Virginia May Have Elected a Republican Governor, But It Still Skews Blue

by James A. Bacon

Virginia may have elected three Republicans to statewide office last year, but it’s still a blue state. It’s not a deep blue state, but a solid plurality of voters identify as Democrats. In the latest Wason Center poll, 35% of respondents said they generally consider themselves to be Democrats, compared to 29% who identify as Republicans.

An important reason that Republicans managed to sweep the statewide offices last year is that (a) nearly a third of the electorate (31%) identifies as “independent” and (b) independents skew more conservative than liberal. The same poll found that 34% of Virginia voters consider themselves conservative or very conservative compared to 27% who declare themselves liberal or very liberal.

However, while Governor Glenn Youngkin scores a positive approval rating — 50% approval versus 40% disapproval — 46% of Virginia voters say they are more likely to vote for a Democratic candidate for Congress compared to 40% who say they will go Republican. In an election in which President Joe Biden, a Democrat, is highly unpopular and in which Democrats are widely expected to lose control of Congress, that is a remarkable show of Democratic Party strength.

Perhaps Wason’s latest poll misses a subterranean rightward shift in the electorate. I’m willing to hear out anyone who wants to make that case. But I’m inclined to the view that if Republicans are to accomplish anything lasting, they need to acknowledge that they are underdogs in Virginia and, as underdogs are inclined to do, work harder and smarter than the other guy.

And that brings me to one of my pet peeves: Youngkin’s gallivanting around the country.

Youngkin insisted in a recent network news interview that he has no interest in running for national office and that he will serve out his term as governor. I’m glad to hear that. But I would add that he needs to devote his attention to getting things done here at home.

Look, I like Youngkin. I like his priorities; I like his policies; I like his demeanor; I like his rhetoric; and I like his outreach to minorities. He has done a lot of things to get Virginia back on the right track, especially in schools, higher ed, taxes, and (with qualifications) energy. But almost all of his accomplishments have come through executive orders and appointments, all of which can be undone by the next Democratic governor — which has a high probability of happening in a state with a Democratic-leaning electorate.

Youngkin’s first year saw only modest legislative victories. That’s unsurprising given the fact that the General Assembly session began the same month he stepped into office. Every governor has a learning curve. But he has had nine months since then to get ready for the next two legislative sessions when he has the best opportunity to put his stamp on the state, and what has he done?

Has Youngkin launched any major commissions or task forces to highlight important issues and devise legislative remedies? Other than a commission looking into antisemitism — is the rise of anti-Israel sentiment on college campuses really a pressing concern in Virginia? — I can’t think of anything.

Has he been stumping the state in support of Republican legislators here in Virginia? Has he been recruiting promising candidates to run for the state Senate and recover that body from Democratic control? Even if Republicans re-take the Senate, where are the big ideas?

In his rhetoric, Youngkin has developed a promising theme of tempering the soaring cost of living — higher taxes, higher electric bills, higher college tuitions, and higher housing prices. In an era of punishing inflation, that’s a great strategy. But what do we do about those things?

Youngkin made a promising start by outlining an all-of-the-above energy policy. But he won’t get to first base as long as Democrats, for whom climate change represents an existential threat, control the Senate. He fought to give Virginians a one-time tax rebate this year, when the state was flush with tax revenue and COVID helicopter dollars from Uncle Sam. But a one-time rebate lasts… only one year. He mau-maued Virginia’s public colleges and universities to keep tuition stable this year. But they agreed only because of gigantic increases in state funding, and, by the way, the tuition freeze didn’t apply to student fees or charges for on-campus food and housing. He has highlighted the problem of escalating rents and housing prices. But, while advocates for the poor cry for eviction moratoria, I have seen no concrete alternatives coming from the Governor.

