Virginia’s Very Own Boomergeddon Scenario

by James A. Bacon

Virginians take great pride in their status as a state with a AAA credit rating. But if you put any credence in a set of projections made by Jeffrey Miron with the Mercatus Center, increasing indebtedness could start to unravel the commonwealth’s fiscal integrity by 2034… if not long before. We have 23 years before we reach the point of no return.

What happens in 2034? That’s when Virginia’s indebtedness-to-GDP ratio reaches 90%, the point at which, research has shown, sovereign states reach a tipping point at which indebtedness slows economic growth and a fiscal crisis becomes nearly inevitable. So argues Miron in a new paper, “The Fiscal Health of U.S. States.”

The paper draws five broad conclusions about the fiscal condition of the 50 states:

First, state government finances are not on a stable path; if spending patterns continue to follow those of recent decades, the ratio of state debt to output will increase without bound. Second, the key driver of increasing state and local expenditures is health-care costs, especially Medicaid and subsidies for health-insurance exchanges under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2009. Third, states have large implicit debts for unfunded pension liabilities, making their net debt positions substantially worse than official debt statistics indicate. Fourth, if spending trends continue and tax revenues remain near their historical levels relative to output, most states will reach dangerous ratios of debt to GDP within 20 to 30 years. Fifth, states differ in their degrees of fiscal imbalance, but the overriding fact is that all states face fiscal meltdown in the foreseeable future.

Underlying his projections, Miron makes a number of assumptions, which he insists are biased, if anything, toward more optimistic outcomes. He expects that state spending will continue to increase at a rate comparable to the average growth rate of the 1962-2008 time frame. Future expenditure growth will be hard to restrain, he contends, because it will be dominated by Medicaid and other health-care spending. He assumes that interest rates on government debt will remain stable, despite a significant risk that it could run higher, and that economic growth will continue at historical rates despite some evidence that it might be slower. But, critically, he also assumes that tax revenues as a percentage of the economy will not increase as a percentage of the GDP. Political pressures will prevent politicians from raising taxes, so legislators will resort to budgetary gimmickry and off-balance sheet borrowing to make ends meet.

If you find those assumptions to be reasonable, or even somewhat optimistic, then you should be very worried. One very important assumption Miron does not make is that the federal government experiences a fiscal crisis between now and then, cutting back on federal aid to states and localities and crippling the national economy. If you believe that a Boomergeddon-style scenario will occur within the next 15 to 20  years, as I do, then the day of reckoning for the states will come all the sooner.

Virginia is in better condition than the average state, though that will buy it a reprieve of only a few years. The commonwealth’s adjusted debt-to-GDP ratio in 2008 was 7.5%, compared to 11.2% nationally. While states with weaker finances will reach the dreaded 90% debt-to-GDP ratio by as early as 2023, it will take Virginia until 2034. If Virginia manages to reduce expenditure growth by 0.5% less than historical averages, it will delay Doomsday until 2041. By eking out a growth rate 0.5% faster than historical averages, it can delay crunch time until 2042. (Miron does not consider a scenario of a slower rate of spending growth and a higher rate of economic growth.)

As with all such long-term projections, these assume that past trends continue indefinitely as before, which, of course, they won’t. What I fear most is a global investor revolt against sovereign debt, triggered most likely by a default by Spain, Italy and other European Union countries, which drives up risk premiums for sovereign debt in all advanced democratic societies. The contagion could easily spread to California, Illinois, New Jersey and New York. If one of those states defaulted, all states would wind up paying higher interest rates on their debt. States don’t use long-term debt to finance day-to-day government operations, but they do use it to fund critical educational and infrastructure investments needed for economic growth.

I see no evidence that state leaders are on the same wavelength as Miron: They persist in thinking of the commonwealth’s sterling credit rating as unshakable. We still have time to enact fundamental deep-structure reforms to transportation, land use, health care delivery and education that would bring costs in line with revenues, but not as much as we think. The requisite sense of urgency does not exist. Unless the public temperament changes soon, Boomergeddon will not spare Virginia.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

17 responses to “Virginia’s Very Own Boomergeddon Scenario”

  1. Peter Galuszka Avatar
    Peter Galuszka

    let me see. A Koch Brothers institute says that Medicare and Obamacare are going to bus everyone’s budget.

    Who knew?

    Peter Galuszka

  2. Wave the magic “Koch Brothers” wand and all your problems disappear. You don’t have to engage the facts, logic or methodology of someone’s argument. Poof! They’re discredited!!

