Virginia’s Battered News Industry Takes Another Hit

Another shell blasts the pathetic remains of Virginia news media.

After a century-and-a-half of independent ownership, Norfolk’s Virginian-Pilot severed its last connection with the Batten family, which had run the newspaper since 1955, with the sale to the Chicago-based Tronc Inc. media chain. Style Weekly, Richmond’s weekly alternative to the Richmond Times-Dispatch, was included in the $34 million deal.

Tronc touts its ability as one of the largest newspaper companies in the U.S. to centralize operations and make investments needed to keep the newspaper competitive. It had better be good. Like other regional newspapers, the Virginian-Pilot has suffered a steady erosion of circulation and loss of display advertising, which it has been unable to offset through increased online sales.

I’m working from a fallible memory here, but I recall that the Virginian-Pilot print circulation once exceeded 240,000 — maybe closer to 300,000. The most recent number: 132,000. Like its in-state rival, the Richmond Times-Dispatch, the Pilot also has shrunk its page count drastically. (The T-D recently packaged local news, the business page, and the editorial page in a pathetic eight-page section. Once upon a time, newspapers aimed for a 50/50 advertising-editorial page count. That T-D front-age section had about two pages of ads.)

Expect more downsizing as Tronc integrates the Virginian-Pilot with the Daily Press on the far side of the James River, which it also owns. The strategy of most newspaper companies these days appears to be slashing expenses and maintaining cash flow as long as possible, even if it means cannibalizing their print operations.

Bacon’s bottom line: I started my journalistic career as a summer intern at the Virginian-Pilot. I had a great experience there, and it set me up to land a job at the (then-independent) Martinsville Bulletin after college. A couple of years later, I moved on to another Batten family-owned property, the Roanoke Times & World-News. The Batten family upheld the highest standards of journalism. And Frank Batten Sr., who donated hundreds of millions of dollars to educational institutions across Virginia, was one of the great philanthropists in Virginia history.

I was blessed to work in the industry during its golden age of profitability when newspapers could afford to pay staffs of investigative reporters who conducted in-depth research on enterprise projects not expected to pay off for months. Such luxuries are long gone. Today, newspapers don’t have staffs capable of covering basic functions of government. Thanks to various sponsorships that have supported this blog over the years, I have covered the Commonwealth Transportation Board and the State Council of Higher Education for Virginia, which oversee transportation and higher education in the state– and I was typically the only reporter at the board meetings. Now that those sponsorships have expired, literally no one is reporting consistently on those crucial topics.

One possible successor to the dying advertising-, circulation- and profit-driven business model of the past is a nonprofit model supported by fund-raising and endowments. Whether journalism-as-charity can fill the void is a big question. I expect that it can for certain topics favored by wealthy philanthropists such as the environment and possibly social-justice issues. I would be amazed if the nonprofit model will do much for state budgets, taxes, transportation, land use, economic development, health care, K-12 education, higher education, public safety, or general state administration — much less for journalism at the local-government level.

Even the geniuses in Silicon Valley haven’t been able to figure out a business model. Google and Facebook are parasitical, feeding off the content created by the dying newspapers. Yahoo! tried creating its own news content, but that has flopped. Local-level digital news initiatives also have gone bust. Solutions, if they come, will emerge from rampant trial-and-error experimentation at the local level. I’m confident that a viable business model eventually will emerge from the debris.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

5 responses to “Virginia’s Battered News Industry Takes Another Hit”

  1. The writing at the VP has gotten bad. Many complaints. People would buy if there was decent journalism. Even if people submitted stories, they won’t take them. Cuts into ads or their “leaks”.

    I actually do more for a local paper outside of my city, patronize its supporters to, rather than the VP.

  2. Acbar Avatar

    We are quite fond of the Gloucester-Mathews Gazette-Journal — a broadsheet weekly published in two or three sections and fat with food and clothing and gardening and real estate ads. But that paper makes no attempt to cover national or even State issues unless there’s a purely local spin. And my sense is that it’s only the spotty and expensive broadband service in these rural counties that has allowed that newspaper to survive as the [still] dominant source of local news.

