USA Women’s National Team 2019

by James C. Sherlock

Abigail Spanberger, (D) Va. – Voted against protections for girls and women in sports

Every Virginia Democratic member of the U.S. House of Representatives voted against a bill to amend Title IX to prohibit biological boys and men from competing against biological girls and women in K-12 and college sports.

Voting nay: Donald Beyer, Gerald Connolly, Jennifer McClellan, Bobby Scott, Abigail Spanberger and Jennifer Wexton.

H.R. 734 Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act of 2023 amends Title IX (“on the basis of sex”) by stating that the term “sex” in athletics shall be recognized based solely on a person’s reproductive biology and genetics at birth.

Jennifer McClellan (D) Va. – Voted against protections for girls and women in sports

The consequences of a no vote. H.R. 734 protects the dreams and hard work of girls who wish to play college sports.

The ones who got up early and stayed late training for their sport. The ones whose parents ferried them to practice and games on weekends.

It protects girls and young women in contact sports such as soccer and field hockey from inevitable injury from bigger, stronger, faster men.

Indeed, it protects their ability to participate.

It prevents the biological male who never won a medal from deciding — no hormones or surgery required — he is female to mount the platform and be awarded the gold. To break records set by girls and women.

To get rich with the new NIL rule in college sports and richer yet in women’s professional sports.

Everyone who thinks that won’t happen, raise your hand.

Not including the women with their hands already raised celebrating their 2019 FIFA World Cup victory in the photo above.

Jennifer Wexton (D) Va. – Voted against protections for girls and women in sports

It protects girls and young women against the type of devastating injury suffered by volleyball player Payton McNabb, a senior at Hiwassee Dam High School in Murphy, North Carolina, who suffered a concussion and neck injury during a game in September when a trans athlete sent the ball into her face.

House Democrats opposed the bill unanimously. Every Virginia Democrat in that body voted “no.”

Four of the six have daughters. The votes were undeniably anti-girl/woman.

The world is coming apart at its very seams.

Title IX is codified as Public Law No. 92‑318, 86 Stat. 235 (June 23, 1972), codified at 20 U.S.C. §§ 1681–1688.

To quote the Biden Department of Education:

Title IX applies to schools, local and state educational agencies, and other institutions that receive federal financial assistance from the Department.

These recipients include approximately 17,600 local school districts, over 5,000 postsecondary institutions, and charter schools, for-profit schools, libraries, and museums. Also included are vocational rehabilitation agencies and education agencies of 50 states, the District of Columbia, and territories of the United States.

The authors of H.R. 734 agree with that. That is why the Biden interpretation is so dangerous.

The achievements of Title IX in women’s sports. From How Title IX Transformed Women’s Sports:

In 1972, there were just over 300,000 women and girls playing college and high school sports in the United States. Female athletes received 2 percent of college athletic budgets, while athletic scholarships for women were virtually nonexistent.

From The Washington Post in June of 2022, the 50th anniversary of Title IX:

The National Federation of State High School Associations says almost 3.5 million girls played high school sports in 2018-2019. More than 200,000 women play sports in college. That’s 44 percent of all college athletes.

In addition, there are millions of girls who play soccer, softball, basketball and many other sports every day across the United States.

If those girls don’t get the chance to play, they might not become the high school, college, professional or Olympian athletes of the future.

H.R. 734

was offered to protect those gains on the basis of sex against a Biden administration determined to attack them on the basis of gender identity.

From the AP:

The sponsor, Rep. Greg Steube, R-Fla., highlighted the case of Emma Weyant, a resident of his district and a 2020 member of the U.S. Olympic swimming team who finished second in the NCAA women’s 500-yard freestyle championship last year. She was defeated by Lia Thomas, who had competed for three years on the University of Pennsylvania men’s swimming team before joining the women’s team.

Democrats said every child regardless of gender identity deserves the opportunity to belong to a team and that preventing competitors from doing so sends the message that they don’t matter.

But the last sentence quotes Democrats lying by omission.

By voting against this bill, Democrats say that biological boys who identify as transgender deserve the opportunity to belong to a girls team. That is the Biden position.

It is not a small distinction.

H.R. 734 amends Title IX to eliminate that interpretation.

It prohibits school athletic programs from allowing individuals whose biological sex at birth was male to participate in programs that are for women or girls.

The opportunity offered to biological boys by H.R. 734 is to try out for the boys teams.

Shower with them, not the freshman girls.

Bostock v Clayton County. The claim that gender identity is an instantiation of the term “sex” under Title IX is the current official interpretation of the Biden Administration.

