Virginia No-Limit Campaign Laws = Tax Exemptions for Partners in Venture Capital Firms

by James C. SherlockUpdated Dec 14 at 10:19 AM

I just spent some spare time browsing through the Virginia tax code. (I know, get a life.) Lots of interesting items in there. Some tax exemptions make sense for the best interests of the state. Some don’t.

This case benefits a very few people a lot.  It is harder to figure out what is in it for the state.

If you are a partner in a venture capital company, you get a large and controversial federal tax break for what is called carried interest. Great being you.

Since 2018 Virginia does not tax income, including investment services partnership interest income (that same carried interest income) attributable to an investment in a Virginia venture capital account.

A Virginia venture capital account is defined as an account with half of the money in Virginia companies, including those in target-rich Northern Virginia. Even better being you.

Is America a great country or what?

The federal government taxes “carried interest” — a share of a private equity or fund’s profits that serve as compensation for fund managers — at long-term capital gains rate instead of as ordinary income. In some quarters, this is considered a scandal.

From the Congressional Research Service:

Much of the concern over the tax treatment of carried interest has been about its fairness and economic efficiency, which may be of increased salience as investments in alternative investment vehicles have grown. As of the second quarter of 2019, private equity and hedge funds had roughly $14.3 trillion in assets under management—an increase of nearly 40% over the past four years.

Under the current characterization of carried interest, general partners’ performance fees are taxed less heavily than other forms of compensation, leading to distortions in employment, organizational form, and compensation decisions. It is also argued that the current treatment of carried interest violates the principles of both horizontal and vertical equity.

Carried interest

is not automatic and is only issued if a fund or private equity firm performs at or above a designated level.

In a typical scenario, about 80% of carried interest eventually trickles down to the fund’s limited partners, those who initially invested capital. The general partner receives the other 20%, as well as compensation in the form of an annual management fee—a percentage of the fund’s assets.

Now see Virginia Code Title 58.1. Taxation § 58.1-322.02. Virginia taxable income;  subtractions:

27. a. Income, including investment services partnership interest income (otherwise known as investment partnership carried interest income), attributable to an investment in a Virginia venture capital account. To qualify for a subtraction under this subdivision, the investment shall be made on or after January 1, 2018, but before December 31, 2023.

b. As used in this subdivision 27:

“Qualified portfolio company” means a company that (i) has its principal place of business in the Commonwealth; (ii) has a primary purpose of production, sale, research, or development of a product or service other than the management or investment of capital; and (iii) provides equity in the company to the Virginia venture capital account in exchange for a capital investment….

“Virginia venture capital account” means an investment fund that has been certified by the Department as a Virginia venture capital account….

… the Department shall certify the investment fund as a Virginia venture capital account at such time as the investment fund actually invests at least 50 percent of the capital committed to its fund in qualified portfolio companies.

From Virginia Tax in implementation of the law:

For taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2018 taxpayers may claim an individual and corporate income tax subtraction for income attributable to an investment in a Virginia venture capital account made on or after January 1, 2018, but before December 31, 2023. For the purposes of this subtraction, income includes, but is not limited to, investment services partnership interest income, otherwise known as investment partnership carried interest income.

OK, I’ll bite.

 Three options that I can think of for why this tax code change was passed.

  1. It was meant to cause venture capital funds to invest in Virginia companies that they would not otherwise find financially attractive. Does anyone really think such investments would be made hoping for a 5.75% break on carried interest if they made a profit?
  2. It was meant to reward venture capital funds for investing in Virginia companies they would have invested in anyway.  That is at best a waste of money.
  3. It was meant to reward campaign donors who were already located here and already investing in both Virginia companies.

I wonder how much money is “subtracted” each year for this provision and by how many Virginians.  It would really be meaningful if we knew the amount of the average subtraction by those taking advantage of it.  I am going to guess it is a lot of money by very few Virginians –  the kinds of people who are big campaign contributors.

The process is corrupted by the lack of limits on campaign donations in Virginia, not by those who give them.

