Virginia Traffic Congestion — Not as Bad as We Thought

Contrary to what Virginians have been telling themselves, we really don’t have the worst traffic congestion in the country. You have to go to the west coast to experience world-class gridlock. (Click for more legible image.)

by James A. Bacon

One of the arguments driving the transportation-funding debate this spring was the factoid that Northern Virginia is one of the most congested regions of the country, if not the most congested region. The genesis of this claim came from the 2012 Urban Mobility Report published by the Texas Transportation Institute (TTI), which declared that the Washington region experienced more hours of delay per automobile commuter, at a higher cost in time wasted and gasoline burned, than anywhere else in the country.

If the Washington region ranked No. 1 in congestion, then surely Northern Virginia, which, anecdotally speaking, has the worst congestion in the Washington region, must be the worst in the country!

But TTI is not the only organization that measures traffic congestion. So does Tom Tom, a company that makes GPS-guided route-finding system, whose millions of customers feed data into what may be the largest database of travel times on the globe. And it turns out that Tom Tom’s measures of congestion don’t match up especially well with TTI’s, which is based upon data provided by INRIX using an arguably less robust methodology.

According to Tom Tom’s data, the Washington region ranked 6th in delay per peak auto commuter in the United States, behind Los Angeles, Honolulu, San Francisco, Seattle and San Jose, just to name the American cities. (Tom Tom also tracks travel times in Canadian cities, but I have deducted them from the rankings in order to create an apples-to-apples comparison with the TTI report.)

Hampton Roads ranked 24th for congestion among U.S. regions in Tom Tom’s congestion index compared to 20th in TTI’s ranking.

Conversely, Richmond ranked 51st among U.S. regions, according to Tom Tom, higher than TTI’s 60 ranking. In other words, Richmond is more congested than the conventional wisdom would suggest… though still relatively congestion-free by the standards of Washington and Hampton Roads.

Why does this matter? It matters because business, civic and political leaders had worked themselves into a lather this past year over Virginia’s supposedly crippling levels of traffic congestion. Heart-rending travel-time delays were driving away corporate investment and devastating our economic competitiveness. Virginia’s atrocious transportation tax restructuring/increase plan is the result. But if you believe Tom Tom’s data — which is based upon real-time traffic flows unlike TTI’s sampling-based methodology — the problem is significantly less acute in Northern Virginia and Hampton Roads compared to other major metropolitan regions than we have been told.

(While congestion may be worse than commonly thought in Richmond, that’s a non-factor politically because traffic delays there still don’t rise to the level of being a serious problem.)

As an aside, U.S. traffic congestion is milder overall than it is in European cities. Among capital cities, Moscow, Paris, Rome, Stockholm, Berlin and London all have higher levels of travel-time delay than Washington. (I am pleased to report, however, that the bicycle-friendly cities of Amsterdam and Copenhagen have among the lowest congestion rates, with my new favorite city in the world, Barcelona, not far behind.) And, for what it’s worth, Australian and New Zealand cities would rank among the worst in the U.S.

Dawn of the digital city. Which brings us to a totally unrelated but very interesting point… Tom Tom is yet another example of the potentially disruptive influence of information technology on transportation. As the company states:

By helping drivers to find a faster route we can also demonstrate that the total available capacity on the road network increases. If a small percentage of drivers uses different (and faster) routes, congestion can be alleviated across the entire road network, thereby benefiting all drivers.

By offering a more accurate analysis of traffic flows, we help identify and pinpoint congestion trouble spots more effectively. And by routing traffic away from congested areas we can play a key role in easing congestion in cities and urban areas.

We are witnessing the dawn of the digital city. Tom Tom, Google and others can provide us data that can help us better manage traffic and better target our infrastructure improvements. The information is there. We simply need to develop the analytics — and the will — to use it effectively.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

24 responses to “Virginia Traffic Congestion — Not as Bad as We Thought”

  1. Breckinridge Avatar
    Breckinridge

    Oh. Only SIXTH worst in the whole US of A. Traffic really is worse in LA or NYC. Well then, never mind. I guess commuters and others in Northern Virignia didn’t know how well off they really were! They should just quittheirbitchin.

