Virginia’s Natural Gas Pipelines, Virginia’s Economy and the World

by James C. Sherlock

God looks after the United States of America. The fracking revolution tripled our recoverable natural gas volumes. America is the world king of natural gas.

In 2008, the wellhead price of natural gas reached $8 per thousand cubic feet in the United States. By 2012, it was $2.66. It fueled a new, cleaner industrial revolution.

God also smiles on Virginia. He put a huge percentage — nearly half — of America’s natural gas close to us.

But He also gave us too many lawyers, too many green-funding billionaires and the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

American producers have done the work to make natural gas available at the Appalachian wellhead.

(Well, the Mountain Valley Pipeline [MVP] will now not be ready in 2022).

Yet the Consumer Price Index reported that natural gas prices were up nearly 50% year-over-year in December. In the past year, the wellhead price has varied from $8.56 to over $12. It is $12.34 today. So how can that be?

The answers, of course, are demand, storage and transportation. On the demand side, the U.S. Energy Information Administration reported in November of 2020:

The growing trend toward more natural gas-fired electricity generation generally encourages more storage capacity. This trend continued in 2020, and July 2020 holds the record for the most natural gas consumed in the electric power sector in a single month. Natural gas remains an important fuel to support the growing use of renewable energy-sourced operations such as wind and solar power.

The vast increases in the production of natural gas allowed the conversion of coal-fired electrical plants to much cleaner gas. Military installations made the same shift.  Natural gas supports renewables. Do the greens know that? Does the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond? Who do they think uses the gas? Or do they care?

Underground storage has physical limits. Pipelines are required to move the gas from where it is to where it is needed. The service areas for the Atlantic Coast and Mountain Valley pipelines are shown below. Virginia was the destination for both.

The underground Atlantic Coast pipeline was designed to transport natural gas supplies from West Virginia to public utilities in Virginia and North Carolina to generate cleaner electricity, heat homes, and power local businesses and the DoD installations in Hampton Roads. It has been cancelled.

From the Virginia Mercury:

Dominion attributed the (Atlantic Coast) pipeline’s demise to “ongoing delays and increasing cost uncertainty which threaten the economic viability of the project.” In particular, the utility pointed a finger at a string of legal challenges to federal and state permits the pipeline had received and then subsequently saw yanked. The delays had been extremely costly: since the initial $4.5 to $5 billion estimate, the price tag had risen to $8 billion.

In the end, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Dominion and its partners in overturning a 4th Circuit decision but the lawsuits were still coming. Here is Dominion CEO Thomas Ferrell:

To state the obvious, permitting for investment in gas transmission and storage has become increasingly litigious, uncertain and costly.

This trend, though deeply concerning for our country’s economic growth and energy security, is a new reality.

The MVP received the required FERC Certificate of Convenience and Necessity  on October 13, 2017, and construction activities began in early 2018. An estimated 20 linear miles of pipe remain to be completed. MVP’s total project work is nearly 94% complete, which includes 55.8% of the right-of-way fully restored – the details of which are shown on the adjacent map.

With the current course of events, the MVP is likely to be cancelled for the same reasons as the Atlantic Coast Pipeline. Government agencies must again rewrite permits for the Mountain Valley Pipeline to satisfy the Fourth Circuit — which has been perhaps the biggest challenge for developers since they first announced the project nearly a decade ago. The expense of the court battles and delays may prove too much for the investors.

The pipelines repeatedly passed required reviews by the federal agencies charged with environmental reviews. But the 4th Circuit has repeatedly overruled those agencies. That court has its own unique interpretation of the Endangered Species Act. Few projects will meet its standards. It puts the regional prospects for the new infrastructure bill in doubt.

The 4th Circuit as currently configured is an obstacle until the Supreme Court overturns some of its most “imaginative” decisions.

I expect that to happen at some point on the MVP, but we will have to see if that is enough to restart the project.

Now there is war in Europe.

Our European allies desperately need to replace Russian gas and we need to help them do so to preserve NATO. The Appalachians contain near limitless supplies of it. Hampton Roads is the closest major port to the Appalachian supplies.

The top four natural gas producing nations in the world were, in order (2018):

Rank Country Continent Annual NG production (million m 3)
1 United States North America 831,800
2 Russia Europe 669,500
3 Iran Asia 239,500
4 Canada North America 184,700

Look at that list and see if it raises any issues.

High natural gas prices, shortages in Hampton Roads (including at its military bases), allies in need, geopolitical balance of power, plentiful supplies nearby, pipelines near completion, and the option of a new LNG terminal in the Port of Virginia.

The federal legislation writes itself. We need a bill to approve the Atlantic Coast and Mountain Valley pipelines directly as a national security matter to preempt any more lawsuits to block them.

We therefore need to find out the positions on that issue of Virginia’s two Senators and eleven Representatives and their opponents in the fall election.

