Virginians’ Money and Our Tax-Exempt “Public Charity” Healthcare Monopolies

The Business of Healthcare

by James C. Sherlock

A generally accepted rule of thumb for the minimum profitability required for a hospital to maintain operations and fund its future is 3%.

Virginia’s community hospitals as a group in 2019 had an operating margin of 10%. Most of them are filed with federal and state governments as not-for-profit public charities and are untaxed at any level of government.

I yesterday wrote a  column that disclosed 34% increases in the 2019 profitability of Virginia hospitals that were generated by taxpayer funds sent directly to the hospitals through Medicaid expansion and increases in Medicaid payments passed by the General Assembly in 2018.

There were several good reasons for Medicaid expansion. Better access for the poor. Financial stability for rural hospitals. I was for Medicaid expansion myself, and Republican votes put it over the top.

I am not sure why the General Assembly also had to raise Medicaid payments simultaneously except that the hospitals wanted the money.

Using taxpayer money to make Virginia’s regional urban/suburban monopoly health systems richer than they already were was not among the good reasons for Medicaid expansion and payments increases.

They hit three home runs — more paid patients, fewer unpaid patients, and higher reimbursements for each Medicaid patient. Doesn’t get any better than that. All without lifting a finger if you discount the political contributions.

Readers of yesterday’s column indicated that they thought there was no way to recover the excess profits that their tax money has funded because those multi-billion dollar non-profits are tax exempt.

I disagree on a couple of levels — taxes and payments in lieu of taxes.

Background

The federal Revenue Act of 1954 established the modern tax code, including section 501(c) for exempt organizations.

When that law was passed in the heart of the post-war industrial boom, non-profit educational and medical (ed and med) corporations simply did not play the same outsized role they do in a modern economy.

We still have the basic 1954 tax rules for exempt organizations not only in the federal tax code but, by reference to that code, in Virginia’s.

Over the last 50 or so years, ed and med nonprofits have grown in size and importance in the economies of many areas of America.

During that same period manufacturing has disappeared and development has moved to the suburbs, leaving much of the best land in some cities and counties off the property tax rolls. Richmond is an example. So are Roanoke, Norfolk, Portsmouth, Harrisonburg, and others.

In 1972, Virginia passed the Certificate of Public Need law.

Together, the tax exemptions and COPN’s granting of regional healthcare monopolies to non-profits laid the foundations for the creation with taxpayer money of the highly profitable, untaxed economic and political powerhouses we have today.

Now the Governor and many in the General Assembly tremble before them on healthcare business issues. And take their money.

What can be done?

Taxes. Let’s see how Virginian’s might get a little of that largesse back.

Charity property tax exemptions, currently protected by the Virginia Constitution, are subject to definitions by the General Assembly of what constitutes a charity. The Constitution itself doesn’t define the term.

Code of Virginia § 64.2-701 offers the following definitions:

“Charitable organization” means (i) a person, other than an individual, organized and operated exclusively for charitable purposes or (ii) a government or governmental subdivision, agency, or instrumentality, to the extent that it holds funds exclusively for a charitable purpose.

“Charitable purpose” means the relief of poverty, the advancement of education or religion, the promotion of health, a municipal or other governmental purpose, or another purpose the achievement of which is beneficial to the community.

Virginia corporate and sales tax exemptions for charities do not appear to be protected by the Virginia Constitution. If not, the exemptions can then be made subject to caps.

Or the simple definition standards in Virginia law above can be applied.

Readers will point out that the chances of the General Assembly passing and the Governor signing legislation to alter the tax status of the non-profit hospitals approaches zero.

I agree with them.

Payments in Lieu of Taxes. Major non-profit and state-owned hospitals and educational institutions, like federal facilities, create big holes in many urban government property tax bases. Especially when the economic benefits including the highest paid employees and their taxes go to the suburbs. And the services to the hospitals — police, fire, rescue, waste management, etc. — are provided by the cities and towns.

Under Public Law 94-565, enacted in 1976, the federal government makes impact payments to make up for some property tax losses.

Even if Virginia’s major non-profit businesses are not taxed directly, cities and counties disproportionately affected by the resulting holes in their property tax receipts can pursue the non-profit business giants for payments in lieu of taxes.
That has been done successfully in other states. Some Virginia municipalities may have those arrangements already.

You might ask why the big, powerful non-profits would make such payments since they own and operate the General Assembly.

Easy answer – risk management.

Cities in other states have gone to court to challenge the charitable status of the non-profit hospital corporations when they were turned down, Pittsburgh most famously suing giant medical non-profit UPMC.

