Standards and Curriculum Framework are Both Needed – Not One Without the Otherby Kathleen Smith

In November, the Board of Education put off the approval of the Virginia History and Social Science Standards again. The Board members seemed quite perplexed as they were asked to approve only the Standards without the Curriculum Framework –- or a “decoupled process” as the State Superintendent explained.  In February, the concerns over the much-disputed process and standards will be considered again.

On November 30, the Virginia Mercury published an article regarding the separation of the Virginia History Standards and the Curriculum Framework.  Three other articles have recently come to light as well.  On December 3, the Richmond Times-Dispatch published an opinion column by Tom Shields entitled “Schools Have a Moral (and Legal) Obligation to Resist a ‘Divisive Concepts’ Ban.”  Children First – IRDA published a policy paper entitled “What Virginia’s Anti-Equity Executive Order 1 and Reports Mean for K-12 Schools & Students – A Guide for School Leaders.” Lastly, EducationWeek published “The Architects of the Standards Movement Say They Missed a Big Piece.”

These references provide some insight into the concerns the Board of Education expressed at the November meeting. The public and parents are interested in what should be taught or not be taught in schools related to divisive concepts, including equity. State Board members should stay the course and approve both the Standards and the Curriculum Framework without any “decoupling” of the two documents.

When you pick up any package of food, all ingredients are listed as required by code. This lets the consumer know what is in the food you are eating. The curriculum framework is the same as the ingredient listing on food packages. It is a transparent way of making sure folks know what they are eating, or in the case of the frameworks, know what is meant by the standard and what the teacher is expected to teach.

Whether you are on the “woke” or “anti-divisive concepts” side of teaching history in Virginia’s classrooms, keep this quote from Children First – IRDA in mind:

Contrary to the assertions made in the 30-day report, the equity tools and guidance removed by the Superintendent of Public Instruction are not “banned” but simply are unavailable from the VDOE.

Meaning of above: without the framework, teachers can teach divisive concepts if they want to do so. Tom Shields says they absolutely have a moral obligation to do so.

The curriculum framework provides the ingredients. Those “ingredients” matter. Parents want to know exactly what is being taught — not at the 50,000-foot-level of the standard, but at the classroom level. In other words, they want to know not only what “bread” their kids are eating, but they also want to know that the bread doesn’t contain harmful by-products.

Further, the EducationWeek article offers a great read as to why the curriculum framework provides teachers with a clear understanding of the expectations of each standard and directs them to what needs to be taught. This ensures that “meatloaf” in one classroom will follow the same “recipe” as in another classroom. Meatloaf will be meatloaf, not sausage. In other words, the framework serves as a recipe.

Here is an example from the VDOE website for the current History and Social Studies Standards and Framework. Both were approved at the same time in 2015 by the Board of Education. 

Standard – Virginia Studies 7.b Framework or Recipe
VS.7 The student will demonstrate an understanding of the issues that divided our nation and led to the Civil War by

b) describing Virginia’s role in the war, including identifying major battles that took place in Virginia; and

 

The student will demonstrate an understanding of the issues that divided our nation and led to the Civil War by

b) describing Virginia’s role in the war, including identifying major battles that took place in Virginia…

Essential Understandings

Virginia played a significant role in the Civil War and became a major battleground between Union and Confederate troops.

Virginians played a significant role in the Civil War. Essential Knowledge

Major Civil War Events battles fought in Virginia

· The First Battle of Bull Run (also known as the Battle of First Manassas) was the first major clash of the Civil War. Confederate General Thomas “Stonewall” Jackson played a major role in this battle.

· General Robert E. Lee, Commander of the Army of Northern Virginia, defeated Union troops at Fredericksburg, Virginia.

· Richmond was the capital of the Confederacy. It fell to General Ulysses S. Grant and was burned by the Confederacy near the end of the war. Fires were set by retreating Confederate forces to keep war supplies from approaching Union forces.

· President Abraham Lincoln used the Union navy to blockade southern ports. An important sea battle between the Monitor (Union) and the Merrimack (Confederacy), two ironclad ships, took place in Virginia waters near Norfolk and Hampton. The battle was fought to a draw.

· The Civil War ended at Appomattox Court House, Virginia, where Confederate General Robert E. Lee surrendered his army to Union General Ulysses S. Grant in April 1865.

· The Confederates were using slaves to help them in the war effort. Three men (Shepherd Mallory, Frank Baker, and James Townsend) refused and escaped to Fort Monroe, this led to the Contraband decision, which led to tens of thousands of enslaved people to seek refuge with the Union Army.