Joint Subcommittee on Tax Policy.  Item 1 (AA) of the 2021 Appropriation Act (House Bill 1800, Special Session I, Chapter 552):

“This amendment establishes a Joint Subcommittee on Tax Policy to evaluate and make recommendations on potential changes to Virginia’s tax policies, including changes to tax brackets, tax rates, credits, deductions, and exemptions, and any other changes it deems necessary.”

“The Joint Subcommittee will consider factors such as equity, certainty, convenience of payment, economy in collection, simplicity, neutrality, economic efficiency and any other factors it deems relevant to the Commonwealth’s tax policies.”

The 12 members are appointed by Chair of House Appropriations (6) and Chair, Senate Committee on Finance and Appropriations (6), so the House members will be new this term.

We can watch and see what they do with the “subtraction” for carried interest.

I hope, just this once, they surprise us.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

39 responses to “Virginia No-Limit Campaign Laws = Tax Exemptions for Partners in Venture Capital Firms”

  1. Stephen Haner Avatar
    Stephen Haner

    Given your free time you might have found these — took me 1.5 minutes….

    The 2017 Act of Assembly:
    http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?171+ful+CHAP0762

    The Tax Department Fiscal Impact Statement:
    http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?171+oth+HB2074FH1161+PDF

    The history:
    http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?171+sum+HB2074
    …which notes that both chambers passed it without dissent, but there were different versions that had to go to a conference committee. Signed by McAuliffe.

    The tax treatment of carried interest and other investment income is a constant ping pong ball at both the federal and state levels. Under federal law it is treated as investment gains and taxed at a lower rate than “earned income.” Some see a loophole and some see an economic incentive, but to jump right to claims of corruption strikes me as reckless and borderline libel. Hope you don’t get sued naming names and making accusations.

    My default position is conformity to federal practice, and this may indeed be an example of non-conformity. I bet the JLARC reports on the value of various tax preferences has also looked at this. The department does an annual report on the impact but I couldn’t find that on the website.

    1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      I also looked for a report of the impact. I also favor conformity to federal tax code.

      Some of these carried interest transactions are in 8 or 9 figures. This is a straight give away of a lot of money to a few people.

      Nothing more nor less. Not illegal, just terrible public policy. Like no limit campaign contributions.

      As far as getting sued, look again. Public records. But thanks for your sincere concern.

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        “As far as getting sued, look again. Public records. But thanks for your sincere concern.”

        Uh, you may want to research a bit before feeling too comfortable. I can give you the name of a woman who was sued by a huge defense contractor for quoting directly out of the company’s SEC filings. It cost her. If you receive a subpoena from a Florida or Texas court, cut your losses and settle.

        Think about it. If they can so easily control tax laws, imagine what they can do to you with the libel laws. I am not “Nancy Naive” without reason.

        1. John Harvie Avatar
          John Harvie

          Seems she should have been made whole on appeal, including legal expenses. What was the final disposition?

          1. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            She was fired.

          2. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Along with 11 other employees including a company VP. Messy.

            “On the Internet, nobody knows you’re a dog.”

          3. Matt Adams Avatar

            I would go with the fact that NN isn’t telling the full story, that’s his standard game.

    2. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      I tell you this with a smile on my face, a sense of shame, and 67% disappointment.
      I retired in 2013 at 61. I was able to do so because of a sizable investment portfolio and cash bucket. My goals in those first 3 years was to pay $0 income tax AND collect the Obamacare tax credit.

      I succeeded with the tax objective all 3 years with capital gains and qualified dividends just under the limit, and collected the premium tax credit once to the tune of $10K.

  2. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Virginia Tax break for carried interest?? You should see the Fed Tax break for it!

    So, what’s in a year? Why short term, and long term capital gains rates? Mystery to me why 364 versus 365 makes a difference between as low as 0% and earned income rates.

    It’s that whole windfall thing. We hate the whole idea that people can earn it without working for it.

    Ah, the tax codes. Social engineering at its best. Screw Roe v. Wade. This is the REAL way to legislate morality.

  3. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    There are 3 types of Navy Captains; those who can’t add, and those who can’t count. List of the top 10, eh?