    Actually, Jim, I think this bolsters the case that doing nothing was a bad option. Given the different methods, I’m not surprised there was a different result. But the Tom Tom data hardly paints a rosy scenario. It sucks to be a commuter in Hampton Roads and Northern Virginia, and given housing prices, people will be driving long ways for a long time to come.

    Agreed, transportation funds poorly spent can do little or make things worse, but the right investments can make a positive difference. I still think the 2013 General Assembly did the right thing. And double agreed, the Tom Tom data can help decide how to spend it well.

  2. I totally agree, doing nothing was a bad option.

    Unfortunately, what we did is worse than doing nothing.

    Now that the money is flowing again, the chances of us changing how we allocate transportation dollars is unlikely to change. Why bother? The money is flowing. Problem solved…. Until 10 years from now, when we’ll hear the same cry all over again.

  3. WoodbridgeKid73 Avatar
    WoodbridgeKid73

    You don’t need to have these expensive studies to see the traffic issues in the Northern part of the Commonwealth.

    Just go to Google maps and click on the traffic view.

    All day Saturday there is a solid red line going South (the opposite direction the express lanes are running) from Springfield to Fredericksburg.

  4. DJRippert Avatar
    DJRippert

    I am struggling with the Tom Tom congestion index. Let’s say there are only two roads. One has almost no traffic and is never congested. Its Tom Tom congestion index is 0%.

    The second road has a lot of cars on it and travel time is twice as long during times of congestion as during times of free flow. It’s congestion index is 100%.

    What is the Tom Tom congestion index for our theoretical, two road city? 50% – because that’s the average of the two roads?

    If 1,000 people a day take the congested road and 100 people a day take the uncongested road, does this change the congestion index?

    Unless this index is weighted by the actual number of people in congestion I am not sure that it is useful.

  5. larryg Avatar

    If one was a true Libertarian instead of the plethora of FAUX wannabies these days, he/she would observe that not every trip has the same value at any time during a 24hr day yet that is how we rate congestion and make decisions on spending money to deal with it.

    and that’s a big problem because the guy spending an hour in traffic to buy the latest video game is not harmed as much as the doctor trying to get to a heart transplant operation.

    Our current transportation premise is that the roads are “free” to all to use per their own decided needs but then we get the bi-polar mentality that we can never spend too much money on trying supply that demand when “congestion” occurs.

    if you put a price on getting less congestion, how many are willing to pay?

    the various ways of measuring congestion in NoVa and other cities (national and international) is not world-shaking different. I is mostly at the “noise” level in the data when the top 10 just wiggle from one year or one different method to another.

    I’m surprised that DJ does not “share” his congestion experience that he has lots of when he travels to Paris and then China, etc.

    a REAL congestion index would be a composite index for the region and one in which you could model and from the model determine which prospective projects would deliver the most bang for the buck.

    Much of the stuff we build now just moves congestion from one place to the next bottleneck rather than actually reduce network congestion.

  6. larryg Avatar

    re: ” We are witnessing the dawn of the digital city. Tom Tom, Google and others can provide us data that can help us better manage traffic and better target our infrastructure improvements. The information is there. We simply need to develop the analytics — and the will — to use it effectively.”

    that very same data can tell YOU what you may want to do before anything else is done (which may be a long, long time).

    When you look at a Tom Tom or Garmin GPS and it tells you that your 50 mile commute is going to take 85 minutes – and it says that day after day and each year more minutes gets added – what is your response?

    but it actually brings up an every more compelling question AKA – Jim Bacon ROI style… everyone bitches about congestion – but let’s say you actually want to reduce that 85 minute trip to a more “reasonable” time.

    what time would you shoot for?

  7. Darrell Avatar

    I don’t shoot for time. I shoot for direction.

    1. larryg Avatar

      ha ha ha… so.. you go in whatever direction has the least congestion and best travel time?

