by James A. Bacon

George Mason University has granted Todd Zywicki a medical exemption from its mandatory COVID-19 vaccination policy. The law school professor had sued the university, which had denied him an exemption, on the grounds that, as a COVID survivor, he had acquired natural immunity to the virus and that a vaccination would expose him to unnecessary medical risks.

GMU has assured Zywicki that he will not be subject to disciplinary action, and that he will be allowed to hold office hours and attend in-person events provided he maintains six feet of distance, said the New Civil Liberties Alliance (NCLA), which backed his lawsuit, in a press release. However, the professor must get tested for COVID-19 once per week.

“Thanks to NCLA, we have increased public awareness that vaccinating the naturally immune is medically unnecessary and presents an elevated risk of harm to COVID-19 survivors,” said Zywicki. “I speak for tens of millions of Americans in the same circumstances I am in, and I call on leaders across the country to develop humane and science-based approaches as opposed to one-size-fits-all policies.”

“NCLA is pleased that GMU granted Professor Zywicki’s medical exemption, which we believe it only did because he filed this lawsuit,” said the NCLA.  “Nevertheless, NCLA remains dismayed by GMU’s refusal — along with many other public and private universities and other employers — to recognize that the science establishes beyond any doubt that natural immunity is as robust or more so than vaccine immunity.”

Now that Zywicki has won his exemption from GMU, his case could set a precedent regarding mandatory vaccination policies across Virginia. The NCLA said it continues to explore litigation against GMU and, additionally, would “welcome hearing from others on public-university campuses in Virginia — particularly tenured faculty — who have naturally acquired immunity backed by antibody testing.”

Zywicki’s lawsuit cited a substantial body of scientific evidence indicating that COVID-19 survivors have naturally acquired immunity to the virus that equals or exceeds that obtained from the Pfizer, Moderna, and Johnson & Johnson vaccines. Zywicki had backed his claims of immunity with lab tests showing a high level of antibodies in his system.

GMU has yet to offer publicly the scientific rationale behind its vaccination mandate. For that matter, neither has any other Virginia university.

Indeed, the University of Virginia, which claims that its mandate follows guidance from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and various unidentified medical experts, has defied Freedom of Information Act requests to release any documents or communications that might illuminate the scientific basis for its mandate. The university contends that the university president’s “working papers” are exempt from FOIA.

GMU’s concession to Zywicki brings it close to the UVa mandate, which requires unvaccinated students, faculty and staff to undergo weekly testing. GMU is less restrictive in one way, however: While Zywicki is required to maintain social distance, unvaccinated persons at UVa must wear masks in all public places.


Share this article



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)



ADVERTISEMENT

(comments below)


Comments

63 responses to “Victory for Zywicki”

  1. Publius Avatar

    It’s not enough.
    There are still unresolved civil rights violations.
    And federal law. And State law. And medical ethics.
    But, it’s a start.
    So, why did GMU crumple like a cheap suit?

    1. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      https://www.wsj.com/articles/covid-19-herd-provincetown-mayo-delta-mask-mandate-vaccine-passport-cdc-mucosal-immunity-11629128219

      A very interesting column from yesterday’s WSJ if you can get past the paywall. Hadn’t really thought about how the injection builds one kind of immunity, which wanes far faster in the upper respiratory tract meaning you can get the virus established there — but the IgB protection will still kick in and prevent serious illness. A previous infection, on the other hand, does build the IgA protection that works better within the nose, etc.

      Never doubted previous infection provided some level of protection. The doctors are arguing vehemently about whether it is durable or stands up to the later variants. When they argue, and they really are, I can’t blame employers for leaning in favor of the shots. Six feet of social distancing is just a virtue signal against an airborne virus.

      Doesn’t change the fact we are still in this mess because of the stubborn idiots.

    2. Stephen Haner Avatar
      Stephen Haner

      https://www.wsj.com/articles/covid-19-herd-provincetown-mayo-delta-mask-mandate-vaccine-passport-cdc-mucosal-immunity-11629128219

      A very interesting column from yesterday’s WSJ if you can get past the paywall. Hadn’t really thought about how the injection builds one kind of immunity, which wanes far faster in the upper respiratory tract meaning you can get the virus established there — but the IgB protection will still kick in and prevent serious illness. A previous infection, on the other hand, does build the IgA protection that works better within the nose, etc.