They assert that claim is supported by a 2020 Supreme Court opinion on Title VII, Bostock v. Clayton County, an employment practices case. They recently got their hats handed to them by a federal judge.

Tennessee v. Department of Education. The Biden interpretation of Bostock has been enjoined by a federal judge in THE STATE OF TENNESSEE, et al., ) Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, et al., Defendants.

The judge in Tennessee cited the Sixth Circuit:

Bostock extends no further than Title VII.

The Sixth Circuit has also recognized, “it does not follow that principles announced in the Title VII context automatically apply in the Title IX context.” Meriwether v. Hartop, 922 F.3d 492, 510 n.4 (6th Cir. 2021).

The judge also found with regards to Bostock:

The (Supreme) Court expressly declined to “prejudge” other issues that might be implicated by Title VII, such as “sex-segregated bathrooms, locker rooms, and dress codes.”

The Tennessee ruling in part:

Therefore, in applying Bostock to Title IX, the Department overlooked the caveats expressly recognized by the Supreme Court and created new law.

Thus that the “interpretation” was in fact legislative, not administrative. Ouch.

That:

Plaintiffs (9 states) can show that the Department of Education’s guidance creates rights for students and obligations for regulated entities not to discriminate based on sexual orientation or gender identity that appear nowhere in Bostock, Title IX, or its implementing regulations.

Finally:

it is hereby ordered that Federal Defendants and all their respective officers, agents, employees, attorneys, and persons acting in concert or participation with them are ENJOINED and RESTRAINED from implementing the Interpretation, Dear Educator Letter, Fact Sheet, and the Technical Assistance Document against Plaintiffs

Read all of the MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER in Tennessee to learn a great deal about this issue.

Those six Virginia Democrats could have done so. That injunction was filed July 15, 2022.

Bottom line. There is absolutely no question that if H.R. 734 becomes law, girls and women will be protected in their participation in sports at the K-12 and college levels.

The Biden court filings on the other hand, under appeal to the Sixth Circuit, if ultimately successful would result in the Biden interpretation of Title IX under which:

  • girls and women in sports are threatened physically by the participation of biological males on their sports teams;
  • girls and women risk biological boys and men occupying their changing rooms and showers (see the government source documents in Tennessee);
  • biological males will take their spots on those teams;
  • biological males will take their medals;
  • biological males will take their scholarships to college; and
  • biological males will earn the money from NIL and professional careers that females currently do.
6’4” Lia Thomas, once male now female swimmer for the University of Pennsylvania. Thomas was sixth in his state high school swimming championships, competing for Westlake High School. Thomas finished second in the men’s 500, 1,000, and 1,650-yard freestyle at the Ivy League championships as a sophomore man in 2019. Won the women’s 500-yard, 200-yard and 100-yard freestyle events at the Ivy League swimming championships as a woman in 2022. In March 2022, she became the first openly transgender athlete to win an NCAA Division I national championship in any sport, after winning the women’s 500-yard freestyle event beating a UVa freshman biological woman swimmer. Approximate net worth – $1 million.

If those six Virginia Democrats think that won’t happen, they are willfully ignorant of current events.

Lia Thomas, the transgender swimmer at the University of Pennsylvania, won the NCAA championships in the 500-yard race in March 2022.

Thomas defeated UVa freshman Emma Weyant by 1.75 seconds with a time of 4:33.24.

Thomas swam for three years at Penn as a male before transitioning, sat out a year after he graduated while undergoing testosterone suppression treatment and returned to compete as a woman.

H.R. 734 would stop all of that by law.

So let’s look at who voted no. I can find no public statement from any of them about why they voted as they did.

  • Abigail Spanberger. Ms. Spanberger presented herself as a centrist to win re-election. She has three school-age daughters.

She has posted on her website a ton of stories about herself. Nothing about her vote on H.B. 734. Nothing in her section on education updates. Nothing in the women’s issues section.

Perhaps she will link to this article.

  • Jennifer McClellan.  One daughter.
  • Jennifer Wexton. Presents herself as a centrist. Two sons.
  • Donald Beyer. Three daughters.
  • Gerald Connolly. One daughter.
  • Bobby Scott. No children.

I choose not to believe that they do not love their daughters and granddaughters and want them to have safe opportunities to play sports.

So, I have to credit the Democratic party for its ability to impose ironclad discipline, if not humanity, in successfully whipping the votes of every House Democrat against the undeniable best interests of their own daughters and granddaughters. In support of dogma.

If that is not a religion, I have never seen one.

The citizens of Virginia, the Virginia press, their Republican opponents in Congressional races and feminists (whatever happened to Democratic feminists?) must ask these Virginia members of Congress to explain their votes.