If Youngkin wants to bring about lasting change, he has to identify winning proposals, gain public support for them, and win majorities in both houses of the General Assembly — all in a state with a hostile media, a network of heavily funded “progressive” advocacy groups, and an electorate that skews Democratic. He can’t do that in Nevada, Michigan or Texas. He needs to spend every waking minute at home.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

45 responses to “Virginia May Have Elected a Republican Governor, But It Still Skews Blue”

  1. James McCarthy Avatar
    James McCarthy

    Perhaps, some Republican respondents to the poll were asking themselves, “Am I blue?” Lotsa reasons for the question. With his national image well promoted, Youngthing may be eying the post 2022 midterms before campaigning on home grounds for 2023.

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      Nothing would burnish his national reputation brighter than a GOP win in the state House and Senate next year. I think he gets that.

  2. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    I could have written most of Jim’s article. Lots of rhetoric, but few ideas. Example: what about all those charter schools he promised? That is what you get with a candidate who comes out of the woodwork with no background in government and no real agenda except winning. He was lucky that McAuliffe gave him a handle to use and right now he seems to be a one trick pony, riding that “parents matter” mantra for all he can get out of it.

    1. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      The windex at the top of my mast is less sensitive to the wind than is Trump in a sweater vest. We know he’s deceptive. It’s on a secretly recorded video.

    2. LarrytheG Avatar

      I’d not underestimate Youngkin… he’s got time to do “stuff” – even Charters that start out as “Lab Schools”.

    3. Matt Adams Avatar
      Matt Adams

      Long on rhetoric and short on facts is the summations of all your blog posts.

      As for the rest of your comment, bureaucrats sandbagging their political opponents in Government, humm isn’t that SOP.

    4. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      The windex at the top of my mast is less sensitive to the wind than is Trump in a sweater vest. We know he’s deceptive. It’s on a secretly recorded video.

      Apparently, the only way to determine where a Republican stands on the issues is to catch them on secretly recorded video or question them under oath.

      Now back to the latter, and the Liz Cheney Show…

      The intro is sounding like a criminal referral is in the works.

    5. Eric the half a troll Avatar
      Eric the half a troll

      “…what about all those charter schools he promised?”

      22 new charter schools open on day one wasn’t it…? Crickets from the Right…

  3. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
    James Wyatt Whitehead

    At least the Lt. Governor is present for roll call. I see Winsome Sears traveling the state all of the time and inserting herself into the debate of key issues.

  4. Stephen Haner Avatar
    Stephen Haner

    First, Youngkin’s tax package went way beyond a one time rebate and included a substantial increase in the standard deduction. He also signed changes in the Earned Income Tax Credit program that will provide benefit to many low income working families. It was actually Northam who started the poker game with a single rebate.

    Second, you can’t have a discussion about the state of the current Republican Party brand without dealing with the, pardon the pun, elephant in the room, the most divisive and inflammatory political figure in our lifetimes, Donald Trump. He repels many of those otherwise conservative-leaning independents. He will continue to feed tensions among active Republicans, many of us quite ready for him to fade away. I think the GOP would be looking at 52-54 seats in the U.S. Senate come January except for Trump’s insistence that candidates at least tiptoe around his delusions about the election outcome and his subsequent seditious behavior. And the Biden Administration’s brilliant campaign to prick and bedevil him with legal issues and thus keep him in the news.

    1. Fair enough. Youngkin deserves credit for the standard deduction and EIC. I should have mentioned that in the post.

      Regarding Trump’s impact on the GOP… do you think Republicans would command a majority in both houses in Richmond were it not for Trump’s disruptive influence?

      1. Stephen Haner Avatar
        Stephen Haner

        On balance, in Virginia, Trump probably cost Virginia GOP legislative candidates more than he gained them in 2017 and 2019. And 2019 resulted in the two years of the Democratic trifecta. He was less of a factor in ’21. I sure hope he is not the center of attention in ’23, when both houses are up.

      2. James McCarthy Avatar
        James McCarthy

        Some counts have 299 disrupters running on the GOP ticket across the nation supported by the Chief Disrupter. VA is no exception though they appear to be somewhat quieter. Four GOP Congressfolk voted to reject the 2020 election results from PAA and AZ.