Payments in lieu of taxes must be negotiated to avoid the courts, but the hospitals have several compelling reasons to settle. They include:

  • Do these multi-billion dollar corporations want to go to court and prove that they meet the Code of Virginia definitions of charitable organizations? They clearly don’t.
  • They might win on a claim that they meet the federal 501c standards to which Virginia law currently refers for tax purposes, but they might not. Neither the IRS nor Virginia enforces those standards but a court might.
  • Such a suit would roil the political waters in a big way here in Virginia by exposing a lot of things that most Virginians know nothing about and won’t like when they find out. Are minorities disproportionately affected by the business practices and profits of the hospitals? Why is the health of minorities and the poor so bad in Sentara’s Hampton Roads? Do the non-profit hospital corporations want to find out?
  • The payments would not approach in scale the total tax bill that would owed if a hospital system lost its charitable status in a court decision. Some of for-profit HCA’s hospitals in Virginia pay north of $50 million a year in taxes. Each.
  • The woke press, which often lets them alone because of the non-profit mystique, is unlikely to give them a pass on this. Struggling cities. Rich executives. Poor people. A racial angle. Pulitzer material.

So on a risk-reward basis, the hospitals are likely to pay up.

We see this payments arrangement increasingly used in Pennsylvania, California and at least 16 other states.

It is a potential avenue in this now-blue state to fund some of our struggling local governments after the blue federal government exhausts its multi-trillion dollar splurges.

And it is a way to transfer some of the citizens’ money from the hospitals to the local governments that host them to mute property tax rate increases for the rest of us.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

18 responses to “Virginians’ Money and Our Tax-Exempt “Public Charity” Healthcare Monopolies”

  1. Stephen Haner Avatar
    Stephen Haner

    I’ve got way better things to do with my evening other than pick this apart. Maybe in the AM, but I will say this: Using the tax code as means of punishment or preventing excess revenue is not something I consider good policy or a conservative approach. Yeah, you really dislike these people, I get it. We ALLLLL get it.

  2. John Martin Avatar
    John Martin

    medicare for all………..it is the only thing that makes sense

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      He says laughingly.

      1. John Martin Avatar
        John Martin

        I wasn’t laughing a bit. Someday, when we smarteen the hell up, it will be true

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          We can’t smarten up. We haven’t yet.

  3. Stephen Haner Avatar
    Stephen Haner

    I’ve got way better things to do with my evening other than pick this apart. Maybe in the AM, but I will say this: Using the tax code as means of punishment or preventing excess revenue is not something I consider good policy or a conservative approach. Yeah, you really dislike these people, I get it. We ALLLLL get it.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      So, a minimum wage increase is preferable to the EIC?

      Ya know, we could nationalize the military hospital system. Wait, no. I guess not.

    2. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      Yes, funneling public money to private interests without public value bothers me. It should bother ALLLLL of us.

      1. Stephen Haner Avatar
        Stephen Haner

        The massive and growing concentration of wealth and power in the non-profit sector is not unique to hospitals. It often involves “public money.” It is not unique to Virginia. It is best addressed in Congress (shudder) because I’m going to stand firm that the state should not try to just blow off and de-conform from the 501(c) designations. Virginia already de-conforms too damn much.

        PILOT to compensate local governments for lost property tax revenue is possible already. That is up to local governments to negotiate. If you want the GA to tighten up on property tax exemptions, which I agree can get spread out to widely, that’s a bill that I could endorse.

        You are glossing over a great deal of complexity. The Medicaid increases, as you recall, were officially financed by assessments (taxes) on the hospitals, a shell game wherein the money was used to capture federal matching funds at something like 9-1. Does the state actually keep the assessment or does that also circle back to the hospital as revenue? I don’t know. Looking at that spike in excess revenue, maybe it does.

        The reimbursement increases for providers — was that just for hospitals? Or are doctor practices (the few that remain independent) also seeing more profit on Medicaid patients? Again, that was the stated goal, because many docs refused to see Medicaid patients.

        I’m not disagreeing on the problem but your prescription. It is bigger than hospitals.

        1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
          James C. Sherlock

          The problem I have with the 501c regulations Steve is that they are not enforced by the IRS. That agency gets something north of 250,000 Forms 990 every year. Sentara’s 2018 return was 120 pages long. The 990’s go to the same office in Cincinnati that was made infamous by the turn downs of Tea Party associated non-profits a decade or so ago. There is not nearly enough staff there to review even the ones that their computers spit out as worthy of a look. Virginia could do it for the largest of Virginia-registered non-profits and share that info with the IRS, but does not appear to do so.

