By Peter Galuszka

Plans to mine uranium in Southside Virginia did not get the boost some had been hoping for now that a 22-month-long review by the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Engineering has been released.

Far from rubber-stamping the plan, the independent analysis reported that there are “significant” health and environmental obstacles with the plan, which would allow mining 119 million pounds of uranium from the properties of several politically connected families near Chatham.

Among those challenges are that Virginia, which must protect the environment and the lives of mining workers, has no experience doing so and lacks any regulations covering mining uranium. The study did not give a go or no-go recommendation but said that mining could occur if proper safeguards were put in place. Getting them will take much time and effort.

In other words, the juggernaut towards the uranium mining idea, which has included all-expenses-paid trips to France for legislatures considering ending a two-decades-long ban on such mining, just got a big, bright yellow caution light, not exactly what proponents  had hoped for.

Even supporters started backing away from the idea. Gov. Robert F. McDonnell, who wants to make Virginia “the Energy Capital of the East Coast” seemed to mumble that uranium mining should be done safely. Virginia Energy Resources Inc., which owns 29 percent of the mining project, put the happiest face it could on the report, stating that we now have a “roadmap” to employ the “best practices” in safety that have been in practice in the U.S. and Canada. Mining opponents hailed the report as vindication of their fears.

What’s going to be interesting is the next step. How Virginia’s business elite handles the report and the moratorium will be the determining factor about whether the ban is ended and the mining goes through.

The sad truth is that many of these people see only one side of the energy equation and are loath to consider environmental issues or even get a deeper understanding of energy itself. Instead, legitimate concerns are painted as over-regulation madness by the likes of Barack Obama and his band of socialists. What is sad is that these very critics really have no real idea of what the global energy mix and what the markets really are.

For proof, read a piece of a couple of weeks ago by Barry E. DuVal, the new president of the Virginia Chamber of Commerce who was once mayor of Newport News and a cabinet secretary under Republican Gov. Jim Gilmore. DuVal’s piece was a diatribe against the Obama Administration for not including areas offshore Virginia for exploration and drilling. He also attacked Obama’s concerns about the controversial Keystone XL pipeline that would take fossil fuel energy from an oil sands project in Canada to Gulf Coast refineries. Without a major change in direction from the White House,” DuVal wrote, Virginia won’t be able to drill offshore, expand renewable electricity sources and build nuclear power plants.

A few little problems here. First, there are no known, large deposits of oil off the Virginia coast. There may be natural gas, but nothing certain. If you want to discuss natural gas,  one thing DuVal fails to mention, is that hydraulic fracking of Marcellus shale in Pennsylvania and New York, has resulted in an unexpected flood of new gas. The quantity is so great that electric utilities are shifting to gas from coal. As far as nuclear, DuVal seems to have forgotten the August earthquake that pushed the North Anna nuclear plant to its design limits and caused a national review of just how susceptible the country’s nuclear stations are to earthquakes. As for wind, Google plans a huge wind farm just off Virginia’s coast. No mention there. As for the Keystone pipeline, the petroleum is exceptionally dirty. The pipeline will result in zero jobs in Virginia, if you bother to look at a map.

And lastly, for the first time in decades, the U.S. has become a net exporter of energy. This is all happening without Bob McDonnell’s fantasy of the state becoming the “Energy Capital of the East Coast.” The Old Dominion is a huge shipping port for coal exports, but it involves coking coal for steel for skyscrapers in Shanghai and Mumbai and has nothing to do with energy.

So, given the level of understanding of the energy outlook, it should come as no surprise that this crowd will be pushing for an end to uranium mining and pressing on without substantive regulations. We hate regulations. We’re Virginians. In any event, it’s all Barack Obama’s fault.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

4 responses to “Virginia’s Energy Fantasies”

  1. Drilling for offshore oil and/or gas is a walk in the park compared to uranium mining.

    The Aussies mine it in the middle of nowhere and it’s still a very iffy proposition.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=774sqs34VCM

    There may be a safe way to mine uranium. However, the only way that will happen is through substantial (draconian?) regulations. This is especially true in Virginia where there is no place as isolated at the places where Australia mines the stuff.

    Peter’s point is well taken. A disdain for regulation coupled with gamma radiation, alpha radiation, radon and radioactive tailings is a very volatile mix. And when the health consequences of poorly regulated uranium mining fall on the citizens after the minimg companies go under, even the conservatives may rue the day that uranium mining was approved.

  2. Peter wrote, “A few little problems here. First, there are no known, large deposits of oil off the Virginia coast. There may be natural gas, but nothing certain.”

    Question: How do you find out if there are oil/gas deposits or not unless you allow drilling?

    Isn’t Peter’s logic circular? You can’t drill here because there’s no evidence of oil or gas. There’s no evidence of oil or gas because you can’t drill here.

  3. the problem with uranium mining is the tailings. In very arid regions, this is much less an issue but in areas with abundant rainfall unless you entomb the tailings, water eventually finds it’s way into them and then migrates into surface and ground water.

    and the folks who want to mine it don’t want to pay to entomb it because they’re competing with operations in arid regions that don’t have that cost.

    and ya’ll might find this news interesting:

    ” A Texas-based company is trying to lease 100,000 acres in the Fredericksburg region to drill for oil and gas.”

    http://www.fredericksburg.com/News/FLS/2011/122011/12182011/670622

    sounds like to me that there is no problem exploring for gas and oil in Va.

  4. Peter Galuszka Avatar
    Peter Galuszka

    Jim,
    The possibility of Mid Atlantic reserves has been studied for decades. You have the technology to find potential oil and gas fields without drilling. Nothing yet has screamed “Drill Me!” there. In the meantime, there have been plenty of other big finds and new drilling technologies are resulting in more oil and gas, especially in the West and Marcellus Shale. Even Fox News says we’re on the way to becoming a net exporter again, but you conservatives like so don’t want to hear that. It means you’ll all have to come up with some new arguments. Boo hoo.

Leave a Reply