Virginia’s a Frequent Battleground in the Expanding Culture War

by Nelson Fegley

To discuss this subject properly we first need to define the phrase “Culture War.” With the help of Wikipedia, it may be described as “a cultural conflict between different social groups to impose their own virtues, beliefs and practices over society. Culture wars often delve around wedge issues, often based on values, morality and lifestyle.” Other terms often used in discussing these values include: diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI), and in the corporate world: environmental, social, and governance (ESG). The social part of ESG is often taken to mean involvement of DEI. 

Why is it important to consider this issue? The phrase “Culture Wars” was coined by James Davison Hunter, a prominent educator at the University of Virginia. In his book on this subject he describes a battle for control of American culture and social institutions pitting conservative religious groups against opposing politically progressive counterparts. The progressive movement has adopted far left concepts of identity politics which are changing our society in ways that are anathema to conservatives who are concerned about the future of our democracy. The conflict in values and practices between these two groups will be major issues in the 2024 presidential election. More about this below.

Virginia has significant constituencies on both sides of this polarized political spectrum. Progressives are dominant in the highly populated northern counties. Critical Race Theory (systemic racism) became the recent hot button issue when parents discovered its use in the Loudoun County schools and confronted the school board. The issue received national exposure when the FBI was reportedly directed to monitor the parents’ activities. CRT is typically embedded in the normal activity of class instruction, and therefore difficult to recognize. In this regard, the Loudoun parents were exceptional. The publicity accorded this case alerted the residents of the state and likely contributed to Glenn Youngkin’s winning the gubernatorial election. While the citizens in Virginia’s northern suburbs tend to support progressive issues, much of the rural parts of the state tend to be politically more conservative. When my wife and I moved to Bumpass from New Hampshire in 2020, the many signs on front lawns and on the shores of Lake Anna clearly showed strong support for Trump (2020 election) and disdain for Biden.

Freedom of speech has recently become a much-discussed part of the Culture Wars, with pro-Palestinian demonstrations erupting on many college campuses. Three college presidents testified before Congress regarding their policies on allowing speech on campus. The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE) has generated ratings for colleges regarding climate for free speech. As you might expect, Harvard came in last at #248, and the U. of Pennsylvania at #247. To my surprise, UVa was rated #6, and Va Tech #160. I graduated from Va Tech in 1962, and at that time free speech on campus was not an issue. I received a graduate degree from the U. of Pennsylvania in 1964, and there also speech was not an issue. A lot can change in 60 years.

What the heck has been going on?  Our slide into “wokeness” has been studied by many in academia and the think tanks. Among the best of these scholars is Christopher Rufo, a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute. I highly recommend his book: America’s Cultural Revolution. It is a major source of information for this column. America’s cultural revolution began in the late 1960’s, as we endured student uprisings, urban riots, and revolutionary violence. The capture of America’s institutions, however, was so gradual and bureaucratic that it escaped public notice until the protests following the death of George Floyd. DEI has been created to enforce the new orthodoxy across public and private bureaucracies. The ultimate goal is to replace individual rights with group identity-based rights, enact a scheme of race-based wealth redistribution, and suppress speech. 

In the early 1970s Herbert Marcuse, a far-left politician who had earlier migrated from Germany, noted that the far-left political violence had been defeated by law enforcement. He thus recommended returning to the universities and rebuilding the Marxist-inspired revolution. Eventually the students would take the theoretical knowledge (“critical theories”) and spread it by contagion through society. They introduced the concepts: ”institutional racism,” “white supremacy,” “white privilege,” “male supremacy,” “institutional sexism,” “cultural identity,” “corporate greed,” etc. The “critical theory revolution” has been almost invisible due to the slow, steady way in which it was introduced. In 1977, a group of black lesbian activists invented the tern “identity politics.” This new revolution within the institutions has been absorbed into the legislative agenda of the Democratic Party.

The extension of this ideology to K-12 school systems in many parts of the nation was accomplished with the help of a Brazilian Marxist, Paulo Freire. His book Pedagogy of the Oppressed is widely used to help design the curricula in U.S. public school systems. It involves a system where the U.S. is first framed as an oppressive society. The students are then separated into “oppressor” and “oppressed” groups, then transformed into activists for antiracism. It is this process that the astute parents in Loudoun County recognized.

There is much more to say on this subject, but I think the above information clarifies why the 2024 presidential election is so important. On the one side we may well have a candidate who thrives on chaos – someone who I believe will have difficulty attracting the kind of people he needs to govern effectively. On the other side may be a candidate who is mentally impaired and surrounded by people who embrace the “woke” ideology described above. Let’s hope we are offered better choices than these. But in any case, for the sake of our democracy this is a really important election.

Nelson Fegley is a retired mechanical engineer who lives in Bumpass.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

44 responses to “Virginia’s a Frequent Battleground in the Expanding Culture War”

  1. LarrytheG Avatar

    What’s interesting is the idea that Trump is a Republican that Conservatives vote for over the alternatives.

    And yep, Lake Anna is a hotbed of Trumpsters!

