Credit pxhere.com

by James C. Sherlock

Politicians on the right and left proclaim they want to change Virginia’s abortion laws.

It is thus a useful exercise to see how those laws actually read. I am not an attorney, but I will take a shot at summarizing at certain points.

The reference is Code of Virginia Title 18.2 Crimes and Offenses Generally, Chapter 4. Crimes Against the Person, Article 9. Abortion. Go directly to it at the link if you wish to see the entirety of that Article.

There are nine active sections of Article 9.

We will take them individually, see how they read and point out later some of what they do not address.

§ 18.2-71. Producing abortion or miscarriage, etc.; penalty makes it a Class 4 felony to conduct or produce an abortion “except as provided in other sections of this article.”

§ 18.2-71.1. Partial birth infanticide; penalty. This section is longer than you might imagine, defines what partial birth infanticide is and what it is not; and defines it as a Class 4 felony:

E. This section shall not prohibit the use by a physician of any procedure that, in reasonable medical judgment, is necessary to prevent the death of the mother, so long as the physician takes every medically reasonable step, consistent with such procedure, to preserve the life and health of the infant. A procedure shall not be deemed necessary to prevent the death of the mother if completing the delivery of the living infant would prevent the death of the mother.

§ 18.2-72. When abortion lawful during first trimester of pregnancy.  

Provides the first exception to § 18.2-71 under which abortion is legal.

Short version: Abortion during the first trimester is legal when conducted by a licensed physician or nurse practitioner.

§ 18.2-73. When abortion lawful during second trimester of pregnancy.  

Short Version: Abortion is legal when conducted in the second trimester by a licensed physician in a hospital.

§ 18.2-74. When abortion or termination of pregnancy lawful after second trimester of pregnancy. 

Short version: Third trimester abortion is legal if done by a licensed physician

provided the following conditions are met:

(a) Said operation is performed in a (licensed) hospital ….

(b) The physician and two consulting physicians certify and so enter in the hospital record of the woman, that in their medical opinion, based upon their best clinical judgment, the continuation of the pregnancy is likely to result in the death of the woman or substantially and irremediably impair the mental or physical health of the woman. [Emphasis added.]

(c) Measures for life support for the product of such abortion or miscarriage must be available and utilized if there is any clearly visible evidence of viability.

§ 18.2-74.1. Abortion, etc., when necessary to save life of woman.

To save the life of a woman, abortion is legal subject only to the opinion of the physician so performing the abortion or causing the miscarriage.

§ 18.2-75. Conscience clause. No hospital or physician is required to host or perform an abortion and no person is required to assist. Such persons are protected against any recrimination.

§ 18.2-76. Informed written consent required. The physician or nurse practitioner “shall obtain the informed written consent of the pregnant woman.”

However, if the woman has been adjudicated incapacitated by any court of competent jurisdiction or if the physician or, … the nurse practitioner … knows or has good reason to believe that such woman is incapacitated …, then only after permission is given in writing by a parent, guardian, committee, or other person standing in loco parentis to the woman…. may the abortion, induction or termination be performed.

§ 18.2-76.1. Encouraging or promoting abortion.  

If any person, by publication, lecture, advertisement, or by the sale or circulation of any publication, or through the use of a referral agency for profit, or in any other manner, encourage or promote the performing of an abortion or the inducing of a miscarriage in this Commonwealth which is prohibited under this article, he shall be guilty of a Class 3 misdemeanor.

Omissions in the laws. First

, and perhaps most obviously, Virginia law does not address abortifacients. Abortifacient drugs are both legal and toxic, and to be safe they must be taken under medical supervision. More than half of the pregnancy terminations in the United States are through use of abortifacient drugs.

Other than those basic facts, abortifacients, starting with the definition of the term, are very controversial.

The most popular abortion pill, mifepristone, is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for abortion use and, though a prescription drug, is commonly sent through the mail.

One of the warnings on the label of mifepristone is:

You should get mifepristone only from a certified doctor and use this medication only while under the care of a doctor. You should not buy mifepristone from other sources, such as the Internet, because you would bypass important safeguards to protect your health. Do not let anyone else take your medication.

Virginia law, very careful to protect the mother in other abortions, takes no position on abortifacients.

Second, Virginia law makes no reference to the father of the child, even when the woman is incapacitated under the informed written consent requirements.

Third, § 18.2-74. governing late term abortions makes them legal if they are done to prevent “substantial and irremediable impair(ment) of the mental or physical health of the woman.”

That same law requires neither a psychiatrist nor a psychologist to be a member of the panel that makes a mental health diagnosis.

Bottom line. Above is a summary and the link to how Virginia law on abortion currently reads.

In its current form, though there has been some back and forth, nearly all of it has been there with only technical corrections since 1975.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

32 responses to “Virginia’s Abortion Laws”

  1. Fred Costello Avatar
    Fred Costello

    The word “abortion” sanitizes a process. DNA science proves that the human fetus, even the human embryo, is a human being, not part of the mother or father; therefore, science shows that abortion kills a human being. The word “abortion” distracts us from the fact that the process kills a human being, a human being who has done no wrong.

