Virtual Education in K-12 Public Schools – A False and Corrupt Narrative in Virginia

by James C. Sherlock

Public employee interests with personal stakes in the outcome are lying by omission in public discussions of virtual schooling in Virginia.

Their message was published in Suzanne Munson’s column in the Richmond Times Dispatch on Jun 25th.

The VDOE has made a commendable start with online learning through its Virtual Virginia classes. But these are available in only a handful of school districts, serving less than 2% of the commonwealth’s students. This system could become a major player, with serious funding from the General Assembly. (emphasis added)

A free, accredited online curriculum, featuring the finest instructors in every subject, would level the playing field for students from diverse backgrounds. Rich and poor students alike across the commonwealth could receive the same good instruction, addressing uneven education in affluent, low-income and rural areas. Students confined at home due to illnesses or physical disabilities would be able to keep up with their studies and not fall behind.

Additionally, for those choosing remote learning individually or in small-group settings, this need not be an isolated experience. There could be opportunities for discussion, exercise, social interaction and creative expression, with adult supervision.

Ms. Munson failed to mention that exactly the public school educations she describes have been offered successfully for more than a decade free to parents by VDOE-certified private providers offering SOL-compliant instruction here in the Commonwealth.  Ms. Munson may even be ignorant of the existence of the privately run program.  

Somehow they have been doing it for those years to the great satisfaction of parents without “serious funding from the General Assembly.” They exist on the state share of school funding for each pupil that attends. The state money follows the child. No special state appropriations. Parents pay nothing. The local school districts pay nothing.

The problem the state employees have with that program is that the participating organizations are privately run. VDOE under the previous administration made a coordinated attempt to drive the MOP (Multi-division Online Provider) program out of business.

Now the state employees, using communications like Ms. Munson’s column, are lobbying for vast increases in dedicated state appropriations for their own virtual program. Promotions undoubtedly to follow for everyone currently in the program.

That constitutes public corruption.

Read about the Multi-division Online Provider (MOP) program that went unmentioned in Ms. Munson’s column. I have written about it here before.

For reader convenience I have uploaded the Virginia Department of Education Approved Multidivision Online Provider Summary for Stride, Inc, the nation’s largest online K-12 provider with accredited offerings in every state. You will note that it has been accredited in Virginia since 2011.

VDOE under the Northam administration did not, for political reasons, ask Stride and the others on the long list of Virginia-accredited private providers to take up the slack due to school shutdowns during COVID. even though they were already accredited and have proven track records in Virginia and are already under VDOE supervision.

So. the administration started up its own brand new, unproven in-house virtual school and named it “Virtual Virginia.” Cute. The very successful Stride, Inc. offering is called “Virginia Virtual Academy.”

The staff of that new program is comprised ofstate employees. Now they want “serious funding from the General Assembly” to expand it. That is worse than nonsense. It is public corruption.

The government employees know that they cannot survive a rational discussion of the costs and merits of depending upon long-established, accredited private virtual school systems vs. spending untold millions of dollars to create a new, publicly-run competitor.

So, they encourage stories like that by Ms. Munson that simply fail to mention the MOP program.

I hope the Youngkin administration does not participate in this scandalous misuse of government funds and considers shutting “Virtual Virginia” down.

Update: Suzanne Munson has asked to have the following response appended to this article. — JAB

I am not a state employee, nor was I writing on behalf of state employees. I wrote as an observer. For a number of years, I have seen the positive potential of easy-to-access, free online learning, both in the home setting and in public schools with teacher shortages, especially in critical areas like math and the sciences, and in rural and low-income areas. This was all that I was trying to say. No nefarious conspiracy theories here.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

43 responses to “Virtual Education in K-12 Public Schools – A False and Corrupt Narrative in Virginia”

  1. vicnicholls Avatar
    vicnicholls

    Capt. if we can advocate against this with our General Assembly reps, please let me know.

    1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      Absolutely. Do it.

  2. f/k/a_tmtfairfax Avatar
    f/k/a_tmtfairfax

    It’s a national problem. Back in the 1990s, the Washington Lawyer (publication of the D.C. Bar Association) interviewed former Democratic Party leader and former cabinet official. He decried the special interests in D.C., noting that the U.S. Department of Education was created as a separate agency only to please a labor union, the National Education Association.

    A number of years ago, Fairfax County Public Schools was experiencing a significant number of teacher vacancies when school started. The Administration offered staff members a plan whereby they could return to the classroom for the school year, have their staff position guaranteed and be paid at the higher of the teacher or staff rate. Not a single staff member, who allegedly care about kids, took the offer. It shows their priorities.