Perhaps they will also predict for us what the photo of the 2039 US Women’s National Team will look like if the Biden interpretation and guidance is allowed to stand.

Updated Apr 23, 2023 at 2030 to provide the Lia Thomas example.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

50 responses to “Virginia Democrats in the House of Representatives Vote Against Their Own Daughters”

  1. From ‘Title IX’ to ‘Title NEIN’
    Where is NOW? Where are the feminists? Where are all those who fought so hard so that females could have the same opportunities as men in sports?

      1. Donald Smith Avatar
        Donald Smith

        She’s been canceled. Oh, and she’s also been dead for a long time.

        1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
          James Wyatt Whitehead

          Mrs. America was pretty cool. I always liked her.

    1. Donald Smith Avatar
      Donald Smith

      Megan McArdle wrote a Washington Post column on this a few years ago. She attempted to explain why so many women favor policies that make it easy for trans women to supplant biological women in sports. (I’m going from memory here, and I can’t find the link to the article).

      She reasoned that women in general want to show empathy. They value it more than men do. Allowing trans women to compete in women’s sports is a way to show empathy. Only a small percentage of people can be sports champions, but everyone can get satisfaction by showing empathy.

      Makes sense, and it explains a lot, if you look at it that way. If your reasons for playing sports are to be a member of a team, have fun and make friends, you can still do that on a team with trans players. And those are the goals for the vast majority of people who participate in scholastic sports.

      1. William O'Keefe Avatar
        William O’Keefe

        But people join teams to compete and to win if they can. The competitive process helps make team members get better and to learn how to lose as well as win.
        If your recollection of McArdle’s article is correct the logical extension justifies giving all participants trophies so that they don’t feel bad. Well, life is not fair and becoming a healthy, well adjusted adult means learning to lose as well as win.
        The thought process behind her logic is insidious in the long run.

      2. James C. Sherlock Avatar
        James C. Sherlock

        If a man walks off a cliff and a woman feels bad, that is sympathy.

        If a man walks off a cliff and a woman jumps off behind him, that is empathy.

        If a man walks off a cliff and a woman’s daughter jumps off after him, that is tragedy.

  2. Your position is not the centrist position, so stop being shocked that some centrists voted against the far-right position.

    The far-left position is allowing trans women to compete. What is your compromise to sway the centrists and possibly some of the more left-leaning votes?

    1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      I posed it. Let trans women compete with the men.

      BTW, it is a “far left” position held by every Democrat in the House of Representatives and the President.

    2. Kurt Eberly Avatar
      Kurt Eberly

      Your statements are absurd and of no substance.

  3. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    If we are going to debate this, we should debate it with facts and not scare tactics.

    Your assertion that a “biological male who never won a medal [could decide]– no hormones or surgery required – he is female [and] mount the platform and be awarded the gold” is wrong. The NCAA policy requires that a transgender athlete undergo one year of testosterone suppression treatment, plus periodic testosterone serum level tests. https://www.ncaa.org/sports/2022/1/27/transgender-participation-policy.aspx

    Then there is the example of the volleyball player who suffered serious injury when a transgender player “sent the ball into her face.” Transgender athletes do not have a monopoly on being able to hit a volleyball with a lot of force. There are biological females who could have caused the same type of injury. I recently attended the NCAA women’s basketball regional tournament in Greenville, S.C. There were several players on the University of South Carolina that I would have not wanted to face over a volleyball net. They were big enough and strong enough to do some damage.

    1. James Wyatt Whitehead Avatar
      James Wyatt Whitehead

      Perhaps an algorithm is the remedy. Inclusive and fair. What’s not to like? Every conceivable nuance can be factored into the equation.

    2. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      Three answers.

      1. The NCAA policy is in jeopardy if the Biden interpretation holds.
      2. High school leagues can’t require the same medical treatment in minors.
      3. Your point about Amazonian women is that they are big women. That is an observation without a meaning on this issue.

      You said you want to debate the bill. What is your position and why? Which of my observations are “scare tactics”?

      1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
        Dick Hall-Sizemore

        The scare tactic is that the transgenders will beat up on the women. My point is that this should not be a reason to exclude transgenders from competing because other women are also capable of causing injury.

        As for your other two points:

        1. I do not understand why the NCAA policy would be in jeopardy under the Biden interpretation. Under the Biden interpretation, there could be critieria for establishing a bona fide transgender athlete.

