Virginia’s Schools Really Do Need More Money

by Suzanne Munson

Recent General Assembly debates about state budgets open a cornucopia of questions about the future of education in Virginia — charter schools, lab schools, vouchers, funding for religious schools? Now might be a good time to examine some background about public education in Virginia.

Thomas Jefferson proposed the state’s first legislation in support of universal education, for rich and poor alike, in 1779. He viewed pubic education as necessary for an informed, successful democratic republic: “If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, it expects what never was and never will be.”

As school funding involved tax dollars, well-to-do Virginia legislators ignored Jefferson’s appeal for decades. Meanwhile, our neighbors to the north were educating their populace. It would take a Civil War and its aftermath for this state to develop a nascent system of public education.

Today, Virginia’s school divisions across the board receive 14% less funding from the state than the 50-state average, equal to about $1,900 less per student. This is neither admirable nor sensible, if we are to have a successful economy, students trained for challenging work, and an informed electorate.

Politicians like to criticize Virginia’s beleaguered inner-city schools, saying that more money will not help their plight. They place most of the blame for poor academic performance on teachers and administrators. I have met some of these administrators and instructors and find that they are courageous, concerned individuals doing their best under bad circumstances.

Suzanne Munson

In places like Richmond, many teachers and students go to school every day in decaying, unhealthy buildings. Teachers work with a population of children who are often traumatized by bad parenting, violence, and dangerous neighborhoods.

A good education is their only way out of this mess, which will only grow worse as qualified teachers leave the profession. More reading specialists, smaller classrooms, and better learning environments are needed. When young students fall behind in reading, they eventually drop out entirely, often entering the school-to-jail pipeline.

If nothing else motivates politicians to better fund these schools, perhaps public safety and jail expenses should be concerns. Studies show that the majority of inmates who are housed at tremendous government expense failed to learn to read at an early age. As the saying goes, reading is fundamental.

Another hot debate in the General Assembly concerns providing parents with vouchers for private schools. While this sounds very attractive to many parents, there are pitfalls. Politicians are increasingly ignoring the hallmark of separation between church and state. They may approve of public tax dollars for a Baptist private school, for example, but what if radical Islamists and dangerous fringe cults also ask for funding for their schools?

These requests will naturally crop up regarding state money, further dividing rather than uniting our population, under commonly accepted principles. All the while, desperately needed funds for public education will be cannibalized by a proliferation of special interests.

There are places in the United States like the Chicago suburbs where private schools aren’t considered necessary because public schools are excellent and well-funded. Graduates of New Trier High School, for example, attend the best colleges in the country. Their student-teacher ratio is 11.7 to 1, similar to that of good private schools. In some Virginia schools, the ratio is 30 to 1 or even 35 to 1. Often, when a teacher is absent, classrooms are combined, making the numbers an impossibility for effective teaching. In crowded rooms, education suffers.

It would be a great benefit to Virginians if we had more first-rate schools like New Trier across the state, with smaller classrooms and excellent teachers who are well paid and carefully chosen. This is not going to happen without substantially improved funding from the Virginia General Assembly and localities.

Regarding tax cuts, these are obviously used by politicians as election bait. If Virginia is to have good roads, bridges, schools, and other necessities, it must have an adequate tax base.

It is reasonable that some of our budget surplus can be used as a one-time rebate to tax-payers. This would be popular. But now is also a golden opportunity for Virginia to up its game for public education. The state’s future success depends on it.

Following a career in corporate and non-profit communications, Suzanne Munson turned her attention to writing and lecturing. She is the author of six books, three published and three on the way, as well as numerous opinion pieces in regional newspapers and magazines. Her works of history focus on ethics in government and on individuals who played major roles in getting America off to the right start as a democratic republic. She is the author of “Jefferson’s Godfather,” a comprehensive biography of Thomas Jefferson’s most important mentor, George Wythe, signer of the Declaration of Independence and champion of the Constitution.  “First in Law, First in Leadership” will be published later this year. It is  the story of Wythe’s consequential decade as America’s first law professor at the College of William & Mary. Munson is a frequent lecturer and podcast guest on the Jefferson-Wythe legacy and on ethics in government.

Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

38 responses to “Virginia’s Schools Really Do Need More Money”

  1. Fred Costello Avatar
    Fred Costello

    Why are the Virginia and Federal governments involved, especially in wealthy counties such as Fairfax County?

    1. Ben Slone Avatar
      Ben Slone

      Control

  2. Stephen Haner Avatar
    Stephen Haner

    I would commend to this guest contributor two of the other posts today, adjacent to hers, both dealing with how the schools have become embroiled in divisive social topics totally unrelated to education. It might explain to her why not everybody is lining up to give them more money. The “giving more money to schools will reduce crime” argument is getting especially long in the tooth with me. Likewise the straw man (or straw Muslim) argument against allowing parents vouchers for religious-oriented schools. Gosh, it could go to Catholics even!