      Never doubted previous infection provided some level of protection. The doctors are arguing vehemently about whether it is durable or stands up to the later variants. When they argue, and they really are, I can’t blame employers for leaning in favor of the shots. Six feet of social distancing is just a virtue signal against an airborne virus.

      Doesn’t change the fact we are still in this mess because of the stubborn idiots.

      1. Publius Avatar

        I can blame them. The reality is they don’t know because they have never studied it (the full nature of natural immunity or the full effectiveness of the mRNA shots). I take the conservative (not political) position that, until there is a reason to change past practice, we stick with past practice, AND I strongly suspect that natural immunity is better. I think that is now being shown – oh, you need a third shot, etc.
        Meanwhile, make no mistake, the mandate is about power and the kids are being screwed over, again.

        And a hint to what I think the answer is as to GMU folding – it was not for medical reasons!

        1. Stephen Haner Avatar
          Stephen Haner

          Virginia’s data page is now tracking the low number of cases of hospitalizations and deaths among the fully vaccinated. (Deaths about 1 in 100,000 to date.) They are incredibly effective. Immunity from previous infection would have to be perfect to exceed that, and perfect doesn’t show up much in nature.

          The real story behind the the third shot is that the second shots were given way, way too soon. But good luck getting them to admit that.

          1. Matt Adams Avatar
            Matt Adams

            Didn’t Israel do studies regarding the timing of the second dose and the increase in effectiveness with an extended wait?

          2. DJRippert Avatar
            DJRippert

            When forced to choose between scientific theory and observed fact one should always choose observed fact.

            These vaccines don’t work all that well.

            Israel – One of the most vaccinated countries on Earth.

            From June 17 to July 8 – no deaths.

            Yesterday, 17 deaths.

            They’re already administering the third dose in Israel.

            To be useful a vaccine has to be safe, effective and necessary.

            Looks like “science” missed the mark badly on “effective”.

            Let’s hope we don’t find out that “science” missed the mark on “safe” too.

          3. Matt Adams Avatar
            Matt Adams

            What described is why there should be no mandates. Jacobson v mass the cornerstone of mandates, eugenics and the like centered on a vaccine that even at that time was 100 years old.

          4. DJRippert Avatar
            DJRippert

            I was vaccine eager, not vaccine hesitant. I still am. I’ll take the booster as soon as someone is willing to jab me. But that’s me.

            Other people may look at the confusion over breakthrough infections, masks, vaccinations, etc and decide that “science” never understood these vaccines enough.

            Their choice.

          5. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Does the microchip in the vaccine help or hurt?

            The vaccines were given 21 days on the hopes of creating really high resistance quickly. Probably because the intelligent people, with degrees in medicine, couldn’t imagine there are 40% of Americans, complete morons, who would refuse a life-saving vaccine because of something someone wrote on Facebook.

          6. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            harsh, NN, harsh. But.. dang it, true!

          7. Are that many African-Americans on Facebook?

          8. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            I dunno, but I’ll bet you don’t know any.

          9. John Harvie Avatar
            John Harvie

            Worse down here in sunny, Fla. Only 50.1% even with at least one shot. … and wow of wows, we agree on something!

          10. DJRippert Avatar
            DJRippert

            No, they are not effective. At least not in the way they were advertised. They were supposed to stop you from getting COVID, not just keep you from dying.

            You were not supposed to need a mask after vaccination. Now you do.

            You were not supposed to need a booster shot. They are already being given in one of the most vaccinated countries on Earth – Israel. In the US the feds are on the cusp of mandating booster shots in nursing homes now.

            In Israel 78% of those 12 and older are fully vaccinated.

            Israel is running at 650 new cases daily per million people.

            Now, deaths are up sharply in Israel.

            You can’t die from COVID until you catch it, get sick, get very sick and then die.

            Virginia is not an island. The virus moves around the world. Just because it hasn’t hit us hard yet is no reason for confidence. It will come here too.

            Just because vaccinated people with breakthrough infections haven’t died yet doesn’t mean they won’t die.

            Remember, early on, when West Virginia had no cases?

            Irrelevant in the long run.

            Israel’s experience equates to 5,655 daily infections in Virginia. Just about the same as our peak in January. Before the vaccinations.

      2. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        WSJ opinion page. The doctor is not an immunologist and what he is saying that is logical and plausible does not appear to be backed up with cites to research.