        2. The Virginia High School League allows transgender athletes to participate on the team with whose gender they identify with. However, a guy cannot just claim that he identifies as a girl and then play on the girls’ basketball team. She has to apply to the VHSL for permission to compete on the girls’ team. That application goes through three stages of review. “At each level of review, the goal is to determine if the evidence and documentation
        submitted is sufficient to establish that the expression of the student’s gender identity is bona fide and not for the purpose of gaining an unfair advantage in competitive athletics.” While the VHSL does not require that the applicant undergo any medical procedures, the policy encourages those involved in the later review stages to consult with medical professions familiar with established protocols for transitioning. See page 85 of the VHSL handbook: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1AchkcF2QGRsPsZVcnCpWdvMb_5cCGIUo/view

        As for my position, I am somewhat conflicted. There is a member of my extended family who has transitioned from female to male and so I understand the desire/need to do so is genuine, even if I cannot identify with it. In the end, transitioning is not an easy process and, if one chooses to do so, in fairness, they should be allowed to function in society as a member of the gender with which they identify. I think your vision of women’s sports being taken over by men who can’t make it in men’s athletics is vastly overblown.

        Lastly, I am sure that the female members of the Virginia Congressional delegation have discussed this issue with their daughters.

        1. Lefty665 Avatar

          “transitioning is not an easy process and, if one chooses to do so, in
          fairness, they should be allowed to function in society as a member of
          the gender with which they identify.”

          I believe most would agree with that, I certainly do. However, there are limits. As with Constitutional rights, none are absolute. We recognize limits where rights bump up against one another.

          One line that gets crossed is biological aspects of gender. For example, genetic males, no matter how they identify or choose to live, cannot become pregnant and bear children. Requiring people to aver that they can is both anatomically not possible and offensive.

          Allowing genetic men (XY chromosomes) to compete in women’s sports is another. It is an unfair advantage. There are physical gender differences that advantage genetic men in sports. Title IX was enacted to achieve gender fairness where genetic women have been disadvantaged. Let it function as designed.

          We have come a long way towards ameliorating the disabling aspects of gender dysphoria. People can now openly live as works best for them, and that is a huge step forward.

          Please have the grace and the wisdom to accept biological limits that facilitate a better society for all. Forcing people to say things that are biologically impossible, or in sports to competitively disadvantage others who make up a majority of the population is both wrong and profoundly unwise.

          Live and let live.

        2. James C. Sherlock Avatar
          James C. Sherlock

          You wrote: “The Virginia High School League allows transgender athletes to participate on the team with whose gender they identify with. However, a guy cannot just claim that he identifies as a girl and then play on the girls’ basketball team. She has to apply to the VHSL for permission to compete on the girls’ team. That application goes through three stages of review. “At each level of review, the goal is to determine if the evidence and documentation submitted is sufficient to establish that the expression of the student’s gender identity is bona fide and not for the purpose of gaining an unfair advantage in competitive athletics.”

          Got that, Dick. Nonsense. At what level of review do you anticipate that the VHSL will require minor boys or girls to have had medical transition procedures?

          You wrote: “I think your vision of women’s sports being taken over by men who can’t make it in men’s athletics is vastly overblown.”

          In anticipation of your position, I added the details of the Lia Thomas saga.

          You wrote: “I am sure that the female members of the Virginia Congressional delegation have discussed the issue with their daughters.” Again, gratuitous nonsense. You are not sure of any such thing.

          And should not the male members of the Virginia delegation have discussed it with their daughters and granddaughters? Just asking. To be inclusive.

          You don’t have any answer for this better than mine. Encourage biological boys/men and girls/women to compete in athletics, but require them to compete, and shower, with their biological peers.

          If they do not wish to do that, we wish them well.

          Perhaps they can form a transgender male and transgender female leagues. It is, after all, their choice.

        3. Lefty665 Avatar

          “I am sure that the female members of the Virginia Congressional delegation have discussed this issue with their daughters.”

          They may have and the answers they got may have been along the lines of “Mom, what the F is wrong with you? You’ve been hanging out with AOC again haven’t you?”

          1. Actually, if the daughters are very young they probably gave their parents the answers their parents wanted to hear. I know I did at that age.

            If they are older, they have probably been fully indoctrinated themselves.

          2. Lefty665 Avatar

            Or thinking for themselves. It happens.

          3. VaNavVet Avatar

            So when will this post be deleted?

          4. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Speaking of deleted…

            Sic Semper Tuckerus

            Eh?

          5. Lefty665 Avatar

            Lemonade too.

          6. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Old news now. The latest?

            Mickey Mouse v. Ronny Rat.

            Bets?

          7. Lefty665 Avatar

            “When we put posts up who cares when they come down? That’s not my department says Werner Von Braun” Apologies to Tom Lehrer.

          8. VaNavVet Avatar

            Some folks do care about the censorship being displayed.

