radiation symbolBy Peter Galuszka

In his typical business-only fashion, Gov. Robert F. McDonnell has named several nuclear energy industry executives to the new, 17-member, non-profit Virginia Nuclear Energy Consortium Authority set up this year just as the move to end the uranium mining moratorium was augering in for a crash.

Hmm. Let’s check this out. State politics and global economics make mining uranium a non-starter for Virginia Uranium that has spent $300,000 plus on political donations over the past five years. No can do the moratorium end thing.

So, with nuclear flaying and AREVA laying people off, we suddenly have the need for some public entity that is a non-profit. I love the details. Although public it will NOT have to bother with Freedom of Information Act requests. Its members will NOT be bound by rules pertaining to state employees. I guess that means reporting or limiting personal gifts and the like.

And, in classic McDonnell form, the participants are either state officials, college types, lobbyists or people with a very definite stake in making money from the nuclear industry. There is not ONE person from the environmental sector. Not ONE engineer skeptical of nuclear power. Not ONE person concerned about Virginia Uranium’s mining operation that is deemed enough of a threat to groundwater that it has everyone from the State of North Carolina to cities in Hampton Roads up in arms. THEY don’t count since they obviously are not STAKEHOLDERS and know nothing about nuclear power (Jim Bacon, please tell me if I am wrong, given your previous, suck-up posting).

Let’s see who is on-board:

  • The director of the Department of Mines, Minerals and Energy; the CEO of the Virginia Economic Development Partnership; and several college presidents.
  • Michael Rencheck of Powell, Ohio, president and CEO of Areva Inc., which has operations in the Lynchburg area. “The Virginia Nuclear Energy Consortium Authority’s collaboration and research efforts will help drive the future of nuclear energy and support the country’s clean energy vision,” Rencheck said in a statement.  “I am honored to serve … and look forward to working with my fellow board members to address important issues in the nuclear energy industry.” Gee, he sounds like someone with an open mind to energy sources other than nuclear.
  • Marshall Cohen of Fairfax, vice president of government affairs and communications at The Babcock and Wilcox Co.
  • David Christian of Toano, executive vice president of Dominion Resources and CEO of Dominion Generation.
  • Colleen Deegan of Rockville, Md., vice president of government programs for Bechtel.
  • Donald R. Hoffman of Bethesda, Md., president and CEO of Excel Services Corp. and president of the American Nuclear Society.
  • Maureen Matsen of Richmond, counsel for Christopher Newport University in Newport News.
  • Matthew J. Mulherin of Yorktown, president of Newport News Shipbuilding and corporate vice president of Huntington Ingalls Industries.
  •  Ganapati Myneni of Yorktown, senior scientist at Jefferson Lab.
  • Ron Sones of Gladstone, professor of business at Liberty University and president of SIBS LLC.
  •  Kiyoshi Yamauchi of Arlington, chief executive director of Mitsubishi Nuclear Energy Systems, Inc.

And not one environmentalist. Not one person from the Union of Concerned Scientists. Not one person from Southside who questions Virginia Uranium.

CLASSIC Bob McDonnell!


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

14 responses to “Virginia Does NOT Say Yes to Nuclear”

  1. DJRippert Avatar

    Doesn’t Virginia need an over-arching energy strategy before we embark on a nuclear strategy?

    Who is building our over-arching energy strategy?

  2. From the legislation: “The purposes of the Consortium include … conducting … activities useful in (i) making the Commonwealth a leader in nuclear energy, (ii) serving as an interdisciplinary study, research, and information resource for the Commonwealth on nuclear energy issues, and (iii) raising money on behalf of the Authority in the corporate and nonprofit community and from other nonstate sources.”

    You can take exception to the legislation. But McDonnell is just appointing representatives consistent with the aims of the legislation.