    1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
      James Wyatt Whitehead

      We have seen what our friends in southwest Virginia can do on a shoestring budget. Matt Hurt and CIP have proved this with data driven results. I am interested in the author’s book on George Wythe. One of my favorite Virginians.

    2. I support vouchers. Public bureaucracies shouldn’t have a monopoly on education, or the tax monies used to fund it.

      The general public would have a much more favorable view of teachers (and public schools) if Randi Weingarten and people like her weren’t “representing” them in the public eye.

      Randi Weingarten has spent only a small portion of her career in the classroom despite leading the American Federation of Teachers (AFT), the second-largest national teachers union in the United States. Trained as a lawyer, Weingarten taught full-time for just three years and was a substitute teacher for three more.

      However, according to a report by Freedom Foundation, a think tank, she will collect over 15 years’ worth of public pension when she retires. That sum could total well over $200,000.

      While Weingarten’s union leave is unpaid, the New York City Department of Education used tax revenue to pay her pension contributions for over a decade.

      https://reason.com/2023/05/23/randi-weingarten-only-taught-for-3-years-shes-getting-15-years-of-public-pension-anyway/

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        so how would voucher schools infrastructure be funded?

        1. Learn from others already doing it successfully.

          Indiana is committed to providing all children access to quality educational opportunities. Indiana’s Choice Scholarship Program, commonly referred to as the voucher program provides scholarships to eligible Indiana students to offset tuition costs at participating schools.

          Participating schools and interested parents/guardians work together to enroll students. The Choice Scholarship application is submitted electronically to Indiana Department of Education by the participating school. Schools and parents/guardians should explore the links below for more information.

          https://www.in.gov/doe/students/indiana-choice-scholarship-program/

          1. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            Right, but curious how these non-public school facilities are paid for. Do the vouchers also cover that cost?

          2. Plenty of links. Look for yourself.

          3. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            I have. I don’t see any. All I see is the thing about “vouchers”. Have no idea how non-public school facilities get done, classrooms, libraries, gyms, lunchrooms etc… are there standards that have to be met? Folks wants vouchers in Va as if the schools that would get them already exist and if they do , do they meet state standards for public schools… New public schools can cost 50 million for an elementary… that’s a bunch of money for a non-public entity to come up with to build a school that will get funded with vouchers…

            So.. no , I’ve looked.. and I don’t see much about this at all.

          4. It would seem obvious that private schools in states that have vouchers would fund building projects the same way they are doing now.

          5. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            We have specific standards for public school facilities, right? No such standards for private schools?

          6. You are determined to find something wrong with vouchers and there’s nothing there. That must indeed be frustrating.

          7. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            Nope. Just simple questions about facilities. It costs 30-50 million dollars for a public elementary school. One presumes these costs are legitimate and related to the requirements of the facility. I don’t have a problem at all with vouchers and especially so if they can deliver better educated kids for less money, especially the economically disadvantaged kids. We just need the same level of transparency for them that we demand for public schools…

  3. Don Bowler Avatar
    Don Bowler

    Not buying it. More money ends up going to extra levels of administration or unnecessary infrastructure. It never makes it’s way to the classroom or the teachers. Cry all you want for more money but the taxpayer is not getting their return on investment. Bottom line, the kids are the ones who are shortchanged.

  4. how_it_works Avatar
    how_it_works

    “There are places in the United States like the Chicago suburbs”

    Yes, like where I used to live prior to moving to Manassas, VA around 35 years ago (wasn’t my choice).

    Demographics and culture are very, very different between the two places….to understate it just a bit.

    As one example, I never saw a street sign shot full of holes till we (my family) moved to Manassas.

    EDIT: I looked it up, since I didn’t remember where New Trier High School is. There ain’t them people like who live (and lived) in Manassas living around there.

    (Changing demographics).

    EDIT: I’d be real curious what a teacher who taught in the suburbs of Chicago and who taught in Manassas, VA thought about the differences between the two places.

    I’d sum it up by saying that Elmhurst, IL was a great place to grow up.

    Manassas, VA? Not so much.

  5. Kevin Brown Avatar
    Kevin Brown

    Thought provoking. Still in favor of school choice, as I don’t trust the public school administrators to not waste $ on unnecessary PC overhead.

    1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
      James Wyatt Whitehead

      I agree with your sentiments. In Fauquier County, the school board has consolidated two middle schools into one. One of the buildings is under renovation and expansion, the other will become the school board office. My beef with this scheme is we had two perfectly functioning schools. The renovation was budgeted for 40 million dollars. Now the bill is approaching 90 million dollars and I am certain they will ask for more before the project is complete. Such incompetence and gall should not be tolerated by taxpayers.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        how would stuff like that work non-public voucher/choice schools?

        1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
          James Wyatt Whitehead

          I don’t know Mr. Larry. I do know that I am weary of the bait and switch routine.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            ? explain…

      2. They should be able to build a brand new middle school for $90 million, shouldn’t they?

        1. Lefty665 Avatar

          or maybe 2.