        While I do think he might be on to something, I’d feel much more confident if this was the view of other scientists and not just one guy.

        The problem with the ” stubborn idiots” is that they are all over the map with various different reasons and rationales and no real consensus among themselves on what is the right path forward.

        Been this way from the get go it contributes to doubt and uncertainty among others and has led to the situation we have now with significant hesitancy.

        We have a LOT to LEARN about this virus. We are still in the process of understanding it and I’ve not yet seen a consensus among most infectious disease experts that immunity from having had the disease is “better” than the shots.

        When I DO hear that agreement among many scientists, I will more strongly believe it. Until then, I see it an opinion and not really something to take to the bank.

        Until then , a “conservative” approach is a safe but sorry approach not latching on to thing we want to believe but are not really agreed to by the experts in those fields.

        1. Publius Avatar

          OK, Larry, time for a good and thorough Fisking of your post, which contradicts itself over and over…

          The problem with the ” stubborn idiots” is that they are all over the map with various different reasons and rationales and no real consensus among themselves on what is the right path forward.
          Calling people who make different decisions than you stubborn idiots is not very persuasive. And, since you do not KNOW every person’s reasons, you can’t possibly know you are right. They are all over the map because the reasons vary. Each person has a different risk/reward analysis. And there is a thing called liberty. Sorry you hate it for others.

          Been this way from the get go it contributes to doubt and uncertainty among others and has led to the situation we have now with significant hesitancy.

          There is doubt and uncertainty because there is doubt and uncertainty! No mask, mask, double mask, get jabbed and no masks, oops, get masked. You’re safe, you’re not safe. Two weeks to flatten the curve. It didn’t come from China. The American people have been misled repeatedly. Then throw in that the Covid “Vaccine” (it’s not a vaccine – it is a therapeutic) is experimental. It has been rushed to market. It is EUA. If you don’t believe you are at risk from Covid and far and away, most people are not, what is the calculus for taking the shot? Out of love for Larry? Under that line, can I ask you to quit voting for Leftists who destroy the country and the economy and cause racial division? Otherwise, Larry, you hate people…and are probably a racist to boot!

          We have a LOT to LEARN about this virus. We are still in the process of understanding it and I’ve not yet seen a consensus among most infectious disease experts that immunity from having had the disease is “better” than the shots.
          And I haven’t seen proof that “the experts” consensus that the shot is better than natural immunity is true. First, because it will not be so, and second, because, again Larry, let’s go over this – SCIENCE! is a process, not a religion. It requires skepticism and requires replicatable results. We have crap – so much has been distorted and mixed and it will take years to get a clear, and unbiased, and non-panic based judgment. (And I will be shown correct as to the lockdowns being overwhelmingly wrong and masking not working and our bureaucracies being an incredible waste of taxpayer money).

          When I DO hear that agreement among many scientists, I will more strongly believe it. Until then, I see it an opinion and not really something to take to the bank.

          Larry – consensus is not proof. That is the current problem. Our SCIENCE! has been corrupted by money and government power. Follow the money. The current “consensus” is opinion. It is what the experts “think” and they have repeatedly moved the goalposts. Because they don’t know.

          Until then , a “conservative” approach is a safe but sorry approach not latching on to thing we want to believe but are not really agreed to by the experts in those fields.

          Yeah, those doctors have been wrong for millenia with the “first, do no harm” mantra…

          But, you do you Larry! Trust those experts who keep saying something different from a couple of weeks ago!

          (And a question…why does Fakebook and the MSM need to suppress people who disagree? Isn’t science a process about trying to get to the truth? Have you seen this story? How come you have to get it from an obscure paper in the California desert? Asking for a friend…
          https://www.thedesertreview.com/news/national/indias-ivermectin-blackout-part-ii/article_a0b6c378-fc78-11eb-83c0-93166952f425.html

          1. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Are you vaccinated?

          2. Publius Avatar

            Are you transgender? Gay? An atheist? On Soros’ payroll?
            I could be vaccinated, I could not be. Heck, for all you know, I might not have any vaccines (which is legal and was always accepted prior to Covidiocy).
            So, let’s recap.
            The Covid vaccine mandate:
            Violates federal law:
            Has no authority under VA Statutes; violates all medical system patients’ rights policies;
            Violates the Constitution;
            Violates natural liberty.