    While I have major reservations about uranium mining, I think it’s a great idea to pursue nuclear-related research and economic development in Virginia that’s not tied to uranium mining. You want industry and university people on this board, not citizens and activists. There is an appropriate place for citizens and activists to be involved in drafting legislation and/or environmental regulations affecting uranium mining. But not in this authority.

  3. Peter Galuszka Avatar
    Peter Galuszka

    “There is an appropriate place for citizens and activists to be involved in drafting legislation and/or environmental regulations affecting uranium mining. But not in this authority.”

    The overwhelming arrogance of this statement is stunning. Why is the state support such PRIVATE interests? “This is not the appropriate” place for citizens to voice concerns about a key element of their future – energy policy and the safety of the air and water they need to survive.

    JEEEEEEZZZZZ!!!!

  4. HillCityJim Avatar
    HillCityJim

    This committee kind of reminds me of one in Lynchburg established by the Democratic majority on City Council and the all Democratic appointed School Board that appointed an all Democratic committee to do a study to see if we needed to build a new, newer high school to replace the, get ready, 30 year old one in use.

    Guess what? You want the end result to go your way, you never want to appoint free thinkers that might have views that contradict yours!

    The nuclear business outside of the Navy is dying because Nat gas is way cheaper and a hellofalot safer!

  5. If smaller, town or city-scale nukes – that auto-shutdown instead of melt-down could be designed – it might get somewhere but as HCJ points out the economics are not good.

    Most of the smaller island nations on the globe that do not have native fossil fuels – no coal or oil or nat gas – they import fossil fuels – and electricity costs 3-4 times what it costs where coal/nat gas is available on the mainland.

    you’d think these island nations would be the perfect place for smaller-scale nukes – but it appears to not be the case.

    I live 17 miles from North Anna – and we were told from the get go that it was not built in an area that had a chance of a snow ball in hell to have earthquakes – and all those guys – they were wrong.

    In Japan – built them so they’d be resistant to tsunamis but guess what…???

    I don’t trust the pro-nuke folks as far as I can throw them.. they have too much arrogance and not enough common sense and the result are disasters.

  6. Breckinridge Avatar
    Breckinridge

    Classic Larry, classic anti nuke hysteria. How many killed or sickened by air pollution as we burned oil and coal to make electricity? How many killed by accidents at commercial nuclear plants in the US? Hmmmmm.

    The consortium was established to support the commercial nuclear industry and university research and had nothing to do with mining. You see no company on the list involved in mining. Even with the power companies like Dominion, the government provides the fuel. But given the timing I can write that a thousand times and you’ll call me a liar. So time will just have to demonstrate that.

    The various public information exemptions are very, very similar (if not identical) to those in the statute setting up the Offshore Wind Authority. Whoa Nelly! You didn’t see that coming, did you! Digging around for complaints from Peter G about the secretive wind research process…finding none.

    1. reed fawell III Avatar
      reed fawell III

      Good point!

      The Nuclear power industry had the best safely record of any industry in America, bar none. The last time I looked, not a single death has been attributable to an nuclear power plant accident, operating in America.

      On the issue of Nuclear power, the Union of Concerned Scientists for decades had proven themselves ideologues of the most irresponsibly sort imaginable. The kind that give responsible scientists a bad name.

  7. re: classic Larry – you mean by acknowledging the obvious realities – pretty much the view of most others is “classic Larry”?

    I think when you can convince people that Nukes are no more a danger than wind -you may make some headway but most normal people look at what is going on in Japan as not good.

    re: the “government” provides the fuel… Jesus Breckinridge – you trust the govt?

    when did you change?

    ๐Ÿ˜‰

  8. and don’t get me wrong – when we come up with pebble bed or sodium based reactors that won’t do what North Anna or the plants in Japan do in a casualty situation.. I’m all for the technology.

    I’d LOVE to see a technology that does not require the govt to be the insurer of last resort in case of a disaster.