  3. James,

    This is a thoughtful analysis, but you – as with many to the right of the political spectrum – continue to treat revenues like the weather: something over which we have little control.

    Virginia gives away via various loopholes, subsidies, and giveaways over $2.5 billion annually. Let’s close those loopholes and see what an additional 57.5 billion dollars does for our debt to GDP ratio between now and 2034 . . .

    And that’s just loopholes. Once we talk tax modernization there remains much more room for revenue growth in ways that can benefit our bottom line WHILE growing our economy.

  4. Evan, I have blogged about closing tax loopholes at both the federal and state/local level. My mantra: Close the loopholes, broaden the tax base, lower tax rates and stimulate economic growth.

  5. You’ve got a 25, 30 year fiscal horizon. If you used that same horizon for the private sector – say health care – what would it show in terms of future costs and liabilities?

    Social Security uses a 75-year horizon – which has been used against them even though the purpose of the funding horizon is to recognize future potential problems far enough in advance that steps can be taken to bend the curve.

    when you use a multi-decade horizon for projections what does that mean?

    If Anthem looked ahead 30 years to what their costs would be what would happen?

    well…. not a whole heck of a lot.

    they’re going to be looking at what theirs costs are right now and in the next 5 years or so and determining whether they will need to raise premiums or change benefits.

    Why.. if the private sector works this way – we act like govt cannot is beyond me.

    I would assert that BOTH for the private and public sector if you look ahead 25, 30 50 years using today’s numbers you’re going to see problems.

    why we perceive this to be an impending disaster for the govt and not for the private sector is a bit humorous.

    the private sector looks ahead and make anticipatory changes..

    while the perception is the govt looks ahead and they’re frozen and can’t change.

    FICA/SS… have changed numerous times over the years in response to look-ahead analysis… and in doing so.. they’ve kept SS pretty much solvent… and if they follow the same practice as they have been in the past 60 years.. they’ll keep SS solvent…. with mid-course corrections …

    so.. the “look ahead” boomergeddon is little more than some salacious sensationalism … that comes true only if we look ahead…see disaster.. and refuse to make changes in the interim.

  6. Groveton Avatar

    LarryG:

    Your fascination with comparing private enterprises with sovereign governments is odd.

    Private enterprises do go bankrupt. Since the year 2000, the 10 largest retail bankruptcies were KMart, Circuit City, Montgomery Ward, A&P, Ames Department Stores, Speigel, US Office Products, Linens ‘N Things, Heilig-Meyers, Borders and Blockbuster.

    Your belief that private enterprises always find a way to “course correct” just isn’t true.

    The reasons that people worry more about state bankruptcies than the bankruptcy of private companies are:

    1. States are monopolies. When KMart went bankrupt people could shop at Wal-Mart. Where will people go for state services when Virginia goes bankrupt? The District of Columbia? North Carolina.

    2. The economic health of public concerns can almost always be viewed through the lens of audited financials and share price. What is the well accepted measure of a state’s economic status?

    3. Public concerns have less leeway for con games. When public corporations fail to fund pensions they have to take the actuarial charge to income. When states fail to fund pensions … well, they declare a balanced budget and pass off the problem on future administrations and generations.

  7. Groveton – I don’t believe that all companies that “course correct” don’t go bankrupt but I do believe most all successful companies that do not go bankrupt DO “course correct”.

    I also believe companies that sell health, auto, life insurance “course correct” big time and continually look at how much they are charging for their products and what their future “unfunded liabilities” are … and they take action either to raise their rates and/or reduce/alter pay outs.

    there is no law – natural or man-made that says that govt cannot engage in the same practices to keep on a fiscally sustainable path.

    SS has done exactly that for 60+ years. For 60+ years it has a 2.1 trillion surplus to show for it’s operations even if some folks think that 2.1 trillion is worthless IOUs.

    the more germane point is that SS survived, generated a surplus and is still around after all the companies you named are not.

    But Groveton – you ought to read WaPO about NoVa and Govt Spending:

    ” Government dollars fuel wealth: D.C. enclaves reap rewards of contracting boom”

    cut-line: ” Nowhere in the Washington area is wealth more concentrated than Great Falls. Sixteen percent of households in the Northern Virginia enclave earn at least $500,000 a year.”

    WOW excerpt: ” More than $80 billion in federal contracting dollars will flow to the region this year, up from $4.2 billion in 1980….”

    Groveton – my man – it sounds like the non FICA/SS spending was much, much worse and did not stay in balance.

    what say you?