            Prior to Covid, all vaccine mandates:
            Provided religious and medical exemptions (in recognition of the Constitutional and natural liberty issues).

            You do not want this world where an employer can mandate things like vaccination? Why not abortion as a pregnancy would disrupt? Why not how you vote? Why not a bunch of other medical treatments?

            You people (who are blindly “baa-ing” approval for the Covid vax mandate) have no idea how wrong you are. It is beyond dangerous.

          3. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            What we don’t want is a world where someone has the “right” to drink and then drive drunk because it is their “right” to do so.

            We don’t want a world where you have the “right” to light up a cigarette in the desk next to mine.

            So yes, we do want a world where you are required to recognize others rights and restricted from imposing yourself on them.

          4. Publius Avatar

            False analogy Larry.
            Actually, look at old movies – people smoking in hospital rooms!
            The mandates are ILLEGAL. That’s my problem.
            And guess what – what is the percentage of US citizens vaccinated for the normal vaccines? I would guess somewhere in the 95-99%.
            And yet, somehow, that 1 to 5% has not unleashed death and destruction everywhere.
            If our worthless legislators passed a law, then I would quit griping…because there would/should be religious and medical exemptions AND because all medical systems have right to accept or refuse treatment language, including the right to die.
            That reflected a balancing and breaking that balance will lead to tyranny.
            Try persuasion.

          5. are you a Macedonian Bot?

          6. Publius Avatar

            Yes. Aren’t you, Comrade?

          7. DJRippert Avatar
            DJRippert

            Do bots have nationalities?

          8. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Personally, I’m hopin’ not.

          9. Publius Avatar

            Funny!

          10. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Won’t be, but you keep your spirits up.

            Hey, if I send you $200, would you take out a life insurance policy on yourself and name me beneficiary? I feel lucky.

          11. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            Some folks are just not serious folks on this issue. They really have no way forward.

            The “stubborn idiots” was Haners description, not mine but I did adopt it.

            It’s all about anti-govt, anti-science and opposition for opposition’s sake.

            And we can never go forward with these folks in charge.

            As it is, we make progress inch by inch as more and more folks realize that the “anti” folks have no real way forward.

      3. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        It’s why tests reveal positive, but the symptoms are mild or nonexistent. The infection stays in nasal and larynx.

        Fortunately, stubborn idiots appear to be a dying breed. Well, them and children under 12.

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          It’s amazing to me how LONG it has taken before the opponents and relented to get the shots but STILL don’t trust the GOvt or the CDC.. and STILL rely on folks other than the CDC and infectious disease experts for their views.

          I don’t think the CDC nor science is infallible by a long shot and especially so with this virus but going from there into the frying pan of smart-folks opinions who are not infectious disease experts just boggles the mind.

          You’d not want an infectious disease expert to do your coronary bypass operation or give you an alternative opinion from your cardiologist – but heckfire… any old doctor who is not an infectious disease expert can give his/her opinion, and it’s just as “good”.

          1. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Apparently, the various parts of the immune system, IgA, B, etc., are factual and any doctor would know that.

            Nevertheless, I don’t want it anywhere, especially my nose where some ENT destroyed one of the passages and left me missing a chunk in there.

            First sign of a sniffle, I’m snortin’ vodka!

          2. LarrytheG Avatar
            LarrytheG

            The various parts might well be factual.

            How it works for THIS virus may be not at all like others, until we actually do have evidence to inform our views.

          3. Matt Adams Avatar
            Matt Adams

            IgA = Immunoglobulin A, a common antibody in the body found the respiratory tract.

            https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16362985/

            IgB = Immunoglobulin attached to B cells.

            https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4702236/

            “How it works for THIS virus may be not at all like others, until we actually do have evidence to inform our views.”

            Um it’s how the body’s immune response works, period. Clearly you you should exclude “we” and “our” from your statement and also stop commenting on the topic.

          4. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Well, I trust Steve, and he said cloth, surgical, and N95 provide 20, 40, and 95% reduction over no mask at all. This means two people in cloth masks reduce probability of transmission by 1/3. Gotta figure a 1/3 reduction those in the ICU would be welcomed by the nursing staff. Did you know it takes 6 people to prone a person on a ventilator?

  2. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    “Thou shalt not bear false witness.”
    https://gizmodo.com/catholic-leader-placed-on-ventilator-for-covid-19-after-1847498791

    Drizzle, drozzle, drezzle, drome…
    Time for this one to come home.