Is there any reason why the documents shouldn’t be approved at the same time once again as the Board of Education has done in the past? If this administration wants to be open and transparent, wouldn’t it be wise to have the board review the ingredients and the recipes at the same time they review the Standards? The Board of Education should seek no less in this next round of approval.

Dr. Kathleen M. Smith has been an educator since 1975. She has served as the Regional Director for the Mid-Atlantic States for AdvancED l Measured Progress (now Cognia) and the Director of the Office of School Improvement with the Virginia Department of Education. She served as a Board Member At-Large for the Virginia Council of Private Education.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

33 responses to “Virginia Board of Education: Stay the Course”

  1. Kathleen Smith Avatar
    Kathleen Smith

    I served as a PAST member of VCPE.

  2. James McCarthy Avatar
    James McCarthy

    “…what should be taught or not be taught in schools related to divisive concepts including equity.” By definition, equity means fairness, well-balanced. It is not per se divisive except, perhaps, as some critics allege. Equity need not be the single term value characterizing curricula so long as the content of the material can be agreed to be fair.

    1. Kathleen Smith Avatar
      Kathleen Smith

      I agree. Fair and it’s definition by way of a published framework is a Board responsibility.

    2. James C. Sherlock Avatar
      James C. Sherlock

      Fairness means fairness. Equity as used by progressives means equal outcomes. As well you know.

      1. James McCarthy Avatar
        James McCarthy

        That is your opinion. Equity as used by conservatives means divisive.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar

          and essentially denial about what equal opportunity means …. when it comes to education.

          1. DJRippert Avatar

            Equal opportunity was long used as the term of art for this matter. As in The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. If that term was accurate then why the change to “equity”?

          2. LarrytheG Avatar

            They’re not the same.

            The question is if one kid is provided far better resources than the other over the years is that equity?

            When only 2% of low-income kids , including Asians, qualify to get into TJ, is it because of some kids having access to more/better resources?

            Is that “equal opportunity”?

  3. LarrytheG Avatar

    Thank you Kathleen for explaining and illustrating.

    What is the benefit of “de-coupling”?

    1. Kathleen Smith Avatar
      Kathleen Smith

      I am not sure what VDOE means by that. My thinking is that they have always been separate documents, but we’re both sanctioned by the Board of Ed. The framework should not disappear. It is critical for transparency. If this is what is meant my decoupling, then I don’t agree. It must appear on the website and be sanctioned by the Board prior to the test year.

    1. DJRippert Avatar

      Who was the first woman elected as a Virginia congressperson? Who was the first Catholic? The first Jew?

      The more interesting point is why there was such a gap between the first Black Virginia Congressman and the second.

      The Readjusters actually wrote a good state constitution in 1870. It was the ass-clown “real Virginians” who ushered in Jim Crow with their abominable and illegal 1902 constitution that caused the century of racial regression in the state.

      The name of the first Black Virginia Congressman is a trivia question. Why there was a huge gap between the first and the second tells the tale of the Plantation Elite in this state and their catastrophic impact on the development of Virginia.

      Remember that the next time some dumbass from Richmond or Southside calls somebody a Carpetbagger. Had the carpetbaggers remained in power there would have been a second Black congressman a lot sooner than was the case.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar

        basically illustrative of the lack of history with respect to Virginia’s black citizens. Jim Crow was not done to women and Jews and they were not omitted from history to the extent that blacks were.

        Black kids have the same need for role models as white kids but few were provided in the history that was taught.

  4. James C. Sherlock Avatar
    James C. Sherlock

    Kathleen, is this is purely a process complaint?

    Because your illustrated example clearly indicates that the Framework depends upon and is derivative from the Standards. That would seem to indicate that approval of the Standards first is the right choice. Otherwise the Framework efforts may be mis-directed.

    If it is a content complaint, which by the references you have chosen it seems to be, that is another debate.

    1. Kathleen Smith Avatar
      Kathleen Smith

      Correct. As long as the framework doesn’t disappear and the framework is approved prior to the tested year. I could live with that.

    2. Kathleen Smith Avatar
      Kathleen Smith

      Many parents in “woke” communities as well as conservative communities need to know what is being taught – precisely, not at an above that. So yes this is a process complaint.

      I don’t care when approved, or if approved as guidance, but because it is tested at the framework level, it has to be reviewed on the record by the Board.

      It took many, many people to put that framework together. After reading the EdWeek article, I am convinced every state struggles with this. I still think it levels the playing field. To lose its publication and its place in the website would be alarming.

      1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
        James C. Sherlock

        I was editing my comment as you replied. There is more there now.

        1. James C. Sherlock Avatar
          James C. Sherlock

          redirected

        2. James C. Sherlock Avatar
          James C. Sherlock

          redirected

      2. James C. Sherlock Avatar
        James C. Sherlock

        Kathleen, Virginia’s system of quasi-independent boards and panels dilutes the power of any governor.