        1. Nancy Naive Avatar
          Nancy Naive

          Methinks the lady doth not know the difference between disruptive and destructive.

        2. Stephen Haner Avatar
          Stephen Haner

          As did numerous D’s four years earlier, as you never admit. In both cases it was a “so what?” moment. Why have a roll call vote if nobody is allowed to vote nay, even if just to posture? I know two of those four personally and both are Great Americans.

          1. James McCarthy Avatar
            James McCarthy

            The Dems did not produce 147 partisan Congressional votes to reject election results. Yes, a few objected. Not a matter of a simple yea or nay as the peaceful transfer of power was the gravamen. Jan 6 & 7 were hardly a “so what” occasion. Y’all can’t normalize that day nor try moral equivalencies to do so.

          2. LarrytheG Avatar

            Yes… it’s funny how they compare the Dems actions on that election with the GOP actions on this one including Jan 6.. apples and apples.. nothing to see here…

            Haner blames Trump but look at what Haner is saying… really Trump-like… normalizing just totally over-the-top behavior…

            Trump and much of the GOP sez Jan 6 was no big deal then other GOP follow by saying… “yeah, the Dems objected to an election also…”

          3. Matt Adams Avatar
            Matt Adams

            “Y’all can’t normalize that day nor try moral equivalencies [sic] to do so.”

            I don’t think you know what a “moral equivalence” is, given your above statement.

          4. James McCarthy Avatar
            James McCarthy

            What I wrote = Moral equivalence is a logical fallacy that asserts that since two things are morally equivalent, to claim that one is better than the other is to commit the logical fallacy of either/or.

            Or, if you prefer false equivalencies.

          5. Matt Adams Avatar
            Matt Adams

            Again, it is clear you don’t know what a “moral equivalence” is.

            There is indeed a “moral equivalence fallacy”, the only person who’s teetering on that is yourself. As you’re conflating arguments, also know as strawman fallacy.

            A moral equivalence is an attempt at an indirect proof, whose reasoning is flawed as it distorts the issues (i.e. your argument).

            No, you wrote “moral equivalencies” [sic] which is why, I quoted you and your made up word.

          6. Matt Adams Avatar
            Matt Adams

            I think it’s a folly to think McCarthy will ever admit his beloved D party has done anything wrong.

            He once tried to bring up 1877, he slank away in the interwebs when asked about Redshirts.

          7. DJRippert Avatar

            Yep. Yet another example of liberals’ double standard. When Ds vote to reject electoral results, that’s fine. When Rs do the same thing, it’s a huge issue.

          8. LarrytheG Avatar

            Did the Dems go on to claim the election was stolen, run for office saying the election had been rigged with massive fraud?

          9. James McCarthy Avatar
            James McCarthy

            Check the facts. Seven Dems objected to the 2016 election returns. Without a Senator’s vote, there was no Congressional vote. 2020 had vote 147 GOP join to reject.

      3. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        By disruptive, you mean flat out lies. You really are anti-democratic, aren’t you? Power over democracy.

        1. DJRippert Avatar

          Biden claimed yesterday that his son Beau died in Iraq. That was a lie. Beau died in Bethesda, MD of cancer.

          Biden claimed that he got a nomination to the US Naval Academy in 1965. That was a lie. There was no nomination and Biden graduated from college in 1965.

          Biden claimed that he once drove 18 wheel trucks. That was a lie.

          Biden claimed that inflation is worse everywhere but here. That was a lie. Inflation is lower in Australia, Canada, China, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and many other countries.

          Biden claimed that since he took office, families are carrying less debt, their average savings are up. That is a lie. Household debt has risen by $1.29 trillion in just the first 15 months of Biden’s presidency.

          Biden claimed that he was a ‘full professor’ for four years at the University of Pennsylvania. That was a lie.