  3. Publius Avatar

    Covid vax mandaters are racist

    Robby Starbuck
    @robbystarbuck
    ·
    23h
    More Black Americans in NYC are not vaccinated per capita than any other race. This is segregation in a new form, it’s racist and again it’s Democrats who are behind the policy just like they were the last time segregation occurred.
    Quote Tweet
    The Associated Press
    @AP
    · Aug 17
    New York City’s restaurants, bars, gyms, museums and other cultural venues have begun requiring proof of vaccination. The mandate, first announced two weeks ago, is meant to persuade more people to get the COVID-19 vaccine. http://apne.ws/HlLvRLt

    Deal with it.

    1. it’s an obvious white supremacist conspiracy to keep Black Americans down and out of NYC’s economic life.

      1. Publius Avatar

        I agree. And who runs NYC and NYS?
        The party of the Klan…
        Donkey is the symbol…
        Help me out here!

    2. DJRippert Avatar
      DJRippert

      How can you prove you were vaccinated? That silly little card I got with some scribbles on it?

      Required IDs for bench presses but not for voting? Wow.

      1. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        An antibody test.

        1. DJRippert Avatar
          DJRippert

          Ok, that sounds complicated. Where would I get such a test and what documentation would I receive to prove my status?

          1. Nancy Naive Avatar
            Nancy Naive

            Read the article. The numbnut prof gets them. Ask him.

  4. Eric the half a troll Avatar
    Eric the half a troll

    Just more idiots undermining the vaccine… nothing to see here…

    1. DJRippert Avatar
      DJRippert

      Would you suggest that Northam mandate the vaccine for all Virginians 12 and older with limited exemptions? If this is a real public health crisis and the vaccines are that good why doesn’t Northam mandate the vax for everybody?

      Does Northam just not care about public health or might he wonder about the vaccines?

      It’s got to be one or the other, doesn’t it?

  5. tmtfairfax Avatar
    tmtfairfax

    Toss in Roe v. Wade and its progeny into the mix and it becomes much harder to sustain a requirement for Professor Zywicki to obtain vaccinations. Because courts have generally held that the health of the woman (patient) can override otherwise valid restrictions on the availability of an abortion, the health of the patient (the professor) should override otherwise valid vaccination requirements.

    While I think Roe v. Wade is a piece of crap as legal analysis, I would not support its being overturned. But penumbras and emanations aside, the courts have held that a person has a right to make health care decisions for her/himself with the aid of the individual’s doctor. It surely includes the decision of a COVID-19 survivor whether or not to be vaccinated for the virus.

    1. Matt Adams Avatar
      Matt Adams

      There are a whole host of legal challenges being put forth in several jurisdictions on the mandates.

      Depending on the legal mind, some see this as a call back to the eugenics era of the 40’s.

  6. LarrytheG Avatar
    LarrytheG

    I think anytime a person feels they might be hurt by a vaccine or some treatment or therapy, they ALWAYS have the personal right to refuse but that does not mean they can refuse and it won’t have consequences that could impact where you can go or what you can do.

    That’s the trade-off. It’s been that way before now.

    It’s considered a term of employment and depending on the issue, the employer can or might have to offer accommodation depending on the impacts to the other workers and workforce or customers or others like students.

    1. tmtfairfax Avatar
      tmtfairfax

      I think private employers have a much broader ability to impose reasonable conditions on employment before they begin to run afoul of anti-discrimination laws. But the government is different. It is bound by constitutional law, directly through the Bill of Rights as the federal government and, indirectly through their incorporation through the 14th Amendment for states and local government.

      If a person’s doctor advises that the individual should not be vaccinated because the individual has had COVID-19 or has some other malady that would be worsened by the vaccination, the constitution must protect that decision.

      1. LarrytheG Avatar
        LarrytheG

        The Government – as an employer – is very much like private employers in most all aspects.

        There is no discernible difference in terms of work environment for a Federal civilian employee and a contractor employee. Sometimes they actually work side-by-side in a facility.

        The Federal Govt , as an employer, has the same responsibility for it’s workplace safety as not-govt.

        If someone has a condition that can impact others, the employee has the right to decide if they can accommodate them – or not, according to the law.