      😉

      re: a plumber – I guess I’d think if a plumber was scheduling business appointments without regard to time, distance or rush hour that I’d not want his services either….

      but in a way this again points out the fact that :

      1. – not all trips have the same economic value but we treat them as if they do when we talk about congestion and the costs of congestion.

      2. – trips that DO have economic value are often more carefully and precisely planned – specifically to adapt to time, distance and congestion.

      for instance, you can bet that Fed Ex and UPS want to “right size” and “right time” their delivery routes even if they believe more road capacity is needed – their jobs is to deal in a cost-effective way with the “here and now” while others may literally be on fools errands… given the traffic conditions.

      Finally – you cannot “fix” congestion on city grid streets, certainly not the same way you’d approach the beltway and regional surface streets.

      How is congestion addressed in the city streets of Alexandria, Chicago, New York City?

      are you going to tear down buildings to widen streets? Only if you are Robert Moses!

      I’m taking a bit of a devil’s advocate approach here but seriously – how we actually measure and describe the specifics of “congestion” is pretty pitiful when most folks cannot even agree on what projects should have priority – other than the road they are having issues on.

      When I look at an air photo or satellite view of NoVa or Hampton Roads, and I try to think where you’d put new roads or even widen existing ones, I see no places to do it without tearing down property.

      The last road in NoVa to do this was the ICC – and that road cost 100 million dollars a mile – and has put the Maryland Transportation Agency in such a deep hole that they are facing decades of no money for anything…. unless they increase their gas tax 10-20 cents.

      The people of Maryland have paid big time for the ICC and the irony is that the Coalition for Smarter Growth fought that road for decades – essentially predicting what would happen.

      I’m of the belief that the era of “free roads” is over. From now on, most new roads but especially those that are expensive are going to be tolled and as the ICC demonstrates – just putting a toll on it does not guarantee that it won’t break your finances anyhow.

      If the State of Md actually tried to charge the tolls that would be required to pay off that road in 30-50 years – no one would use it.

      so you have to ask yourself this. If the purpose of the ICC was to relieve congestion – … what happened?

      1. larryg Avatar

        re: the ICC and NoVa. I’m aware that I have misplaced the ICC… but often view the entire Md/Dc/NoVa region as “NoVa”…. freudian slip, perhaps.

        and… I’d have to admit that the Fairfax and Prince William Parkways are relatively new roads that are heavily used and likely tore down properties to get built – but I do not think, are tolled.

  8. reed fawell III Avatar
    reed fawell III

    Anti-fragile is informative on these issues. How traffic analysis can often be useless, unintelligible, or wrong when tested against real experience.

    That’s often been my experience too. If a Virginia plumber can’t do work in Maryland because he can’t set an appointment time, then traffic is bad no the matter of some expert. Conversely, I’ve sat through hours of testimony on failed intersections only to have hired guys circle blocks for a week of rush hour traffic without having to wait though a single light cycle.

  9. reed fawell III Avatar
    reed fawell III

    correction; “no the matter what some expert says on the subject.”

  10. Darrell Avatar

    “ha ha ha… so.. you go in whatever direction has the least congestion and best travel time?”

    Direction matters not as long as you end up at the destination. I use a mental version of a computer router’s spanning tree protocol to navigate traffic. The longest path is a lot of times the shortest, depending on conditions. If you sit dead in congestion burning gas and time, you aren’t moving toward your end point, are you?

  11. larryg Avatar

    no…you’re right….. to a point… as you know…

    and the GPS units that have traffic and alternative route finding sound like just the ticket for that strategy.

    those familar with GPS units also know that they can be configured in their route finding to seek out shortage time or shortest distance with the shortest time set as the initial default.

    and of course the other big help is that the GPS will calculate your estimated arrival time for the route you have chosen.

    When we travel – we will use these functions when we approach an urbanized area – we’ll look at it from 50-100 miles out seeing what the time difference is between “going around” and “going through” (but you do have to do that quite some distance out – too late if you wait until 20 miles out).

