Virginia Beach School Board Adopts Controversial Youngkin Policy

from The Republican Standard

The school board for Virginia’s largest city has adopted controversial guidelines announced by the Youngkin administration.

Under the new rules, teachers and students have the right to call transgender students by their birth name and the pronouns of their biological sex.

The Virginia Beach School Board initially opposed the governor’s order but reversed course on Thursday amid a lawsuit brought by two parents.

As The Virginian-Pilot reports:

“For the past year, the school board and community have been embroiled in a debate surrounding these policies, with LGBTQ advocates arguing the model policies could put transgender and nonbinary students in danger by forcibly “outing” them to unsupportive families or hiding their gender identities.

“A spokesperson for the school system said the board’s decision to approve the regulations regarding the model policies “was not related to an impending lawsuit.” Board chair Trenace Riggs said the board had been working toward adopting the model policies “for months” and for “many hours at a time” when the lawsuit was filed. Riggs wrote in a statement that “the allegations in the lawsuit did not accurately reflect the School Board’s intent” and the time the board spent reviewing and revising its policies and regulations. Now that the suit has been dropped, she wrote the school system can “direct limited resources back to educational services.”

The division’s statement read: “The VBCPS School Board grappled with the Model Policies since their approval in mid-July, working diligently to reach consensus on how best to meet the unique needs of our community while blending the policy and regulation of VBCPS to be consistent with the Governor’s model policies.”

Republished with permission from The Republican Standard.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

11 responses to “Virginia Beach School Board Adopts Controversial Youngkin Policy”

  1. Fred Costello Avatar
    Fred Costello

    This is not controversial. It is common sense, based on science. If the mind does not agree with physical reality, the mind needs fixing.

  2. Not Today Avatar

    The first time a child is repeatedly and intentionally deadnamed (read:bullied) by adults at school and the feds step in to investigate civil rights violations, the district will be singing a completely different tune.

    1. Perhaps, but would it prove that might makes right, or that the feds are great judges of morality?

      1. Not Today Avatar

        Maybe it means that the feds are the DETERMINANTS of law/federal policy, not morality?

  3. walter smith Avatar
    walter smith

    Ooh, deadnamed. The horror! Someone else’s mental problems does not require me to play along. Richard Levine. William Thomas. Grow up. Still compelled speech. Still unConstitutional, even if a Marxist federal judge says otherwise.. Part of the inalienable natural law.
    How many sexes are there?

    1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
      Eric the half a troll

      Being transgender is not a “mental problem”.

      1. walter smith Avatar
        walter smith

        Yes, it is.
        Billions of cells in your body, all one way. Not chance. Mental problem.
        In fact, the doctors who do these surgeries on minors should lose their licenses. And I am strongly thinking the same for adults. Just because someone WANTS to change sexes, and never complete it, and be then on a required regimen of drugs and hormones for life, does that not violate “first, do no harm?” Seems to me it does.
        The way to treat a mental problem is with mental counseling.

        1. Eric the half a troll Avatar
          Eric the half a troll

          It is well documented that being transgender does not equate to mental illness. You perpetuating such a fallacy does not make it true.

          Now you extend your argument to claim that performing elective surgery violates the hippocratic oath… smh…

          1. Not according to the DSM.
            “Gender dysphoria (GD), according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM 5), is defined as a “marked incongruence between their experienced or expressed gender and the one they were assigned at birth.” It was previously termed “gender identity disorder.”Jul 11, 2023

            National Institutes of Health (.gov) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK532313/

          2. Eric the half a troll Avatar
            Eric the half a troll

            “An earlier change occurred in 2013, when “gender identity disorder” was dropped from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), U.S. psychiatry’s bible for diagnosing mental illness. A new condition called “gender dysphoria” was added to diagnose and treat those transgender individuals who felt distress at the mismatch between their identities and their bodies. The new diagnosis recognized that a mismatch between one’s birth gender and identity was not necessarily pathological, notes pediatric endocrinologist Norman Spack, a founder of the gender clinic at Boston Children’s Hospital.”

            https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/where-transgender-is-no-longer-a-diagnosis/

            So you see simply being transgender does not mean one is suffering from gender dysphoria. Further, the psychiatric community has moved past any mention of mental illness when discussing transgender individuals as of late.

            You also might find this read informative:

            https://www.apa.org/topics/lgbtq/transgender-people-gender-identity-gender-expression

  4. Thomas Dixon Avatar
    Thomas Dixon

    When will it evolve into identifying as different species?

Leave a Reply