    1. Virginia Gentleman Avatar
      Virginia Gentleman

      Thanks for sharing your opinion as fact so emphatically.

    2. Teddy007 Avatar
      Teddy007

      But does “science” show why the state should be able to punish a woman for a contraception failure by forcing the woman to carry an unwanted pregnancy to term.

      In the end, pro-life is really about controlling and punishing women for having sex with the wrong man.

      1. DJRippert Avatar
        DJRippert

        Pro-life is about enforcing the murder statutes. Does anybody question that a new mother killing a one month old baby is murder – whether the baby is a product of “having sex with the wrong man” or not?

        What’s the difference between killing a baby one month after birth and performing an abortion one month before birth?

        It all depends when you believe life begins.

        It has nothing to do with how that life began.

        1. Teddy007 Avatar
          Teddy007

          Since the fetus cannot live outside the womb for the first 20 weeks or so, it is not murder unless one wants to twist the definiton of murder to punish women for having sex with the wrong. man.

          the baby one month after birth is alive independent of the mothers and all through history, many children were alive after their mother died in child birth. However, if one really wants to punish women for being sluts, then life begins a conception, women should be denied most forms of birth control and emergency contraception, and IVF must be allowed. If one believes that women are nothing more than a uterus with feet, then keep punishing the draconian belief that all abortion needs to be ban because women need to be punished.

  2. Joe Jeeva Abbate Avatar
    Joe Jeeva Abbate

    Research data shows mifepristone is even safer than some common, low-risk prescription drugs, including penicillin and Viagra. There were five deaths associated with mifepristone use for every 1 million people in the US who have used the drug since its approval in 2000, according to the US Food and Drug Administration as of last summer. That’s a death rate of 0.0005%.

    Comparatively, the risk of death by penicillin — a common antibiotic used to treat bacterial infections like pneumonia — is four times greater than it is for mifepristone, according to a study on life-threatening allergic reactions. Risk of death by taking Viagra — used to treat erectile dysfunction — is nearly 10 times greater, according to a study cited in the amicus brief filed by the FDA.

    What is the reason that the government should regulate a legitimate medical procedure that a woman would choose for herself? The best reason would be to keep a women safe and provide a safe procedure.

    This medical procedure is described as “… a procedure that ends an undesired pregnancy by removing the fetus and placenta from the mother’s womb (uterus).”

    Also, the photo that accompanies this posting infers that abortions are terminating babies, when the reality is that the vast majority of abortions are removing unformed cells or incomplete material.

    Another perspective on this sensitive issue, is that the Bible notes that a forming fetus is not a human being. Many people think that a human being is created at the time of conception, but this belief is not supported by the Bible. The fact that a living sperm penetrates a living ovum resulting in the formation of a living fetus does not mean that the fetus is a living human being. According to the bible, a fetus is not a living person with a soul until after drawing its first breath.

    After God formed man in Genesis 2:7, He “breathed into his nostrils the breath of life and it was then that the man became a living being”. Although the man was fully formed by God in all respects, he was not a living being until after taking his first breath.

    I am not an expert on this matter, but I personally chose to support my wife in her pregnancy 39 years ago and have a wonderful son from our marriage. But I would be reluctant to impose my choice on every woman, whom I believe have the right to choose.

    Thank you for the opportunity for this discussion,

    1. vicnicholls Avatar
      vicnicholls

      “There were five deaths associated with mifepristone use” – those stats don’t include the baby killed does it?

    2. vicnicholls Avatar
      vicnicholls

      “What is the reason that the government should regulate a legitimate medical procedure that a woman would choose for herself?” because we believe that murder is wrong.

    3. DJRippert Avatar
      DJRippert

      While I disagree with your interpretation of the bible I appreciate your calm and logical argument in what is too often a hugely emotional debate.

    4. vicnicholls Avatar
      vicnicholls

      Amazing how you left out Jeremiah 1:5.

      1. Joe Jeeva Abbate Avatar
        Joe Jeeva Abbate

        You make a good point. In the bible, Jeremiah 1:5 God says, “Before I formed you in the womb, I knew you; before you were born, I sanctified you; and I ordained you a prophet to the nations.” . Before we were formed in the womb and before we were born, we were Spirit, as we are before birth and after death…but this does not appear to me to clarify the question about when life comes to a human body. Can you proved some perspective on this? Thank you.

    5. Nathan Avatar

      Appreciate hearing your perspective, but the Bible should not be the basis for state law on abortion (for or against).

  3. DJRippert Avatar
    DJRippert

    When does life begin? Conception? Birth? Somewhere in-between?

    However you answer that question dictates how you view abortion.

    Unfortunately, there is no scientifically certain answer to that question and there will probably never be such a scientific answer.

    So, society has to make up rules.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Okay, definitely no sense of humor, Carol. Every retiree knows that’s the answer to when life begins.

      How about serious answers then, apparently life begins when the meddlesome busybodies of soiety insert themselves in to the maternal process.