        Ergo, we went from the “right” of people to smoke at work to a world where it’s not only illegal for one to smoke in a work environment BUT the employer ALSO does not have to accommodate them – and that’s true across the board whether you work for a private employer or the govt.

      2. DJRippert Avatar
        DJRippert

        But the students at Indiana University are not employees of the university and that university is an arm of the government. So, why the disinterest in the case from the Supreme Court?

        1. LarrytheG Avatar
          LarrytheG

          They’re not employees but they are students in a public education facility and just like with k-12 – the University bears responsibility for the health and welfare of the students when at that facility.

          No matter whether there are employees, students, customers, volunteers, etc… it’s the same thing – the entity in charge of the facility bears responsibility for the safety and welfare of those who occupy the facility.

          The same is true on cruise ships, airplanes and other transport.

          And it don’t matter if the Governors name is Northam or something else, it’s the same game no matter where.

          except of course for the stubborn idiots and their ilk.

          1. DJRippert Avatar
            DJRippert

            TMT is a lawyer. Re-read what he wrote.

            Do you support Northam mandating the vax for all Virginians (with limited exemptions)?

            You mandators don’t want to answer this question.

            NYC is mandating proof of vaccination for all sorts of public places – restaurants, gyms, etc.

            Should Northam do the same?

            You guys are talking out of both sides of your mouth. Getting the vax out is critical. Mandates are legal. But no calls for mandatory vaccines from Northam.

            Why not?

  7. Publius Avatar

    This excerpt is from a WordPress blog – not Bacon, but explains a lot of the hesitancy. The “experts” don’t have any more currency…

    PMC means “professional managerial class” and this is the actual blog (it might have been in German originally)
    https://tinkzorg.wordpress.com/2021/08/16/farewell-to-bourgeois-kings/

    Moreover, on a more practical level, the war in Afghanistan became another sort of crucible. In very real terms, Afghanistan turned into a testbed for every single innovation in technocratic PMC governance, and each innovation was sold as the next big thing that would make previous, profane understandings of politics obsolete. In Afghanistan ”big data” and the utilization of ever expanding sets of technical and statistical metrics was allowed to topple old stodgy ideas of dead white thinkers such as Sun Tzu or Machiavelli, as ”modern” or ”scientific” approaches to war could have little to learn from the primitive insights of a pre-rational order. In Afghanistan, military sociology in the form of Human Terrain Teams and other innovative creations were unleashed to bring order to chaos. Here, the full force of the entire NGO world, the brightest minds of that international government-in-waiting without a people to be beholden to, were given a playground with nearly infinite resources at their disposal. There was so much money sloshing around at the fingertips of these educated technocrats that it became nearly impossible to spend it all fast enough.

    Their spectacular failure on every conceivable level now brings us to the true heart of the matter. Western society today is openly ruled by a managerial class. Where kings once claimed a divine right to rule, and the bolsheviks of old claimed a right to rule as messiahs of a future kingdom on this earth (bearing a conspicuously strong resemblance to a very old tradition of messianic christianity with the serial numbers filed off, by the way) the technocrats of today base their claims to lordship not necessarily on the idea of the democratic will of the people, but on the historical inevitability of technocracy as such. Just as there once was a properly ”socialist” way to understand great literature, there is today a properly technical, scientific, or ”critical” (in the academic sense of the term) way of understanding war, nation building, cinema, primitive marriage rituals, or whatever else. Our managerial leaders deserve to rule us, because managerialism as a world ethos is the only means of effecting functional rule in the context of a modern, international, post-national, information driven, knowledge economy, rules-based… well, you probably already know all the familiar buzzwords beloved by this class of people. Kings ruled in the epoch of monarchies, because only kings could rule, or at least so they all claimed. Technocrats rule our post-Soviet era for very much the same reason; they are, according to the legitimating narrative of our age, the only ones that can rule. Much like you can’t put a monkey in charge of a battleship, you can’t possibly hope to rule a modern country without being part of the educated managerial class. And just like the kings of old, our technocrats at one point claimed (and even enjoyed) a form of quasi-magical power in the eyes of their peasantry; a view once commonly shared that they could use the very thing that made them rightful rulers – science, logic, rationality, data – to lay on hands, cure ills, and improve society.