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/dc-enclaves-reap-rewards-of-contracting-boom-as-federal-dollars-fuel-wealth/2011/06/27/gIQAWQC5HJ_story_1.html

  8. geeze Groveton – this is downright embarrassing … all these folks blather on and on about what a good state Va and NoVa are for business and it turns out they are the ultimate poster boy for govt deficit spending…

    and the reason NoVa and places like Great Falls are “rich” is because of lavish govt spending on contractors…

    and NoVa has the smugness to look down their nose at the “pitiful” economic performance of RoVa compared to NoVa.

    I wonder what South West Va would look like if they had 80 billion dollars worth of govt spending in their region?

    lordy.

  9. Groveton Avatar

    The only source of “information” less reliable than the Chinese government is the Washington Post.

    I happen to know a bit about Great Falls. The antique car show is held there because a small businessman operates “Cars that Matter” out of one of the offices in that strip mall. Neither he, nor his business have any affiliation with the federal government. The vast majority of car enthusiasts who come to that Saturday morning event do not live in Great Falls.

    “I wonder what South West Va would look like if they had 80 billion dollars worth of govt spending in their region?

    lordy.”.

    Your arguments are frightening in their simple mindedness. The question isn’t what SouthWest Virginia would look like if the capital of the United States were located in SouthWest Virginia. The question is why people living in places like Millersville (with near 18% unemployment) don’t move to places like Arlington County (with 3+% unemployment).

    If all anybody has to do in order to get rich is move to Washington I really have to wonder at the ambition and work ethic of those who don’t just make the move.

    The real crime in your article is this:

    “Talwar, a 59-year-old immigrant from India, had no idea that she and her husband would amass a small fortune when she launched a company providing tech support to the federal government in 1987. But she shrewdly took advantage of programs for minority-owned small businesses and rode a boom in federal contracting.”.

    See if you can wrap your libtard world view around this – a woman who voluntarily immigrated from India to the United States was afforded protected class status as a government contractor because she is “a minority”. Her companies enjoyed specific “set asides” in federal contracts presumably intended to right the wrongs of past discrimination.

    Holy crap, lib-man!

    Did she suffer this discrimination in Chennai?

    She started her business in 1987. Was there widespread anti-Indian prejudice in 1987? If so, why did she immigrate here? Why not Canada or England or China?

    Maybe it was because in America the mental disorder called liberalism affords voluntary immigrants who are not fleeing persecution protected status as minorities.

  10. ” The only source of “information” less reliable than the Chinese government is the Washington Post.”

    My Personal favorite is the Heritage folks….and the Washington Examiner.

    “I happen to know a bit about Great Falls…. his business have any affiliation with the federal government.”

    Groveton, my man… do you think the folks that buy from him get their money from the Federal govt and it’s contractors?

    “Your arguments are frightening in their simple mindedness. The question isn’t what SouthWest Virginia would look like if the capital of the United States were located in SouthWest Virginia. The question is why people living in places like Millersville (with near 18% unemployment) don’t move to places like Arlington County (with 3+% unemployment).”

    because they do not have the education to get a job in NoVa and likely would end up needing even more entitlements to live in Nova.

    “The real crime in your article is this:

    See if you can wrap your libtard world view around this – a woman who voluntarily immigrated from India to the United States was afforded protected class status as a government contractor because she is “a minority”. Her companies enjoyed specific “set asides” in federal contracts presumably intended to right the wrongs of past discrimination.

    Holy crap, lib-man!”

    Did she suffer this discrimination in Chennai?”

    you’re preaching to the choir on this one.. I agree with you.

    She started her business in 1987. Was there widespread anti-Indian prejudice in 1987? If so, why did she immigrate here? Why not Canada or England or China?

    Maybe it was because in America the mental disorder called liberalism affords voluntary immigrants who are not fleeing persecution protected status as minorities.”

    yadda yadda…..

    the point is that her wealth is the result of govt spending in NoVa – no two ways about it.

    It’s don’t matter if she is female, indian or a purple people eater… govt money flows like water in NoVa… and those with a good education and entrepreneurial inclinations can benefit from it.

    but it’s not like she was competing in a non-govt economy… it’s all Uncle Sam in NoVa – 80 billion dollars worth.

    and if just 1/10th of that were invested in better educations for SW Virginians – they COULD come to NoVa and get a job but some notable residents of Great Falls who blog here take a dim view of that idea…. eh?