Perhaps the press will ask.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

45 responses to “Virginia’s Natural Gas Pipelines, Virginia’s Economy and the World”

  1. Those who have dedicated themselves to shutting down the natural gas infrastructure in the United States are Putin’s useful idiots.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      You do realize there is no transatlantic pipeline, right?

      1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
        James C. Sherlock

        You have heard of LNG, right?

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          Uh yep. And the entire worlds fleet of some 500 storage ships, or so, can move less gas than your 1964 data point.

          1. But it is possible, which is why in 2017 the first US LNG delivery arrived in the newly
            opened LNG import terminal in Klaipėda, Lithuania

            https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/baltics/2017-09-12/us-natural-gas-arrives-lithuania?cid=nlc-fa_fatoday-20170912

  2. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    BTW, Mitt Romney just now, “Liz Cheney is right. She’s been right all along.”

    Hey congrats guys! Your party’s on the move from vile and disgusting to merely untrustworthy… again.

    1. tmtfairfax Avatar

      You must work for the Post’s editorial board. You cannot respond to any statement beyond snark – ever.

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        You must be a lawyer… wait, it’s coming clear,… clearer…. Ah! A real estate lawyer.

    2. As Biden marches the US into nuclear war with Putin…..over what? Preserving our ability to not let Ukraine into NATO, rather than agreeing with Moscow for the same outcome. BRILLIANT! Robert Gates & Barry Obama proven right again!

  3. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    He also looks after the inebriated and irresponsible, which is probably why the GOP lays claim to the moral majority.

  4. Bob X from Texas Avatar
    Bob X from Texas

    I’m amazed that Leftists oppose every form of energy production and energy transportation but still expect their heating, air conditioning, and lighting to be available 24 7 365. Nuclear powered hydrogen production is the future green energy that we can easily move to but it is opposed because it will work!

    1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
      Eric the half a troll

      Environmentalist support nuclear power as a part of the shift to a carbon free future. It is unlikely that nuclear production of green hydrogen will be the future though. Far more likely solar and wind energy will be used to generate hydrogen.

  5. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    3,000 Tcf at 30 Tcf per year… then what?

    1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      That’s 100 years, Nancy.

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Yeah, then it’s all gone, but then you need, what, only 15 at best? What the hell do you care?

        1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
          James C. Sherlock

          And you. Do you think the clock on technology will be stopped at 2022? But then, ignore my question. I am done with you.

          1. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            I keep forgetting you’re real Navy. They never run out of steak in the officer’s mess. Never been down to 1/2 bottle of rum three days out.

            FWIW, not 100 years. “That is, for every cubic foot of natural gas drawn from underground reservoirs, 1.4 percent of it is lost into the atmosphere.Jul 4, 2018”

            So, 98.6 years. Hmm, that’s ironic.

            There is solar, and the Earth is an emitter of as much energy as radiated to it. It’s a balance thing.

            By the way, vaccines are technology and half your party refused them. Luddites. And you want to burn methane. That’s so 1900.

            Bye. Of course, if the mashugana in Moscow is as crazy as he seems… But, then you could have always hit ‘cancel’.

  6. David Wojick Avatar
    David Wojick

    You say “Natural gas supports renewables. Do the greens know that?”. Have you read Dominion’s VCEA IRP? For a mere $70 billion NPV-dollars we can do it all with wind, solar, old nukes and a few batteries. They don’t need no stinking gas.

    1. David Wojick Avatar
      David Wojick

      Moreover, as gas fired generation is phased out, beginning in 2023, more gas will become available for other uses, until they too are legislated away, including exports. It’s a plan, man.

      1. energyNOW_Fan Avatar
        energyNOW_Fan

        Unrelated but I appreciate your comments over on the Curry blog.

        OK , I will tie it in. This sentence by Judith Curry is what I am trying to say all along:

        “Characterization of climate change as an environmental problem has downplayed the cultural and political dimensions of the issue”

        https://judithcurry.com/2022/02/19/how-we-have-mischaracterized-climate-risk/#more-28343

    2. Eric the half a troll Avatar
      Eric the half a troll

      Actually Dominion’s plans call for green hydrogen in out years to replace NG for system reliability/renewable energy storage.

      1. David Wojick Avatar
        David Wojick

        The VCEA plan — IRP Plan C — says no such thing. Zero hydrogen capacity is added.

      2. David Wojick Avatar
        David Wojick

        The only official Dominion plan for VCEA is Plan C in the 2021 IRP submitted to the SCC in Sept. If you have seen it, where is this hydrogen part? If you have not seen it, what the heck are you talking about?

        I wish they would throw in green hydrogen because they would have to specify when, how, where, and how much it cost? Hydrolysis capacity, transportation capacity and combustion capacity. Those would be fun numbers!

    3. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      Read the link. It is the U.S. Energy Information Administration that has said it.

      1. David Wojick Avatar
        David Wojick

        I don’t think EIA uses the term “greens”. My point was the answer is no, they do not know that, at least not in VA.

    4. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      Read the link. It is the U.S. Energy Information Administration that has said it.

