Warren Buffett Writes Off His Own Newspapers

The sage of Omaha: Don’t get too attached to your hometown newspaper.

Uh, oh, this has got to make a lot of Virginia journalists nervous: Warren Buffett, whose BH Media Group owns daily newspapers in Richmond, Roanoke, Charlottesville, Lynchburg and Danville, among other media properties, has reiterated his conviction that there is no long-term future for most newspapers.

“It is very difficult to see — with a lack of success in terms of important dollars rising from digital — it’s difficult to see how the print product survives over time,” said Buffett during a Q&A session during the Berkshire Hathaway annual meeting today, as reported by The Wrap.

“No one except the Wall Street Journal, The New York Times and now probably the Washington Post has come up with a digital product that really in any significant way will replace the revenue that is being lost as print newspapers lose both circulation and advertising,” he said.

Adding insult to injury, he noted, “The economic significance to Berkshire is almost negligible.” But, he added, “the significance to society I think actually is enormous.”

Even before Buffett purchased the Virginia newspapers, the enterprises were treated as cash cows — milked for profitability. The now-defunct Media General focused mainly on controlling costs, not growing revenue. Investing in the newspapers would have been throwing money away. I resented the cost cutting when I was publisher of Virginia Business magazine, thinking it short sighted, but in retrospect it was probably the right thing to do. Other than the three national brands noted by Buffett, which have the brand power to generate big subscription revenues, no U.S. daily newspaper anywhere has figured out a viable long-term strategy.

I expect Buffett to continue milking his Virginia newspapers as long as he can, prolonging the inevitable by cutting costs to match declining revenues. Inevitably, reporting staffs and news holes will continue to shrink until there’s nothing left.

Who, then, will report the news? Who, then, will hold Virginia’s political class accountable?

One model is to raise money, build an endowment, and support journalism as a nonprofit enterprise. If you can find the funds, good luck with that. Cross your fingers and hope your benefactors don’t have a partisan or ideological agenda. Another model may be hyper-local, county and courthouse reporting — we’ll see how that works out. In the meantime, I have done some thinking about a sustainable business model for an online publication (like Bacon’s Rebellion) for covering the statehouse. If there are any journalists out there looking for a longer-term future than Warren Buffett can offer, I’d like to chat. Contact me at jabacon[at]baconsrebellion.com.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

20 responses to “Warren Buffett Writes Off His Own Newspapers”

  1. Steve Haner Avatar
    Steve Haner

    You know, we probably are viewing the past through some significant rose-colored glasses and the challenge is today’s readers are besieged with information choices, some of them excellent. I listened to Buffet and Bill Gates for more than an hour on CNBC, which I can watch in the morning without having to hear about the royal wedding or the latest cute trending cat video. (When some other resident as a major network on during my workout, I can barely keep my breakfast down.)

    What was going on when I started full time at the Roanoke Times summer of ’76? We had the morning and evening papers, the two Roanoke TV and one Lynchburg TV stations, and a smattering of radio stations (that basically spent much of their time reading our copy.) Circulation penetration was high by today’s standards. Some people got the Washington Post (or Star) or WSJ but there was no access to the hundreds of other choices available now on your phone or tablet.

    And what were people reading? The sports pages, the food section, the lifestyle sections. Sure they’d glance at a news headline and actually read a story they cared about, and the truly engaged (a small subset) were on the editorial page. Were people better informed 40 years ago? I wouldn’t be so sure…

    We are also kidding ourselves if we forget that for most of American history the major daily newspapers had major political axes grinding constantly, and were often directly financed by political parties. Buffet is not Hearst, and that’s a good thing.

    Newspapers probably still have special postal rates, and in Virginia they remain exempt from a couple of key business taxes. We could further subsidize them, and find ways to tear down the pay walls, but that wouldn’t make people put down their other distractions. We’re just a couple of old romantics, Jim – “hello sweetheart, get me re-write.”

