What If They Threw a Party and the Wrong People Came?

Source: Fairfax County Office of Research and Strategic Improvement

by James A. Bacon

In an effort to overcome “catastrophic learning loss” among Virginia school kids over the past five years, Governor Glenn Youngkin has ramped up efforts to recruit more tutors. This morning, for instance, he announced a tutoring partnership between the Urban Leagues of Hampton Roads and Greater Richmond, and the state’s four Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HCBUs).

Finding more tutors is a great idea. It would be a wonderful thing if every child who wanted help catching up to grade level could find one-on-one help. But it’s important to set realistic expectations. Not every child who needs help takes advantage of it.

Fairfax County used $488,000 in federal funds to partner with Tutor.com to provide free online tutoring to help students overcome “unfinished learning” last spring, reports WTOP News. But only a tiny percentage of Fairfax County students used the service when it was rolled out in April, and those who did often needed it the least.

“When tutor.com access became available, the large majority of students did not access Tutor.com services,” wrote the county’s Office of Research and Strategic Improvement in a study released last month. “Of those that did, they accessed Tutor.com for limited time.”

Only 1.6% of the Fairfax County student population accessed the platform for learning support, with a median of 29 minutes. 

Here’s the kicker: “Asian students and AAP students were disproportionately overrepresented in participation data…. Students who were not identified as needing academic intervention accessed the resource to a greater extent than those who were identified.”

“Overall, these results suggest Tutor.com is primarily fulfilling an enrichment function rather than an academic intervention function,” the report said.

The report recommended that Fairfax schools increase communication about Tutor.com as a resource for struggling students and continue to monitor the use of the resource, the cost of which worked out to an average of $130 per tutoring hour.

Bacon’s bottom line: Remember the debate over the admissions system at Fairfax County’s elite Thomas Jefferson High School? A common criticism of the old merit-based system, which was based on a test, was that Asian families were disproportionately likely to pay for tutoring. Isn’t it interesting that when free tutoring services were made available to the general school population Asian kids were the most likely to use them — even though they were less likely to need them!

It turns out that some kids are more motivated — or perhaps motivated by their families — to succeed than others.

The only silver lining in the report is that Black students, though less likely to avail themselves of tutoring than Asians, were more likely than Whites and Hispanics to do so. It is not clear from the data, however, how many of those Black students were educationally at risk.

Regardless of the racial/ethnic breakdown, only a tiny fraction of economically disadvantaged students took advantage of the free tutoring. Forty-three percent of economically disadvantaged students in Fairfax County Public schools failed to pass their English Standards of Learning (SOL) exams in 2021-22, while 47% failed to pass their math exams, according to Virginia Department of Education data. Remarkably, only 1.6% of economically disadvantaged students used the free online tutoring resource.

Hopefully, participation in Tutor.com will improve as awareness of the program increases and students have the opportunity to access it early in the school year before they have gotten discouraged and fallen behind.

Likewise, we can hope that in-school, face-to-face tutoring programs will achieve greater buy-in than an online resource. But the Youngkin administration — and everyone else — needs to set realistic expectations of what tutoring can accomplish. Sometimes the problem doesn’t reside with the teachers or schools. Sometimes it’s the students and their families. You can’t make a student learn if he or she just doesn’t care.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

25 responses to “What If They Threw a Party and the Wrong People Came?”

  1. Kathleen Smith Avatar
    Kathleen Smith

    $130 per hour??? Wow! The research behind tutors has been mixed. This is why the industry of tutors increased and then decreased when Title I finds made it available to parents sometime around 2005. Problem is parents don’t want to give up soccer or baseball. Where would they be able to gossip and find out what is going on?

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Or demonstrate their bad behavior.

  2. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    I have a feeling that on-line tutoring for the educationally disadvantaged will be about as effective an on-line regular instruction was.

    In-person tutoring will, of course, be much more effective. The question will be when the tutoring is to take place. As Steve and Kathleen point out, there are lots of distractions out of school. So, it would be best to have the tutoring take place during school hours, when the student is a “captive” audience.

    It does not have to be one-on-one. Many years ago, my wife taught in a Henrico County school program called PRIME. I forget what the acronym stands for, but, basically, she got a few kids who were having trouble with reading, for an hour a day and worked with them on their reading. Her personal main objective was to get them excited about reading, what it could do for them.

    One of the problems with in-school programs is that kids don’t like being singled out. And other kids are quick to catch on to what programs are for the “slow” learners and some kids can be cruel in such situations.

    Bottom line: there are no easy solutions.

  3. DJRippert Avatar

    “Remember the debate over the admissions system at Fairfax County’s elite Thomas Jefferson High School? A common criticism of the old merit-based system, which was based on a test, was that Asian families were disproportionately likely to pay for tutoring.”

    A criticism that was never accompanied by any facts that I ever saw.

    Seems like just more Asian bashing by America’s liberals.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar

      re:…. ” was that Asian families were disproportionately likely to pay for tutoring.” all Asian income levels ?

      The percent of low income Asians in TJ is 2%

      1. James McCarthy Avatar
        James McCarthy

        Nah, just disproportionally as stated by somebody.

      2. DJRippert Avatar

        What does that have to do with your contention that Asian families are disproportionately likely to pay for tutoring in order to pass the TJ test?

        1. LarrytheG Avatar

          NoVa is home to a larger than typical (for other places) number of College-educated Asian immigrants who, like most high-income parents , want their kids to become highly educated and are willing to pay for tutoring, etc – like any higher income parent is – regardless of race or ethnicity.