    Maybe the Committee will be as successful as the Redistricting Committee. Ya know, the one we actually voted for. Fingers crossed. Is there a provision to kick it to the courts?

    1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      This is a codified tax exemption for perhaps 100 people a year. A great moment in legislating.

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        It was an “edit” comment. You say, “here is a list of the top ten” and then give 5 names.

        But yes, carried interest tax breaks are not only limited to a handful, and unattainable to the rest, but that handful are the wealthiest of the wealthiest. Moreover, strange things can be done with carried interest that you cannot even fathom. Imagine collecting your DFAS monthly as “carried interest” instead of a pension…

        Wait… I’ll be back.

        Okay, here. https://www.npr.org/sections/money/2012/01/19/145449117/carried-interest-why-mitt-romneys-tax-rate-is-15-percent

        I know it’s NPR, but it won’t kill you to read one liberal article from one liberal source. But, be aware, this particular article might give you a headache.

        1. Matt Adams Avatar

          DFAS is a Government Agency, an LES is the pay.

          As for Romney’s pay, he like Buffett utilize the tax code for their advantage. Earn a low salary or pension and reap the benefits on interest. Which is why Buffett is used as an example of a rich person for higher taxes, that he’ll never pay.

          1. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Yes, but would it be nice for the Captain, et al, if they could have DFAS declare their money to be a LTCG or QD? Ah, one can dream.

            Yes again. Loopholes for the low and middle income aren’t called loopholes.

          2. Matt Adams Avatar

            Everyone should try to minimize their own tax burden within the limits of the code. It’s why a flat tax will never work, those who write the code do so to benefit themselves and their CPA’s and Lawyers.

          3. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Don’t forget H&R, and ilk. I don’t consider them CPAs, just well paid form fillers. If taxes are so easy anyone can do them, are they still a tax?

            In fact, given reporting changes over the last 2 decades, the IRS could send you a form with a question, “Do you agree with our current accounting?” 90% of America would answer “yes”.

          4. Matt Adams Avatar

            “In fact, given reporting changes over the last 2 decades, the IRS could send you a form with a question, “Do you agree with our current accounting?” 90% of America would answer “yes”.”

            That’s because as a rule people are stupid.

          5. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            How about, say, 80% COULD say “yes”, and it be correct?

        2. James C. Sherlock Avatar
          James C. Sherlock

          It does not give me a headache. It is exactly what I am referring to. Perhaps Mitt Romney will sue.

          1. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            He can’t. He’s a public persona, and libel laws kinda give wide latitude to those who rag on ’em.

            Nevertheless, prudent is the better part of valor. Any one of those identified can make your lifr miserable for years.

          2. James C. Sherlock Avatar
            James C. Sherlock

            I have taken your advice.

            When I wrote it, I did not think folks would try to make a connection between the big campaign contributors and law breaking. But clearly some did.

            Because that is not what I meant, I removed the section with the names.

            A problem with Virginia is that there are no campaign contribution laws to break, which was my point. Contributions buy access. No one in their right mind would deny it. And, whether individual donors use it socially or professionally, or not, access is worth a
            great deal.

            BTW, Super Brain has a good take below.

            Steve Haner, a lobbyist, always takes it personally when I complain about lack of campaign funding limits. He posted a rant above. But we will always need lobbyists for the very simple reason that our very part-time General Assembly members have real jobs and very small staffs. If they would staff up to the level the state deserves and needs, I think we would get better legislation, but we would still need lobbyists.

            When Congress enforces regular order, it has marvelous staffing on both sides of the aisle. It was really a pleasure to work with that system. Not so much here, so I understand some of Haner’s frustration and responses. He has no choice but to deal with the General Assembly system as it is, and thus feels part of it and a need to defend it.

          3. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Probably for the better. It’s always best not to do anything unintentionally. You want the taste of blood when you skewer someone.

          4. Matt Adams Avatar

            “He can’t. He’s a public persona, and libel laws kinda give wide latitude to those who rag on ’em.”

            Libel laws require a higher threshold for public personal, unless that libel is made on the Senate floor (see Sen. Reid).

            “Nevertheless, prudent is the better part of valor. Any one of those identified can make your lifr miserable for years.”