    I’ll tell the grandkids about the editions after the 1985 flood, when I had multiple bylines on Page One and had done a re-write of the main story lede at oh dark 30 for the 1-star. I’ll tell them I once actually made the call from the copy desk with the command “stop the presses!” They will stare at me and pass the Alzheimer meds…..

  2. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    There is no shortage of information these days but the “gatekeepers” are gone and it’s up to you to figure out what is truth and what is fiction and in between and the reality is there are a lot of folks these days that are perfectly willing to believe – essentially what appeals to their own biases…

    So Bezos is doing what with WaPo? Keeping it alive ? Expecting to make a profit?

    I don’t think Warren Buffet is Bain Capital. I think he’s trying to figure out a way for the free press to survive and is wiling to take losses in doing it. Otherwise why in the world did he purchase what was clearly companies in an industry flirting with extinction… just like Bezos. No?

    And really with a large number of people condemning WaPo and company as Main stream Media “rags”… who cares so why all the whining about “who will report the news”?

    It’s not like there are not hundreds/thousands of would-be replacements, no?

    The real irony is that newspapers were supposed to be the bastions of Freedom and Democracy but their key to survival, their vitality, had nothing to do with with whether people were actually willing to pay for news… nope … it’s was pure serendipity that news journalism ended up funded by advertising… and now – “advertising” has … “evolved” and left print journalism behind..

    Now.. in the 21st century age of the internet – more and more people believe what they want to believe.. and facts and reality are Fake News…

  3. As one of the few interested in news, I find the only “rags” here are way too biased and don’t print real news.

  4. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    Make me wonder why FOX News doesn’t start selling a “real News” Newspaper like USA TODAY. They could call it FOX NEWS TODAY and it would surely become the coup de grace for all those biased lame stream Media outfits like WaPo and NYT, eh? And Trump would have a daily column..about the “rest of the story”….. 😉

    1. Steve Haner Avatar
      Steve Haner

      The Murdochs and News Corp have a few newspapers already, Larry – I guess they could rename one of them….Turn the Guardian into Fox Print UK?

      There is a small paper up here in Richmond’s Northside, what used to be called a shopper, free with a bunch of announcements and ads and a few articles. I pick up Style Weekly fairly regularly. Like Jim I hate to see the TD or the Roanoke Times wasting away to shadows of their former selves, and I worry that many important things are being missed, but human beings are intensely interested in news (and gossip) and the market will provide one way or another.

  5. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    I’m signed up with four papers… including WaPo, NYT and WSJ… none are on “paper”.

    I simply cannot afford any more but more and more papers are also putting up paywalls… which is self-dooming…

    I thought BHMedia was on to something when it bought a bunch of papers in Virginia and actually puts some articles from RTD and Charlottesville and others into the Fredericksburg Paper but that’s it – you can’t go to these other papers and read them… and I was hoping that BHMedia would offer a bundle subscription..

    That may be a path forward…

  6. Peter Galuszka Avatar
    Peter Galuszka

    I started working in journalist full time in 1974and have written for outlets both tiny (9,000 circulation) to really big (one million worldwide). I have worked for Landmark, which owns The Virginian-Pilot and used to own the Roanoke paper, the RTD and Virginia Business, then owned by Media General and then McGraw-Hill, then owner of BusinessWeek.
    I don’t have a lot of sympathy for the managements of those places. The Net was a huge change and no one embraced it. They were too fat and happy with their monopolies when there were department stores and car dealers that took out huge ads. Making margins of 25 percent or more in a captive newspaper market was common. TV stations could make 40 plus percent in margins in the right market. They did not want to change. Too easy staying where they were.
    One telling example was at Media General. In 2000, Jim hired me at Virginia Business. The magazine had a pretty decent, homegrown Website. Then Media General got int the act and created a separate corporate division for digital since that was the buzz at the time. It was beset by the usual Media General penchant for cost cutting. EVerything was done on the cheap. They put up a truly awful Website prototype to save money cross selling ads and hired a bunch of mediocrities. Out when VB’s decent Website.

