Virginia: Pretty Darned Enterprising

enterprising_statesby James A. Bacon

For those who haven’t yet succumbed to state-ranking overload, here’s one more, this from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. Its fourth annual Enterprising States report ranks states for the degree to which they are “best positioned to grow, create jobs and prosper in the coming five to ten years.”

The Chamber examines each state for 33 measures, which it organizes in six broad categories. Virginia snags a No. 5 spot for overall performance. Here is the breakdown by category:

Economic performance — 5th
Exports — 46th
Innovation and entrepreneurship — 3rd
Business climate — 16th
Talent pipeline — 5th
Infrastructure — 24th

Three of the top five performing states — North Dakota, Texas and Wyoming — are all enjoying natural resource booms. Of course, it could be said that Virginia has benefited from a federal spending boom. Here’s what the report says about the Old Dominion:

Virginia takes 1st place in our measure of general standard of living: median family income adjusted for cost of living. The state’s steady performance—ranking between 14th and 23rd in the other six performance measures—lands it 5th overall in growth and performance. Partly owing to its proximity to the nation’s capital, Virginia is a national leader in professional, scientific, and technical services. Virginia grew that sector 37% over the past decade — impressive growth for an already large sector.

And here is what Governor Bob McDonnell had to say:

Creating the best environment for private-sector job creation and innovation has been the top focus of our administration. Since we took office, our unemployment rate has fallen from 7.3 percent to 5.3 percent, the lowest rate in the Southeast and the second lowest east of the Mississippi. This report confirms that when it comes to supporting startups and new jobs, Virginia is a national leader and continuing to make substantive progress. But there is more to do. We have continued last year’s “Year of the Entrepreneur” campaign in Virginia with the ongoing “innoVAte” initiative, including an undergraduate business plan competition that brought some of the most promising startup ideas from 21 of Virginia’s colleges and universities to Richmond yesterday. Innovators like the young people who pitched their business plans to investors yesterday will form the backbone of a culture of entrepreneurship in Virginia that will continue to make the Commonwealth one of the best places to live, raise a family, and find a good job.

Bacon’s bottom line:

To what extent can McDonnell, or any other governor, take credit for Virginia’s strong performance? That’s a really sticky question. Clearly, the national economy is a major factor in Virginia’s performance, and so is proximity to the federal spending machine in Washington, D.C. The boom in major industries, especially the energy and agricultural sectors, also has driven state performance recently — in Virginia’s case, an energy-importing state, acting as a drag on performance. It’s difficult to disentangle the effect of state or regional policy, and any claims must be taken with a grain of salt.

My first rule of economic development is, “Do no harm.” And other than raising taxes to crank up spending on transportation, McDonnell has done no harm. The initiatives he highlights in the prepared statement above have little more than symbolic value. What he has not done — he hasn’t passed a lot of expensive regulations or spending programs — is more important that what he has. And his record on that score is fairy good.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

6 responses to “Virginia: Pretty Darned Enterprising”

  1. reed fawell III Avatar
    reed fawell III

    I am beginning to wonder if his recent act funding transportation, however pragmatic, might in the end do far more harm than good, given its tendency to disguise government action. All as Jim pointed out earlier.

  2. larryg Avatar

    re: ” Virginia. Virginia takes 1st place in our measure of general standard
    of living: median family income adjusted for cost of living. The
    state’s steady performance—ranking between 14th and 23rd in the
    other six performance measures—lands it 5th overall in growth and
    performance. ”

    so we get 5th because of the high salaries in the uber-govt NoVa region?

    re: ” to the extent that a gov can…”

    I notice that North Dakota ranks high…. and that sort of begs the question as to what exactly North Dakota has done to garner that rating other than sitting on top of gas and oil resources….

    compare ND to Va:

    export rank
    ND – 21
    Va – 46

    innovation and entrepreneurship
    ND 15
    Va 3

    business climate
    ND 14
    Va 16

    talent pipeline
    ND 13
    Va 5

    infrastructure
    ND 22
    Va 24

    makes me wonder if you subtract out gas and oil for ND and govt employment for NoVa – what the ranks would be.

    1. Neil Haner Avatar
      Neil Haner

      No use playing that game, Larry. It’s like asking “what if we took the beaches away from Hawaii” or “what if Texas didn’t have nearly unlimited cheap immigrant labor to wipe out its construction labor costs.” Each state has it’s own unique business strengths and weaknesses due to it’s geography. Ours is our proximity to Washington, DC. ND’s is its proximity to oil and natural gas. None of the above are about to change.

      Now, with that said, we can start to play games about setting a state’s benchmark higher or lower based upon its God-given advantages. In other words, is a particular state over- or under-achieving based upon its own geographic dumb luck.

      Ditto is a particular administration over- or under-achieving based upon the business climate they inherited.

      “And even more will be expected of the [state/governor] who has been entrusted with more” and what not.

  3. larryg Avatar

    @Neil – you are 100% correct! Each state IS unique and as they say – not all people are created equal in terms of their attributes.

    as you so adroitly point out: ” In other words, is a particular state over- or under-achieving based upon its own geographic dumb luck.”

    but then that sorta puts the premise of the study (actual one of too many to count) at question if they include things that are ‘dumb luck” things.

    I’ve always wondered what makes one city in a state better economically than another in the same state. Why is Roanoke not bigger and more powerful economically than say Harrisonburg or Lynchburg, Lexington, etc ? what makes the differences?

    why Columbus, Oh instead of Cleveland or Toledo?

    seems like tackling the states is an even more daunting task.

    but I still have trouble seeing ND rated high over oil/gas and Va rated high over Fed spending!

    1. reed fawell III Avatar
      reed fawell III

      My guess is people, individually and collectively, make up all the difference.

  4. DJRippert Avatar
    DJRippert

    Ranking anything by state is debatable at best. States are too big to draw any kind of useful conclusion from these rankings. Go tell the people in Martinsville that everything is hunky-dory because Virginia ranks 5th overall. Tell the people in Arlington about Virginia’s low cost of living. Tell the people in Silicon Valley that Maryland, Colorado and Virginia are #1, #2 and #3 for innovation and entrepreneurship.

    State rankings are useless aggregations of disparate facts because states are useless aggregations of disparate regions.

    The average American has one breast and one testicle. Now, what do we do with that important statistic?

Leave a Reply