      Or, life begins when the peanut can be removed from the uterus, hooked up to life support, and complete term as a ward of the state. Until then, it’s a parasitic growth.

    2. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Okay, definitely no sense of humor, Carol. He asked when life begins. Life has many definitions. Every retiree knows that what I gave is the answer to when real life begins.

      Are we alive? Dreams of a blue turle and all that rot, eh?

      How about serious answers then, apparently life begins when the meddlesome busybodies of society insert themselves in to the maternal process. The problem with society making the rules is that it won’t be a compromise. It will be the dictate of the extreme.

      Or, how about this, life begins when the peanut can be removed from the uterus, hooked up to life support, and complete term as a ward of the state? Until then, it’s a parasitic growth and none of anybody’s business.

      1. DJRippert Avatar
        DJRippert

        Society has determined that terminating a life after it has begun is (with very few exceptions) murder. Murder is not an individual decision. The murder statutes apply to everybody. So, at some point along the gestational process the killing of a fetus goes from “a woman’s choice” to murder.

        When is that point?

        That’s the question.

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          “(with very few exceptions)”

          Yep, and one of them will be…. C’mon, you can say it.

          “Murder is not an individual decision.”

          You’re right! That guy in Allen, TX had the assistance of the Republican House, Senate, and White House in February, 2017.

          1. DJRippert Avatar
            DJRippert

            The few exceptions are in war, self-defense, capital punishment, etc.

            I should have probably written, “the definition of murder is not an individual decision”.

            Do you believe that a mother killing a one month old baby is guilty of murder? This is a simple “yes” or “no” question.

            Do you believe that aborting a fetus in the eighth month of pregnancy is murder? Again, a “yes” or “no” question.

            When do you believe life begins?

          2. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            War, self-defense, … and if necessary, abortion.

            You mean a 10-month old fetus “ex-utero”?

            No.

            An 8-month in uterus?

            No.

            Well, for us, it was when the daughter moved out and the dog died.

            Not sure it ever begins for anyone else. Dunno. 14 billion years ago?

          3. WayneS Avatar

            Wait. You do not think a mother who kills her one-month old baby is guilty of murder? Really?

          4. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Oops.

            Until it is born, i.e., removed from the womb, it’s a woman’s health issue.

          5. WayneS Avatar

            That’s what I thought. Thank you for the clarification.

          6. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Well, just the once at 2AM on the third or fouth sleepless night… a fleeting thought… followed immediately with self-recriminations that went for weeks. But, it explained why sleep deprivation is a CIA technique.

          7. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Well, just the once at 2AM on the third or fouth sleepless night… a fleeting thought… followed immediately with self-recriminations that went for weeks. But, it explained why sleep deprivation is a CIA technique.

  4. DJRippert Avatar
    DJRippert

    My admittedly limited understanding is that mifepristone can be effectively and safely be used up to 12 weeks after conception. My further understanding is that current Virginia law allows for abortions (for any reason or no reason at all) up to the end of the second trimester (26 weeks). Hence, mifepristone is not at issue under existing Virginia law.

    I am happy to be told where I am in error with my understanding.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      Yet. How about this then? Viagra is illegal is some states and Cialis not, and vice versa. If Viagra doesn’t work for you and you live in a Cialis state, well, too bad.

      Or maybe, one type of chemo is illegal in some states?

      1. DJRippert Avatar
        DJRippert

        Viagra, Cialis and chemo aren’t designed with the intent to end a pregnancy. There is no way those products can be used for intentional murder.

        If one believes that life starts at conception, then mifepristone is an instrument of murder just like a knife would be an instrument of murder if used to stab a two year old to death.

  5. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Sure, abortion right up to birth is fine, ‘cause every woman wants to carry a fetus for 8.99 months and then say, “I’ve changed my mind!”

    Why don’t you research 3rd trimester abortion reasons?

  6. Lefty665 Avatar
    Lefty665

    All in all seems pretty reasonable. Decidedly Roeish.

  7. William Chambliss Avatar
    William Chambliss

    If since 1975, then post-Roe. Also, it may not be a state law issue regarding the use of FDA approved medications.

  8. Nathan Avatar

    I find it very sad that the vast majority of those lamenting the overturning of Roe v Wade and seeking legislation to “restore the protections that were in place prior to the Court’s decision,” have no understanding whatsoever about what Roe v Wade said.

    Roe v Wade findings from Findlaw.com

    During a pregnant person’s first trimester, the Court held, a state cannot regulate abortion beyond requiring that the procedure be performed by a licensed doctor in medically safe conditions.

    During the second trimester, the Court held that a state may regulate abortion if the regulations are reasonably related to the health of the pregnant person.

    During the third trimester of pregnancy, the state’s interest in protecting the potential human life outweighs the right to privacy. As a result, the state may prohibit abortions unless an abortion is necessary to save the life or health of the pregnant person.

    https://supreme.findlaw.com/supreme-court-insights/roe-v–wade-case-summary–what-you-need-to-know.html

  9. killerhertz Avatar
    killerhertz

    TL/DR. We never should have given women the right to vote.

Leave a Reply