Virginia Needs a Constitutional Amendment to Elect the Board of Education

by James C. Sherlock

The Virginia Board of Education (VBOE) is by far the most powerful and consequential public board in Virginia. It is the only one whose Powers and Duties are defined in the Virginia Constitution.

It was a mistake not to make the members of the Board with such vast and unconstrained powers constitutional officers who stand for election.

We are now seeing what the Board, once appointed and confirmed, can do. It has transformed Virginia’s educational system into a Marxist indoctrination system.  Board members know what they are doing is not only radically transformational, but intensely political and fiercely opposed.

Their work is not only dogmatic, but sloppy. Their use of the English language has been demonstrated here to be severely challenged. Not exactly a trait most look for in a Board of Education.

And they do not care. There is no constitutional reason they should.

The current Board has demonstrated like no other before it that it needs to face the electorate. Virginia will need a constitutional amendment to make the VBOE, who are together more constitutionally powerful than any elected official but the governor, constitutional officials elected by the people.

It is time.

Article VIII of the Virginia Constitution Section 4. Board of Education  provides:

“The general supervision of the public school system shall be vested in a Board of Education of nine members, to be appointed by the Governor, subject to confirmation by the General Assembly. Each appointment shall be for four years, except that those to fill vacancies shall be for the unexpired terms. Terms shall be staggered, so that no more than three regular appointments shall be made in the same year.”

So, once appointed and confirmed, there is no constitutional provision for General Assembly recall of a board member or members.

A new Governor cannot immediately replace the Board. Of the current group, the terms of Jamelle Wilson and Anne Holton — McAuliffe appointees — expire in June. So the lame duck Governor will appoint two of the nine board members for new four year terms.

If Republicans take control of either body of the General Assembly in the fall, I expect a special session of the General Assembly to be called to confirm the Northam appointments before the new GA is seated.

If a Republican Governor is elected, he or she will not have a Board vacancy to fill (two of them) until June of 2022, and won’t have selected a majority of appointees until June of 2023.

The Code of Virginia contains a provision for judicial review of decisions of local school boards:

“Any parent, custodian, or legal guardian of a pupil attending the public schools in a school division who is aggrieved by an action of the school board may, within thirty days after such action, petition the circuit court having jurisdiction in the school division to review the action of the school board.”

There is no such provision for judicial review of the decisions of the Board of Education.

Instead,  any person aggrieved by an action of the board may appeal to the House or Senate Privileges and Elections Committee or to the Joint Commission on Administrative Rules.  Except they are not in session.  And would not take it up if they were.

We clearly need a constitutional amendment. The current Board has made it imperative. Board members should be deemed constitutional officers and stand for election every four years in alignment with the election of a new Governor.

The constitution should define the number of VBOE members as the number of Virginia’s congressional districts, currently eleven, and one member should be elected in each congressional district.

Those who might think to argue that this would politicize the Board simply have not paid attention to what has happened the past few years.

VBOE has proven far too powerful, unconstrained and radical to be allowed to continue without the consent of the governed.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

26 responses to “Virginia Needs a Constitutional Amendment to Elect the Board of Education”

  1. Damn good idea, Sherlock!

  2. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
    James Wyatt Whitehead

    You make a good case Captain. My fear about electing the state school board and superintendent is this:

    Will voters be informed enough to make good choices?
    Will voters care?
    If the ballots on election day are jammed pack full of names I worry about ballot fatigue and people making careless choices.
    If the vote is held at off times such as June will there be a significant turnout or will a limited number of hyper excited voters sway that election?

    1. Matt Hurt Avatar
      Matt Hurt

      Are voters sufficiently informed in any other election? Why should this one be different?

  3. William O'Keefe Avatar
    William O’Keefe

    I have seen the results of elected school boards and suggest that the devil you know may be better than the one you don’t. Would a provision in the Constitution providing for judicial review be preferable?

    1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      There is a provision in Code of Virginia § 2.2-4014. Legislative review of proposed and final regulations that lets the GA suspend and cancel a rule, but with Democratic majorities in both houses, a vote to file with the Registrar and the promulgating agency an objection to a proposed or final adopted regulation will not occur. The last thing many Democratic GA members want is to have to take a recorded vote on CRT-based regulations or Social Emotional Learning. If we want accountability, the VBOE will have to run for election themselves.