  3. James McCarthy Avatar
    James McCarthy

    The central issue is whether to outsource a public education function to a profit making organization, e.g., Stride, founded by financiers and engaging in lobbying state officials. Alleging public corruption because public school teachers are advocating for a Commonwealth sponsored and funded model is a stretch. If Stride advocates have invested in the company or state officials received contributions from it, the choice debate takes on another dimension.

    1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      The private organizations were providing this state-accredited education before COVID, and what you call the “central issue” was no question at all. The “public school teachers” did not want to set up full time virtual schools.

      The discovery by state, not local, employees of a previously hidden desire to run full time virtual schools was as sudden as it was predictable. The state bureaucracy had absolutely no experience in full time virtual schooling, which is very hard to manage successfully, but then did it anyway. Instantly. It’s not like “gang, let’s start a new school system” and it happens and they are good at it. Didn’t matter. The kids were the Guinea pigs.

      As for lobbying state officials, these are state executive branch officials lobbying the GA to kill the MOP program. It is not a stretch, I watched it happen and reported on it.

      1. James McCarthy Avatar
        James McCarthy

        Thus, it’s acceptable for private investors to lobby state officials in regard to a primary function of government? Perhaps, the “suddenness” you seem to fear is actually a matter of public policy. When public schools were first created, there was little experience upon which to rely and no accrediting agencies. As another commenter observed, competition should be welcomed. Note the response to your accusations about state employees in JAB’s comment. As usual, methinks your ideology prevents clear vision.

        1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
          James C. Sherlock

          Everything after “Thus” above is your own conclusion, not mine.

          Let’s make a deal. When you have a position, state it. When I have one I’ll state mine.

          Public policy on private entities providing remote public school instruction at state expense is explained in the article link to the MOP program on the VDOE website. It is public policy to certify private companies to provide remote public education in Virginia.

          It is public policy with which the employees of VDOE disagree. They lobbied against it for their own benefit.

          Your attempt at an analogy with “when public schools were first created” is pathetic. Virtual public schools privately run were up and operating successfully in Virginia for a decade before a cabal of VDOE employees under a radical progressive administration tried to shut them down.

          Jihads by public employees against successful private providers is not “competition”, but state funded corruption.

          1. James McCarthy Avatar
            James McCarthy

            What’s pathetic is your soft shoe evasion. The so-called accreditation is not state initiated. The state merely accepts the Cognia accreditation which is a closed cycle of private investors. Invoking jihads exposes the extreme inanity of your position. Get over your own rhetoric.

        2. James C. Sherlock Avatar
          James C. Sherlock

          Everything after “Thus” above is your own conclusion, not mine.

          Let’s make a deal. When you have a position, state it. When I have one I’ll state mine.

          Public policy on private entities providing remote public school instruction at state expense is explained in the article link to the MOP program on the VDOE website. It is public policy to certify private companies to provide remote public education in Virginia.

          It is public policy with which the employees of VDOE disagree. They lobbied against it for their own benefit.

          Your attempt at an analogy with “when public schools were first created” is pathetic. Virtual public schools privately run were up and operating successfully in Virginia for a decade before a cabal of VDOE employees under a radical progressive administration tried to shut them down.

          Jihads by public employees against successful private providers is not “competition”, but state funded corruption.

      2. James McCarthy Avatar
        James McCarthy

        Thus, it’s acceptable for private investors to lobby state officials in regard to a primary function of government? Perhaps, the “suddenness” you seem to fear is actually a matter of public policy. When public schools were first created, there was little experience upon which to rely and no accrediting agencies. As another commenter observed, competition should be welcomed. Note the response to your accusations about state employees in JAB’s comment. As usual, methinks your ideology prevents clear vision.

  4. Virginia Gentleman Avatar
    Virginia Gentleman

    Good post. It is nice to read an article without the dog whistling.

  5. Kathleen Smith Avatar
    Kathleen Smith

    Also, and in my mind, most important, is that the state run program is not accredited. However, privately run programs are accredited by an outside accrediting agency that has serious standards for digital schools that must be met like ensuring authenticity of student work. In fact, to be an approved MOP vendor, you must be accredited.

    1. James McCarthy Avatar
      James McCarthy

      The program is accredited by Cognia which, in turn, was funded by venture entrepreneurs, Vodafone and Oxford Capital. “Outside accrediting agency” does not necessarily equate with independent.

      1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
        James C. Sherlock

        Read your own comment. That circumvention of the accreditation process is a scam and you know it. You have suddenly discovered a place for private companies in public education. Do you think Cognia will ever deny or withdraw accreditation to the Virginia Department of Education? VDOE certainly doesn’t.

        1. James McCarthy Avatar
          James McCarthy

          As usual, no mention of circumvention was offered. Nor was there any allegation about withdrawal of accreditation. The point you missed concerned the public-private intersection for education. Try rereading.