        2. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
          James Wyatt Whitehead

          They can’t do that Mr. Wayne. The school under renovation is the former segregated black high school. Too many alumni above ground. So, we are going to pay top dollar to do the wrong thing. Both schools were fine. Upgrade the AC and heat was really all that was needed.

          1. I hear you. I have a good deal of experience trying to keep old, obsolete, buildings in service on a shoestring budget in a county that refuses to let anything go. I served as Director of Public Works in Fluvanna County for six years..

            Some people think every old building is “historic”. The truth is, some old buildings are just old.

            Put up a historic marker, build an exhibit of a ‘typical classroom’ in the museum of county history, and then tear down the old school and build the kids a new, modern, facility.
            Or, if you’re dead set on keeping the old school building, repurpose it as something other than a school, (a museum of county history, perhaps?) and build the kids a new, modern school at a different location.

          2. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            Yes. Old buildings are often old and more costly to renovate to code than rebuild new.

            We have an old high school – that folks have advocated renovating. So the BOS hired a consulting firm who did a thorough job and came back saying that a modern building from scratch would be less expensive than renovating the older.

            It’s still in use for some things – like the old cafeteria is now a “senior center” and the gym used for pickleball and the old library now a branch of the regional library… and some county functions and VaTech county extension, in some of the classrooms…

            All the new public schools in the county have metal roofs… as the older flat roofs seem to always leak after awhile.

            In fact, at one point, the county was ready to lease the old school to a Catholic school looking to expand but the cost of the maintenance and operations and who would pay or not… killed the idea.

          3. All the new public schools in the county have metal roofs… as the older flat roofs seem to always leak after awhile.

            Old, flat roofs were once the bane of my existence.

          4. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
            James Wyatt Whitehead

            I know what you are talking about Mr. Wayne. Old flat roofs with 6 inches of roofing tar from the last 50 years.

          5. All the new public schools in the county have metal roofs… as the older flat roofs seem to always leak after awhile.

            Old, flat roofs were once the bane of my existence.

        3. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          the cost keeps going up and up… last big dust-up was
          retrofitting the fields with blue astro-turf…

  6. Matt Hurt Avatar
    Matt Hurt

    I get the arguments against more funding for public schools, but who can argue against hiring the best possible teachers for our students? The General Assembly could with an affirmative vote raise Virginia teaching salaries to well above the national average, which would entice more folks into the field. This would be non-discretionary spending that could not be funneled into other priorities. Besides, with the projected $5 BILLION budget surplus, we can certainly afford it.

    Later this fall, VDOE will publish the October teacher vacancy data. Last year this figure was unconscionable, and this year it is expected to decrease slightly to only be extremely egregious. Given that the demand for teachers still dwarfs the supply, something has to give if we want teachers with a pulse in our classrooms, much less great teachers. We certainly get what we pay for.

    As far as producing positive student outcomes, great teachers are a prerequisite, but do not necessarily ensure positive outcomes. Great leadership which prioritizes student outcomes, eliminates barriers to improved student success, and conveys high expectations in meaningful ways is also necessary. It seems that we may now have that leadership at VDOE, and I suspect that this has a good chance of trickling down to school divisions.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      Thanks for weighing in Matt!

      “… but who can argue against hiring the best possible teachers for our students? The General Assembly could with an affirmative vote raise Virginia teaching salaries to well above the national average, which would entice more folks into the field.”

      Apparently not what Conservatives support?

      what do Conservatives support if not attracting more and better teachers into public education?

      1. Matt Hurt Avatar
        Matt Hurt

        We shall see who supports what in the budget making process in January.

      2. Apparently not what Conservatives support?

        It’s apparently not what “progressives” support, either, or it would have happened during the administration of governor Ralph Northam when he and his democrat cohorts had full control of the state government. At that time there was no way “conservatives” could have stopped it, even if they wanted to.

      3. Apparently not what Conservatives support?

        It’s apparently not what “progressives” support, either, or it would have happened during the administration of governor Ralph Northam when he and his democrat cohorts had full control of the state government. At that time there was no way “conservatives” could have stopped it, even if they wanted to.

      4. Apparently not what Conservatives support?

        It’s apparently not what “progressives” support, either, or it would have happened during the administration of governor Ralph Northam when he and his democrat cohorts had full control of the state government. At that time there was no way “conservatives” could have stopped it, even if they wanted to.

      5. Apparently not what Conservatives support?

        It’s apparently not what “progressives” support, either, or it would have happened during the administration of governor Ralph Northam when he and his democrat cohorts had full control of the state government. At that time there was no way “conservatives” could have stopped it, even if they wanted to.

  7. Lefty665 Avatar

    Tightly targeting state money to increase teacher pay seems like an obvious use of available surplus funding.

    From some of the discussions here on BR it has not seemed there is much correlation between spending per student and performance in Virginia’s schools. Richmond for example has fairly high spending per pupil and terrible performance.

    More money cannot hurt, and there are undoubtedly systems that would
    put it too good use. There are others, like Richmond and Fredericksburg, where systemic reform is needed before more money will do much good.

Leave a Reply