Courtesy NBC 6                                                             6’7” 270 pound student assaults teaching aide

by James C. Sherlock

In 2019, the National Education Association (NEA) published Threatened and Attacked By Students: When Work Hurts, urging lawmakers to address the crisis of unsafe behaviors in schools.

Read about Chesterfield schools in that article.

Unfazed, progressives in 2020 in full control of the General Assembly, led by now-Congresswoman-elect Jennifer McClellan, looked to break what they considered a “school-to-prison pipeline.”

They changed Virginia law to eliminate the requirement for principals to report misdemeanor assault and battery in Virginia schools, on school buses or at school-sponsored events to law enforcement.

Even battery on school staff.

It would seem to me, if I worked in a school, useful to require such violence to be reported to law enforcement.

But maybe that’s just me.

Change in Virginia law. Until 2020, Virginia school principals were required to report all crimes occurring on school property, on buses or at school-sponsored events to law enforcement.

Very straightforward.

Not any more.

See the 2020 change below to § 22.1-279.3:1. Reports of certain acts to school authorities; reports of certain acts by school authorities to parents; reports of certain acts by school authorities to law enforcement.

D. Except as may otherwise be required by federal law, regulation, or jurisprudence, the principal shall immediately report to the local law-enforcement agency any act enumerated in clauses (ii) through (vii) of subsection A that may constitute a criminal felony offense and may report to the local law-enforcement agency any incident described in clause (i)of subsection A.

So, principals now must assume the role of both judge and jury and determine whether the assault and battery is a Class 1 misdemeanor or, based on either intent or extent of injuries, a felony.

Really.

Misdemeanor assault and battery. Assault and battery are not defined in Virginia law, just the penalties.  

Battery as generally defined in common law can be harmful or offensive.

A harmful contact of battery is contact causing physical impairment or injury, while an offensive contact of battery is a contact that makes a reasonable person of ordinary sensibilities feel threatened.

Code of Virginia § 18.2-57. Assault and battery; penalty.

A.  Any person who commits a simple assault or assault and battery is guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor.

D. In addition, if any person commits a battery against another knowing or having reason to know that such other person is a full-time or part-time employee of any public or private elementary or secondary school and is engaged in the performance of his duties as such, he is guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor

So, a principal is no longer required to report to law enforcement misdemeanor assault and battery not only against students, but also against teachers and staff.

Even if bodily injury occurs.

Unless he judges it to be a felony.

Felony assault and battery. There are two situations that require reporting to police because the battery rises to the level of a felony.  

  1. If under § 18.2-57 B. the principal discerns the battery occurred with intent to injure a person because he/she is a member of a listed protected class; or
  2. if the battery results in a “serious bodily injury.”

Serious bodily injury is defined in § 18.2-51.4. Maiming, etc., of another resulting from driving while intoxicated and referred to for definition purposes in other statutes such as § 18.2-58. Robbery; penalties.

“serious bodily injury” means bodily injury that involves substantial risk of death, extreme physical pain, protracted and obvious disfigurement, or protracted loss or impairment of the function of a bodily member, organ, or mental faculty.

“Maiming” cross-references to “serious bodily injury” in that and other Virginia laws.

As an aside, one wonders if the “serious bodily injury” assessment is to be made by the school nurse who may or may not be certified in trauma. Because if 911 is called to assess, treat and/or transport the injured party, police as well as EMS will show up.

Got all that?

You are now qualified to be a principal in a Virginia public school or a juvenile and domestic relations court judge.

Change the law. The Democratic General Assembly made the law change purposely to hide from law enforcement assault and battery in schools.

It puts pressure on the principals not to report. And they are the ones who have to face the parents.

It was signed into law by a Ralph Northam damaged and submissive after the blackface scandal that broke on Feb. 1, 2019.

Simply said, the law as written is on its face unacceptably dangerous for students and staff.

It needs to be changed to list battery as an offense that must be reported to law enforcement regardless of the level of injuries sustained.

Or Virginia will continue by law to enable school violence.

School boards. Importantly, I find no restrictions in law that prohibit school boards by policy from requiring principals to report all incidents of battery to law enforcement.