    🙂

  11. Groveton Avatar

    I must insist in LarryG’s use of a disclaimer.

    When he makes comments like …

    “it’s all Uncle Sam in NoVa – 80 billion dollars worth.”.

    I need him to add the following disclaimer:

    Except, at least, for Groveton and his co-workers who live and work in Northern Virginia but have absolutely, positively nothing to do with the US government.

  12. Groveton Avatar

    “and if just 1/10th of that were invested in better educations for SW Virginians – they COULD come to NoVa and get a job but some notable residents of Great Falls who blog here take a dim view of that idea…. eh?”.

    People with no education whatsoever come to Northern Virginia from places like Mexico and get jobs. They don’t even speak English when they arrive.

    Nobody has to invest anything in anything for people from SW Virginia to come to Northern Virginia and get jobs.

    And my only request is that once they move here they shut the hell up about how wonderful their prior hometown was. I once lived in Baltimore and Chicago and New York. I watched the Orioles, Bears and Jets. I never complained about the town where I was living. I didn’t incessantly yap about how dirty the streets were in Manhattan or how cold it was in Chicago or how bad National Premium really tastes. Why? Because I was living in their town and working in their town and only an a**hole moves somewhere and them complains about the place.

    So, welcome SW Virginians. Happy to have you. Just shut up about how much better you liked things in South Boston or wherever. You’re here now.

  13. Groveton’s company might well be one of very few who are not connected in any way with the spending of Fed Govt money.

    I point out that in ANY town with a predominate employer whether it be the govt or some other version of a company town that the guy who works in McDonalds, as well as the deputy and teacher – are jobs indirectly provided by the companies who are primary employers.

    There is an easy way to correlate this. Just look at Hampton Roads, or Quantico or any town/city in the US with a military base nearby.

    and … it’s totally blows out of the water the repeated claim that the government does not create jobs.

    they create jobs just as surely as Detroit does.

    The only difference is that Detroit jobs come from building cars and Govt jobs come from building carriers and tanks.

    If you believe the nut jobs out there… humvees are “ok” govt spending…. but not other govt bought non-military “stuff”.

  14. Darrell Avatar

    Hmm. Now there’s a study that some academic should do. Maybe the reason no one speaks English in NoVa is because they all work for Indian ran government contractors.

  15. I think we’re going to find out whether the govt “creates” jobs or not if/when the military takes budget hits.

    I predict that we’ll see jobs lost, economic impacts when DOD cuts back.

    Of course we’ll blame that on Obama also, eh?

  16. Groveton Avatar

    Here’s a plan I can live with:

    1. Balanced budget amendment, phased in over 20 years.

    2. Immediate 7.5% permanent reduction in federal spending. Not in the deficit, in spending – regardless of tax receipts. Spending committee reductions or, if no agreement, a 7.5% reduction in all federal expenditures including, but not limited to, all entitlements.

    3. Immediate roll back of the Bush tax cuts.

    4. In 5 years, another 7.5% reduction in federal spending. Again, without regard to tax receipts. Same process as before.

    5. Five years after that, another 7.5% reduction.

    Any surplus to be immediately applied to improved education for all Americans on a pro rata basis determined by population.

  17. Sounds like Groveton got into some really good spirits or grass, eh?

    I’d call that plan – heavy-duty anti Republican… given the state of the GOP these days.

    Grover Norquist would not like this.

    why 7.5%? let’s check it out… 7.5% of 3.5 trillion…. about 252 billion.

    right? 5yrs…= 1.5 trillion

    if you look at the current budget in thirds with 1/3 being gen govt, and 1/3 being entitlements (medicare part b/medicaid) and 1/3 being the military and you cut equal – the entitlements would go from about 600 billion to 520 billion and the military from about 860 billion to 780 billion…

    painful but probably doeable…. but you’d not want to do any of this until we get past the current recession… which looks to be much longer than hoped for.

    but even under a best case scenario – Groveton’ plan (like Ron Pauls) take 5 years to reach balance and in the meantime … the 14+ trillion debt would continue to build (albeit at smaller levels) but then if that 7.5% continues – it would take another 20 years to pay down the debt.

    what a nightmare! this is like having a loan and only being able to pay the interest on it….

    the entitlements are not a tough in my view as the military who will not accept the cuts and will end up scaring the bejesus out of the populace to protect it’s funding.

    In other words.. I think Seniors are much more likely to accept higher premiums and lower benefits that the Pentagon will accept it’s share of cuts.

Leave a Reply