  9. Breckinridge Avatar
    Breckinridge

    Good grief. What disaster, natural or financial, in the last 100 years has not been followed by government assistance? Who issues the flood insurance policies in the first place? I’m not thrilled about this, but it is a reality. The technology behind Fukushima is 30 years old, and those few remaining plants of that design are being phased out or changed. North Anna is a generation ahead of that, and any addition to North Anna will be two generations ahead of those first two reactors. Financially there is every reason to doubt that North Anna 3 is in our immediate future, but there is no safety or health reason to fear it and plenty of environmental reasons to want it. If you want to see sodium based reactors or other new approaches, well, so do I and I WANT THEM DEVELOPED IN VIRGINIA which is what this nuclear industry consortium is all about.

    So you’re for it, right?

  10. Nuke disasters are much much damaging and unfixable than natural disaster Breckinridge. More than 100,000 people are off the adjacent lands for a long time and the ocean will have radiation oozing into it for a longer time.

    I totally disagree with you about North Anna 3. Recent statements from Dominion itself cast doubts that they could attract financing for it and it’s time for Dominion to move away from this kind of reactor and towards the ones that will not run away.

    It’s totally delusional to continue to pursue plants that can melt down IMHO.

    saying there is no health or safety issue to fear – when a melt-down is still possible is foolish. One terrorist-guided airliner can send more than 100,000 people off their land …for a generation or more. If what happened to the Louisa High School happened to North Anna – it would be broken and shut down right now and heavy knows in what condition.

    Name another civilian technology that has that kind of potential…

    The insurance companies have made it clear – they will not 100% insure these plants. There’s a reason why.

    It’s not clear to me what this commission is going to do. It’s not really cast as an economic development effort – but I’ll say this – if it is about developing in Va a capability to develop new designs and licensing, I’m all for it but you have to have a physical site to do that and I’m not seeing that.

    DOE has sites to do this. How is Va going to actually get into this?

    DOE Nuclear R&D sites

  11. Thank you Peter Galuszka for the article and I couldn’t agree with you more.
    Nuclear energy is dangerous, dirty and expensive. The whole fuel cycle is toxic and why should we continue with this form of energy that leaves future generations with toxic forever waste…with no way or where to safely store for thousands of years. Oh and I have NO confidence in the nuclear industry and the nuclear rubberstamping commission.
    Get real people. It’s time to move towards renewable energy sources.
    Dominion is still going through the motions for the 3rd reactor at North Anna….how stupid is that, to put yet another nuke on the fault line.
    As it goes for the Nuclear Energy Consortium, I attended the hearings and even though we do have a Wind Consortium, it plainly is /was not written the same. Nor does wind energy present the risks like nuclear.
    Plus there are ~ Routine Radioactive Releases from US Nuclear Power
    http://www.beyondnuclear.org/storage/documents/Routine%20Releases_Dec%202012.pdf
    I now have seen 3 nuclear accidents in my life time, TMI,Chernobyl and Fukushima. Enough is Enough!

  12. Thank you Peter. I recently filmed a segment for my documentary “HOT WATER” which was screened in Halifax this past July – and am once again surprised/not surprised that so many are either ignorant of the facts or arrogant in ignoring them. There is NO safe level of radiation. Period.
    This film doesn’t preach to the choir – it talks to people like me, who knew nothing about the issue, are not activists, and are the ones that need to be educated on the risks.
    I now know enough about the subject to be REALLY annoying at dinner parties.
    I’m constantly using the Virginia activist community as an example of how this battle should be fought, and will continue to do so. They have inspired and encouraged me to continue this work.
    HOT WATER will release soon, the trailer can be seen at http://www.zerohotwater.com
    @ZeroHotWater on twitter
    https://www.facebook.com/pages/HOT-WATER/192042100867185?fref=ts

  13. ” I now know enough about the subject to be REALLY annoying at dinner parties.”

    ๐Ÿ˜‰

    yup! Would Love to see you and Breckinridge together at one!

    ๐Ÿ˜‰

Leave a Reply