Maybe even report a six-year-old who, say, strangles a teacher. So, maybe he does not come back another day and shoot one.

Perhaps they can prevent a student like the one in the picture, who has grown to NFL size, from learning early in Virginia that violence in school can be expunged in a restorative justice circle.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

51 responses to “Virginia Law Enables School Violence – School Board Policies Can Correct It”

  1. Violence is just the outward expression of words when one has a limited vocabulary

  2. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Two words: “Pamela” and “Smart”.

    This violence has been and always will be. “Cain, meet Able.”

    1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      Not about violence, Nancy. It is about reporting violence to the police. Comment on that.

  3. Stephen Haner Avatar
    Stephen Haner

    Given the media’s political leanings, what gets reported has to be just the tip of the iceberg, the events captured on camera. Look, the Newport News incident made it clear the goal of the administration in too many schools is to avoid rocking the boat or angering the parents of these bad seeds, given the parents probably taught the behavior. That kid’s gun was not found on a street corner.

    1. No reason to believe that the “parents taught the behavior”. Just because a principal is not required to report incidents to law enforcement does not mean that they might not choose to do so. Hard to see where this minor change in the law actually enables violence.

      1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
        James C. Sherlock

        Because it puts pressure on the principals not to report. And they are the ones who have to face the parents.

        1. Not sure saying that they don’t have to report it amounts to pressure. In fact, it might be easier to face the parents after reporting these incidents. Would like to think that the principals actually do have a good relationship with local law enforcement.

          1. LarrytheG Avatar

            yes. Many schools have LE as resource officers and they see the same incidents as the principals do and more than likely discuss.

          2. Local School Boards do not want their schools do get/have a reputation for being violent and dangerous. They put pressure on the Superintendent and his upper level administration to reduce reporting of violent incidents as much as is allowable under the law. These people then make sure the school principals know what is expected of them. Principals with higher than “normal” numbers of reported incidents will get noticed by the superintendent’s office – and not in a good way.

            That’s where the pressure on principals comes from.

          3. You make a good point about school boards but the principal is the one that has to face the parents who surely do hear about these incidents. It still seems easier to be able to tell the parents that it has been reported and that the school is indeed working with local LE.

          4. You also make a good point. It seems principals will end up with the [dirty] end of the stick no matter what they decide to do.

    2. Nancy Naive Avatar
      Nancy Naive

      If it bleeds it leads trumps all political persuasions.

  4. James McCarthy Avatar
    James McCarthy

    How and who selects the images to accompany articles?

    1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      The author does. I did.

  5. walter smith Avatar
    walter smith

    And the “kid” was from a “marginalized” race so beating up the white teacher aide is OK?
    But she was a woman and a teacher! How does this run through your victim analysis heirarchy?
    (Rhetorical – we know – whatever is wrong is what Lefties think right, but thanks for adding location to the calculation Joy Behar)

    1. walter smith Avatar
      walter smith

      Sure Troll. Does the Red Florida County teach the same stupidity? Isn’t this what DeSatan is trying to get rid of? Parkland? Orlando shooter? People are capable of evil anywhere and everywhere, and the big part of all these problems everywhere (trigger warning, particularly for you and Dr. SCIENCE!) is ILLEGITIMACY. And in all the stupid policies favored by people like you, you won’t acknowledge your policies don’t work, so you ramp up more stupid policies to address the stupid problems you have created. Never let a crisis go to waste said all the Marxists…
      Deal with it

      1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
        Eric the half a troll

        So Special Needs Students (Special Education Students in your days) are caused by ILLEGITIMACY in your world, eh… Not surprisingly…

        1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
          James C. Sherlock

          Who, other than you, brought up special needs students?

          Clearly, you need to change the subject. Not working.