  7. Stephen Haner Avatar
    Stephen Haner

    The Europeans could use the same technology as we do to produce vastly more gas within their own borders, including even the UK, but refuse to because the Greens have a stranglehold on their politics. Yet their wind and solar expansion has not produced enough reliable energy, so the Russian supplies fill the void. France with its nukes is the least vulnerable, and Macron is moving to expand them. Wind and solar, even if there is a realistic amount of storage (cost $1T), will also fail here. The Greens control the Democratic party here, too. Either we keep using gas or our economy strangles.

    Virginia’s economy is already hurting because of the death of the Atlantic Coast Pipeline, the delay and uncertainty about the MVP, the death of that Virginia Natural Gas project to help Hampton Roads. There is something about a Eastern Shore project mentioned in the Senate budget and the Virginia Mercury is already zeroing in to kill that, I’m sure. The big projects will go where the energy is available. Virginia is now tagged as an anti-energy state.

    If you think Congress as now configured or Biden will change direction, Captain, forget it. Federal legislation is a pipe dream.

    1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      I am not sure you are correct, but even if you prove to be if doesn’t mean we should not get candidates for federal office to commit to a position.

    2. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Pipe dream? Pipeline dream. Har! Humor!

    3. energyNOW_Fan Avatar
      energyNOW_Fan

      Not all energy proposals are good. I personally chalk up ACP as a possible blunder by Dominion. Perhaps at 1/2 the scale it *might* have made sense. Blaming enviros may be cover-up.

    4. energyNOW_Fan Avatar
      energyNOW_Fan

      Not all energy proposals are good. I personally chalk up ACP as a possible blunder by Dominion. Perhaps at 1/2 the scale it *might* have made sense. Blaming enviros may be cover-up.

  8. This is why John Kerry is an idiot… well one reason among many….
    “But [the Ukrainian War] could have a profound negative impact on the climate obviously. You have a war and obviously you’re going to have massive emissions consequences to the war.“

    Thousands being killed and maimed, millions of refugees… and this is his concern. Hopefully his plan to parachute James Taylor and his guitar into Kiev will stop the war.

    So glad his on Biden’s team.

  9. William O'Keefe Avatar
    William O’Keefe

    The invasion of the Ukraine is a strong reason to rethink the push to get off fossil energy and onto renewables on a timeline that is driven by politics; not technology and economics. All we have to do is look at Europe. It has gone down the renewables road and now is faced with energy scarcity.
    Europe’s lack of natural gas is not geological; it is political. The largest gas field in Europe is the Groningen field in the Netherlands. It’s production is being curtailed because of the risks of earthquakes. But, the risk from Putin is greater. There are also gas reserves in the North Sea. The EU can solve its energy problem by reordering its energy priorities and telling Putin to keep his gas and oil.

    1. David Wojick Avatar
      David Wojick

      Of course the greens argue just the opposite, that the problem here is clearly with gas. They say if there was a lot more wind and solar the EU would not need that Russian gas. Given that the original gas crunch was just due to an overestimation of what the existing wind capacity would produce this is a fairly strong argument.

        1. David Wojick Avatar
          David Wojick

          Sorry but no idea what the point of your bald link is in relation to what I said. Try saying it.

      1. David Wojick Avatar
        David Wojick

        Let me clarify my point. A big downside of wind + gas is that you need a huge reserve of gas to handle the unpredictable occurrence of long term low wind. Europe did not have that and got caught, causing the energy crisis.

        But it is still true that more wind can reduce gas use. However depending on more wind requires even bigger low wind reserves, which might only be used every decade or so.

  10. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    He also looks after drunks and fools.

  11. energyNOW_Fan Avatar
    energyNOW_Fan

    Don’t even get me started. The other example of leftist green pressure might be Germany shutting down all of its nuclear power plants prematurely. We are letting eco-extremism weaken our national security and ability to solve problems including war.

    Not all energy project proposals are winners, so I am hoping the Atlantic Coast Pipeline died for good reasons. But MVP should probably be allowed to move forward, and may need that western oil pipeline from Canada.

    1. energyNOW_Fan Avatar
      energyNOW_Fan

      PS- Nat Gas prices are hard to talk about because they quote so many different numbers, and different numbers for different people (homeowners pay the brunt as usual) . Price has spiked up in 2022 but is still relatively low due to fracking.

  12. energyNOW_Fan Avatar
    energyNOW_Fan

    Liberals posters here opposed ACP on the basis some of the gas might be exported to other countries. This was said to be a great crime against humanity and Virginia.

  13. Funny how the rationale has morphed. When fracking started to expand the argument was domestic supplies, low prices and no exports, all domestic.

    Curiously our goal has increasingly become exports as the LNG terminal at the end of the proposed ACP illustrates. Now we are adding national security anti Russian hysteria to justify exports to Europe. Simultaneously we are importing around 1/4B barrels of Russian oil per year and exempting Russian energy from sanctions and SWIFT restrictions.

    Cognitive dissonance anyone?

Leave a Reply