          It’s always interesting to hear liberals spew about Donald Trump’s lies while the senile clown in the oval office now can’t go a day without telling another whopper.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar

            I think you are confused about what “lies” are – which are things purposely designed to deceive others and obfuscate the truth,

            And then you equate Biden to Trump on it.

            Don, I’m pretty sure you’re a Trumper. RIght?

          2. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Keep going. By best count you’ve only some 30,490+ to equal number, but better find a doozey to match the “Stop the Steal” and get anywhere near magnitude.

            https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/01/24/trumps-false-or-misleading-claims-total-30573-over-four-years/

            BTW, at only one per day, he’ll need a second term just to get close.

          3. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            “Biden claimed that he once drove 18 wheel trucks. That was a lie.”

            How do you know that? You his conjoined twin? I could believe that you share a brain.

            I was in my 40s and my father in his 70s when he told me about the one and only time he drove an 18-wheeler. Kennedy Block and Steel. He lied about his experience. Was fired when they found out he took 3 loads on one trip.

          4. James McCarthy Avatar
            James McCarthy

            The President DID NOT say his son died in Iraq. He did say he lost his life in Iraq as a result of exposure to toxins from burn pits. Fox and the Washington Examiner headlined the phrase died in Iraq.

    2. DJRippert Avatar

      I am one of “those otherwise conservative-leaning independents.” I could care less about Donald Trump in the upcoming mid-term elections. He’s not on the ballot.

      Who is on the ballot are people like Jennifer Wexton. She votes 100% of the time with Nancy Pelosi and bears responsibility for the calamitous state of the economy.

      Enough is enough.

      As Bill Clinton once said, “It’s the economy, stupid.”

      1. Matt Adams Avatar
        Matt Adams

        Carville coined it, Bubba J used it.

    3. Joe Jeeva Abbate Avatar
      Joe Jeeva Abbate

      Yes, as this 10 ton toxic, destructive & obviously seditious elephant has seized the GOP and few real conservatives have the courage to stand against that destructive character, even while he drags the party away from many conservatives and “conservative -leaning independents”. Republican candidates may as well be wearing a sign stating “we support Jan 6 and treason” as long as the GOP is lead and influenced by this mad elephant. It’s a horrific situation that will remain until real conservatives stand up and publicly denounce the Jan 6 attack and its leader, and support for the Nazis and racists that were part of the planned attack on our democracy.

  5. Stephen Haner Avatar
    Stephen Haner

    Members of Congress in 2016 and then in 2020 voted against certifying the election results in this state or that…I in no way compared that to the violent, in my opinion treasonous, assault on the Capitol which I believe was directly instigated by Donald Trump. Once again today the House Democrats are laying out their investigation results, but they only confirm what I concluded that very afternoon as I watched the event in horror and counted the hours before Trump called off his mob (which then went home, hard proof he ran the show). To their credit, the Democrats are making it clear that the heroes that day included Pence, McCarthy and McConnell and even some on the White House staff who stood up to a president preaching treason and standing back to let it happen, and who are still standing up to him today.

    The Democrats on this blog lack the integrity or the cojones of those Democrats in Washington.

    1. James McCarthy Avatar
      James McCarthy

      Seven Dems in 2016 attempted to object to election results in several states. Because no Senator joined in an objection, NO vote on those results was taken. Your moral equivalency fails the fact and truth test. The loser of the 216 election conceded. The difference between 2016 and 2020 are qualitatively and quantitatively disparate. There is little point in your comparison.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar

        Haner talks of “integrity” as he makes this argument. Lord.

    2. LarrytheG Avatar

      How many Dems CONTINUED to deny the election results AND claimed the election was stolen by fraud going into the next election running on that?

      You talk “integrity”, How much integrity is it when we’re STILL essentially trying to equate the two actions of the Dems and GOP – Trump aside?

      How do you think Liz Cheney got booted and abandoned by her party?

      re: ” McCarthy and McConnell who stood up to a president preaching treason, and are still standing up to him today.”

