VRS “Diet COLA” Squeezes Pensions Second Time

by Steve Haner

Virginia’s “Diet COLA” approach to calculating annual inflation increases to Virginia Retirement System pensions has constrained the increases once again.  Beneficiaries will see a benefit increase of 5% effective July 1, up from the 3.85% increase they received a year ago.

Both are below what they would have been if the increase had simply matched the full annual change in the consumer price index. The CPI-U measure of inflation for the calendar year 2021 was 4.7% and for 2022 was 8.0%.  The compounded rise was 13%.  But instead of rising those amounts, the VRS retirement benefits will have risen less than 10% over two years.  (Those figures have been corrected since the initial posting.)  

This is just one more example in the ongoing saga of how government gets richer by protecting itself against inflation, but not doing the same for its people (or its former employees.) The house (in this case, the treasury) always wins.

Had the full CPI-U amount been used, a $1,000 payment in August 2021 would have risen to $1130.76 this August.  The the constraints it will be $1090.42. That is a difference of $484 over the year.  The impact of the gap between real inflation and the “diet” COLA adjustment compounds with every additional year of benefits through the retirees’ lives.

It gets worse for some. The 2022 and 2023 adjustments mentioned above are the more generous provisions of VRS Plan 1, for employees who started with the state system before a less generous pension approach was adopted about a decade ago. Under Plan 2, which provides less defined benefits and instead supplements these with an investment match, the cost of living increase for the defined benefit portion of their monthly check will rise only 3%. It is constrained even more deeply than Plan 1.

The Plan 1 retirement COLA is capped at 5% and the Plan 2 COLA is capped at 3%. Both hit the statutory ceiling for the first time with this year’s adjustment. The larger benefit amounts will appear with the August 1 deposits.  Plan 1’s COLA is below inflation in years where the CPI-U exceeds 3%, so it will probably happen again next July.

To be fair, many pensions have no cost of living adjustments at all and most investments are down compared to inflation, but the COLA was always part of the deal with VRS. The deal changed, however, when the General Assembly took steps to move away from a defined benefit plan to ensure that Virginia didn’t find itself challenged to meet its pension obligations.

Here is the actual paragraph on how the benefits are now adjusted for inflation.

The percentages shall be based on monthly averages and shall be the difference between (i) the average for the calendar year just ended and (ii) the average for the most recent calendar year used in the determination of the post-retirement supplements currently being paid. The annual increase, if any, in the CPI-U shall be considered only to the extent of the first two percent plus one-half of the next two percent of any additional increase, or a maximum increase in the post-retirement supplement of three percent in any given year.

However, for anyone who (a) is not a person who becomes a member on or after July 1, 2010, and (b) has at least 60 months of creditable service as of January 1, 2013, the applicable annual increase, if any, in the CPI-U shall be considered only to the extent of the first three percent plus one-half of the next four percent of any additional increase, or a maximum increase in the post-retirement supplement of five percent in any given year.

In 2022

, 231,000 retired state and local employees, teachers, state and local police officers and judges were receiving retirement benefits from VRS.  The total paid out exceeded $5.7 billion.

The 2023 General Assembly did pass several bills making it somewhat easier for retirees to keep VRS benefits and return to work. Call that a carrot to go along with the stick of benefits not keeping up with the real cost of housing, food, energy and health care.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

20 responses to “VRS “Diet COLA” Squeezes Pensions Second Time”

  1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    Ah, I knew that Bill Howell had succeeded in screwing future state employees by moving away from the completely defined benefit plan. I did not realize that he also screwed those of us on the “old” plan.

    The statutory language refers to the calendar year. Why is this increase effective July 1, rather than January 1, 2023?

    1. Nathan Avatar

      Inflation is taking its toll on everyone.

      Wages aren’t keeping up for those still working.

      Cost of living comes after the inflation for Social Security recipients.

      VRS retirees must suffer the yearly lag of higher costs, then a partial increase.

    1. energyNOW_Fan Avatar
      energyNOW_Fan

      TAB died hard in Pittsburgh we loved it.

      1. how_it_works Avatar
        how_it_works

        “I can’t give you a tab unless you order something!”

      2. how_it_works Avatar
        how_it_works

        “I can’t give you a tab unless you order something!”

  2. Stephen Haner Avatar
    Stephen Haner

    I didn’t write the rules. They look back at the two full previous calendar years. If it were July to July, the past 12 months would have been lower than 7.5%. The smoothing does work both ways.

  3. energyNOW_Fan Avatar
    energyNOW_Fan

    The U.S. Social Security COLA prediction for this year (in October for 2024 payments) is only ~3.o% or less as inflation has cooled. This means I might have accidentally taken too much IRA conversion last year, which will bump me up a notch in Medicare payments.

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      I need to revisit my numbers in the post above. Looks like CPI-U Dec 2020 to Dec 2022 was 13.5% combined, not 15%. Still higher than the COLA. A Social Security increase of 3% next winter would be ridiculous.

      1. energyNOW_Fan Avatar
        energyNOW_Fan

        That’s the number 3% SS expectation….I became aware my assumption was wrong (checked the data trend) several months ago

  4. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    I wonder what pay raise back in the 80s that teachers gave up for the retirement promises broken today?

    Promise them anything, give them Chanel.

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      I don’t remember, but I bet she does. I do recall that initially pay was withheld to pay into VRS, and at one point in lieu of a raise they did away with that. I also remember Bill Leighty strongly advising me to buy back the year or so she had taken off after the birth of our daughter, which was extremely good advice. My wife used the 50 and 30 rule to retire on full VRS at age 53. For her, it’s been a great deal.

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Hey. Corporations have raided their defined benefits plans for years, why not the State?

        Must admit, there’s a greater chance of retirement failure with the self-directed plans, but then there’s zero chance of shenanigans.

        1. Stephen Haner Avatar
          Stephen Haner

          Yep. The shipyard changed its rules while I was there, and the guy who came after me didn’t get the same deal. But basically she has the pension, and I have the investments, so our own “hybrid” plan.

          1. Nathan Avatar

            I was fortunate to start state employment when the original VRS plan was available. Later, when the state switched to the hybrid for newer employees, I was asked if I wanted to transfer to that. No thanks.

            I did, however, voluntarily contribute to a 403b, so I too have a hybrid of sorts.

        2. William O'Keefe Avatar
          William O’Keefe

          If you have a defined benefit plan the employer is on the hook and has to comply with ERISA.

          1. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Retirement Heist: How Companies Plunder and Profit from the Nest Eggs of American Workers

            Yeah. Right.

            Here’s a taste…
            https://psc-cuny.org/clarion/2012/march-2/how-business-elites-looted-private-sector-pensions/

          2. William O'Keefe Avatar
            William O’Keefe

            Most of what she wrote as I understand it focused on GE which changed from a defined benefit to defined contribution plan in 2010 for new employees; not existing ones. GE challenged her premise and I don’t know who is right. But there were a number of reasons why firms changed their retirement programs. I think that most who did “grandfathered in” existing employees.

            My limited reading of Ellen Shultz writings leads me to believe that she is anti-corporation and anti-capitalist.

          3. William O'Keefe Avatar
            William O’Keefe

            You obviously believe that this was all about shafting employees. See this Investopedia article for a different perspective–https://www.investopedia.com/articles/retirement/10/demise-defined-benefit-plan.asp

Leave a Reply