          By far the biggest Medicaid payment increases were for the hospitals, because they were something like 10% across the board. 10% of what the primary care physicians were getting was still not much. 10% of inpatient payments was real money.

          You are right about how the state and hospitals gamed Medicaid by having the hospitals pay a “tax” to offset the state’s 10% of the costs and keep the 90% that is federal money.

        2. James C. Sherlock Avatar
          James C. Sherlock

          You are right about the colleges, but I frankly don’t have enough information to comment on that issue. The large urban non-profit hospitals have a much more direct connection to all taxpayers wallets.

    3. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      Yes, funneling public money to private interests without public value bothers me. It should bother ALLLLL of us.

    4. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      So, a minimum wage increase is preferable to the EIC?

      Ya know, we could nationalize the military hospital system. Wait, no. I guess not.

  4. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    Generally, I agree that these large hospital companies should not be classified as non-profit. If it were possible to challenge that IRS classification, I am sure that HCA would have done so.

    Several comments:

    1. You argue that the hospitals realized increased Medicaid revenue “all without lifting a finger if you discount the political contributions”. That is not exactly correct. As part of the deal to expand Medicaid, hospitals agreed to a “tax” that would provide the revenue to pay the state’s portion of the expanded Medicaid costs. So, technically, those increased revenues were not realized totally with taxpayer money.

    2. It is true that the legislature can define what constitutes a charitable organization for income tax exemption purposes. Rather than set out exemptions individually, the legislature has chosen a blanket definition. Section 58.1-401, exempts from the Virginia corporate tax those corporations “exempt from income tax under the laws of the United States.” Therefore, the GA could exclude hospitals from that exemption. However, to treat one category of IRS tax-exempt organization differently would open a can of worms the GA would probably be extremely reluctant to do.

    3. As for taxation of property by local governments, the GA has taken a different approach. Instead of providing a blanket exemption for IRS tax exempt organization, the legislature has set out a series of categories and specific designations of organizations whose property is tax exempt. Hospitals do not seem to be included in those listings. Therefore, it seems that the property of hospitals is subject to local taxation. See Chapter 36 of Title 58.1 of the Code of Virginia (Sec. 58.1-3600 et seq.)

    1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      The state data on taxes paid by hospitals reflect the changes for the Medicaid “tax”.

      In 2017, Sentara’s twelve hospitals together paid a total of a little over a million dollars in taxes of all types. (source, Sentara consolidated financials). The public data available to citizens are not broken out by the type of taxes.

      In 2019, the first year of expanded Medicaid, Sentara Virginia Beach General alone reported $11.5 million in taxes, showing the effect we must assume of the Virginia Medicaid offset taxes they started paying to the state in 2019. To show the beneficial tradeoff, however, Virginia Beach General’s operating and total margins jumped from 8.3% in 2018 to 11.7% in 2019. (An HCA hospital of the same financial size as Beach General likely paid north of $50 million in taxes in 2019 as an example for comparison.)

      State incurred no extra Medicaid costs; hospitals got a windfall. Everybody won but we federal taxpayers.

      As for the GA changing the tax treatment of non-profit hospitals, you and I won’t live long enough I think.

    2. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      The state data on taxes paid by hospitals reflect the changes for the Medicaid “tax”.

      In 2017, Sentara’s twelve hospitals together paid a total of a little over a million dollars in taxes of all types. (source, Sentara consolidated financials). The public data available to citizens are not broken out by the type of taxes.

      In 2019, the first year of expanded Medicaid, Sentara Virginia Beach General alone reported $11.5 million in taxes, showing the effect we must assume of the Virginia Medicaid offset taxes they started paying to the state in 2019. To show the beneficial tradeoff, however, Virginia Beach General’s operating and total margins jumped from 8.3% in 2018 to 11.7% in 2019. (An HCA hospital of the same financial size as Beach General likely paid north of $50 million in taxes in 2019 as an example for comparison.)

      State incurred no extra Medicaid costs; hospitals got a windfall. Everybody won but we federal taxpayers.

      As for the GA changing the tax treatment of non-profit hospitals, you and I won’t live long enough I think.

    3. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      OTOH, it’s not like the industry isn’t excepted from corporate laws in other ways.

      It’s time for the Feds to say “Thank you” to the 50 labs of democracy, sit down, and decide once and for all what to do with Victor’s and Igor’s creation.

Leave a Reply