          1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
            Eric the half a troll

            Ummm… Sherlock… the student you referred to when you said, “Perhaps they can prevent a student like the one in the picture, who has grown to NFL size…” is a Special Needs student…

          2. Eric the half a troll Avatar
            Eric the half a troll

            Ummm… Sherlock… the student you referred to when you said, “Perhaps they can prevent a student like the one in the picture, who has grown to NFL size…” is a Special Needs student…

        2. walter smith Avatar
          walter smith

          Troll – you and your ilk just can’t help but be wrong. All the time, every time. You couldn’t even match an old fashioned clock.
          Looks like Flagler Co has PBIS and has similar issues…
          https://flaglerlive.com/79487/civil-rights-lawsuit-flagler-disciplinary/
          https://www.flaglerschools.com/students-families/behavior-discipline
          https://www.learningforjustice.org/magazine/summer-2016/flagler-county-a-case-for-suspension-abolition
          So the Obama DOE and the hacktivists threaten due to “disparities” and Flagler has to get rid of things like zero tolerance, so NFL size “kids” can maul teachers,in Florida, 6 year olds are so disassociated that they want to shoot teacher, but we need more policies from Larry and Troll and James McCarthy (who thinks the picture is racist, even if true).
          Biggest problem in our society – ILLEGITIMACY.
          Crime, schools, poverty – all tied in.

          1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
            James C. Sherlock

            You bought the progressives’ transition of the argument to Florida, Walter. Watch for such deflection.

          2. James C. Sherlock Avatar
            James C. Sherlock

            You are the one who said “all evil” Larry.

            You and Eric extended your comments on this article to an issue I did not raise. That is his playbook.

            Illegitimacy is the root of a lot of school issues, Larry. And I think you would agree with that.

            But not “all evil”.

          3. James C. Sherlock Avatar
            James C. Sherlock

            The U.N. suggests that 246 million children and adolescents experience violence in and around school every year. So yes.

          4. walter smith Avatar
            walter smith

            And you seem to do the same old thing, changing the subject, misinterpreting, anything to ignore that your policies damage the people you claim to want to help…
            Illegitimacy is a problem for everyone. I think no fault divorce was a bad thing, too, society wise. Let me throw one more at you to really trigger you – an amazing thing happens at conception – a life is created. If you argue convenience of mother, you are a eugenicist.

          5. James McCarthy Avatar
            James McCarthy

            Most insightful post!! Not a single hypothetical question.

          6. walter smith Avatar
            walter smith

            No mind reading required. If you are a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
            If you claim to be an anti-racist (which is per se racist in application), then anything you don’t like is racist.
            Quod erat demonstrandum

    2. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      It didn’t take a genius ten or twenty years ago to see what kind of society we were intentionally creating. That student behaved intentionally, doing what he was told to do (By a parent? A song? A TV character?) to an oppressor who interfered with his right to play with whatever toy he wanted to play with. That is learned behavior. He is just a larger version of the 6-year-old who shot the teacher in Newport News because she prevented him from following his impulses.

      They are perpetual toddlers, in a permanent state of the terrible twos. With guns. Lots of them.

      Never watched “Walking Dead.” Am streaming it now. Gee, why is America so violent, why do so many place no value on human life? No idea….

      1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
        James C. Sherlock

        The article is about requiring principals in Virginia to report assault and battery to police.

      2. James C. Sherlock Avatar
        James C. Sherlock

        He did not have a gun when he strangled the other teacher.

        1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
          James C. Sherlock

          You responded to me, but yet I made no such statement. Try to keep up.

          1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
            James C. Sherlock

            What you and Steve were discussing had nothing whatever to do with my article, yet you responded to me as if I had said it.

            Stay in the lane you pick.

    3. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      Not my job or intention to defend Sherlock’s assertions, and yes the presence in our society of so many guns has changed the nature of the threat from violent students. What I also think is different, though, is the desire to kill and the disregard for human life. I’ll even get more direct and tie those attitudes to the embrace of abortion as an actual social good.

      That Fla case has my attention. My wife is back in the classroom daily as an instructional aide now.

      1. vicnicholls Avatar
        vicnicholls

        I disagree with guns being the issue. Its the people, attitudes, lifestyles. Abortion too.

  6. James C. Sherlock Avatar
    James C. Sherlock

    Take a deep breath.

    The article is not about Florida. It is about the wisdom of requiring Virginia principals to report battery to Virginia law enforcement officials.

    Stay on topic.

    Are you in favor of that or against it?

    1. James McCarthy Avatar
      James McCarthy

      Gotcha questions are soooo juvenile.

    2. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      So yes or no to the question of whether Virginia principals should be required to report battery to the police is a gotcha?