  7. Reed Fawell 3rd Avatar
    Reed Fawell 3rd

    “No one except the Wall Street Journal, The New York Times and now probably the Washington Post has come up with a digital product that really in any significant way will replace the revenue that is being lost as print newspapers lose both circulation and advertising,” Buffett said.

    I disagree with Warren Buffett.

    All three of these papers – the Wall Street Journal. New York Times, and Washington Post – are failing institutions. They are failing in all important respects – financially, content-wise, and influence-wise. Indeed, it’s gotten to the point where these newspaper do far more harm than good. They are failing all of us, and the nation, and our society. It is sad. It is also very dangerous, what these so called newspapers and reporters are doing. Their recent annual “Correspondents Dinner” proves their collapse.

    As recently as 18 months ago, I never though I would see the day, but last month I terminated my subscription to WSJ.

    It took three phone calls to get rid of the WSJ. The first question they asked on the first call was “Why?”

    “I do not trust your news reporting,” I replied.

    “Then will you continue your subscription at $15 a month, a more than 60% reduction in its normal digital annual cost?

    “NO. Why should I? Your news is lousy, inefficient, and over priced at almost any cost. Axios is far better news in every respect. And its free?

    It took three long calls to rid the WSJ from my automatic renewal subscription list.

    Each call was quite disagreeable. On the first two calls, I said their news reporting was dishonest and unreliable, so I was terminating, despite my like of their editorial commentary. Still they refused to terminate.

    On the third call, I asked for them to tell me why I was terminating based on their records, and asked them review their records as to the substance of those two earlier calls I had with them. This they did.

    At the conclusion of their telling me what happened on the two earlier calls, I told them “You just told me six lies. Your records of our two earlier conversations are bogus. For example, I AM NOT TERMINATING because I don’t like our Editorial content. It’s the reverse, your editorials are what I like. Its your news that I don’t trust. It is highly unreliable. But I do like your editorial content.”

    The WSJ’s termination process of an otherwise annual automatic renewal subscription is disgraceful. It’s designed to thwart the customers wishes. In my case, it was designed to misrepresent the reasons for my terminating so as to hide the newspapers incompetence in news reporting, and to instead blame it on the editorial side of the paper.

    My advice to subscribers is never allow the WSJ to automatically renew annually. They have clever ways of upping the price in covert ways. And never pay their $450 annual charge for a digital edition because, unless you are a sucker. You can get it for around $190 tops. But in my opinion its not worth that either. Or anything close.

    Newspapers are habit forming. Otherwise they would be dead already.

    As it is, these three newspapers a dying a slower death only because of that habit forming nature of a subscription. Bezos and his ilk surely will keep them on life support after they otherwise would fail, but they are now, and increasingly so will be, shadows of their former selves, replaced by news outlets that find new and far better ways to aggregate and distribute the news at a far better cost. Meanwhile, these three big newspapers are increasingly harmful to our society and nation, a plague that poisons our society and its culture at its roots. Again, witness the Correspondence dinner.

  8. S. E. Warwick Avatar
    S. E. Warwick

    Newspapers deserted their readers long before the reverse happened. Newsroom pogroms, like the one at the RTD a decade or so ago, replaced competent editors and reporters with bean counters focused on cutting costs with little appreciation for retaining the quality of the product. Seasoned reporters were replaced with kids who had not grown up reading newspapers and had no one to mentor them along the way. Many of them do a creditable job of reporting, but are unable to put things into context and give depth to the traditional five ws.

    They were all too slow to realize the potential of the internet, believing that subscribers would not read their paper on a computer. Enter the tablet, which soon replaced the on the breakfast table and elsewhere.

    Local governments get little coverage until something goes wrong, as in the continuing sad saga of Petersburg. Kids are not interested in entry level reporting jobs at local papers with long hours and low pay. They consider local government boring and beneath their skill set. It is often easier to find out what is going on in Moscow than your county courthouse.