            That’s where you’re wrong, they wouldn’t have a case under Virginia Law. It’s public information and he didn’t imply they were criminal. Beyond that they’d have to prove he knew his statements were false, which they couldn’t.

          5. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            See “Raytheon 21”.

            There’s a basic rule I’ve developed over the years. Never piss off someone who has a legal department, or even just keeps a lawyer on retainer. Their pockets are generally deeper than mine.

          6. Matt Adams Avatar

            What’s to see? Juries cannot base defamation verdicts on statements of opinion.

            I presume you’re speaking of Hyland v Raytheon (2007)? Outside of that there is not “Raytheon21” lawsuit of record.

            https://law.justia.com/cases/virginia/supreme-court/2007/1060400.html

          7. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            It never even made the courthouse. They ruined those people with just filing the suit and withdrawing it. They just wanted a subpoena. Try “Raytheon 21 SLAPP 1999”

          8. Matt Adams Avatar

            Nothing comes up, how about you find it and cite it.

          9. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Sorry about that. I had guessed it was still searchable under the buzz title at the time. This can get you started on the subject of SLAPPs.
            https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB923262678424548543

            And https://www.deseret.com/1999/6/12/19450307/john-doe-suits-threaten-critics-internet-anonymity

            Sometimes in SLAPPs, libel is contended. Often what is more damaging is simply costing defendants to pay legal fees.

          10. Matt Adams Avatar

            That’s from 1999 and behind a paywall.

          11. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Try the other one I added. Yes, I edit things. Have to. This POS browser locks up tight in Disqus sometimes.

          12. Matt Adams Avatar

            Raytheon dropped the suit when 4 people resigned and the other’s entered a company program.

            Raytheon indicated they used information only an employee would know, and that their only course or action was the suit.

            If they released proprietary information against company policy, they are lucky.

          13. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Yvonne, can’t remember her last name, printed material on sales to SK straight from the SEC filings. RatCo claimed it to be proprietary when it filed for the subpoena to unmask her.

            Anyway Raytheon is immaterial. SLAPPs are the real subject. A deep pocket can ruin your life for years even if you are made whole, you lose.

          14. Matt Adams Avatar

            That is why locals and states pass anti-SLAPP laws, one which state is Virginia.

        3. Stephen Haner Avatar
          Stephen Haner

          One of my bills for a client created a sales tax exemption for a product. The big argument for it was how other states were taxing their local businesses in that line, and our firms were losing out. Did the client give a bunch of campaign contributions? Nary a one. Did I bribe a legislator or three? No. Sherlock was wrong to name names of individual donors who might be using that tax break and to imply they corrupted the process. When the case is made against Dominion on that front, there is far more evidence…this was just guilty by association.

          I wasn’t following tax bills in 2017, since the shipyard was still my main focus. The lack of any opposition indicates somebody had a pretty good argument for why this was a good bill. Doesn’t mean it was, but they sold it.

          And Cap’n, you don’t know shinola about libel law and need a few lessons.

          1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
            James C. Sherlock

            You imply they corrupted the process. I did not.

            The process is corrupted by the fact of the lack of limits on campaign donations in Virginia, not by those who give them.

          2. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Ya know, it occurred to me that Steve is genuinely concerned that you could suffer a lifetime (given our ages) of legal woes… OR he is a lobbyist, and could be courting, or currently representing, a listed entity.

          3. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            There is only ONE rule on libel. Don’t do it or even hint it. Money makes might. I guess that’s two.

            By the time that a jury, or judge, even hear your squeaking about the 1st Amendment, your grandchildren will be bust. These are called Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation. They have a name because they work, and well.

            We could have a wonderful discussion on the curse of being 100% bound by a common currency.

  4. Super Brain Avatar
    Super Brain

    Very good article. One of the latest carried interest tax planning strategies is altering the fee that would normally be the ordinary income portion to carried interest. BTW, carried interest is not unique to hedge funds.
    Generally speaking, politicians can be be rewarded in ways other than cash be it a contribution or in a bag. Access to investments and other things are quite possible as well as reduced fees.

Leave a Reply