      Thank you for making that clear.

    3. VaPragamtist Avatar
      VaPragamtist

      I’m undecided. There’s nothing preventing Virginia principals from reporting battery to law enforcement officials.

      You argue that making it a requirement would prevent assault. But you use Flagler County as an example of a place with zero tolerance and provide an example of how Flagler’s zero tolerance policy didn’t prevent a life-threatening assault.

      So what’s your evidence that a zero-tolerance policy and requiring principals to report assault will prevent future assault?

  7. James C. Sherlock Avatar
    James C. Sherlock

    Nice try. The article was about requiring principals to report assault and battery to police.

    To avoid that, you took the last sentence and tortured it wrongly to change the subject. Without addressing the point of the article.

    I wrote “like the one in the picture” in order to make a point.

    Not every student is eight and 80 pounds.

    I was not referring to that kid in particular.

    Flagler County has zero tolerance for assault and a long list of crimes and principals must report it to law enforcement. https://go.boarddocs.com/fla/flcsd/Board.nsf/goto?open&id=8ZMP7763322D#

    So does Florida law.

    I am interested to know whether you support the current Virginia law as modified in 2020.

    1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      You are utterly reliable, Eric. When you can’t face the main topic of an article, you pick out one sentence, misuse it, and try to change the subject.

      You really should see someone about that.

    2. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      We are saying, Eric, that it is irrelevant to the topic, which is Virginia public schools and Virginia law and policy.

    3. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      This kid nearly killed that teachers’ aide. In Flagler County, in contrast to say, Richmond, the prosecutors will make sure he does not do such a thing again for a very long time.

    4. vicnicholls Avatar
      vicnicholls

      No because they know there are consequences for actions, so people teach and model behavior that isn’t condusive to kids acting like that.

    5. “To avoid that, you took the last sentence and tortured it wrongly to change the subject. Without addressing the point of the article.”

      That’s who he is. If it were not for misrepresentation he would have nothing to say.

      1. Matt Adams Avatar

        Intellectual dishonesty at it’s finest.

  8. vicnicholls Avatar
    vicnicholls

    Witnesses would be able to be threatened into silence. Seen that by the R’s in a majority R ruled city. Works both ways.

  9. James C. Sherlock Avatar
    James C. Sherlock

    I wrote the headline.

    The change to the law enabled violence because it put principals on the hot seat.

    It took away their ability to say to parents who are their neighbors “it is out of my hands” and put them personally on the spot.

    It particularly put them on the spot when law and policy simultaneously ordered them to keep offenders in school rather that suspend them out of school or expel them.

    Jennifer McClellan, who sponsored the change to the law, made no apology for what she was trying to do.

    She did not want school assault perpetrators reported to the police.

    Do you have a different opinion or am I wasting my time?

    I suspect the latter but surprise me.

  10. James C. Sherlock Avatar
    James C. Sherlock

    Neither one of us have any idea what you are talking about.

    1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
      Eric the half a troll

      Here, I will explain it to you:
      The law states:
      “ D. Except as may otherwise be required by federal law, regulation, or jurisprudence, the principal shall immediately report to the local law-enforcement agency any act enumerated in clauses (ii) through (vii) of subsection A that may constitute a criminal felony offense”
      In other words, the principal must report any offense that may be a felony.
      You changed that to:
      “So principals now must assume the role of both judge and jury and determine whether the assault and battery is a Class 1 misdemeanor or, based on either intent or extent of injuries, a felony.”
      So the only crime the principal may opt to not involve police in is where they know it does not rise to the level of a felony and then they still can if they so choose – they never have to determine if the offense is actually a felony. That little shift of wording twisted the intent of the law. This law creates no onus on the principal and only provides them with a very narrow alternative for a very few select scenarios.
      Do you understand now…?

  11. DJRippert Avatar

    “The Democratic General Assembly made the law change purposely to hide from law enforcement assault and battery in schools.”

    That seems likely. Why else would the Democratic General Assembly make that change?

  12. Kathleen Smith Avatar
    Kathleen Smith

    Read the sections of the code changed in 2022.
    2022, cc. 793, 794.

Leave a Reply