Virginia Partisanship in Congress

Rep. Abigail Spanberger
Photo credit: Richmond Times Dispatch

Virginia Congressmen have scored at the extremes on a national measure of bipartisanship in Congress.  As reported by the Richmond Times-Dispatch, Rep. Abigail Spanberger, D-7th, has been ranked as the fifth most bipartisan member of the House of Representatives and Rep. Bob Good, R-5th, the fifth least bipartisan member.

Rep. Bob Good, Photo credit: Richmond Times Dispatch

The Lugar Center, founded by the late Sen. Richard Lugar (R-Indiana), and the McCourt School of Public Policy at Georgetown University, annually publishes the Bipartisan Index.  The Index “measures the frequency with which a member co-sponsors a bill introduced by the opposite party and the frequency with which a member’s own bills attract co-sponsors from the opposite party.”  It is not a simple compilation of co-sponsorships.  The Index utilizes a 20-year baseline of data to standardize the data and there is a weighting factor to account for members who sponsor or co-sponsor lots of bills or just a few bills.  Not counted in the compilation were resolutions or private bills, such as those that name post offices.

The Center chose to use co-sponsorships as a measure of bipartisanship, rather than voting records, because “members’ voting decisions are often contextual and can be influenced by parliamentary circumstances. Sponsorships and co-sponsorships, in contrast, exist as very carefully considered declarations of where a legislator stands on an issue.”  In addition, they did not want to measure the quality of legislation, which could be subjective, but “the efforts of legislators to broaden the appeal of their sponsored legislation, to entertain a wider range of ideas, and to prioritize governance over posturing.”

A listing of the Index scores of all the current members of Congress, as well as those of previous Congresses, along with a detailed description of the methodology used in constructing the Index, can be found here.

Here are the Partisan Index rankings of the entire Virginia delegation for 2021:

House:

  •  Abigail Spanberger, D-7th–5
  •  Elaine Luria, D-2nd–26
  • Gerry Connolly, D-11th–72
  • Jennifer Wexton, D-10th–79
  • Morgan Griffith, R-9th–154
  • Rob Wittman, R-1st–203
  • Don Beyer, D-8th–231
  • Bobby Scott, D-3rd–240
  • Ben Cline, R-6th–265
  • Donald McEachin, D-4th–341
  • Bob Good, R-5th–431

Senate:

  • Mark Warner, D.–35
  • Tim Kaine, D.–50

Although Spanberger ranked as one of the least partisan members, most of the members of the Virginia delegation would be considered partisan.  The Lugar Center, which publishes the Index, considers any member who scores above zero on the Index to be a “Bipartisan Legislator”.  Only Spanberger, Luria, Connolly, and Wexton in the House and Warner in the Senate met that criterion in 2021.  For the 116th Congress (2019-2020), the delegation showed a little more bipartisanship, with Spanberger, Luria, Connolly, Griffith, and Wittman in the House earning an Index score above zero.  In the Senate, Warner was the sole Virginia “Bipartisan Legislator”.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

25 responses to “Virginia Partisanship in Congress”

  1. Steve Gillispie Avatar
    Steve Gillispie

    Since the reality of their actual behavior and votes is almost 180 degrees different from the ranking, these rankings were clearly constructed by Democrat partisans.
    Warner, for God’s sake, was one of the key actors in propagating the Watergate hoax.

    1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      If you had looked at the actual scores and rankings, you would have seen that the most bipartisan House member was a Republican, Brian Fitzpatrick of Pa. Ranking no 3 was another Repubican, John Katko of New York. In the Senate, the second and third most bipartisan Senators were Republicans, Collins of Maine and Portman of Ohio.

      And with McEachin ranked very low. It hardly seems that it was constructed by “Democrat partisans”.

  2. DJRippert Avatar
    DJRippert

    That ranking seems about right to me with the exception of seeing Connolly ranked higher than I would have expected.

    1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      I don’t know much about Connolly, but, from my general impression of him, I was also surprised at his ranking.

  3. Randy Huffman Avatar
    Randy Huffman

    Spanberger and Warner talk in a bi-partisan manner, but they can be counted on by the Democratic Leadership for all critical votes, and they vote lock step in that manner. Hence this report is not that meanginful.

    1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      It is not meaningful if you think that introducing legislation that members of the other party would be willing to sign on to or signing on to legislation introduced by a member of the other party is not a worthwhile endeavor.

      1. Randy Huffman Avatar
        Randy Huffman

        Cant disagree with you on that. There has been a lot of that in the last several years, in my view it started with the Obama Presidency, though maybe you would argue sooner.

        But the major bills are rammed through by the Leadership. Those who dare challenge the Leadership, like Manchin, Sinema and McCain (now Collins and Murkowski) are crucified by ideologues. My point, neither Warner or Spandberger have shown any willingness to go against the Democratic leadership, so they are no better than Good as far as I am concerned.

        1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
          Dick Hall-Sizemore

          A compilation a couple of years ago found that only ten Democrats had voted against Pelosi’s position more often than Spanberger. One of her “no” votes was against a multi-trillion dollar COVID relief bill. https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2020/sep/09/nick-freitas/spanberger-has-voted-pelosi-relatively-low-92-time/#sources

          1. Randy Huffman Avatar
            Randy Huffman

            I actually thought she voted for that bill, glad to know she did not. I do think that if Pelosi needed one more vote, she would have “convinced her” to vote for it. But that is only speculation on my part. I will agree with you that Spanberger represents the Democratic party, and her constituents, better than many others on both sides of the aisle. She is right outside of my District so will never have an opportunity to vote for or against her.