        The Board of Education is the most powerful of those boards with both constitutional and legislative authority.

        Virginia Constitution Article VIII Section 2. Standards of quality; section 5 Powers and duties of the BOE and Section 7. School boards takes the governor entirely out of the process of standards of quality. https://law.lis.virginia.gov/constitutionexpand/article8/

        The BOE, and not VDOE, both constitutionally and in statute has control of the SOQ’s. It is subject in the constitution only to the intervention of the General Assembly, not the governor.

        This governor appointed strong, independent members that form a majority of the BOE. He did not appoint lackeys. That acknowledgment is always missing from the outraged commentary.
        Given those facts, the practical effects of what the governor advocates or does not advocate are grossly overstated by the lineup of progressive commentary you have chosen.

        1. Kathleen Smith Avatar
          Kathleen Smith

          Not sure what you mean. The Board Member who spoke the loudest and stopped the process was appointed by Youngkin. This isn’t progressive, in fact, it is the opposite. If the children’s first folks had their way, they would not have the framework or its contents, but allow any teacher to decide what should be taught or not taught. That is my point.

          If kids are going to be held at graduation for a verified credit earned in an assessment, then the rules of what is taught needed to be clear. If the teacher follows those rules instead of making up their own, there should be no problem.

          My point is, the framework should not disappear and the Board must review the content of that framework. It is what is tested.

          1. Kathleen Smith Avatar
            Kathleen Smith

            Teachers have a moral obligation to do anything less than teach what is on the test. If they want to do more, they can, but there must be accountability for what should be taught.

          2. Kathleen Smith Avatar
            Kathleen Smith

            Teachers have a moral obligation to do anything less than teach what is on the test. If they want to do more, they can, but there must be accountability for what should be taught.

          3. James C. Sherlock Avatar
            James C. Sherlock

            We are talking past one another. I was referring to the list of articles you linked. They are uniformly progressive.

            We agree that the governor’s appointees are independent. I don’t think he is disappointed in them. As per my original comment, this is a process issue, not a policy issue.

          4. Kathleen Smith Avatar
            Kathleen Smith

            You are correct, the articles are progressive. Important to see their context

        2. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
          Dick Hall-Sizemore

          The Governor may not have formal authority over the SOQs, but he does not practical authority. For at least three years, the prior BOE adopted extensive amendments to the SOQs. To implement them would have cost hundreds of millions of dollars. Northam included funding in his budget amendments for only a small portion of the BOE proposals. That is quite an influence.

          There is another wrinkle. Unfornately from the the BOE’s perspective, the SOQs are codified in state law. Bills were submitted in the GA to amend the Code sections to have them reflect the SOQ changes adopted by the BOE. The GA did not pass those bills; therefore the SOQs were not changed. (Presumably, even if the GA had passed the bills, the Governor could have vetoed them or send back changes.) The BOE seems not to have recognized this failure of the GA to go along. BOE statements after 2019 refer to the SOQ changes it adopted in that year , but which were not funded. It is as if it were saying that the SOQs it had adopted were the real thing, despite what was set out in the Code of Virginia.

  5. Congressman Langston supported requiring literacy tests to vote in federal elections.

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      He was a Republican! Another reason he was cut from history texts. Perhaps the main one.

      The interaction between the standards and content is subtle. Traditionally the curriculum itself was a local decision. Others better informed in that arena should weigh in.

      1. Others better informed in that arena should weigh in.

        Agreed.

  6. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    In listening to the recording of the meeting in which the Superintendent proposed the decoupling and the subsequent discussion, I came to the conclusion that the administration wants to change the curriculum (the details of what is taught), but there was not enough time to do that if the Board were to adopt the Standard either late this year or early next year. Therefore, the proposed timetable called for decoupling and voting on the Standard at the February (I believe) meeting and considering and voting on the curriculum sometime late next summer.

    1. LarrytheG Avatar

      But if I believe Kathleen, and I do, not having the second part makes it impossible to actually do a valid review because if the second part is not consistent with the first , are you going to have to go back and re-do the first again?

      Call me skeptical on the process. It’s a real transparency issue IMO.

    2. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      My understanding is the de-coupling takes things back to pre-Northam. His team was the first to tie them up together, wanting to impose curriculum from the top for ideological reasons. But I’m repeating things I’ve heard, not speaking from my own knowledge.

    3. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      My understanding is the de-coupling takes things back to pre-Northam. His team was the first to tie them up together, wanting to impose curriculum from the top for ideological reasons. But I’m repeating things I’ve heard, not speaking from my own knowledge.

Leave a Reply