    Media gurus like Jaron Lanier have been making the point for some time now that, for privacy’s sake if no other reason, we must get away from the advertising model for internet media entirely and go to a subscription model where the publisher looks entirely to the subscriber for revenues and therefore has a disincentive to sell harvested subscriber data to the likes of Cambridge Analytica. In his view, internet advertising creates far too much incentive to invade the privacy of users both collectively and individually. But the debate rages on: will subscribers pay full cost (with no advertising revenue offset) for a general news newspaper? The successful “newspapers” online today are mostly newsletters or blogs which address an audience that has chosen to read them, an audience that is already self-selected in their direction.

    You pose an alternative: “One possible successor to the dying advertising-, circulation- and profit-driven business model of the past is a nonprofit model supported by fund-raising and endowments.” Ah, yes, sponsorships. Like advertising they can provide the financial margin that makes a publication possible, and, starting with sponsorship by the government (such as for NPR), bring programs to people that would not otherwise have access to them; but at what cost in terms of independence? I would hope that one effect of the deliberate debasing of main stream media standards today, with fake news and alternative facts, would be a greater appreciation for the enormous void that opens up when you really don’t have anywhere to go for comprehensive, reasonably unbiased coverage of State and national and international affairs. Cable news and at least one network seem to have devolved into entertainment focused not on covering all the significant events of the day, let alone journalism to high standards, but on providing the largest possible viewership to advertisers. As it is, these days, one of the best-edited daily overviews comes, IMO, from the PBS Evening News — but even that comes with strong biases. PBS, in addition to the government, has many foundation and corporate as well as individual sponsors whose personal agendas, one hopes, cancel each other out. Indeed, “Whether journalism-as-charity can fill the void is a big question.” Perhaps, the big question.

  3. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    so.. here’s a question – what business model for news assures objective reporting and not targeted to what the paying customers want to read?

    The thing that amazes me about CNN, FOX, MSN is that many of the advertisers buy time on all those networks. They sell the same cars and the same drugs and insurance on all those channels. So TV is definitely not a “subscription” model. They’re actually working off the same model for papers except GOOGLE cannibalized print advertising but NOT broadcast advertising.

    How much of this do most of us really and truly understand what has happened?

    1. Acbar Avatar

      JB knows better than either of us — but it’s now obvious, the model we’ve inherited from the 20th century – circulation to paid subscribers, with the price subsidized by print advertising and classifieds, and journalistic standards for the strict verification of facts and separation of factual news from opinion pieces – has broken down. What will replace it? Or will the average voter of the future be informed solely by news sources that cannot be trusted? Will the news sources of the future be limited to a mix of government propaganda and self-selected on-line blogs that “preach only to the choir”? That’s a bleak and scary prospect.

  4. Peter Galuszka Avatar
    Peter Galuszka

    Blue Virginia has a hysterical mock of this all

    https://bluevirginia.us/2018/05/video-john-oliver-talks-about-tronc-the-company-that-just-bought-the-virginian-pilot

    Likewise, I was a Pilot summer intern (1973) and then spent five years with them. I still write for Style.

    Since the 1990s, news management at newspapers have been clueless about how to deal with the online craze where early pioneers and ones now take advantage of the content created by individual journalists. They had a comfy model of newspaper market monopolies and enormously profitable TV stations. Curiously, the Pilot used to have a truly good Website. They invented the hugely successful Weather Channel.

    But working in media was for the most part sweat shop. That’s been the case for 44 years. The only places that really treated me well were McGraw-Hill and BusinessWeek.

    When the digital craze hit, the bosses wanted it all — you are supposed to do, long-form, deeply reported investigative stories involving long distance travel and around the clock hours. You are also supposed to post or tweet so many times daily.

    It was absolute BS as the Oliver show and skit point out. Can you really trust a company that calls itself “:tronc” and uses a big X to explain what it does? I mean, what kind of marketing bullshit is that?

    Reminds of of Media General nearly 20 years ands their fetish for “synergy.” They even built the synergy center of the universe at the Tampa Tribune and it go a big story in the Columbia Journalism review.
    Guess what? The Trib has been shut down for good after being bought by a competitor.

    The Pilot has had an admirable liberal streak — it won Pulitzers for fighting the Klan and Massive Resistance. It lost its way from time to time but it is hard to see how a Chicago based company with a strange name will continue the legacy.

Leave a Reply