      2. VaNavVet Avatar
        VaNavVet

        Appears like the Virginia delegation has a few more Democrat members willing to do so and a few more Republican members willing to vote to overturn a valid presidential election.

    2. Donald Smith Avatar
      Donald Smith

      Seems to me that, for both Republicans and Democrats, the contingent of “moderates” within either party is what gives that party enough members to constitute a majority in a legislative body (House or Representatives, House of Delegates, Senate, etc…).

      But, within their party delegations, the moderates are a minority or lack seniority. So, when those legislative bodies pick the leaders, who will pick committee chairs and advance (or block) legislation and investigations, it’s the progressives/strong conservatives who end up in charge.

      So, if a candidate tells you that he/she is a moderate, and not like the more strident elements in his/her party—they’re in all likelihood not lying. But what they know—and won’t tell you—is that, if you elect them, you’re actually empowering the more strident elements of that party to wield power. It won’t be the moderates who wield power and advance legislation.

      1. Randy Huffman Avatar
        Randy Huffman

        Good points for Democrats across the Board with a few variances of course at the State level, but on a National level, have to acknowledge neither McConnel or McCarthy are viewed as “strong” conservatives ( or clearly any of their predecessors). Nor was Donald Trump, look at how he ignored the annual deficits, even before COVID hit, which was very disappointing.

  4. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Least bipartisan? I would have bet least bipedal.

  5. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    There was a time of bipartisanship. Coincidentally, that was at a time when there was a regular Friday night happy hour at the WH. It still didn’t work out so well.

  6. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    Bi-partisan does not mean non-partisan. By definition, if someone runs for office with a D or R next to their name, they are partisans and likely will vote the party line on most votes with some exceptions.

    The question, in my mind, is, can SOME legislation be proposed that will gain support from both sides?

    Bi-partisan support almost always requires compromise – a willingness to support something that is not exactly what you’d prefer.

    So I’ll give one example and that is Spanburgers proposal that legislations not be able to directly engage in trading stocks even though Pelosi has been opposed to it.

    No one is claiming nor should they expect Spanburger to vote against most other Democratic proposals but she may well vote in favor of SOME GOP proposals.

    It’s not political nirvana by any stretch of the imagination but it is a step in a right direction that could find other proposals.

    I wish we could find SOME common ground on immigration but that’s a bridge way too far right now.

  7. James C. Sherlock Avatar
    James C. Sherlock

    Dick, We know nothing from those rankings without knowing the content of the bipartisan bills. The rankings are numbers without context.

    The ranking process, as it should, excludes non-binding resolutions and ceremonial bills. But we don’t know what specific bills had bipartisan sponsorship, or extensive bipartisan support on the floor of both houses, or became law.

    A more interesting ranking would be how many bipartisan bills passed, by what margins in the House and Senate, and a summary of the content of those bills.

    We know that the Democrats, for example, restored pork – targeted spending in individual districts. How many of the bipartisan bills were appropriations bills? Certainly the Bipartisan Infrastructure Act was a massive one.

    Bottom line, this particular “ranking” tells us little other than there are some on both sides of the aisle that few on the other side will work with, much less agree to co-sponsor legislation.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      So, basically like everything else. Actually, just because it’s a simple measure doesn’t mean it isn’t a relatively good one.

  8. Lefty665 Avatar
    Lefty665

    Some of us think that Spanberger’s employment on the clandestine side of the CIA working for torturer “Bloody” Gina Haspel disqualifies her as a decent representative of the people of the 7th District.

    We have no way to know what she did or what she espoused there. Did she quit for greener pastures, personal gain, or was she fired for incompetence or worse? Neither she nor the CIA will honestly tell us, and there is no way to verify any tales either she or the Agency tell. One of their missions is propaganda and disinformation.

    In the 7th, Brat was preferable to Cantor, Spanberger iffy as a replacement for Brat, and Anyone will be a good replacement for Spanberger. May the new 7th have higher standards than the old 7th.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      OTOH, Anyone would be better than, oh say, a bad espresso, or even a good latte.

      1. Lefty665 Avatar
        Lefty665

        Exactly, Abagail G. Latte:)

  9. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    What a Derby! 80:1! What a pretty little guy too. He was HYPED!

    Having owned horses and boats, I can definitely tell you, horses are better. When you can’t sell that boat, you’re stuck with 10 tons of HazMat. With a horse, 500 lbs of BBQ.

    1. Lefty665 Avatar
      Lefty665

      Yeah, but you can park the boat and neglect it and nothing dies. Gotta maintain a horse, it still requires board, feed and vet bills.

      Knew a guy years ago with a pair he used for driving, he named them Big Mac and Double Cheese.

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Or charcoal briquettes…

        1. Lefty665 Avatar
          Lefty665

          I can tell you from experience that 1,200 pounds of dead horse is a lot of dead horse. No briquettes need apply,

          1. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Well, ya don’t eat ’em all at once. Besides, 1,200 pounds dresses down quite a bit.

Leave a Reply