Virginia’s PreK-12 Educational Goals?

by Matt Hurt

For any organization to be successful, there must be clearly defined goals based on the desired outcome. The goals must be measurable, and the measure(s) of progress must also be defined. The greater the focus is maintained on those goals, the more likely the organization will attain them.

Virginia’s educators are at a disadvantage in that the goals (identified as priorities) laid out in the Board of Education’s Comprehensive Plan do not identify student outcome targets. The mission adopted by the Board (page 5) mentions the improvement of student achievement, but how much improvement is considered sufficient is not defined anywhere in the document. This document also does not specify any measures of student achievement that could be used to determine whether or not the board is accomplishing its mission.

The lack of adopted student outcome goals and measures could be a significant factor in the declines in student achievement in the past five or so years. Much has been written about the recent and significant decline in National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) scores in 2022, but student outcomes as measured by SOL tests were generally in decline prior to the pandemic. The only SOL scores that improved were in math, and then only because the Board of Education significantly lowered cut scores with the newest SOL test in 2019, which had the effect of making the new tests easier to pass.

There have been a number of decisions made by the Board in recent years that have been inconsistent with practices which improve student outcomes. These decisions in effect lowered the expectations for Virginia’s students and educators. Rarely do outcomes improve when expectations are lowered. For example, the degree to which student outcomes were calculated into teacher and administrator evaluations was decreased from 40 percent of the evaluation to no less than 10 percent in 2019. Also, that same year, the Board lowered the SOL cut scores in math, which effectively lowered the expectations in that subject. Two years later, the Board similarly lowered the cut scores in reading.

The Board’s current comprehensive plan ends this year, and it is assumed that this body will begin the process of drafting a new plan which will guide Virginia’s educational efforts over the next five years. If the Board truly desires to improve student outcomes, it is reasonable to assume that Board members will carefully consider what student outcome metrics capture the definition of student success, and will adopt measurable goals based on those metrics. This would help the Board to sharpen the focus on the specific desired outcome(s) and would ideally help Virginia’s educators to align efforts towards those measurable targets.

If the Board were to do this, an annual report could be provided which details the year-over-year performance of Virginia’s public school students, as well as multi-year trend data. This report could also track the likely effects of a number of factors that had either a positive or negative effect on student outcomes, including actions taken by the Board. This process would help the Board to refine policies and regulations that have an impact on student outcomes across the state annually.

While the General Assembly has the “ultimate authority” over the Board of Education, the annual report could also outline the relationships between the legislative body’s inputs into the educational system compared to student outcomes. For example, topics such as Standards of Quality funding, the Local Composite Index effect on local school funding, specific mandates codified into law, etc. could be correlated. This information could potentially spur action by the General Assembly in future sessions toward those factors that have a positive effect on student achievement. Similarly, this information could help reign in legislative action where it has demonstrated a negative effect.

Matt Hurt is the director of the Comprehensive Instructional Program, a consortium in which teachers and administrators from 49 public school divisions in Virginia collaborate to ensure better educational outcomes for their students.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

16 responses to “Virginia’s PreK-12 Educational Goals?”

  1. Kathleen Smith Avatar
    Kathleen Smith

    It is called moving the pea under the shell so that no one really knows where it is. Great article.

  2. Some would say that at the district level there is too much focus on standardized student outcomes at the expense of actual long term learning.

    1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      Let us know the differences between outcomes and learning when you get a minute.

      1. All too often the outcome is merely teaching to the test with little evidence of actual grasping of the concepts. For example with the multiple choice questions on the Algebra One SOL students are taught to store and match with their calculator. This allows them to use the process of elimination to find the correct answer by merely typing in the equations until they get a matching value. They do not actually need to know how to solve the equation, and yes I have introduced this technique to math teachers during training classes. The school administration is only interested in passing scores.

      2. In my opinion the difference is that to varying degrees, outcomes can be achieved by concentrating all instruction in a subject on passing a standardized test.

        Learning occurs when a student has a fundamental understanding of a subject and can discuss it beyond what was specifically taught in class. They can use what they have been taught to solve problems and/or analyze related issues beyond the scope of a particular standardized test.

  3. LarrytheG Avatar

    I guess I was expecting some significant action from VDOE on academics given the width and breadth of criticism to include the “honesty gap” thing as well as the “loss” from the pandemic and closures.

    I know it’s not an immediate process on any of this and that it may take some time but almost nothing in the GA nor from the Gov on it. Not that I give the Dems any credit either. None seem focused on this and yet the GOV won the election on at least part of it.

    1. DJRippert Avatar

      Which governor oversaw these changes five years ago?

      1. LarrytheG Avatar

        I agree and all the more reason we should be moving now. Why are we not?

        1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
          James C. Sherlock

          The Board of Education does not work for the governor.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar

            So he has no role in it and all the stuff about re-writing the history standards had nothing to do with the GOv? yeah buddy.

            Can’t blather about the honesty gap and then run away and do nothing without being held accountable for that failure to act.

          2. LarrytheG Avatar

            VDOE does, right? Hasn’t seem to have stopped the govt on a wide range
            of education issues…. seems to have full involvement of the culture war
            stuff and zero involvement on the honesty gap issue.

  4. Thank you Matt Hurt. Almost unbelievable.

  5. LarrytheG Avatar

    We need to measure. To not measure means failure for sure. What we don’t want is high stakes testing used to “measure”. The current approach with SOLs has a glaring problem in that we don’t measure on a standard basis in grades 1 and 2 and not measuring has resulted in kids getting to the 3rd grade not knowing how to read.

    We can see this across Virginia by extracting 3rd grade SOL reading data from build-a-table. Some schools in Va have half the 3rd grade failing reading SOLs – at the same time other schools in the same school district have 70, 80, even 90% pass rates.

    Kids who don’t know how to read by 3rd grade, if not remediated, become not only failures for themselves but behavior and related burdens to teachers, administrators and other kids.

    Most kids who learn how to read and get decent passing grades in the later grades have something to work for and are less inclined to miss school and/or have discipline issues.

    The 3rd grade reading failure has significant consequences for everyone and when we find out
    in the 3rd grade , it’s getting pretty late in the game.

    1. Kathleen Smith Avatar
      Kathleen Smith

      The accountability starts with the Board, not the schools.

  6. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    If only there were clear feedback loops, this would be a must. But somebody would have to show me how a change in test scores can be clearly the result of a change in instruction methods, or even subject, before we go nuts.

    In my, admittedly small, field of view, these tests for certain grades, K-5(?) just test memorization. Teach a subject, test adjacent materials, AND now you test learning.

    Generally, I’d wait for a Bacon meme to post this, but in light of recent events, I’m going to have to shoot this down as a good idea gone suddenly bad…
    https://news.yahoo.com/japan-startup-unveils-space-viewing-111114679.html

    1. Matt Hurt Avatar

      The only tests that are straight recall these days are the history SOL tests, and to a lesser degree the science SOL tests. The reading and math SOL tests cannot be memorized, as these are skill based. You can try out the practice tests at the link below.

      https://download.pearsonaccessnext.com/virginia/va-practicetest.html?links=1

Leave a Reply