    Put plainly: managers, through the power of managerialism, were once believed to be able to mobilize science and reason and progress to accomplish what everyone else could not, and so only they could secure a just and functional society for their subjects, just as only the rightful kings of yore could count on Providence and God to do the same thing. At their core, both of these claims are truly metaphysical, because all claims to legitimate rulership are metaphysical. It is when that metaphysical power of persuasion is lost that kings or socialists become ”bourgeois”, in Schmitt’s terms. They have to desperately turn toward providing proof, because the genuine belief is gone. But once a spouse starts demanding that the other spouse constantly prove that he or she hasn’t been cheating, the marriage is already over, and the divorce is merely a matter of time, if you’ll pardon the metaphor.

    I suspect we are currently witnessing the catastrophic end of this metaphysical power of legitimacy that has shielded the managerial ruling class for decades. Anyone even briefly familiar with the historical record knows just how much of a Pandora’s box such a loss of legitimacy represents. The signs have obviously been multiplying over many years, but it is only now that the picture is becoming clear to everyone. When Michael Gove said ”I think the people in this country have had enough of experts” in a debate about the merits of Brexit, he probably traced the contours of something much bigger than anyone really knew at the time. Back then, the acute phase of the delegitimization of the managerial class was only just beginning. Now, with Afghanistan, it is impossible to miss.

    It is not just that the elite class is incompetent – even kings could be incompetent without undermining belief in monarchy as a system – it is that they are so grossly, spectacularly incompetent that they walk around among us as living rebuttals of meritocracy itself. It is that their application of managerial logic to whatever field they get their grubby mitts on – from homelessness in California to industrial policy to running a war – makes that thing ten times more expensive and a hundred times more dysfunctional. To make the situation worse, the current elites seem almost serene in their willful destruction of the very fields they rely on for legitimacy. When the ”experts” go out of their way to write public letters about how covid supposedly only infects people who hold demonstrations in support of ”structural white supremacy”, while saying that Black Lives Matter demonstrations pose no risk of spreading the virus further, this amounts to the farmer gleefully salting his own fields to make sure nothing can grow there in the future. How can anyone expect the putative peasants of our social order to ”trust the science”, when the elites themselves are going out of their way, against all reason and the tenets of basic self-preservation, to make such a belief completely impossible even for those who really, genuinely, still want to believe?

    1. DJRippert Avatar
      DJRippert

      Pride goes before the fall. Arrogance too. How many times has “science” been wrong?

      I’m all for science and scientific research but believing that we know it all and all current scientific dogma is right seems silly and very dangerous.

      1. John Harvie Avatar
        John Harvie

        As one of my last and best managers back in my Big Blue days was wont to say, “Pride is an expensive commodity”. Sums it up for me.

        Can’t wait for Oct to get my 3rd.

        1. DJRippert Avatar
          DJRippert

          I spent the last 5 years of my technology career at Big Blue, 2013 – 2018. Actually came out of retirement to join. Worked in the Software & Cloud group. Worked with LeBlanc and Mills.

          IBM had a lot of interesting sayings …

          In the interests of good order and discipline …

          Treasure your wild ducks …

          The valley of death is littered with the bones of those who hesitated at the moment of victory.

          Great company, great time.

      2. Nancy Naive Avatar
        Nancy Naive

        Whereas religion is only wrong once.

        1. DJRippert Avatar
          DJRippert

          Well, there you are … I was just wondering where Nancy_Naive had gone. Is Xe on vacation?

    2. It is not just that the elite class is incompetent – even kings could be incompetent without undermining belief in monarchy as a system – it is that they are so grossly, spectacularly incompetent that they walk around among us as living rebuttals of meritocracy itself.

      Strong stuff. I like it.

      In my opinion, it is worth your time to go to the blog and read the entire essay.

      1. Publius Avatar

        Yes. Glad you linked to it. I thought it offered why it is not just medical reluctance . The doubt of the so-called “experts” has been well earned – many times over.

  8. Dick Hall-Sizemore Avatar
    Dick Hall-Sizemore

    So, he would rather get tested weekly than take a couple of shots?

    1. DJRippert Avatar
      DJRippert

      I think he’s wrong but it’s his choice.

      Won’t I feel stupid when vaccinated people’s teeth start falling out a year from now though?

      Ooops! Science is always changing.

  9. Nancy Naive Avatar
    Nancy Naive

    How to solve the problem. Start charging for vaccines on Oct 1st. Make it unavailable Jan 1st. Put a Supreme label on it March 1st.

Leave a Reply