    There may be a connection between the demise of bricks and mortar retailing and newspapers. Wading through the bale of ad supplements in a typical Sunday edition often sparked a trip to the mall to buy a specific item on sale. While there, other things might catch a shopper’s eye. Even though online retailing is very focused, the algorithms used to suggest other products are more entertaining than useful.
    As newspapers become less dependable, people become more skeptical. There used to be faith in reporting, if something was “in the paper” it was considered to be fact, now, not so much.

    1. Reed Fawell 3rd Avatar
      Reed Fawell 3rd

      This is a very sage comment, in all respects. You know what you are talking about. For example, how much ground and explication you have covered in the first two sentences of your first paragraph above. As a result, it can be said that there are still great and talented (or potentially so) reporters and editors around, but the systems to manage them have quickly fallen apart, resulting in a “crap product” instead of what had often been a great product before.

      On the other hand:

      It is also remarkable how operations like The Federalists, Aeon and Axios, and many others, not in existence a few years back, have gotten so remarkable good so incredibly fast. So are now making every day “Smart and efficient news worthy of your and my time, attention, and trust,” while the formerly great newspapers – like the WSJ, New York Times, and Washington Post – have gotten slow and stupid, incompetent and inefficient and unworthy of our time, attention and trust, so quickly.

      WHAT A difference a decade or two now can make – whole industries, disciplines, and key institutions now are flipped upside down, or gone from great to rotten. Look at the FBI. Or political science. Or marriage. On gender. Or sex. Or one person’s reputation. Or the Democratic Party. For a few of many many examples.

      Up is Down and Down is Up. Much of the rest is being shattered into unrecognizable parts – the Middle East, and Europe for example. History, macro, micro, and all in between, is run amuck.

      1. Reed Fawell 3rd Avatar
        Reed Fawell 3rd

        Hence, Donald Trump is already among the among the greatest of all American Presidents. And no one else who has an elite education, save for a very very few, has any clue as to what is going on in today’s world. That is how divorced the great majority of America’s highly educated elite are from the reality. Wisdom and competence among our elite has gone into hiding.

        1. Reed Fawell 3rd Avatar
          Reed Fawell 3rd

          What to see the future? What to see some real news? What to see it very smart, and very efficient, and very to the point, and very useful?

          Okay. Let’s do it? Here is how:

          Go to AXIOS AM by Mike Allen published today around 6:20 am.

          From there scroll down to:

          1 big thing … “Going big”: Inside Trump’s Iran gamble

          Now read all several hundred words of it, compressed into bullet points mostly.

          Now follow its leads and GO DEEP – Click on:

          “Iran deal exit splinters alliances, jeopardizes security,” by Michael McFaul 0f Stanford, author of “From Cold War to Hot Peace: An American Ambassador in Putin’s Russia,” out this week. (HERE here summary of the book on Amazon.)

          “Leaving ‘rotten’ Iran deal, Trump rushes nuclear showdown,” by CFR President Richard Haass, author of “A World in Disarray.” (Here do the same)

          NOW you’re LOCKED AND LOADED, ARMED FOR BEAR.

          AND YOU ARE FREE, FREE AT LAST, OF THE MSM- free of the WaPo, WSJ, and NYTs.

    2. Reed Fawell 3rd Avatar
      Reed Fawell 3rd

      This Nov. 2017 article in Vanity Fair shows the outright warfare on conservative opinion by the great bulk of the American press:

      https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2017/11/the-wall-street-journal-editorial-board-coverage-of-mueller

      This Vanity Fair article tells the reader far more about the state of mind of the liberal press, including the newspaper reporters on the WSJ, and writers for Vanity Fair, than it tells us about the Editorial Board and Section of the WSJ.