      McConnell lets a racist trope aimed at his wife go by as do most GOP and McCarthy is basically a weasel who lies until someone produces a recording.

      integrity?

      1. Stephen Haner Avatar
        Stephen Haner

        I don’t know why I wrestle with a fool since only the fool enjoys it, but golly gee Larry, plenty of Democrats still think and say the 2016 election was rigged (one of them is running in GA again) and continue to say so, and the struggle over censorship of social media is part and parcel of that deep illusion. McConnell is still the GOP Senate Leader and might be majority leader in a few weeks so if tactically he just ignores the fools pestering him (I should learn) that is his decision.

        1. James McCarthy Avatar
          James McCarthy

          Haner, you are flat out wrong. How many Dems are currently running for office on the Big Steal of 2016?

          1. LarrytheG Avatar

            He KNOWS this but he continues this disingenuous argument.

        2. LarrytheG Avatar

          You citing one or two Dems verses how many GOP that are parroting the “steal” right now today AND running on it in elections?

          And like Trump , you seem to enjoy hame-calling… seems to be a GOP thing…for sure

          In no way shape or form is what the Dems did comparable to the GOP today , you’re living in la la land Haner.

          This is the problem with the GOP … they live in denial, spouts lies and gaslight and then yammer about character and integrity.

          You think the Jan 6 thing is not involved with the election.. nor the GOP that says the election was stolen and want audits and more “poll watchers”.

          I don’t see Dems doing any of this, guy.

          The GOP is basically undermining the election process and encouraging mistrust – to the point where election officials are being threatened. Not by Dems.

    3. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      What came out today that I did not know was the amount of intel the WH had many days before the attack and they sat on it.

      But the tell was Jason Miller’s text to Trump with thedonald()com link in which were many, many death threats to Pence if he doesn’t “do the right thing”, i.e., “Pence is a dead man walking if he doesn’t do the right thing”.

      Then on J6 how many times Trump echoed that “do the right thing”. 4 times.

      “And he looked at Mike Pence, and I hope Mike is going to do the right thing. I hope so. I hope so.

      Because if Mike Pence does the right thing, we win the election. All he has to do, all this is, this is from the number one, or certainly one of the top, Constitutional lawyers in our country. He has the absolute right to do it. We’re supposed to protect our country, support our country, support our Constitution, and protect our constitution.”

      Then the tweet… “Mike Pence didn’t have the courage to do what was necessary.”

      We call that a “code phrase” for “kill him”.

    4. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      To their credit? Has the committe called any Democrats? After all, it’s not like any Democrats were in on this crime.

      I once sat a jury to which the prosector cautioned us that NONE of the witnesses were fine upstanding citizens because fine upstanding citizens don’t commit murder.

      BTW, you could go back to 2001…

      “When it came time to count Florida’s votes, House Democrats, most of them members of the Congressional Black Caucus, rose one by one to object to the awarding of the state’s 25 electors to Bush and his running mate, Richard B. Cheney. In each case, Gore, standing behind the speaker’s desk, ruled the objection could not be heard because of an 1877 law that requires any protest of electoral votes to be accompanied by the signature of a senator. No senator had agreed to join in the 20 objections raised by the House Democrats.”

  6. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Insurrection? BS. Try felony murder. The DC prosector should take today’s televised hearing, convene a grand jury and indict Trump on 1st degree murder charges.

    https://code.dccouncil.gov/us/dc/council/code/titles/22/chapters/21

    “Whoever, …, kills another purposely, … in perpetrating or attempting to perpetrate an offense punishable by imprisonment in the penitentiary, or without purpose to do so kills another in perpetrating or in attempting to perpetrate … mayhem, … is guilty of murder in the first degree.”

    At the very least, the family of the police officer killed should file suit for wrongful death using vicarious liability. The SPLC got Tom Metzger for the murder of Mulugeta Seraw.

Leave a Reply