        4. James C. Sherlock Avatar
          James C. Sherlock

          You wrote: “The Virginia High School League allows transgender athletes to participate on the team with whose gender they identify with. However, a guy cannot just claim that he identifies as a girl and then play on the girls’ basketball team. She has to apply to the VHSL for permission to compete on the girls’ team. That application goes through three stages of review. “At each level of review, the goal is to determine if the evidence and documentation submitted is sufficient to establish that the expression of the student’s gender identity is bona fide and not for the purpose of gaining an unfair advantage in competitive athletics.”

          Got that, Dick. Nonsense. At what level of review do you anticipate that the VHSL will require minor boys or girls to have had medical transition procedures?

          You wrote: “I think your vision of women’s sports being taken over by men who can’t make it in men’s athletics is vastly overblown.”

          In anticipation of your position, I added the details of the Lia Thomas saga.

          You wrote: “I am sure that the female members of the Virginia Congressional delegation have discussed the issue with their daughters.”

          Again, gratuitous nonsense. You are not sure of any such thing.

          And should not the male members of the Virginia delegation have discussed it with their daughters and granddaughters? Just asking. To be inclusive.

          You don’t have any answer for this better than mine. Encourage biological boys/men and girls/women to compete in athletics, but require them to compete, and shower, with their biological peers.

          If they do not wish to do that, we wish them well.

          Perhaps they can form a transgender male and transgender female leagues. It is, after all, their choice.

        5. “…they should be allowed to function in society as a member of the gender with which they identify.”

          Yes, they are people who deserve dignity, respect, and to the degree possible, accommodation for their special needs.

          But if we are to have any respect for facts, it must be understood that they are not “just like” any other male or female. That has implications.

          “Nurse mistakes pregnant transgender man as obese. Then, the man births a stillborn baby”

          https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2019/05/16/pregnant-transgender-man-births-stillborn-baby-hospital-missed-labor-signs/3692201002/

          There are very serious consequences for some choices in life, including the choice to transition gender.

          As a young adult, I made a choice to convert to a religious faith that prohibited most activities on Saturday (from Friday sunset to Saturday at sunset). I appreciated accommodation where it was possible, but realized that the entire world didn’t revolved around me. My choice limited sports activities, many jobs, and some entire professions.

  4. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    Here we are again, “Squeeze a fruit for Anita Bryant.”

    1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      Welcome back. Incisive contribution.

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        And concise.

        It’s based on sex and not just gender. You seem to think that Congresspersons twice, Title VII and Title IX, didn’t understand the difference.

        I like the “getting rich” part. Renee Richards, eh?

        1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
          James C. Sherlock

          Just a detail, but the Court, in its Title VII case ruling, specifically blocked its order from being applied to other cases and comtroversies.

          1. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            You’re thinking of Gore v. Bush. They do that when they know they’re being political.

            Even with identical wording?

            Ah, apparently they think any consistency is the hobgoblin of the small mind.

            SCOTUS lost legitimacy. They are now a problem to be dealt with; through expansion if necessary, certainly with a code of ethics.

      2. Matt Adams Avatar
        Matt Adams

        He never left, he just commented under another name.

  5. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    “It protects girls and young women in contact sports such as soccer and field hockey from inevitable injury from bigger, stronger, faster men.”

    Played soccer in high school in the 70s. We had two females on our team. Never thought it was a transsexual thing. No “inevitable” injuries either. Alas…

    1. Lefty665 Avatar

      “We had two females on our team. Never thought it was a transsexual thing.”

      Congrats at having a marvelous grasp of the obvious. I won’t ask why you thought they were “female”. Does heading too many kicks perhaps explain how you became almost a troll?

  6. I know it is only one person’s opinion but I think it is telling that Caitlyn (nee Bruce) Jenner opposes allowing biological males to compete in women’s sports. As a man, this person won a gold medal in one of the most difficult individual sports in the Summer Olympics.

    She (nee he) knows first hand what it takes to win at the highest level, as well as how strong, fast and powerful biological male athletes can be. Perhaps people in the trans-community should listen to what Caitlyn Jenner has to say about the issue instead of simply making accusations that she is “attacking” trans-women athletes.

    1. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
      Dick Hall-Sizemore

      That is a good point.

  7. StarboardLift Avatar
    StarboardLift

    Fairness has been the chief underpinning of sport, we go to great effort to assure that 100-pound wrestlers don’t wrestle 150-pound opponents, that 12-year-olds don’t have to play soccer against 16-year-olds. Equal opportunity has not a thing in sport.

  8. killerhertz Avatar
    killerhertz

    Captured by the woke mob

Leave a Reply