      This is a vicious bunch of people, the liberal press, that need to be stood up to and countered. There is a war going on that may well tear this country apart before matters have to be resolved by the force of one side against the other. Increasingly, it appears that we may well have no other choice or option.

  9. Steve Haner Avatar
    Steve Haner

    Yes, as much as most publishers and owners failed to see the changes coming with reader choice, I think the real problem is they failed to see the opportunities created by the Internet for advertisers. If the big display ads or pages of classifieds were still there, the news hole would need to be filled.

    Life is change.

  10. Peter Galuszka Avatar
    Peter Galuszka

    A few more points,
    (1) There will always be some form of the newspaper or wire service. During the mid-century hey day of newspapers and television, there was actually little choice. I remember when there were only three networks and maybe four channels on TV. Now there are hundreds. Before, power over information was really concentrated in the hands of a few owners. Now it is diffuse.

    (2) The NYT, WP and WSJ are not going to die. From what I hear, the Post has done a digital turnaround after Bezos bought it. The Times and Journal are very powerful and will remain so, albeit in a different form.
    (3) It is wrong to hold him the White House Correspondents Dinner as an example of why the media has gone downhill. It centers on a very narrow segment of the reporting sector. Papers like the NYT stopped going some years ago. I have never been but I have been a member of the Overseas Press Club of America and have gone off and on to their annual awards for years. It is completely different. These can be somber affairs because the work being hailed is often about war, famine or storms. It also can honor journalists who have died doing their jobs.
    (4) As a journalist, I am proud of my industry and profession. I think the press should be hailed for the work it has done uncovering Trump and his cronyism.
    (5) If you have trouble discontinuing the WSJ, try doing that with the Richmond Times-Dispatch. Buffett has shifted them to a “subscription” model and it is truly obnoxious dealing with them. It actually made me miss Media General, perish the thought!

    1. Steve Haner Avatar
      Steve Haner

      OMG Peter, the news media’s fascination with Trump and its obvious bias has propped him up from Day One. They got him the nomination! I have never been less proud of my previous calling. They cannot lay a glove on him, and all of his troubles are self-inflicted.

  11. Peter Galuszka Avatar
    Peter Galuszka

    Another point. I once was a low to mid-=level editor at a big magazine in New York. I worked on the international desk. In that capacity I had to deal with the publication’s rather large Washington bureau. There was a lot of tension since the DC people always wanted to spin the story according to their DC sources. There were so many DC journalists that the sources could easily played them. We in New York had to balance that game with what the foreign correspondents were telling us. AT times, they underwent considerable hardship, if not danger, to get the story.

  12. Peter Galuszka Avatar
    Peter Galuszka

    Steve,
    “The media” and its “fascination” with Trump got him elected? Are we on the same planet? I worked for a New York-based media company for 18 years and I can assure you that Trump was seen for what he is and should be — tabloid bait.

  13. Steve Haner Avatar
    Steve Haner

    Peter! Absolutely no question about it – while to you I’m sure it is counter-intuitive. If Trump did not have the MSM to flog, and if the MSM did not oblige by flogging him back to reinforce his victimhood, the Trumpenproletariat might actually catch on. During that Michelle Wolf rant at the White House Correspondent’s Dinner she focused on it – she gets it. But her jibes at the media didn’t get the most attention. Trump has saved the WP, saved some of the cable channels, boosted the NYT – they know it, he knows it, he knows they know it and vice versa. It is classic symbiosis.

    1. Steve Haner Avatar
      Steve Haner

      “That persistent chumminess is why Wolf’s performance, in the end, wasn’t really for the press. It was about us. “You guys love breaking news, and you did it,” Wolf said to CNN. “You broke it.” To everyone else, she said: “You helped create this monster, and now you’re profiting off of him.” Instead of listening — to that or to Wolf’s final line, “Flint still doesn’t have clean water” — we got grumpy on Twitter. Which means Wolf did a better job of defending the First Amendment than those who say that’s our business.”

Leave a Reply