          1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
            James C. Sherlock

            Soldier on.

  6. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
    James Wyatt Whitehead

    Any form of competition with traditional public education should be welcomed and explored. I am also keeping my eye on Arizona’s new experiment with Educational Savings Accounts for parents. Competition is what will finally bend the ear of the public education monolith in Virginia.

  7. This comment is submitted on behalf of Suzanne Munson. — JAB

    I am not a state employee, nor was I writing on behalf of state employees. I wrote as an observer. For a number of years, I have seen the positive potential of easy-to-access, free online learning, both in the home setting and in public schools with teacher shortages, especially in critical areas like math and the sciences, and in rural and low-income areas. This was all that I was trying to say. No nefarious conspiracy theories here.

    1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      Suzanne, I assume you did not know that tens of thousands of Virginia kids have been educated successfully and fully remotely by state-certified and state-overseen MOP program providers for a decade before VDOE forced its way into the business. And that the feedback from parents had been overwhelmingly positive.

      I hope I am right in that assumption.

      1. James McCarthy Avatar
        James McCarthy

        An apology is in order. Since you failed in your first assessment, you have no idea about the woman’s research skills. Such rectitude dims the cognition. Straw man assumption to denigrate the author. Maybe it’s ego and pomposity, not rectitude.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          Yep. It really is a reflection on him to go after her on “research”.

          MPO would have never became a reality to start with without VDOE approving it.

          The irony here is how BR slammed virtual instruction as a failure – all during the pandemic and NOW, they talk about how wonderful it is – from the non-public providers.

          If that is really true why didn’t they make that point during the pandemic instead of condemning it ALL but point out that it worked from private providers and should have been expanded if public schools did not want to open for in-person and/or their virtual schooling sucked.

          A whole different narrative now from Sherlock .. 180 degrees different.

          1. James McCarthy Avatar
            James McCarthy

            The stealth operation is to eliminate public education, part of the deconstruction theories fielded by Steve Bannon. The free choices presentation is no more than the phony idealism argued by libertarians. Don’t be fooled by the faux policy analysis expressed in volumes of words. Engaging in discussion only leads down multiple rabbit holes led by a soft shoe dancer. Remain focused.

            No apology to the woman he accused of representing public corruption, only a scolding for her assumed lack of research. Alone, the amount of ego and rectitude invested in dubious argument is telling.

  8. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    Is this the same virtual schooling that JAB and Sherlock (If I remember correctly) roundly condemned as a gigantic failure during COVID. It had to be in-person or else?

    1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      You do not remember correctly.

      If parents want their kids to go to school in-person, as most do, then public schools should be open except in extremis. There were great arguments about what constituted extremis.

      If some parents for reasons of their own wish their child educated in the public school curricula at home and such instruction is made available, as in Virginia before COVID, they should have that.

      If others do not wish their children educated in the approved public school curricula, that is their choice, but also their responsibilities.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        I seem to remember a dozen or more posts in BR condemning virtual as a massive failure that failed and I’m pretty sure you were one of the critics.

        This is not about what parents want or not.

        It’s about whether or not virtual is a failure or not.

        You’re now touting it as effective.

        Were you and JAB saying that it was during the pandemic? Especially the private sector offerings?

        I do not believe I heard word one from JAB or you as to how effective virtual instruction was back during the pandemic – from non-public, private providers. True?

        1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
          James C. Sherlock

          You are deep in your own thoughts, not mine of Jim’s. Take a deep breath.

          Now consider that it is not only possible but certain that professionally run virtual schools with a decade of successful experience in Virginia can be more effective and efficient than a very large number of classroom teachers turned out of their classrooms suddenly and directed to provide to virtual instruction as was done during COVID.

          Now consider what you, acting as Superintendent of Public Instruction, would have done under the same circumstances over the summer of 2020. Would you have turned to the proven, VDOE-certified and VDOE-supervised MOP schools to expand the scale of their existing successful services or, in the middle of a pandemic, tried to build such a service from scratch at VDOE headquarters?

          You have the floor, Mr. Superintendent.

          1. James McCarthy Avatar
            James McCarthy

            Stunning the ease with which you construct straw man hypos to defeat. Impressive but not persuasive. Since maximizing parental choice is the objective, creation of a nascent virtual education program by VA would enhance competition and benefit that choice mechanism. What could be wrong with that but only your research and opinion.

          2. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            If these private sector virtual schools continued to operate during the pandemic and were effective, why didn’t you and Jim point that out and advocate for them?

            We got something DEEP here alright .

            How about a little honesty?

          3. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            you did, a little, but my question still stands.

            In your many attacks on public schools especially during the pandemic, I do not recall you or JAB supporting private sector virtual schools as an effective alternative option.