    The absolute worst one in our experience – hands down – was transiting from North of Cincinnati to south of it. It was a total mess and our trust GPS could find us no joy.

    in terms of job commuting – my view is that choosing a home involves a series of other factors such as schools, crime, etc but it ALSO SHOULD include HOW you would get to work every day and if there are no options other than driving SOLO every day at rush hour – that’s a problematical choice – IMHO of course. Given the number of people who willingly choose to do that – who apparently do have jobs that do require good judgement when making decisions – this part seems totally out of whack.

    why would anyone willingly CHOOSE a commute that has no option other than driving SOLO at rush hour every day in the first place?

    and if you live in an area where there is congestion – then -like it or not – it does or should drive some of your decisions about what you do and when you do it.

    For instance, no one in their right mind is going to try to perform a non-work transit from say Richmond to Baltimore especially if they KNEW in Richmond that the time required would be half a day or longer.

    HOT Lanes will undoubtedly change that calculus – for the better – for the poor schmucks who just want to get past the Wash Metro area on their north/south destinations.

    What’s the economic value for someone headed to Florida to get tangled up Wash Metro rush hour? is it worth $5-10 to escape it? You bet your bippy it would be!

  12. Network management, anyone? Network operators manage their networks to maximize revenues, control costs and provide good service that retains customers. So are Virginia’s roads different?

    Verizon, Comcast, AT&T don’t build networks with unlimited capacity. Rather, they price usage at peak times at a premium and essentially give away capacity when the network is essentially idle. They also throttle excessive usage by limiting speeds to specific amounts and offer consumers more bandwidth for higher prices.

    VDOT or road users cannot afford to build roads that allow everyone who wants to arrive at the Potomac River bridges into D.C., Fort Belvoir, Tysons Corner, etc. at 9 am. Or leave for home at 5:30 pm. Further, in many locations, residents would not accept the massive infrastructure needed to serve peak demand.

    In selected, heavy demand locations, the Commonwealth needs to impose prices on the use of peak capacity. One price is simply allowing drivers to sit in traffic. Another would be the imposition of time-of-day prices on road use or parking. The market will react appropriately to price signals.

    1. reed fawell III Avatar
      reed fawell III

      There is truth is what you say for sure. But its also simplistic because it’s only one tool among many, some of which many bring far more advantage.

      Prime among these many is building holistic systems that create as many options with as many variables as possible, thus eliminating bottlenecks by building the reverse. And secondly by building smart communities that by their very nature take large amounts of traffic off the roads and disburse it by putting it on feet, rails, and two wheels.

      We fail by failing to see and build that anti fragile traffic worlds.

      1. Reed, I agree that pricing to reduce peak period demand for key and extremely congested road capacity is only one tool among many. Building density within walking distance of fixed mass transit is another, but generally only when accompanied by strict Traffic Demand Management requirements. But for the strict TDM requirements in the Tysons Plan, I don’t think we’d see as much SOV suppression as it needed to keep Tysons afloat and not destroyed by absolute traffic gridlock.

        1. reed fawell III Avatar
          reed fawell III

          TMT – R/B Corridor had 5 million sq. feet office, most in Rosyln in 1980. Today its got 25,000,000 square feet of office. But traffic is same. Why? Because it drove traffic down with dense residential. (see last comment to Fiscal Fix.)

          Today Tyson’s can REDUCE traffic far more than Arlington did by taking all those Tyson’s Corner office commuters off Interstate 495 by giving them the space to live in Tysons so that they can walk to work every day instead of putting I-495 in gridlock everyday.

          The beneficial results of use change in Tysons will huge. But tyson’s doesn’t want to do it apparently. Likely that’s why it paid those big proffers (not to reduce traffic the right way) but to increase it.

          1. reed fawell III Avatar
            reed fawell III

            Re above comments see my fuller comments in In Defense of Proffers article on this website.

