter, if needed, can easily be muffled. All that’s needed is one of those darned transmission lines to connect to — and that’s already there in Mathews County.

    So what’s the problem? A solar farm represents change, I suppose. And unforeseen profit to some owners of hitherto near-worthless land. And unforeseen tax revenue for the County. For shame!

    Yes, renting land for a solar array can also make the difference between a farmer’s surviving and selling out to developers. But sometimes there’s no alternative use at all, yet people still oppose it. That’s NIMBY for you. That’s also confiscation by regulation, wherever on the political spectrum it comes from.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      yes. But to also differentiate. Opposition to a specific solar site is NIMBY. Opposition to solar in general is political and tends to not be “liberal”.

      I’m not convinced that some of the opposition to solar is solely local and NIMBY.

Leave a Reply