  4. I have to say, Dick, Bill, and James raise legitimate points. The current system sucks. But elected school Board of Education members likely suck, too. Think about it. Now that government employee unions are legal in Virginia, who do you think would dominate the Board of Education elections? The unions! Once union-backed BOE board members get in, they’ll never be evicted.

    1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      Yep, be careful what you wish for.

    2. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      See my reply to Steve below. You are too pessimistic about the voters in this case. Politicians can slip a lot by them, but not how their kids are educated.

      1. Matt Hurt Avatar
        Matt Hurt

        It’s a shame, but the vast majority of parents don’t know very much what their students do in school. Usually, it only becomes a problem if the kid comes home and complains about something. Most parents are kept busy working for a living, paying bills, taking kids to practice, etc.

  5. Stephen Haner Avatar
    Stephen Haner

    This was a bad idea before the introduction of full unionization in the public schools, and now an even worse one.

    1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      I reject the theory that VBOE candidates supported by teachers unions will win elections. More than 2 million prospective voters in Virginia have kids in public schools. There are 104,000 teachers. Do the math.

      The situation now is that no Governor ever ran on CRT in education, but we have it.

      VBOE members are the only officers of the state whose powers and duties are defined in the constitution who are not voted into office.

      Absent candidates for the VBOE running on CRT in education being elected by the majority of the people of Virginia in an open election, it is an affront to democracy.

      1. Stephen Haner Avatar
        Stephen Haner

        Reject it all you want. That don’t make it so. The Governor should appoint and as the accountable figure should have the power to fire. At the pleasure….

        1. DJRippert Avatar
          DJRippert

          The governor serves one four year term and cannot stand for re-election. That structure, along with endless appointees who serve without direct consent of the electorate, makes for a backwards system where lasting progress is all but impossible.

  6. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    Damn bad idea, Sherlock!

    Marxist indoctrination system? Give me a break! I don’t even know what that means. Also, you greatly overestimate the power of the BOE over local school boards. I certainly have not heard anyone complaining about” Marxist indoctrination” in the Henrico schools or any of the school system in this area or in Halifax County or other rural counties. This whole critical race theory thing is just another boogeyman chased by conservatives who want to deny that racism is the basis of a lot of the lack of progress of a large segment of society and that, although a lot of progress has been made, there is still latent racism in today’s society.

    And as James Whitehead has indicated, having members of a state agency board popularly elected will just cause confusion among the electorate.

    Don’t like the education policy of the current Governor, Secretary of Education, and Superintendent of Instruction (the latter official is much more important than the Board)? Elect a Governor from a different party, who will appoint a new Secretary of Education and Superintendent of Instruction. Don’t like the policies in the local schools? Elect different members of the local school board.

    1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
      James Wyatt Whitehead

      Halifax County has formed an anti CRT group. They are actively recruiting a slate of candidates to replace the current school board. They intend to not only root out the school board but also the superintendent as well as upper level management. The Halifax group has a broad base that stretches across the lines of class and race. Much of what is happening across the Commonwealth is off the radar of local media and local elected figures.

      1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
        Dick Hall-Sizemore

        If the Halifax anti-CRT group is broad, it is mighty quiet. There has been nothing in the two local papers about it nor have there been recent letters to the editor complaining about “Marxist indoctrination” in the county schools.

        1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
          James Wyatt Whitehead

          Mighty quiet by design.

    2. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      I’ll finish that last paragraph for you. “don’t like the regulations published by the VBOE, elect different members”. Oh, that’s right, we can’t.

      I admit, however, that you nailed me with the “confused electorate” trope. Good one.

      And how, exactly, do I overestimate the power of the VBOE over the school boards? Do they have the option to ignore the Virginia Administrative Code regulations?

      Then there is this: “This whole critical race theory thing is just another boogeyman chased by conservatives”. What rock have you been living under to make that statement?

      Critical theory itself originated in the Frankfurt School, group of researchers associated with the Institute for Social Research in Frankfurt am Main, Germany, who applied Marxism to a radical interdisciplinary social theory.

      Critical race theory came to fruition in American academia more than 30 years ago. It postulates that racism is the driving force in society, that in order to understand power relations, in order to understand institutions such as the law, education, the Constitution, social relations, you have to understand that through the lens of race.