  13. larryg Avatar

    TMT has it right. Whether it’s Verizon, the airlines, or sports events, the operators “manage” the load on the facility.

    but when it comes to roads, it’s a totally foreign concept to most and for many users of roads – utterly rejected as legitimate because they’ve been catered to over the years that roads are “free” to use at any time for any purpose and that it’s VDOT’s “job” to fix it when it does not perform as desired.

    Of course how would one “manage” anything of which there was more demand than supply?

    1. – first come, first served
    2. – rationing
    3. – pay by suffering congestion
    4. – pay to get less congestion.

    the first 3 are failures.

    4 often evokes a “see no evil” nah nah nah response of those who cannot
    fathom the idea that static tolls themselvves are fair and variable tolls do sort out the wheat from the chaff of those who don’t care if the road is congested.. it’s still “free” to use.

    I still believe that if the beltways were initially created as toll roads, that we would have seen more Arlington’s and less Fairfaxes.

  14. reed fawell III Avatar
    reed fawell III

    “I still believe that if the beltways were initially created as toll roads, that we would have seen more Arlington’s and less Fairfaxes.”

    Yes, quite likely it would have have a very positive and ameliorating effect in many ways. This would have included diluting the great damage done by the turbo-charged development that the planner and local governments at the time were ill prepared to deal with, but the entrepreneurs were, giving that by nature they tend to be quicker on their feet.

    And at the very least tolls likely would have given time to bring a far broader mix of antidotes into play. Far stricter control of access, for example. After all the goal of the Interstate system among other things was to get traffic quickly in and out and around cities. But folks at the time didn’t have the sharp focus that only mistakes arising from the doing of things provides.

  15. Darrell Avatar

    If they would build out an interstate quality road from Tidewater to Raleigh, NoVa’s congestion would be reduced by quite an amount. Too bad no one apparently sees that, nor the opportunity such a road would bring for growth to this Chesapeake cul de sac down here.

  16. larryg Avatar

    a toll road?

  17. Barcelona, Jim, started its “Bicing” bikeshare program in 2009 expecting 20,000 clients in a year and had over 100,000 in less than 3-months. It has worked so well that businesses began asking policy makers to remove nearby car parking and put in “Bicing” stations.

    No doubt you saw the red and white “Bicing” bikes running around and might even have been angry that you couldn’t use one as one has to sign up for long-term use (unlike, say, the D.C. Capitol Bikes or Boston’s Hubway). In Bareclona and Paris, the bikeshare programs are strictly for the locals.

    Bikeshare is a brilliant way to minimize driving but virtually all America’s transportation dollars go into building more car roads for reasons the above comments illustrate. We Americans are pretty much stuck in an “auto-centric silo” and when we manage to see outside of it we think throwing similar, massive amounts of money at stuff, like “high-speed” rail (Can anyone say $98 BILLION for the LA to SF plan?) will magically solve what can only solved individually. (SF, to be fair, does have a bike share program and is beginning an eBike share program).

    One big difference between Tom Tom and TTI. TTI measures solely “commuting” while Tom Tom’s aggregate data is for any and all driving trips.

    One big issue with many comments. When you build a new highway you “induce” more people to drive more times to more places and minimize their inclinations to try any alternative methods of getting from here to there. Please, folks, read the data on induced traffic and realize that it is not just new suburbs which create the inbound/outbound congestion, it is the seeming ease which entices all of us to drive more without thought. Some 15 years ago, the Commission on the Future of Transportation in Virginia called it a “futile exercise” to try and build one’s way out of congestion, noting the “round it goes” aspect that more roadway supply is filled by induced demand which then overwhelms (usually within five years) the new supply which then creates more demand (or seeming “need”) for more roadway space…

    1. There was a bicing station on the black where we were staying. Didn’t try it out, but we did see stations all over the city.

      Barcelona has one big advantage over anywhere in Virginia (even Arlington): The city is far more compact (higher density). Very few high-rises or skyscrapers, but loads of 5- to 8-story buildings. The physical distance between locations, therefore, was not very far, hence highly accessible by bike.

Leave a Reply