            The predominate claim was that virtual did not work – not that it did work for private but not public. No such narrative.

            I mentioned in several different comments that virtual k12.com existed and SOL certified as well as the potential for institutions like Liberty, to offer k12 virtual but crickets from you guys.

            It would have been the perfect Conservative alternative to the problems of the public schools in dealing with in-person and virtual AND I would have agreed as I too felt that the public schools “lecture” mode was a failure and that companies like K12.com are much more into interactive and multi-media.

            Now, since Conservatives have so thoroughly and consistently rejected “virtual” and demanded in-person, it’s harder for Youngkin to make changes at VDOE to make public offerings better and allow more competition from privates?

          4. James C. Sherlock Avatar
            James C. Sherlock

            Enjoy the rest of your day, Mr. Superintendent.

          5. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            and to you and hopes that you’ll do a more honest job in your narratives. We actually do agree about much – the difference is , you either changed your position or you chose to misrepresent when it served your Conservative anti-public school narratives. You chose that over a forthright approach IMHO. do better.

          6. James C. Sherlock Avatar
            James C. Sherlock

            You wrote: “You either changed your position or you chose to misrepresent when it served your Conservative anti-public school narratives”.

            So those are my two choices. Goodness.

            “Now, I give you fair warning, either you or your head must be off, and that in about half no time! Take your choice!” said the Queen of Hearts. Lewis Carroll, Alice in Wonderland, 1865

            Facts:

            (1) I wrote an eight part series with the same take on this very subject in January. I am accused now of changing my position.

            (2) I write nearly every week about improving the public schools and am accused of being anti-public school.

            You reflect perfectly the jurisprudence of the left. It is the accusation that counts, not the truth. Thus the overproduced TV show of the star chamber that is the Jan. 6 Commission.

            “Let the jury consider their verdict,” the King said, for about the twentieth time that day.
            “No, no!” said the Queen. “Sentence first–verdict afterward.”
            “Stuff and nonsense!” said Alice loudly. “The idea of having the sentence first!”
            “Hold your tongue!” said the Queen, turning purple.
            “I won’t!” said Alice.
            “Off with her head!” the Queen shouted at the top of her voice. Nobody moved.
            “Who cares for you?” said Alice. (She had grown to her full size by this time.) “You’re nothing but a pack of cards!”

            – Lewis Carroll, Alice in Wonderland, 1865.

          7. James C. Sherlock Avatar
            James C. Sherlock

            Mr. Superintendent. It seems you decline to answer my questions? Shyness?

          8. James McCarthy Avatar
            James McCarthy

            Where’s the apology to Ms.Munson??? You decline to respond, Mr. Congressman.

          9. James C. Sherlock Avatar
            James C. Sherlock

            I define to apologize. Read it again.

          10. James McCarthy Avatar
            James McCarthy

            You responded by scolding Ms. Munson for an alleged absence of research on her part arguing for your presentation. Like the word abortion, apologize does not appear. Worse, you added more straw man assumptions about her expressed years of observation of virtual learning. You can only slick some of the people some of the time. I read your response twice.

          11. James C. Sherlock Avatar
            James C. Sherlock

            Got it. Thank you. Always a pleasure.

          12. James McCarthy Avatar
            James McCarthy

            The deflection and disinclination appear to be all yours. Happy Fourth!!!!

          13. James C. Sherlock Avatar
            James C. Sherlock

            Thanks for answering for Larry.

          14. James McCarthy Avatar
            James McCarthy

            Larry has conducted a reasoned debate about your views. He doesn’t need help.

  9. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    Is this the same virtual schooling that JAB and Sherlock (If I remember correctly) roundly condemned as a gigantic failure during COVID. It had to be in-person or else?

  10. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    The thing I find so inconsistent is the relentless attacks from JAB and Sherlock conducted over months against public education and remote virtual versus in-person.

    Nary a word about private sector companies like K12 and Stride and others also offering virtual – and already serving home-schoolers quite well one might assume.

    I cannot recall once, that JAB/Sherlock opined that the public schools got virtual wrong but the private sector got it right and parents should switch if in-person was not an option.

    Instead, they carried out the months-long attacks on public education over and over on not offering in-person and the failures of virtual.

    It would have been the perfect opportunity – to offer a way forward that worked for people – and at the same time – school choice – but instead we had to suffer through the relentless attacks on public education – and how they “failed”.

    NOW – the evil VDOE is trying to kill the virtual competitors – which is truly odd given the fact that Youngkin is the Gov and has made such an effing issue about tip lines and “inherently divisive” stuff.

    But never fear, JAB and Sherlock can duck and weave with the best and just spin out a new tome with the appropriate shifts in wording.

    And Sherlocks response, deflect, snark and attempts to marginalize.

Leave a Reply