  2. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    When I read that Christopher Rufo was the chief source of information for this article, I quit reading. Rufo is a clever propagandist. He has stated clearly that his goal is to take a term “critical race theory” which has negative connotations for many people and have it cover a wide range of things that conservatives oppose. Regarding that “critical race theory,” he said ,”
    We have decodified the term and will recodify it to annex the entire range of cultural constructions that are unpopular with Americans.” Some “scholar”. https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2021/06/19/critical-race-theory-rufo-republicans/

    1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
      James Wyatt Whitehead

      I wonder if the men of the 1st Minnesota would still make the charge that saved the union at Gettysburg? Out of 250 men, only 47 survived the gallant rush. 5 color bearers were cut down.
      https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/80fc4cf2207d696470c9ae31174f7e8a161ec0797a74be9d34af44dff224f6ff.jpg

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        On the other hand, if they’d had the new flag, the Confederates would have been confused.

        1. “Good Lord, General! I think we’re being attacked by a bunch of bad graphics designers!”

          1. Stephen Haner Avatar
            Stephen Haner

            A moment of high drama that July day, but the war was over, the outcome inevitable, when the fools fired on Sumpter and gave Lincoln what he needed to rally the nation to crush them. William and Mary’s alum Winfield Scott wrote the plan.

          2. Stephen Haner Avatar
            Stephen Haner

            A moment of high drama that July day, but the war was over, the outcome inevitable, when the fools fired on Sumpter and gave Lincoln what he needed to rally the nation to crush them. William and Mary’s alum Winfield Scott wrote the plan.

          3. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
            James Wyatt Whitehead

            Virginia’s flag is next. You watch. Devon Henry will bring his crane in for that one. Hard to believe that guy cashed in on the Arlington Monument too.

          4. Virginia’s flag is next.

            I hope you are wrong.

            We do have the advantage that Virginia’s flag is not racist and cannot in any way be construed to be racist – at least not by anyone with even a modicum of sanity and/or intelligence.

            Violent? Perhaps. But not racist.

          5. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
            James Wyatt Whitehead

            Virginia never had a state flag until the state seceded in April of 1861. The state seal was then adopted as the state flag. So the flag is conceived in the sin of secession. I am rather shocked the lefties in Virginia have not seized on this. Shows how little they know of our state’s history and culture.

          6. LarrytheG Avatar

            trying to figure out what “death to all tyrants” has to do with succession… is that some kind of finger-in-the-eye thing to the Federals?

          7. First, Sic Semper Tyrannus translates as “Thus Always to Tyrants”, not “Death to Tyrants”.

            Second, are you sure the tyrant on our flag is dead, or is he simply defeated?

            Third, it was a “finger-in-the-eye” to all tyrants. I guess “the Federals” would have had to decide for themselves whether they fit the definition.

            PS – I recommend you monitor your auto-correct carefully – the word is ‘secession’, not ‘succession’.

          8. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
            James Wyatt Whitehead

            You can see the last flag to fly over the capital in the state house museum. Great story of how a flag from 1865 found its way home.
            https://www.scvvirginia.org/1861-virginia

          9. Thanks!

          10. LarrytheG Avatar

            I stand corrected and will try to remember proper grammar.

            Is there an interesting story as to how that phrase got on the Va Flag.

          11. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
            James Wyatt Whitehead

            On July 5th, 1776, Richard Henry Lee, George Wythe, George Mason, and Robert Carter Nicolas presented the seal of Virginia to new government for approval. The design and Latin phrase were conceived in just 4 days. I can’t think of a better list of Revolutionary Virginians to come up with something to capture the spirit of those times.

          12. Matt Adams Avatar

            Well now you’ve really gone and done invoked the trifecta of removal. Lee, Virginia & History.

          13. I don’t think so. I’m pretty sure they simply put the State Seal on a blue background to make the flag so Virginia’s Units would have something to carry into battle.

            The Seal and motto had been around more or less unchanged since 1776.

            Also, on one of the early versions of the flag it is quite clear that the tyrant is not dead, but defeated. It’s a little more ambiguous on the modern seal, but I still interpret it as defeating tyrants, not necessarily killing them.

            https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/fa237bfcb3e29a7bb978a5f59febca108031bf2c644726e0e7eadaa3c931460b.png

          14. Shhhh! No sense in letting them know now…

            😎

            PS – As you know, the State Seal and “Sic Semper Tyrannus” motto pre-dated the Civil War, so they were not conceived in secession. I think maybe we can defend it!

          15. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
            James Wyatt Whitehead

            The left doesn’t care. They hate us. Attacking history is one way to jab us. Eventually a thousand paper cuts will bleed you out.

          16. how_it_works Avatar
            how_it_works

            Virginia’s (and several other states) flag has been derisively described as a “seal on a bedsheet”.

          17. how_it_works Avatar
            how_it_works

            Virginia’s (and several other states) flag has been derisively described as a “seal on a bedsheet”.

    2. Mark O Flaherty Avatar
      Mark O Flaherty

      How?

      1. It could be raining…

  3. Stephen Haner Avatar
    Stephen Haner

    “Let’s hope we are offered better choices than these.”