          TJ, across all races and ethnicities is about 2% low income. And that same demographic will access other tutoring services that are available – like most other higher income parents of other races and ethnicities.

          The mistake is in thinking the Asian demographics in NoVa are like Asian demographics in other places AND in all places more interested in education that other races/ethnicities.

          It’s a false premise.

  4. DJRippert Avatar

    “Remember the debate over the admissions system at Fairfax County’s elite Thomas Jefferson High School? A common criticism of the old merit-based system, which was based on a test, was that Asian families were disproportionately likely to pay for tutoring.”

    A criticism that was never accompanied by any facts that I ever saw.

    Seems like just more Asian bashing by America’s liberals.

  5. James McCarthy Avatar
    James McCarthy

    In a FOIA settlement with the Youngkin administration, Axios reported that one Fairfax parent submitted a complaint to the now apparently disabled “tipline” questioning the tutoring offer and possible exposure of tutees to grooming by the unknown tutors.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Are they hiring Youth Pastors?

      1. James McCarthy Avatar
        James McCarthy

        According to some BR denizens, the hiring of yute pastors does not run afoul of the First Amendment. But…but dog groomers must be licensed.

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          Google “youth pastor arrested” and you’ll discover what a groomer is… worse than priests.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar

            Gee.. that could be a “tip line” for Miyares to burnish his law and order credentials.

  6. LarrytheG Avatar

    Here’s the thing that is missing from the “Asians” want to educate their kids idea.

    In terms of economically disadvantaged, they make up only 2% of TJ and that INCLUDES the Asians.

    So what does that really mean? It means parents who are NOT economically disadvantaged KNOW how important K-12 education is for their kids – including higher income Asians – which is really no big revelation.

    Well educated parents, no matter their race and ethnicity WILL access/pay for/or get for free – resources to help their kids learn.

    The challenge has always been that low income, less educated parents – regardless of their race/ethnicity tend to not seek educational resources for their kids.

    1. DJRippert Avatar

      Before the libtwits ruined TJ it was extremely competitive for students of all income levels. Being wealthy (and concerned about K-12 education) did not guarantee that your child got into TJ. Tutoring did not guarantee it either.

      Your point, “The challenge has always been that low income, less educated parents – regardless of their race/ethnicity tend to not seek educational resources for their kids.” is exactly right.

      But what does that have to do with TJ?

      TJ is one high school out of about 70 in Northern Virginia. It was, once upon a time, intended for the most academically talented Northern Virginia children. The fact that a lot of less affluent parents didn’t care enough about their children’s education to get them into TJ is irrelevant. Those kids could attend one of the other 69 (or so) high schools in Northern Virginia.

      Guess what? Those same parents who don’t care about their children’s education won’t see their kids getting into Harvard, MIT or even a public school like UVa.

      What do you want to do next, Larry? Make admissions to UVa a lottery based process?

      1. LarrytheG Avatar

        when were the low-income kids a higher percentage in TJ?

        re: ” Guess what? Those same parents who don’t care about their children’s education won’t see their kids getting into Harvard, MIT or even a public school like UVa.

        What do you want to do next, Larry? Make admissions to UVa a lottery based process?”

        You’re okay with kids who actually have potential – failing – because they don’t have the “right” parents?

        Isn’t the premise of public school to educate each child to that child’s potential rather than saying it’s okay if they fail because of bad parents?

        I’m NOT in favor of unqualified folks being selected by demographic lottery.

        However, I WILL point out that Colleges take academically under-qualified folks – ALL THE TIME – and shepherd them through with special help and tutoring.

        Right?

  7. vicnicholls Avatar
    vicnicholls

    Don’t learn, don’t care, shouldn’t be eligible for services later on. Decades past time to stop paying for choices that tear down vs. build up.

  8. Stephen Haner Avatar
    Stephen Haner

    Yep, it all starts with the home and the expectations or involvement of the parent, or parents or some other adult the child will respond to. Making the little darlings buckle down isn’t always a path to popularity. 🙂 And the distractions have grown exponentially.

  9. James Kiser Avatar
    James Kiser

    News story out that says that kids who graduated during the 2 years of Fauci’s virus are failing college in large number.

    1. DJRippert Avatar

      Colleges need to lower their standards and pretend that everything is just fine. Code name: Operation Democrat Recovery.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar

        They don’t “lower” their standards for sports and sons/daughters of Alumni?

  10. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    I have a feeling that on-line tutoring for the educationally disadvantaged will be about as effective an on-line regular instruction was.

    In-person tutoring will, of course, be much more effective. The question will be when the tutoring is to take place. As Steve and Kathleen point out, there are lots of distractions out of school. So, it would be best to have the tutoring take place during school hours, when the student is a “captive” audience.

    It does not have to be one-on-one. Many years ago, my wife taught in a Henrico County school program called PRIME. I forget what the acronym stands for, but, basically, she got a few kids who were having trouble with reading, for an hour a day and worked with them on their reading. Her personal main objective was to get them excited about reading, what it could do for them.

    One of the problems with in-school programs is that kids don’t like being singled out. And other kids are quick to catch on to what programs are for the “slow” learners and some kids can be cruel in such situations.

    Bottom line: there are no easy solutions.

    1. James Kiser Avatar
      James Kiser

      Why is it that no one expects kids to sacrifice themselves for any thing? Basketball, soccer and football yup motivated for that but nothing else.

Leave a Reply