      It is reflected in everything VDOE has done in the last four years at least. Go to the home page of the VBOE at https://www.doe.virginia.gov/boe/index.shtml and read the Statement from the Virginia Board of Education posted there, front and center. CRT 101.

      For the really failing school districts like Richmond, Petersburg and others, CRT serves as a diversion mechanism.

      These schools where huge numbers of students cannot read, write or multiply in the fourth grade are shifting the blame to racism. The self-servingly ignore the fact that in many cases, schools with black majority teachers and administrators have failed for decades to educate black kids in the very basics of what they’re going to need to succeed in life.

      So we have this really evil paradox where these institutions that are perpetuating inequalities are positioning themselves as the great fighters of inequality.

      I think they are amazed they are getting away with it. You apparently are not.

    3. DJRippert Avatar
      DJRippert

      More of what I call “Richmond logic”. Stupid citizens can’t be trusted with democracy. The state should be run by a small cabal of insiders who thwart the will of the people with impunity. Excessive gerrymandering, no term limits (except, bizarrely, the tightest term limit for governor), unlimited campaign contributions, no provision for recalls, no citizen initiated referenda, off year elections … Virginia’s political architecture is designed for anti-democratic manipulation and corruption. This has led to a long list of disgraceful behaviors including the 1902 Constitution (which was in force until 1971), Massive Resistance, an ongoing oligarchy of huge health care providers squeezing Virginians and a transportation system that is a national disgrace.

      Somewhere, Harry Byrd is smiling.

      It’s long past time to defang the Virginia state government and return power to the people. Even if the Richmond elite believe that they are smarter than the population in general.

  7. […] Virginia Needs a Constitutional Amendment to Elect the Board of Education  Bacon’s Rebellion […]

  8. DJRippert Avatar
    DJRippert

    Reading these comments is fascinating. The Richmond based commentators seem to believe that the electorate is too stupid to be trusted with democracy. Commentators from outside Richmond believe that the more the public is engaged and the more that politicians are directly accountable to the voters, the better.

    Does anybody really believe that the electorate could possibly install a worse Board of Education than the one we have now?

    Atif Qani is a perfect example of appointed radicalism. The twice failed political candidate was appointed to be Virginia Secretary of Education by Ralph Northam. Since taking office he has led an attempted radical rewrite of Virginia’s education system. He even compared preparing for a test to using performance enhancing drugs in sports. He couldn’t be elected dog catcher. But he can be (and was) appointed by Northam.

    If “Democracy Thrives in Sunlight” then the glare of an election would certainly add illumination to the cesspool that is our state government in Richmond.

  9. DJRippert Avatar
    DJRippert

    At least in Fairfax County we can recall school board members. Perhaps needless to say, I signed the petition yesterday to recall the Dranesville District school board member, Elaine Tholen. While I was signing the petition a lot of other people were doing the same.

    Contrary to “Richmond logic” the electorate is very engaged in matters of education in Fairfax County. And … we have some limited tools to force politicians who are incompetent and/or negligent to be accountable for their negligence and/or incompetence.

    Refusing to reopen the schools (despite CDC guidance), implementing CRT, pursuing the left’s openly racist “too many Asians” philosophy and presiding over the general decline of public education in the county should get the school board members recalled.

    Pity we don’t have such power at the state level. If we did, would Racist Ralph still be governor after those yearbook pictures became public?

    https://ballotpedia.org/Laura_Cohen_and_Elaine_Tholen_recall,_Fairfax_County_Public_Schools,_Virginia_(2021)

    1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
      James Wyatt Whitehead

      I did the same in Fauquier. Over a 1,000 signatures and the organizers are gathering them the old fashioned way.

    2. LarrytheG Avatar
      LarrytheG

      Well, it would give Conservatives something to do like in California… All that fire and fury… then ..bump… and start all over…

      Then they have Disney…. I can smell a boycott:

      Anti-racism, tattoos and no more ‘wench auctions’: Disney’s ‘woke’ moves spark a conservative backlash
      Disney has taken steps toward inclusivity in recent years. Not everyone is a fan.

      ” “We want to make sure everybody has the best time — that guests from all over the world can connect with the stories we share and that how we bring those to life are respectful of the diverse world we live in,” Chris Beatty, Walt Disney Imagineering creative portfolio executive, told D23, the official Disney fan club.”

      Damn Liberals…now they’ve infested Disney!

Leave a Reply