    He buried the lede.

    1. Perhaps an independent third party Manchin/Haley (or vice-versa) ticket?

  4. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    When I read that Christopher Rufo was the chief source of information for this article, I quit reading. Rufo is a clever propagandist. He has stated clearly that his goal is to take a term “critical race theory” which has negative connotations for many people and have it cover a wide range of things that conservatives oppose. Regarding that “critical race theory,” he said ,”
    We have decodified the term and will recodify it to annex the entire range of cultural constructions that are unpopular with Americans.” Some “scholar”. https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2021/06/19/critical-race-theory-rufo-republicans/

    1. That’s good. You oppose people knowingly misrepresenting facts related to an issue for political reasons.

      On a peripherally related note:

      https://www.factcheck.org/2022/02/biden-repeats-false-claims-at-gun-violence-meeting/

      https://reason.com/2022/09/28/president-biden-lies-about-guns-again/

      https://www.cnn.com/2023/06/21/politics/fact-check-biden-guns-africa/index.html

      Repeating the same lies over and over, all the while knowing they are lies.

    2. Eric the half a troll Avatar
      Eric the half a troll

      “When I read that Christopher Rufo was the chief source of information for this article, I quit reading”

      Didn’t miss much.

    3. That’s good. You oppose people knowingly misrepresenting facts related to an issue for political reasons.

      On a peripherally related note:

      https://www.factcheck.org/2022/02/biden-repeats-false-claims-at-gun-violence-meeting/

      https://reason.com/2022/09/28/president-biden-lies-about-guns-again/

      https://www.cnn.com/2023/06/21/politics/fact-check-biden-guns-africa/index.html

      Repeating the same lies over and over, all the while knowing they are lies.

      1. There’s considerable doubt that Demented Joe Bribem actually knows much of anything, and certainty that much of what he does “know” is not so.

        Never forget Obama’s observation that it is hard to overestimate Joe’s ability to **** things up; and Will Rogers comment about a politician that what he doesn’t know used to bother me, but here lately it’s what he knows for sure that just ain’t so that scares the hell out of me. Joe’s not quite old enough to be the subject of Rogers comment, but he’s close.

      2. There’s considerable doubt that Demented Joe Bribem actually knows much of anything, and certainty that much of what he does “know” is not so.

        Never forget Obama’s observation that it is hard to overestimate Joe’s ability to **** things up; and Will Rogers comment about a politician that what he doesn’t know used to bother me, but here lately it’s what he knows for sure that just ain’t so that scares the hell out of me. Joe’s not quite old enough to be the subject of Rogers comment, but he’s close.

      3. There’s considerable doubt that Demented Joe Bribem actually knows much of anything, and certainty that much of what he does “know” is not so.

        Never forget Obama’s observation that it is hard to overestimate Joe’s ability to **** things up; and Will Rogers comment about a politician that what he doesn’t know used to bother me, but here lately it’s what he knows for sure that just ain’t so that scares the hell out of me. Joe’s not quite old enough to be the subject of Rogers comment, but he’s close.

        1. You are correct, of course.

          But Mr. Biden is not the only one who repeats these “incorrect” statements and “facts”. Virtually every “gun safety” organization in the country does so on a daily basis. Even their use of the terms “gun safety” and “gun violence” are misrepresentations.

          And I have yet to see Mr. Hall-Sizemore criticize any of these intentionally misleading statements or say anything like: “When I saw that [fill in the name of and anti-gun organization] was the chief source of information for this article, I quit reading”.

        2. You are correct, of course.

          But Mr. Biden is not the only one who repeats these “incorrect” statements and “facts”. Virtually every “gun safety” organization in the country does so on a daily basis. Even their use of the terms “gun safety” and “gun violence” are misrepresentations.

          And I have yet to see Mr. Hall-Sizemore criticize any of these intentionally misleading statements or say anything like: “When I saw that [fill in the name of an anti-gun organization] was the chief source of information for this article, I quit reading”.

          1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
            Dick Hall-Sizemore

            I don’t know enough about guns to comment on these claims.

      4. Not Today Avatar

        None of this validates the misogyny, racism and bigotry of Chris Rufo. Peripheral is right. Lie down with dogs…

      1. On the plus side, he is honest about what he is doing. Which is unlike the majority of people and organizations who make their livings trying to manipulate public opinion and government policy.

      2. It’s villainous to get facts into the public arena to precipitate change one believes is beneficial?

        That’s what everyone on the lest does each and every day. That’s where he learned how it’s done.

    4. “When I read that Christopher Rufo was the chief source of information for this article, I quit reading.”

      If you exclude scholars with a different perspective, you often miss the opportunity to be exposed to facts and arguments that might better inform you on a given topic.

      Christopher Rufo does on a small scale what the left has been doing for years on a large scale.

      Every article by every author is imperfect. It’s part of the human condition. That can only be overcome by reading widely.

      That’s why I read and appreciate your articles. Should I stop doing that because I have found errors and omissions in them, and find them to contain propaganda?

  5. I always wonder why a government official, whose most prominent asset is stopping progress, is referred to as progressive

Leave a Reply